Effective continuing professional development for translating shared decision making in primary care: A study protocol.

Background: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made jointly by the healthcare professional and the patient. SDM is the essential element of patient-centered care, a core concept of primary care. However, SDM is seldom translated into primary practice. Continuing professional development (CPD) is the principal means by which healthcare professionals continue to gain, improve, and broaden the knowledge and skills required for patient-centered care. Our international collaboration seeks to improve the knowledge base of CPD that targets translating SDM into the clinical practice of primary care in diverse healthcare systems. Methods: Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), our project is to form an international, interdisciplinary research team composed of health services researchers, physicians, nurses, psychologists, dietitians, CPD decision makers and others who will study how CPD causes SDM to be practiced in primary care. We will perform an environmental scan to create an inventory of CPD programs and related activities for translating SDM into clinical practice. These programs will be critically assessed and compared according to their strengths and limitations. We will use the empirical data that results from the environmental scan and the critical appraisal to identify knowledge gaps and generate a research agenda during a two-day workshop to be held in Quebec City. We will ask CPD stakeholders to validate these knowledge gaps and the research agenda. Discussion: This project will analyse existing CPD programs and related activities for translating SDM into the practice of primary care. Because this international collaboration will develop and identify various factors influencing SDM, the project could shed new light on how SDM is implemented in primary care.

Development, design and validation of solid reference samples.

We developed a method of sample preparation using epoxy compound, which was validated in two steps. First, we studied the homogeneity within samples by scanning tubes filled with radioactive epoxy. We found within-sample homogeneity better than 2%. Then, we studied the homogeneity between samples during a 4.5 h dispensing time. The homogeneity between samples was found to be better than 2%. This study demonstrates that we have a validated method, which assures the traceability of epoxy samples.

The TREAT-NMD Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Registries: Conception, Design, and Utilization by Industry and Academia.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked genetic disease, caused by the absence of the dystrophin protein. Although many novel therapies are under development for DMD, there is currently no cure and affected individuals are often confined to a wheelchair by their teens and die in their twenties/thirties. DMD is a rare disease (prevalence <5/10,000). Even the largest countries do not have enough affected patients to rigorously assess novel therapies, unravel genetic complexities, and determine patient outcomes. TREAT-NMD is a worldwide network for neuromuscular diseases that provides an infrastructure to support the delivery of promising new therapies for patients. The harmonized implementation of national and ultimately global patient registries has been central to the success of TREAT-NMD. For the DMD registries within TREAT-NMD, individual countries have chosen to collect patient information in the form of standardized patient registries to increase the overall patient population on which clinical outcomes and new technologies can be assessed. The registries comprise more than 13,500 patients from 31 different countries. Here, we describe how the TREAT-NMD national patient registries for DMD were established. We look at their continued growth and assess how successful they have been at fostering collaboration between academia, patient organizations, and industry.

How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is not widely implemented in healthcare. We aimed to set a research agenda about promoting shared decision-making through continuing professional development. METHODS: Thirty-six participants met for two days. RESULTS: Participants suggested ways to improve an environmental scan that had inventoried 53 shared decision-making training programs from 14 countries. Their proposed research agenda included reaching an international consensus on shared decision-making competencies and creating a framework for accrediting continuing professional development initiatives in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in shared decision-making training programs showcases the need for quality assurance frameworks.

Design and analysis of ChIP-Seq experiments for nuclear factor I DNA-binding proteins

SUMMARY : Eukaryotic DNA interacts with the nuclear proteins using non-covalent ionic interactions. Proteins can recognize specific nucleotide sequences based on the sterical interactions with the DNA and these specific protein-DNA interactions are the basis for many nuclear processes, e.g. gene transcription, chromosomal replication, and recombination. New technology termed ChIP-Seq has been recently developed for the analysis of protein-DNA interactions on a whole genome scale and it is based on immunoprecipitation of chromatin and high-throughput DNA sequencing procedure. ChIP-Seq is a novel technique with a great potential to replace older techniques for mapping of protein-DNA interactions. In this thesis, we bring some new insights into the ChIP-Seq data analysis. First, we point out to some common and so far unknown artifacts of the method. Sequence tag distribution in the genome does not follow uniform distribution and we have found extreme hot-spots of tag accumulation over specific loci in the human and mouse genomes. These artifactual sequence tags accumulations will create false peaks in every ChIP-Seq dataset and we propose different filtering methods to reduce the number of false positives. Next, we propose random sampling as a powerful analytical tool in the ChIP-Seq data analysis that could be used to infer biological knowledge from the massive ChIP-Seq datasets. We created unbiased random sampling algorithm and we used this methodology to reveal some of the important biological properties of Nuclear Factor I DNA binding proteins. Finally, by analyzing the ChIP-Seq data in detail, we revealed that Nuclear Factor I transcription factors mainly act as activators of transcription, and that they are associated with specific chromatin modifications that are markers of open chromatin. We speculate that NFI factors only interact with the DNA wrapped around the nucleosome. We also found multiple loci that indicate possible chromatin barrier activity of NFI proteins, which could suggest the use of NFI binding sequences as chromatin insulators in biotechnology applications. RESUME : L'ADN des eucaryotes interagit avec les protéines nucléaires par des interactions noncovalentes ioniques. Les protéines peuvent reconnaître les séquences nucléotidiques spécifiques basées sur l'interaction stérique avec l'ADN, et des interactions spécifiques contrôlent de nombreux processus nucléaire, p.ex. transcription du gène, la réplication chromosomique, et la recombinaison. Une nouvelle technologie appelée ChIP-Seq a été récemment développée pour l'analyse des interactions protéine-ADN à l'échelle du génome entier et cette approche est basée sur l'immuno-précipitation de la chromatine et sur la procédure de séquençage de l'ADN à haut débit. La nouvelle approche ChIP-Seq a donc un fort potentiel pour remplacer les anciennes techniques de cartographie des interactions protéine-ADN. Dans cette thèse, nous apportons de nouvelles perspectives dans l'analyse des données ChIP-Seq. Tout d'abord, nous avons identifié des artefacts très communs associés à cette méthode qui étaient jusqu'à présent insoupçonnés. La distribution des séquences dans le génome ne suit pas une distribution uniforme et nous avons constaté des positions extrêmes d'accumulation de séquence à des régions spécifiques, des génomes humains et de la souris. Ces accumulations des séquences artéfactuelles créera de faux pics dans toutes les données ChIP-Seq, et nous proposons différentes méthodes de filtrage pour réduire le nombre de faux positifs. Ensuite, nous proposons un nouvel échantillonnage aléatoire comme un outil puissant d'analyse des données ChIP-Seq, ce qui pourraient augmenter l'acquisition de connaissances biologiques à partir des données ChIP-Seq. Nous avons créé un algorithme d'échantillonnage aléatoire et nous avons utilisé cette méthode pour révéler certaines des propriétés biologiques importantes de protéines liant à l'ADN nommés Facteur Nucléaire I (NFI). Enfin, en analysant en détail les données de ChIP-Seq pour la famille de facteurs de transcription nommés Facteur Nucléaire I, nous avons révélé que ces protéines agissent principalement comme des activateurs de transcription, et qu'elles sont associées à des modifications de la chromatine spécifiques qui sont des marqueurs de la chromatine ouverte. Nous pensons que lés facteurs NFI interagir uniquement avec l'ADN enroulé autour du nucléosome. Nous avons également constaté plusieurs régions génomiques qui indiquent une éventuelle activité de barrière chromatinienne des protéines NFI, ce qui pourrait suggérer l'utilisation de séquences de liaison NFI comme séquences isolatrices dans des applications de la biotechnologie.

Study design for technology assessment: critical issues.

The epidemiological methods have become useful tools for the assessment of the effectiveness and safety of health care technologies. The experimental methods, namely the randomized controlled trials (RCT), give the best evidence of the effect of a technology. However, the ethical issues and the very nature of the intervention under study sometimes make it difficult to carry out an RCT. Therefore, quasi-experimental and non-experimental study designs are also applied. The critical issues concerning these designs are discussed. The results of evaluative studies are of importance for decision-makers in health policy. The measurements of the impact of a medical technology should go beyond a statement of its effectiveness, because the essential outcome of an intervention or programme is the health status and quality of life of the individuals and populations concerned.

Randomized controlled trial of interventions for young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: study design and baseline characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: Intervention during the pre-psychotic period of illness holds the potential of delaying or even preventing the onset of a full-threshold disorder, or at least of reducing the impact of such a disorder if it does develop. The first step in realizing this aim was achieved more than 10 years ago with the development and validation of criteria for the identification of young people at ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis. Results of three clinical trials have been published that provide mixed support for the effectiveness of psychological and pharmacological interventions in preventing the onset of psychotic disorder. METHOD: The present paper describes a fourth study that has now been undertaken in which young people who met UHR criteria were randomized to one of three treatment groups: cognitive therapy plus risperidone (CogTher + Risp: n = 43); cognitive therapy plus placebo (CogTher + Placebo: n = 44); and supportive counselling + placebo (Supp + Placebo; n = 28). A fourth group of young people who did not agree to randomization were also followed up (monitoring: n = 78). Baseline characteristics of participants are provided. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The present study improves on the previous studies because treatment was provided for 12 months and the independent contributions of psychological and pharmacological treatments in preventing transition to psychosis in the UHR cohort and on levels of psychopathology and functioning can be directly compared. Issues associated with recruitment and randomization are discussed.

Design and establishment of a biobank in a multicenter prospective cohort study of elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (SWITCO65+).

In the field of thrombosis and haemostasis, many preanalytical variables influence the results of coagulation assays and measures to limit potential results variations should be taken. To our knowledge, no paper describing the development and maintenance of a haemostasis biobank has been previously published. Our description of the biobank of the Swiss cohort of elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (SWITCO65+) is intended to facilitate the set-up of other biobanks in the field of thrombosis and haemostasis. SWITCO65+ is a multicentre cohort that prospectively enrolled consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with venous thromboembolism at nine Swiss hospitals from 09/2009 to 03/2012. Patients will be followed up until December 2013. The cohort includes a biobank with biological material from each participant taken at baseline and after 12 months of follow-up. Whole blood from all participants is assayed with a standard haematology panel, for which fresh samples are required. Two buffy coat vials, one PAXgene Blood RNA System tube and one EDTA-whole blood sample are also collected at baseline for RNA/DNA extraction. Blood samples are processed and vialed within 1 h of collection and transported in batches to a central laboratory where they are stored in ultra-low temperature archives. All analyses of the same type are performed in the same laboratory in batches. Using multiple core laboratories increased the speed of sample analyses and reduced storage time. After recruiting, processing and analyzing the blood of more than 1,000 patients, we determined that the adopted methods and technologies were fit-for-purpose and robust.

Design and methodology of the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS): a comprehensive prospective nationwide long-term follow-up cohort.

In Switzerland, organ procurement is well organized at the national-level but transplant outcomes have not been systematically monitored so far. Therefore, a novel project, the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS), was established. The STCS is a prospective multicentre study, designed as a dynamic cohort, which enrolls all solid organ recipients at the national level. The features of the STCS are a flexible patient-case system that allows capturing all transplant scenarios and collection of patient-specific and allograft-specific data. Beyond comprehensive clinical data, specific focus is directed at psychosocial and behavioral factors, infectious disease development, and bio-banking. Between May 2008 and end of 2011, the six Swiss transplant centers recruited 1,677 patients involving 1,721 transplantations, and a total of 1,800 organs implanted in 15 different transplantation scenarios. 10 % of all patients underwent re-transplantation and 3% had a second transplantation, either in the past or during follow-up. 34% of all kidney allografts originated from living donation. Until the end of 2011 we observed 4,385 infection episodes in our patient population. The STCS showed operative capabilities to collect high-quality data and to adequately reflect the complexity of the post-transplantation process. The STCS represents a promising novel project for comparative effectiveness research in transplantation medicine.