How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration.


Autoria(s): Légaré F.; Bekker H.; Desroches S.; Drolet R.; Politi M.C.; Stacey D.; Borduas F.; Cheater F.M.; Cornuz J.; Coutu M.F.; Ferdjaoui-Moumjid N.; Griffiths F.; Härter M.; Jacques A.; Krones T.; Labrecque M.; Neely C.; Rodriguez C.; Sargeant J.; Schuerman J.S.; Sullivan M.D.
Data(s)

2011

Resumo

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is not widely implemented in healthcare. We aimed to set a research agenda about promoting shared decision-making through continuing professional development. METHODS: Thirty-six participants met for two days. RESULTS: Participants suggested ways to improve an environmental scan that had inventoried 53 shared decision-making training programs from 14 countries. Their proposed research agenda included reaching an international consensus on shared decision-making competencies and creating a framework for accrediting continuing professional development initiatives in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in shared decision-making training programs showcases the need for quality assurance frameworks.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_D4C2B3BC679E

isbn:1748-5908 (Electronic)

pmid:21729310

doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-68

isiid:000293776900001

http://my.unil.ch/serval/document/BIB_D4C2B3BC679E.pdf

http://nbn-resolving.org/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_D4C2B3BC679E8

Idioma(s)

en

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Implementation Science, vol. 6, no. 68, pp. 1-5

Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article