National and Gender Measurement Invariance of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS) : A 10-Nation Study With University Students

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS), a self-report measure aimed at assessing identity processes of commitment, in-depth exploration, and reconsideration of commitment. We tested its factor structure in university students from a large array of cultural contexts, including 10 nations located in Europe (i.e., Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, and Switzerland), Middle East (i.e., Turkey), and Asia (i.e., China, Japan, and Taiwan). Furthermore, we tested national and gender measurement invariance. Participants were 6,118 (63.2% females) university students aged from 18 to 25 years (Mage = 20.91 years). Results indicated that the three-factor structure of the U-MICS fitted well in the total sample, in each national group, and in gender groups. Furthermore, national and gender measurement invariance were established. Thus, the U-MICS can be fruitfully applied to study identity in university students from various Western and non-Western contexts.

Un déguisement pour la discrimination?

Malgré une société de plus en plus tolérante, la discrimination reste un problème d'actualité. Pour expliquer la formation des comportements discriminatoires, la recherche en psychologie sociale a traditionnellement étudié la discrimination comme un phénomène intergroupe, notamment à travers la théorie de l'identité sociale (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Toutefois, cette approche ne permet pas de comprendre comment des individus peuvent de nos jours s'engager dans des comportements discriminatoires tout en sachant que ces actes sont répréhensibles socialement et pénalement. C'est à cette problématique que nous nous sommes attelés dans la présente recherche. De nombreuses études ont mis en évidence le fait que des individus étaient prêts à commettre des actes discriminatoires pour autant qu'ils puissent les justifier (Crandall & Eshleman, 2003). Nous proposons de contribuer à la compréhension de ce phénomène grâce au concept de désengagement moral définit comme le processus par lequel des individus justifient leurs comportements immoraux pour les rendre acceptable. Ce concept a initialement été développé de manière conceptuelle par Bandura (1990) pour comprendre les processus cognitifs amenant des individus à se comporter de manière immorale. Dans le cadre de notre recherche, nous proposons de développer le concept de désengagement moral pour des actes discriminatoires (DMD) ainsi que sa mesure. Plus particulièrement, nous proposons de conceptualiser le DMD comme une différence individuelle permettant aux individus de s'engager dans des comportements discriminatoires en toute impunité à travers un processus anticipatoire de justification. Ces justifications visent à prouver le bien-fondé des actes de discrimination envisagés, ainsi perçus comme bénins, acceptables, voire désirables. Deux des trois étapes envisagées pour le développement de la mesure ont déjà été réalisées. Les résultats obtenus sont prometteurs quant à la structure et la validité de la mesure.

How women and men project their gender prototypes on leader prototypes.

Both role incongruency theory (Eagly & Karau, 2002) and the lack of fit model by Heilman (1983) suggest that the underrepresentation of women in leadership positions can be explained by the male-typedness of leader prototypes. We examine how women and men project their gender prototypes onto leader prototypes. We found initially that men more so than women projected their gender prototypes on leader prototypes. For men there is more of an overlap between a prototypical men and a prototypical leader than there is an overlap between a prototypical woman and a prototypical leader. Women, however, do not engage in so called relative ingroup projection. In the current study, we further decompose this finding asking whether the gender difference in relative ingroup projection on leadership prototypes is driven by female prototypes, male prototypes, and/or leader prototypes. We further examine to what extent this gender difference is more manifested on positively valenced or negatively valenced attributes of prototypes. Our findings show that, while women and men have similar prototypes of leaders and men on both positively and negatively valenced attributes, men relative to women have less favorable prototypes of women but only on positively valenced attributes. An interesting implication is that efforts to address gender differences in the projection of gender prototypes onto leader prototypes should focus less on leader prototypes and more on the female prototypes. Theoretically, our findings allude to the importance of distinguishing between more subtle (evaluating the outgroup less positively on positive properties) and less subtle forms (evaluating the outgroup more negatively on negative properties) of outgroup derogation.

« On m'accuse de discrimination, moi ! » Tout est une histoire de perception

De nos jours, les comportements discriminatoires sont mal vus par la société. On tend à montrer du doigt les personnes s'engageant dans de tels comportements et à médiatiser les entreprises prises en flagrant délit de discrimination, tant au niveau du processus d'embauche (p. ex., rejet systématique des candidatures venant de candidats d'origine étrangère), qu'au niveau des différences de traitement au sein des entreprises (p. ex., différence de salaires entre les femmes et les hommes). Si les comportements discriminatoires sont si mal perçus, pourquoi sont-ils toujours d'actualité ? Comment est-ce que des personnes s'engageant dans de tels comportements peuvent garder à la fois une image positive d'eux-mêmes et éviter de se faire réprimander par d'autres personnes qui pourraient avoir connaissance de leurs mauvais agissements ? C'est à cette problématique que je m'atèle dans ma recherche. A travers une expérience sur le thème de la discrimination à l'embauche, je démontre que les individus ayant tendance à se désengager moralement de leur propre action sont plus à même de s'engager dans des comportements discriminatoires que les autres individus. Le désengagement moral est un processus par lequel les individus justifient leur propre comportement non-éthique afin de les rendre acceptable (Bandura, 1986). En particulier, les résultats ont révélé que cette relation entre désengagement moral et discrimination est modéré par le degré de préjugés des individus. Parmi les individus ayant des préjugés marqués envers les étrangers, plus leur tendance au désengagement moral est élevé, plus ils sont à même de s'engager dans des comportements discriminatoires.

Gender ingroup projection and the evaluative connotation of leader prototypes

The underrepresentation of women in top corporate ranks is a topic of ongoing discussion. Manager prototypes are proposed to be more male-typed than female-typed because historically men more often than women have held leadership roles. Why then is the maleness of manager prototypes even more pronounced among men than among women? Given that most personnel decision makers in organizations are men this phenomenon is problematic for women's advancement to top management positions. We address this question by investigating peoples' use of ingroup projection and their endorsement of evaluative attributes in constructing gender and leader prototypes.

Genre et disparités: l'exemple du tabagisme [Gender and disparities: the example of tobacco smoking].

La prévalence mondiale du tabagisme est environ cinq fois plus importante chez les hommes que chez les femmes, toutefois cet écart tend à s'égaliser. En ce qui concerne les conséquences sur la santé du tabagisme, les femmes semblent plus susceptibles que les hommes. Elles sont notamment plus à risque de présenter certains cancers pulmonaires ou de décéder de maladies cardiovasculaires. Si les hommes sont moins enclins à demander de l'aide pour arrêter de fumer, les femmes quant à elles ont moins de succès dans leurs tentatives d'arrêt et les traitements semblent moins efficaces chez ces dernières. Des interventions d'aide à l'arrêt et des mesures de prévention du tabagisme adaptées aux spécificités de genre ont le potentiel d'améliorer la prise en charge des fumeurs et de diminuer les disparités de genre en santé. Smoking prevalence is globally five times higher among men compared to women but this gap tends to decrease. Regarding health consequences of smoking, women tend to be more vulnerable than men. They are namely more at risk to present certain lung cancers and die of cardiovascular disease. While men are less prone to seek help for smoking cessation, women are less successful in their quit attempts and smoking cessation treatments are less effective among them. Interventions for smoking cessation and preventive measures tailored to gender specificities have the potential to improve management of smokers and decrease gender disparities in healthcare.

Gender differences in cancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of cancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) may differ according to gender. METHODS: We used the RIETE database to compare the rate of VTE (pulmonary embolism [PE] or deep vein thrombosis [DVT]) recurrences), major bleeding and mortality during the course of anticoagulation, according to gender. RESULTS: As of August 2014, 11,055 patients with active cancer were enrolled in RIETE, of whom 5,104 (46%) were women. During the course of anticoagulation (mean: 142 days), 505 patients developed recurrent VTE, 429 bled and 2730 died. Compared with men, women had a significantly lower rate of fatal bleeding (risk ratio [RR]: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47-0.99) and death (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.97), and a non-significantly lower rate of PE recurrences (RR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.65-1.06) and major bleeding (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.74-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: During the course of anticoagulation, cancer women with VTE had a better outcome than men.

Associations between perceived discrimination and health status among frequent Emergency Department users

Objective: Frequent Emergency Department (ED) users are vulnerable individuals and discrimination is usually associated with increased vulnerability. The aim of this study was to investigate frequent ED users' perceptions of discrimination and to test whether they were associated with increased vulnerability. Methods: In total, 250 adult frequent ED users were interviewed in Lausanne University Hospital. From a previously published questionnaire, we assessed 15 dichotomous sources of perceived discrimination. Vulnerability was assessed using health status: objective health status (evaluation by a healthcare practitioner including somatic, mental health, behavioral, and social issues - dichotomous variables) and subjective health status [self-evaluation including health-related quality of life (WHOQOL) and quality of life (EUROQOL) - mean-scores]. We computed the prevalence rates of perceived discrimination and tested associations between perceived discrimination and health status (Fischer's exact tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests)

Labor Market Signaling and Self-Confidence: Wage Compression and the Gender Pay Gap

I extend Spence's signaling model by assuming that some workers are overconfident-they underestimate their marginal cost of acquiring education-and some are underconfident. Firms cannot observe workers' productive abilities and beliefs but know the fractions of high-ability, overconfident, and underconfident workers. I find that biased beliefs lower the wage spread and compress the wages of unbiased workers. I show that gender differences in self-confidence can contribute to the gender pay gap. If education raises productivity, men are overconfident, and women underconfident, then women will, on average, earn less than men. Finally, I show that biased beliefs can improve welfare.