Characterisation of novel primary tumour derived epithelial prostate cancer cell lines

Current translational and basic prostate cancer research is limited by the number of cell lines that truly reflect the spectrum of disease progression, with most commonly used cell lines being derived from metastatic lesions. There are essentially no prostate cancer cell lines derived from primary tumours or localised disease in wide use.

A multiple nucleotide length polymorphism (MNLP) mediates androgen regulation of IRX4 in prostate cancer

Androgens and the androgen receptor (AR) play a crucial role in the initiation and progression of prostate cancer (PCa), regulating the expression of many PCa risk-associated genes. Iroquois Homeobox 4 (IRX4) has been recently identified with PCa risk and overexpressed in PCa. We observed a down-regulation of IRX4 expression in the cells undergoing epithelial to mesenchymal transition, suggesting its potential role in PCa progression and aim to delineate the androgenmediated regulation of IRX4 in PCa.

Modulation of protease expression in prostate cancer cells after androgen deprivation

Understanding mechanisms associated with the emergence of castration resistant prostate cancer cells (CRPC) after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is essential to create new therapeutic agents to counteract this aggressive form of prostate cancer (PCa). Because proteases are involved in almost all cancer associated mechanisms such as cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis, we are interested in their modulation in PCa after ADT and their involvement in CRPC.

Extracellular vesicles mediate paracrine signalling in androgen deprived prostate cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) is the main therapeutic target for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Current treatments have focused on inhibiting the transcriptional activity of the AR, however androgens can also induce non-genomic effects by facilitating the initiation of kinase signaling cascades in PCa. Cells, including PCa, secrete extracellular vesicles (EV), which are able to mediate communication between cells and can also contribute towards these processes.

A 3D in vitro model reflecting the androgen deprivation state in prostate cancer bone metastasis

In castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the prevailing organ for metastasis is bone, where the survival of cancer cells is regulated by the permissive metastatic niche offered by the bone marrow. The tumour microenvironment and cellular interactions with the matrix and bone cells enable metastasis and lead to cancer cells becoming androgen resistant. Hence, 3D models that mimic CRPC in terms of an androgen deprivation state (ADS) are needed to identify the mechanisms for CPRC growth in bone and further develop therapeutic strategies.

Investigating the role of neuroendocrine transdifferentiation in the progression to castration resistant prostate cancer

Androgen targeted therapies (ATT) are the most commonly used treatments in prostate cancer (PCa).While these therapies are initially effective, PCa cells are able to activate adaptive response pathways to survive these therapies and progress to castration resistant PCa (CRPC), a highly aggressive and ultimately lethal stage of the disease. Neuroendocrine transdifferentiation (NEtD), a process whereby PCa cells gain neuroendocrinelike characteristics, has been implicated in the development of CRPC. The objective of this study is to develop and characterise models of therapy-induced NEtD to investigate the role of this adaptive plasticity in the progression to CRPC.

Targeting neuropilin-1 to inhibit prostate cancer invasion and metastasis

Recent reports provide evidence that the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a key role in prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis and therapy resistance. We have recently identified the cell surface receptor, Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) to be increased during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and this study aims to determine whether the inhibition of NRP1 will be a feasible therapeutic strategy for blocking PCa metastasis and therapy resistance.

The mesenchymal-to-epithelial reverting transition is enriched in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and correlates with poor survival

Despite recent recognition that the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) program acts in a dynamic manner (termed Epithelial to Mesenchymal Plasticity or EMP) during carcinoma metastasis, it has largely been ignored in the discovery and development of EMT-targeted therapies. In part, this has stemmed from a lack of preclinical models that can mimic the full dynamic nature of EMP and the perception that the EMT-reverting transition [or mesenchymal-epithelial reverting transition; (MErT)] is a mere antithesis of EMT. The objective of this study was to develop the first PCa model capable of recapitulating the dynamic nature of EMP.

Examination of EXOSC4 as a new prognostic marker and a novel therapeutic avenue in lung adenocarcinoma

Although prevention and early detection of the disease greatly improved over the past few years, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths. In order to be able to treat a larger population, we are in urgent need for novel treatments. While it is known that DNA repair genes play a major role in the oncogenic transformation, they also represent a weakness of cancers that constitute a therapeutic opportunity. To identify novel DNA repair genes implicated in Lung cancers, we conducted an in silico investigation to identify genes co-regulated with two DNA repair factors, BRCA2 and hSSB1. This approach allowed for the identification of EXOSC4, a component of the RNA Exosome machinery, as a potential factor involved in the maintenance of genome stability and that is deregulated in lung cancer.

Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials

Background We aimed to assess the effect of afatinib on overall survival of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma through an analysis of data from two open-label, randomised, phase 3 trials. Methods Previously untreated patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage IIIB or IV lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled in LUX-Lung 3 (n=345) and LUX-Lung 6 (n=364). These patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive afatinib or chemotherapy (pemetrexed-cisplatin [LUX-Lung 3] or gemcitabine-cisplatin [LUX-Lung 6]), stratified by EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion [del19], Leu858Arg, or other) and ethnic origin (LUX-Lung 3 only). We planned analyses of mature overall survival data in the intention-to-treat population after 209 (LUX-Lung 3) and 237 (LUX-Lung 6) deaths. These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00949650 and NCT01121393. Findings Median follow-up in LUX-Lung 3 was 41 months (IQR 35–44); 213 (62%) of 345 patients had died. Median follow-up in LUX-Lung 6 was 33 months (IQR 31–37); 246 (68%) of 364 patients had died. In LUX-Lung 3, median overall survival was 28·2 months (95% CI 24·6–33·6) in the afatinib group and 28·2 months (20·7–33·2) in the pemetrexed-cisplatin group (HR 0·88, 95% CI 0·66–1·17, p=0·39). In LUX-Lung 6, median overall survival was 23·1 months (95% CI 20·4–27·3) in the afatinib group and 23·5 months (18·0–25·6) in the gemcitabine-cisplatin group (HR 0·93, 95% CI 0·72–1·22, p=0·61). However, in preplanned analyses, overall survival was significantly longer for patients with del19-positive tumours in the afatinib group than in the chemotherapy group in both trials: in LUX-Lung 3, median overall survival was 33·3 months (95% CI 26·8–41·5) in the afatinib group versus 21·1 months (16·3–30·7) in the chemotherapy group (HR 0·54, 95% CI 0·36–0·79, p=0·0015); in LUX-Lung 6, it was 31·4 months (95% CI 24·2–35·3) versus 18·4 months (14·6–25·6), respectively (HR 0·64, 95% CI 0·44–0·94, p=0·023). By contrast, there were no significant differences by treatment group for patients with EGFR Leu858Arg-positive tumours in either trial: in LUX-Lung 3, median overall survival was 27·6 months (19·8–41·7) in the afatinib group versus 40·3 months (24·3–not estimable) in the chemotherapy group (HR 1·30, 95% CI 0·80–2·11, p=0·29); in LUX-Lung 6, it was 19·6 months (95% CI 17·0–22·1) versus 24·3 months (19·0–27·0), respectively (HR 1·22, 95% CI 0·81–1·83, p=0·34). In both trials, the most common afatinib-related grade 3–4 adverse events were rash or acne (37 [16%] of 229 patients in LUX-Lung 3 and 35 [15%] of 239 patients in LUX-Lung 6), diarrhoea (33 [14%] and 13 [5%]), paronychia (26 [11%] in LUX-Lung 3 only), and stomatitis or mucositis (13 [5%] in LUX-Lung 6 only). In LUX-Lung 3, neutropenia (20 [18%] of 111 patients), fatigue (14 [13%]) and leucopenia (nine [8%]) were the most common chemotherapy-related grade 3–4 adverse events, while in LUX-Lung 6, the most common chemotherapy-related grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (30 [27%] of 113 patients), vomiting (22 [19%]), and leucopenia (17 [15%]). Interpretation Although afatinib did not improve overall survival in the whole population of either trial, overall survival was improved with the drug for patients with del19 EGFR mutations. The absence of an effect in patients with Leu858Arg EGFR mutations suggests that EGFR del19-positive disease might be distinct from Leu858Arg-positive disease and that these subgroups should be analysed separately in future trials.