Käsityötä, kotiteollisuutta ja sosiaalihuoltoa : Työtupa Aunuksessa 1941-1944

When Finland occupied East Karelian territories in Soviet Union during The Continuation War (1941 1944) Finnish people had also to take care of the inhabitants of the occupied East Karelia. For example there was a lack of clothes and shoes during the wartime. In order to facilitate clothing situation and to provide more opportunities to work for women, Finnish people founded some workshops in East Karelia. Workshops also helped to collect East Karelian craft products. One of the workshops was founded in the city of Olonets in October 1941 and it was in operation until June 1944. This workshop is the subject of this thesis. The aim of this thesis is to find out with the microhistorical approach what kind of functions the workshop of Olonets had during The Continuation War and who worked in the workshop. In this thesis I also examine women s crafts in the Olonets workshop and their meaning during the wartime. I collected the material of this thesis from different places. In February 2010 I interviewed Talvikki Lausala, the leader of the Olonets workshop, who worked in the Olonets from May 1942 to June 1944. From the Virkki Käsityömuseo I looked for objects which have been made in the workshop of Olonets. Tyyne-Kerttu Virkki collected crafts from the East Karelia when she was working in the area and in the workshop from 1941 to 1944. Archive material I found from the Finnish National archive and from the archive of the Tyyne-Kerttu Virkki -Foundation. East Karelian women and girls who were not able to do anything else came to work in the Olonets workshop. If women could not go to work outside of home, they had an option to do the same crafts at home. There were three Finnish women, Tyyne-Kerttu Virkki, Talvikki Lausala and Sofi Nyrkkö, who worked and led in the workshop of Olonets. In addition to the workshop, there was a dress maker s atelier in which clothes were made to order and soldiers uniforms were repaired, a small museum and a shop to sell products of the workshop. Craft products were also exported to Finland. Courses were organized in which Finnish women taught East Karelian crafts.

Foreign Capital and Finland : Central government's first period of reliance on international financial markets, 1862-1938

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the Finnish central government s foreign borrowing between the years 1862 and 1938. Most of this period was characterised by deep capital market integration that bears resemblance to the liberal world financial order at the turn of the millennium. The main aim is to analyse the credit risk associated with the state and its determination by evaluating the world financial market centres perception of Finland. By doing this, the study is also expected to provide an additional dimension to Finland s political and economic history by incorporating into the research the assessments of international capital markets regarding Finland during a period that witnessed profound political and economic changes in Finnish society. The evaluation of the credit risk mainly relies on exchange-rate risk free time series of the state s foreign bonds. They have been collected from quotations in the stock exchanges in Helsinki, Hamburg, Paris and London. In addition, it investigates Finland s exposure to short-term debt and Moody s credit ratings assigned to Finland. The study emphasises the importance of the political risk. It suggests that the hey-day of the state s reliance on foreign capital markets took place during last few decades of the 19th century when Finland enjoyed a wide autonomy in the Russian Empire and prudently managed its economy, highlighted in Finland s adherence to the international gold standard. Political confrontations in Finland and, in particular, in Russia and the turbulence of the world financial system prevented the return of this beneficial position again. Through its issuance of foreign bonds the state was able to import substantial amounts of foreign capital, which was sorely needed to foster economic development in Finland. Moreover, the study argues that the state s presence in the western capital markets not only had economic benefits, but it also increased the international awareness of Finland s distinct and separate status in the Russian Empire and later underlined its position as an independent republic.

Paimen vailla hiippakuntaa : Kenttäpiispan viran synty ja vaikutus sotilaspapiston asemaan Suomen puolustusvoimissa ja kirkossa vuosina 1939 - 1944

The main purpose of this research is to shed light on the factors that gave rise to the office of Field Bishop in the years 1939-1944. How did military bishophood affect the status of the head of military pastoral care and military clergy during these years? The main sources of my research are the collections in the Finnish National Archives, and I use a historical-qualitative method. The position of the military clergy was debated within both the Church and the Defence Forces before 1939. At that stage, Church law did not yet recognize the office of the leading military priest, the Field Dean. There had been a motion in 1932 to introduce the office of a military bishop, but the bishops' synod blocked it. The concept of Field Bishop appeared for the first time in 1927 in a Finnish military document, which dealt with pastoral care in the Polish military. The Field Dean in Finland had regularly proposed improvements to the salary of the military clergy before the Winter War. After the Winter War, arguments were made for strengthening the position of the military clergy: these arguments were based on the increased respect shown towards this clergy, especially due to their role in the care of the fallen, which had become their task during the war. Younger members of the military clergy in particular supported the demands to improve their position within the Church and the army. The creation of a Field Bishop was perceived as strengthening the whole military clergy, as the Field Bishop was envisioned as a bishop within the Church and a general within the Defence Forces. During that time the Field Dean was still without any military rank. The idea of a Field Bishop was recommended to Mannerheim in June 1940, after which the Defence Forces lent their support to the cause. The status of the military clergy, in Church law, made it to the agenda of the Church council in January 1941, thanks largely to the younger priests' group influence and Mannerheim's leverage. The bishops opposed the notion of a Field Bishop mostly on theological grounds but were ready to concede that the position the Field Dean in Church law required further defining. The creation of the office of Field Bishop was blocked in the Church law committee report issued close to the beginning of the Continuation War. The onset of that war, however, changed the course of events, as the President of the Republic appointed Field Dean Johannes Björklund as Field Bishop. Speculation has abounded about Mannerheim's role in the appointment, but the truth of the matter is not clear. The title of Field Bishop was used to put pressure on the Church, and, at the same time, Mannerheim could remain detached from the matter. Later, in September 1941, the Church council approved the use of the Field Bishop title to denote the head of military pastoral care in Church law, and Field Bishops were assigned some of the duties formerly pertaining to bishops. Despite all expectations and hopes, the new office of Field Bishop did not affect the status of the military clergy within the Defence Forces, as no ranks were established for them, and their salary did not improve. However the office of the Field Bishop within Army HQ was transformed from a bureau into a department in the summer of 1942. At the beginning of the Continuation War, the Field Bishop was criticized by certain military and Church clergy for favouring Russian Orthodox Christians in Eastern Karelia. Björklund agreed in principle with most of the Lutheran clergy on the necessity of Lutheranizing East Karelia but had to take into account the realities at Army HQ. As well, at the same time the majority of the younger clergy were serving in the army, and there was a lack of parish priests on the home front. Bishop Lehtonen had actually expressed the wish that more priests could have been released from the front to serve in local parishes. In his notes Lehtonen accused Björklund of trying to achieve the position of Field Bishop by all possible means. However, research has revealed a varied group of people behind the creation of the office of Field Bishop, including in particular younger clergy and the Defence Forces.

Kaikkialla minne hän katsoo, hän näkee Sinut : Johannes Viiniköynnöksen käsitys ruumiillisten ja hengellisten aistien merkityksestä Jumalan tuntemisessa

Johannes Viiniköynnös oli 700-luvulla syyrialaisella kielialueella elänyt erakko ja mystikko, jonka värikkäissä ja runollisissa kirjoituksissa käsitellään monenlaisia hengellisen elämän kysymyksiä. Eräs merkille pantava piirre hänen ilmaisussaan on hengellisten aistikielikuvien runsaus. Tässä pro gradu -tutkielmassa Johannes Viiniköynnöksen kirjoitukset liitetään osaksi patristista hengellisten aistien traditiota. Tutkielmassa selvitetään, miten Johannes ymmärtää sisäisen ja ulkoisen aistitoiminnan merkityksen ja muutoksen hengellisen elämän eri vaiheissa. Kysymys sisältää sekä epistemologisen että antropologisen tason: Ensinnäkin analysoidaan, mikä on ruumiillisen ja hengellisen aistitoiminnan tiedollinen merkitys hengellisessä elämässä ja Jumalan tuntemisessa. Sen ohella pohditaan, minkä roolin Johannes antaa ruumiille ja sielulle tässä prosessissa ja millaisia muutoksia niiden suhteessa tapahtuu hengellisen elämän edetessä. Tutkielmassa tarkastellaan Johanneksen käsitystä aistitoiminnasta sekä askeettisen kilvoittelun että mystisen kontemplaation yhteydessä. Analyysissa osoittautuu, että Johanneksen käsitys ihmisen langenneesta aistitoiminnasta sisältää stoalaisen havaintoteorian elementtejä, jotka ovat välittyneet hänelle Evagrios Pontoslaisen kautta. Johannes painottaa, että ihmisen on irtauduttava aistimaailman impulsseista ja käännettävä katseensa omaan sisimpäänsä, sillä Jumala voidaan oppia tuntemaan vain sielun peilistä kuvastuvana heijastuksena. Johannes Viiniköynnökselle mystinen elämä merkitsee yhdistymistä Kristuksen mieleen, jonka kautta avautuvat kaikki hengelliset salaisuudet. Ne vastaanotetaan aistien kaltaisilla kyvyillä, joita Johannes kutsuu sielun voimiksi . Analyysi hengellisen aistivaikutuksen välittymisestä osoittaa, että Johanneksen aistiteologiassa tapahtuu askeesista kontemplaatioon siirryttäessä myös siirtymä stoalaisen havainto-opin periaatteista uusplatonistiseen emanaatiomalliin, jossa aistivaikutus välittyy intellektin kautta sieluun ja lopulta ruumiiseen. Tutkielmassa tuodaan esiin, että hengelliseen aistikieleen sisältyy myös tiettyjä ongelmia. Se kuvaa aina väistämättä olemisen tapaa, joka muistuttaa ihmisen ruumiillista eksistenssiä aineellisessa maailmassa. Tarkastelussa kuitenkin osoittautuu, että Johannes on tietoinen tästä ongelmasta ja vastaa siihen kuvaamalla mystisen yhtymyksen huipentuman tilaksi, jossa kaikki aistinta lamaantuu. Tästä tilasta voidaan puhua vain apofaattisesti negaatioilla ja paradokseilla, jotka irrottavat Jumalan aistimaailman lainalaisuuksista. Tutkielmassa kiinnitetään huomiota arvoon, jonka Johannes antaa sekä aineelliselle luodulle että ihmisruumiille Jumalan tuntemisessa, ja korostetaan, ettei platonistisen filosofian vaikutus väistämättä tarkoita ruumiin ja hengen dualismia. Lopuksi esitetään, että hengellisten aistien ideaa on hedelmällisintä tarkastella koko hengellisen elämän kattavana tiedollisten kykyjen transformaationa eikä pelkkänä mystisen kontemplaation erityisaspektina.