Investigations into electronic stopping regime sputtering of uranium tetrafluoride

Yields were measured for ²³⁵U sputtered from UF₄ by ¹⁶O, ¹⁹F, and ³⁵Cl over the energy range ~.12 to 1.5 MeV/ amu sing a charge equilibrated beam in the stripped beam arrangement for all the incident ions and in the transmission arrangement for ¹⁹F and ³⁵Cl. In addition, yields were measured for ¹⁹F incident in a wide range of discrete charge states. The angular dependence of all the measured yields were consistent with cosʋ. The stripped beam and transmission data were well fit by the form (Az²eqln(BƐ)/Ɛ)⁴ (where Ɛ was the ion energy in MeV/amu and z_eq(Ɛ) was taken from Zeigler(80). The fitted values of B for the various sets of data were consistent with a constant B₀, equal to 36.3 ± 2.7, independent of incident ion. The fitted values of A show no consistent variation with incident ion although a difference can be noted between the stripped beam and transmission values, the transmission values being higher.

The incident charge data were well fit by the assumptions that the sputtering yield depended locally on a power of the incident ion charge and that the sputtering from the surface is exponentially correlated to conditions in the bulk. The equilibrated sputtering yields derived from these data are in agreement with the stripped beam yields.

In addition, to aid in the understanding of these data, the data of Hakansson(80,81a,81b) were examined and contrasted with the UF₄ results. The thermal models of Seiberling(80) and Watson(81) were discussed and compared to the data.

Sputtering of insulators in the electronic stopping region

Using track detectors we have measured sputtering yields induced by MeV light ions incident on a uranium containing glass, UO₂ and UF₄. No deviation from the behavior predicted by the Sigmund theory was detected in the glass or the UO₂. The same was true for UF₄ bombarded with ⁴He at 1 MeV and with ¹⁶O and ²⁰Ne at 100 keV. In contrast to this, 4.75 MeV ¹⁹F(+2) sputters uranium from UF₄ with a yield of 5.6 ± 1.0, which is about 3 orders of magnitude larger than expected from the Sigmund theory. The energy dependence of the yield indicates that it is generated by electronic rather than nuclear stopping processes. The yield depends on the charge state of the incident fluorine but not on the target temperature. We have also measured the energy spectrum of the uranium sputtered from the UF₄. Ion explosions, thermal spikes, chemical rearrangement and induced desorption are considered as possible explanations for the anomalous yields.