Relationship between estimation and real motor performance in school-age children

The relationship between estimated and real motor competences was analyzed for several tasks. Participants were 303 children (160 boys and 143 girls), which had between 6 and 10 years of age (M=8.63, SD=1.16). None of the children presented developmental difficulties or learning disabilities, and all attended age-appropriate classes. Children were divided into three groups according to their age: group 1 (N= 102; age range: 6.48-8.01 years); group 2 (N= 101; age range: 8.02-9.22 years); and group 3 (N=100; age range: 9.24-10.93 years). Children were asked to predict their maximum distance for a locomotor, a manipulative, and a balance task, prior to performing those tasks. Children’s estimations were compared with their real performance to determine their accuracy. Children had, in general, a tendency to overestimate their performance (standing long jump: 56.11%, kicking: 63.37%, throwing: 73.60%, and Walking Backwards (WB) on a balance beam: 45.21%), and older children tended to be more accurate, except for the manipulative tasks. Furthermore, the relationship between estimation and real performance in children with different levels of motor coordination (Köperkoordinationstest für Kinder, KTK) was analyzed. The 75 children with the highest score comprised the Highest Motor Coordination (HMC) group, and the 78 children with the lowest score were placed in the Lowest Motor Coordination (LMC) group. There was a tendency for LMC and HMC children to overestimate their skills at all tasks, except for the HMC group at the WB task. Children with the HMC level tended to be more accurate when predicting their motor performance; however, differences in absolute percent error were only significant for the throwing and WB tasks. In conclusion, children display a tendency to overestimate their performance independently of their motor coordination level and task. This fact may be determinant to the development of their motor competences, since they are more likely to engage and persist in motor tasks, but it might also increase the occurrence of unintended injuries.

Avaliação sensoriomotora do complexo articular do ombro : validação de um protocolo

Introdução: São escassas as medidas objetivas, válidas e consistentes da função sensoriomotora do complexo articular do ombro (CAO). Objetivos: desenvolvimento e validação de um protocolo de avaliação sensoriomotora do CAO. Materiais e métodos: 40 Sujeitos (16 atletas e 24 não atletas) completaram 6 momentos de teste, 3 por cada um de 2 investigadores. Em cada momento avaliou-se a NPA pelo Biodex System 3, na elevação do braço no plano da omoplata a 80º e 160º, e na rotação externa (RE) a 45º e 80º , bem como o controlo postural do CAO avaliou-se pela plataforma Rsscan. Resultados/Discussão: Todas as variáveis apresentaram estabilidade temporal, exceto os erros a 80º na RE (p=0,021) e 80º no PO (p=0,006), nos atletas, para o Investigador 1, e as componentes do CP nos não atletas, para o investigador 2. Os ICC’s foram globalmente baixos, apresentando valores moderados no grupo de não atletas, para o Investigador 2, no comprimento (0,862) e velocidade média do CP (0,852). Excluindo a área do CP no grupo de não atletas (p=0,030), não houve diferenças significativas nas médias entre observadores. Verificaram-se correlações fortes entre as componentes do CP, mas não ocorreram correlações fortes entre estas e as da NPA. Conclusões: Os resultados poucos consistentes, não permitem retirar conclusões sólidas, impossibilitando assumir o protocolo como fiável e válido na avaliação sensoriomotora do CAO.