Port development and related maritime matters [microform] : hearings before the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, second session, on effort to review and maintain oversight of port development and related maritime matters and to receive comments on the omnibus maritime bill, April 7, 9, and 10, 1980.

"Serial no. 96-51."

Is the environmental policies procedures a barrier to development of inland navigation and port management? A case of study in Brazil

The main objective of this article is to discuss the Brazilian environmental legislation and policies towards the development of navigation and port management. The research illustrated some difficulties faced by the country and make suggestions to overcome it. The construction of the environmental legal framework began in the early 1960s and resulted in a very complex system, as a consequence of policies adopted by the country. Nowadays Brazilian environmental policies are developed in democratic and participative way, although with elevated degree of bureaucracy and lack of integration among the several governmental agencies, which makes the approval of environmental certifications demand several years for new port projects or improvements, which delays the economic development of the country. Efforts have been made to simplify the licensing process. As result of this research two flowchart for environmental licenses of ports installation are shown: The first shows the process until 2009 and the second shows the process nowadays. This become an important issue due the fact that inland navigation is one of the less pollutant modes of transportation, and although, the process of environmental certification was simplified, if compare with 2009, it is still complex and time-consuming, delaying the development of the infrastructure. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

Port throughputs in Latin America and the Caribbean in 2009 and the first half of 2010

This issue of the FAL Bulletin presents primary analytical data on port development in the region and analyses the impact of the economic crisis on port activity in Latin America in 2009. It also provides preliminary data on container port throughput through June 2010, which point to recovering activity at most of the region’s ports.

Latin America and the Caribbean: Port system evolution, 1997-2013

This FAL Bulletin demonstrates the evolution of maritime networks and port development at primary and secondary ports in Latin America and the Caribbean. An analysis of time series data on container movements between 1997 and 2013 reveals patterns of cargo flows and trans- shipment location choices. The institutional context of devolution processes and new investments in the region provide additional insight into the performance of selected ports.

Annual report - Department of Resource Development, State of Wisconsin.

WI docs no.: DEV.1:1961-1965

Between path dependency and contingency: new challenges for the geography of port system evolution.

Seaports play a critical role as gateways and facilitators of economic interchange and logistics processes and thus have become crucial nodes in globalised production networks andmobility systems. Both the physical port infrastructure and its operational superstructure have undergone intensive evolution processes in an effort to adapt to changing economic environments, technological advances,maritime industry expectations and institutional reforms. The results, in terms of infrastructure, operator models and the role of an individual port within the port system, vary by region, institutional and economic context. While ports have undoubtedly developed in scale to respond to the changing volumes and structures in geographies of trade (Wilmsmeier, 2015), the development of hinterland access infrastructure, regulatory systems and institutional structures have in many instances lagged behind. The resulting bottlenecks reflect deficits in the interplay between the economic system and the factors defining port development (e.g. transport demand, the structure of trade, transport services, institutional capacities, etc. cf. Cullinane and Wilmsmeier, 2011). There is a wide range of case study approaches and analyses of individual ports, but analyses from a port system perspective are less common, and those that exist are seldom critical of the dominant discourse assuming the efficiency of market competition (cf. Debrie et al., 2013). This special section aims to capture the spectrum of approaches in current geography research on port system evolution. Thus, the papers reach from the traditional spatial approach (Rodrigue and Ashar, this volume) to network analysis (Mohamed-Chérif and Ducruet, this volume) to institutional discussions (Vonck and Notteboom, this volume; Wilmsmeier and Monios, this volume). The selection of papers allows an opening of discussion and reflection on current research, necessary critical analysis of the influences on port systemevolution and,most importantly, future directions. The remainder of this editorial aims to reflect on these challenges and identify the potential for future research.

Public-private partnership investments in dry ports – Russian logistics markets and risks

The investments have always been considered as an essential backbone and so-called ‘locomotive’ for the competitive economies. However, in various countries, the state has been put under tight budget constraints for the investments in capital intensive projects. In response to this situation, the cooperation between public and private sector has grown based on public-private mechanism. The promotion of favorable arrangement for collaboration between public and private sectors for the provision of policies, services, and infrastructure in Russia can help to address the problems of dry ports development that neither municipalities nor the private sector can solve alone. Especially, the stimulation of public-private collaboration is significant under the exposure to externalities that affect the magnitude of the risks during all phases of project realization. In these circumstances, the risk in the projects also is becoming increasingly a part of joint research and risk management practice, which is viewed as a key approach, aiming to take active actions on existing global and specific factors of uncertainties. Meanwhile, a relatively little progress has been made on the inclusion of the resilience aspects into the planning process of a dry ports construction that would instruct the capacity planner, on how to mitigate the occurrence of disruptions that may lead to million dollars of losses due to the deviation of the future cash flows from the expected financial flows on the project. The current experience shows that the existing methodological base is developed fragmentary within separate steps of supply chain risk management (SCRM) processes: risk identification, risk evaluation, risk mitigation, risk monitoring and control phases. The lack of the systematic approach hinders the solution of the problem of risk management processes of dry port implementation. Therefore, management of various risks during the investments phases of dry port projects still presents a considerable challenge from the practical and theoretical points of view. In this regard, the given research became a logical continuation of fundamental research, existing in the financial models and theories (e.g., capital asset pricing model and real option theory), as well as provided a complementation for the portfolio theory. The goal of the current study is in the design of methods and models for the facilitation of dry port implementation through the mechanism of public-private partnership on the national market that implies the necessity to mitigate, first and foremost, the shortage of the investments and consequences of risks. The problem of the research was formulated on the ground of the identified contradictions. They rose as a continuation of the trade-off between the opportunities that the investors can gain from the development of terminal business in Russia (i.e. dry port implementation) and risks. As a rule, the higher the investment risk, the greater should be their expected return. However, investors have a different tolerance for the risks. That is why it would be advisable to find an optimum investment. In the given study, the optimum relates to the search for the efficient portfolio, which can provide satisfaction to the investor, depending on its degree of risk aversion. There are many theories and methods in finance, concerning investment choices. Nevertheless, the appropriateness and effectiveness of particular methods should be considered with the allowance of the specifics of the investment projects. For example, the investments in dry ports imply not only the lump sum of financial inflows, but also the long-term payback periods. As a result, capital intensity and longevity of their construction determine the necessity from investors to ensure the return on investment (profitability), along with the rapid return on investment (liquidity), without precluding the fact that the stochastic nature of the project environment is hardly described by the formula-based approach. The current theoretical base for the economic appraisals of the dry port projects more often perceives net present value (NPV) as a technique superior to other decision-making criteria. For example, the portfolio theory, which considers different risk preference of an investor and structures of utility, defines net present value as a better criterion of project appraisal than discounted payback period (DPP). Meanwhile, in business practice, the DPP is more popular. Knowing that the NPV is based on the assumptions of certainty of project life, it cannot be an accurate appraisal approach alone to determine whether or not the project should be accepted for the approval in the environment that is not without of uncertainties. In order to reflect the period or the project’s useful life that is exposed to risks due to changes in political, operational, and financial factors, the second capital budgeting criterion – discounted payback period is profoundly important, particularly for the Russian environment. Those statements represent contradictions that exist in the theory and practice of the applied science. Therefore, it would be desirable to relax the assumptions of portfolio theory and regard DPP as not fewer relevant appraisal approach for the assessment of the investment and risk measure. At the same time, the rationality of the use of both project performance criteria depends on the methods and models, with the help of which these appraisal approaches are calculated in feasibility studies. The deterministic methods cannot ensure the required precision of the results, while the stochastic models guarantee the sufficient level of the accuracy and reliability of the obtained results, providing that the risks are properly identified, evaluated, and mitigated. Otherwise, the project performance indicators may not be confirmed during the phase of project realization. For instance, the economic and political instability can result in the undoing of hard-earned gains, leading to the need for the attraction of the additional finances for the project. The sources of the alternative investments, as well as supportive mitigation strategies, can be studied during the initial phases of project development. During this period, the effectiveness of the investments undertakings can also be improved by the inclusion of the various investors, e.g. Russian Railways’ enterprises and other private companies in the dry port projects. However, the evaluation of the effectiveness of the participation of different investors in the project lack the methods and models that would permit doing the particular feasibility study, foreseeing the quantitative characteristics of risks and their mitigation strategies, which can meet the tolerance of the investors to the risks. For this reason, the research proposes a combination of Monte Carlo method, discounted cash flow technique, the theory of real options, and portfolio theory via a system dynamics simulation approach. The use of this methodology allows for comprehensive risk management process of dry port development to cover all aspects of risk identification, risk evaluation, risk mitigation, risk monitoring, and control phases. A designed system dynamics model can be recommended for the decision-makers on the dry port projects that are financed via a public-private partnership. It permits investors to make a decision appraisal based on random variables of net present value and discounted payback period, depending on different risks factors, e.g. revenue risks, land acquisition risks, traffic volume risks, construction hazards, and political risks. In this case, the statistical mean is used for the explication of the expected value of the DPP and NPV; the standard deviation is proposed as a characteristic of risks, while the elasticity coefficient is applied for rating of risks. Additionally, the risk of failure of project investments and guaranteed recoupment of capital investment can be considered with the help of the model. On the whole, the application of these modern methods of simulation creates preconditions for the controlling of the process of dry port development, i.e. making managerial changes and identifying the most stable parameters that contribute to the optimal alternative scenarios of the project realization in the uncertain environment. System dynamics model allows analyzing the interactions in the most complex mechanism of risk management process of the dry ports development and making proposals for the improvement of the effectiveness of the investments via an estimation of different risk management strategies. For the comparison and ranking of these alternatives in their order of preference to the investor, the proposed indicators of the efficiency of the investments, concerning the NPV, DPP, and coefficient of variation, can be used. Thus, rational investors, who averse to taking increased risks unless they are compensated by the commensurate increase in the expected utility of a risky prospect of dry port development, can be guided by the deduced marginal utility of investments. It is computed on the ground of the results from the system dynamics model. In conclusion, the outlined theoretical and practical implications for the management of risks, which are the key characteristics of public-private partnerships, can help analysts and planning managers in budget decision-making, substantially alleviating the effect from various risks and avoiding unnecessary cost overruns in dry port projects.

Retos del Puerto de Santa Marta con los TLC

El presente trabajo es un trabajo de investigación en el sector de transporte marítimo de la ciudad de Santa Marta en el departamento del Magdalena, abarcando también los otras regiones de la Región Caribe colombiana, con el objetivo de analizar la competitividad de estás entre sí, específicamente en estos momentos que están entrando en vigencia varios Tratados de Libre Comercio TLC con diferentes países. De esta manera, analizando la información, se generarán estrategias que permitan hacer del sector portuario un actividad económica más efectiva y aprovechando los recursos, capacidades y oportunidades de progreso, crecimiento e inversión tecnológica y ocupacional, articulando los programas de gobierno con una transformación de la visión sobre la industria para lograr hacerla competitiva internacionalmente. Para esto, se lleva a cabo una investigación exhaustiva del manejo del puerto en Santa Marta que en este caso es la Sociedad Portuaria de Santa Marta, un análisis de estadísticas e indicadores que reflejan la situación actual del sector. Sucede los otros puertos situados en la Región Caribe, de tal manera que se conviertan en la base, junto con la normatividad del sector, para atender y enlazar la inversión que está haciendo tanto el gobierno como empresas privadas, junto con la creciente demanda del sector.

Análisis comparativo de la situación actual de los puertos secos en tres contextos diferentes: Colombia, México, España

El presente trabajo tiene como finalidad analizar y comparar Puertos Secos en tres países diferentes: Colombia, México y España; y con ello determinar las claves o herramientas para el éxito de estos. Para esto, la investigación se llevó a cabo a nivel documental y teórico, abarcando desde documentos de investigación académicos y de entidades supranacionales, hasta documentos de carácter legislativo de diferente orden, para los tres países de estudio, incluyendo estudios privados y herramientas estadísticas propias de los Puertos Secos o sus empresas concesionarias. Gracias a todo esto, se pudo desarrollar el documento con la siguiente estructura: Historia, Referencias, Legislación y Descripción. En la primera etapa, resalta el enfoque de desarrollo portuario y de promoción del tren como medio de transporte y herramienta comercial; en la segunda etapa, se corrobora la dificultad que estos proyectos enfrentan en Colombia por parte del sector público centralista y carente de visión y una precaria participación del sector privado; en la tercera etapa se ratifica esto al ser la principal diferencia el enfoque logístico en la legislación, partiendo de la constitución misma, y su presencia o ausencia en los marcos legales de cada país; y se termina con el resultado de estos elementos previos condensado en elementos tangibles en México y España, y tan solo ilusiones y fracasos para Colombia. Por todo lo anterior, se llega a la conclusión que un Marco Jurídico bien estructurado, una fuerte Inversión del Sector Público y Privado, y una Voluntad Política de largo impulso son las claves para el éxito de estos proyectos, y todo lo que viene ligado a ellos.

Using Habitat Equivalency Analysis to Assess the Cost Effectiveness of Restoration Outcomes in Four Institutional Contexts

At the national level, with a fixed amount of resources available for public investment in the restoration of biodiversity, it is difficult to prioritize alternative restoration projects. One way to do this is to assess the level of ecosystem services delivered by these projects and to compare them with their costs. The challenge is to derive a common unit of measurement for ecosystem services in order to compare projects which are carried out in different institutional contexts having different goals (application of environmental laws, management of natural reserves, etc.). This paper assesses the use of habitat equivalency analysis (HEA) as a tool to evaluate ecosystem services provided by restoration projects developed in different institutional contexts. This tool was initially developed to quantify the level of ecosystem services required to compensate for non-market impacts coming from accidental pollution in the US. In this paper, HEA is used to assess the cost effectiveness of several restoration projects in relation to different environmental policies, using case studies based in France. Four case studies were used: the creation of a market for wetlands, public acceptance of a port development project, the rehabilitation of marshes to mitigate nitrate loading to the sea, and the restoration of streams in a protected area. Our main conclusion is that HEA can provide a simple tool to clarify the objectives of restoration projects, to compare the cost and effectiveness of these projects, and to carry out trade-offs, without requiring significant amounts of human or technical resources.

Prospectiva portuaria, gestión e importancia en el desarrollo socioeconómico del Caribe de Costa Rica

A través de la Comisión de Regionalización Interuniversitaria (CRI); representada por la Universidad Nacional (UNA); el Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica; la Universidad de Costa Rica y la Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED) se realizaron encuentros entre 2008 y 2009; con la participación de instituciones y actores sociales de la región Atlántica de Costa Rica; para dialogar sobre la situación actual de la infraestructura; la gestión de los puertos; la importancia social y económico de los puertos en el desarrollo de la región para fortalecer procesos de descentralización y crear agendas compartidas a fin de aprovechar las oportunidades que se abren en la región. Este documento presenta aportes sobre el contexto de la discusión y sobre los temas más relevantes que proponen los diferentes actores.AbstractThrough the Inter-University Committee on Regionalization (CRI); represented by the National University (UNA); the Technological Institute of Costa Rica; the University of Costa Rica and the Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED) meetings were held between 2008 and 2009 with the participation of institutions and stakeholders in the Atlantic region of Costa Rica; to discuss the current state of infrastructure; port management; the social and economic importance of ports in the development of the region. It opened spaces for dialogue on the situation of the ports of Limon and the difficulties in strengthening decentralization and create shared agenda between different parts to take advantage of the opportunities available in the region. This paper presents contributions on the context of the discussion and the most relevant topics proposed by different actors.

Informe del Décimo Período de Sesiones del Comité de Desarrollo y Cooperación del Caribe, Puerto España, Trinidad y Tabago, 27 a 29 de octubre de 1987 = Report of the Tenth Session of the Caribbean Development and Co-operation Committee, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, 27-29 October 1987

Contiene resumen de las decisiones y recomendaciones, organizacion del periodo de sesiones, resumen de los documentos, resoluciones adoptadas y lista de participantes.

Informe del Octavo Período de Sesiones del Comité de Desarrollo y Cooperación del Caribe, Puerto Príncipe, Haití, 6 al 12 de junio de 1984 = Report of the Eighth Session of the Caribbean Development and Co-operation Committee, Port-au-Prince, Haiti, 6-12 June 1984

Presenta la organizacion de la reunion, el resumen de los debates, conclusiones y recomendaciones sobre los temas: ejecucion del programa de trabajo del CDCC desde el 7o periodo de sesiones; proyecto de programa de trabajo para el bienio 1986-1987; accion sobre resoluciones aprobadas en el 6o y 7o periodo de sesiones del CDCC; resoluciones de CEPAL que tienen consecuencias para el CDCC; y admision de las Islas Virgenes Britanicas y las Islas Virgenes de Estados Unidos como miembros asociados del CDCC.

Informe de la Segunda Reunión del Comité Examinador del Comité de Desarrollo y Cooperación del Caribe (CDCC), Puerto España, 20 febrero 1986 = Report of the Second Meeting of the Review Committee of the Caribbean Development and Co-operation Committee (CDCC), Port-of-Spain, 20 February 1986 = Rapport de la Deuxième Réunion du Comité d'Examen du CDCC, Port-of-Spain, 20 février 1986

Informe de la reunion que tuvo por objetivo principal examinar las actividades de los organismos especializados y otros organos en relacion con el programa de trabajo del CDCC en lo que concierne a la coordinacion del programa.