Untersuchungen zur Fachsprache der Ökologie und des Umweltschutzes im Deutschen und Finnischen : Bezeichnungsvarianten unter einem geschichtlichen, lexikographischen, morphologischen und linguistisch-pragmatischen Aspekt

The work integrates research in the language and terminology of various fields with lexicography, etymology, semantics, word formation, and pragmatics. Additionally, examination of German and Finnish provides the work with perspective of contrastive linguistics and the translation of texts in specialized fields. The work is an attempt to chart the language, vocabulary, different textual types, and essential communication-connected features of this special field. The study is primary concerned with internal communication within the field of ecology, but it also provides a comparison of the public discussion of environmental issues in Germany and Finland. The work attempts to use textual signs to provide a picture of the literary communication used on the different vertical levels in the central text types within the field. The dictionaries in the fields of environmental issues and ecology for the individual text types are examined primarily from the perspective of their quantity and diversity. One central point of the work is to clarify and collect all of the dictionaries in the field that have been compiled thus far in which German and/or Finnish ware included. Ecology and environmental protection are closely linked not only to each other but also to many other scientific fields. Consequently, the language of the environmental field has acquired an abundance of influences and vocabulary from the language of the special fields close to it as well as from that of politics and various areas of public administration. The work also demonstrates how the popularization of environmental terminology often leads to semantic distortion. Traditionally, scientific texts have used the smallest number of expressions, the purpose of which is to appeal to or influence the behavior of the text recipient. Particularly in Germany, those who support or oppose measures to protect the environment have long been making concerted efforts to represent their own views in the language that they use. When discussing controversial issues competing designations for the same referent or concept are used in accordance with the interest group to which the speaker belongs. One of the objectives of the study is to sensitize recipients of texts to notice the euphemistic expressions that occur in German and Finnish texts dealing with issues that are sensitive from the standpoint of environmental policy. One particular feature of the field is the wealth and large number of variants designating the same entry or concept. The terminological doublets formed by words of foreign origin and their German or Finnish language equivalents are quite typical of the field. Methods of corpus linguistics are used to determine the reasons for the large number of variant designations as well as their functionality.

Ketkä pääsevät taivaaseen? : Kirkon maahanmuuttajatyöntekijöiden uskontoteologia pelastuksen näkökulmasta

Tutkin tässä tutkielmassa Suomen evankelis-luterilaisen kirkon maahanmuuttajatyöntekijöiden uskontoteologiaa. Maahanmuuttajatyöntekijät ovat koulutukseltaan pappeja ja diakoniatyöntekijöitä. Uskontoteologia taas käsittelee sitä, miten maailman uskonnollinen moninaisuus hahmottuu tietyn uskonnon näkökulmasta. Tarkastelen uskontoteologiaa kristillisen pelastusopin näkökulmasta, koska oppi on keskeinen sekä luterilaisessa perinteessä että uskontoteologian teoreettisessa keskustelussa. Keräsin tutkimusaineiston sähköisen kyselyn avulla marraskuussa 2009. Kysely sisälsi 12 avointa kysymystä sekä monivalintatehtäviä. Kyselyyn vastasi 45 kirkon maahanmuuttajatyöntekijää. Analysoin aineiston laadullisen sisällönanalyysin avulla. Tutkimusaineisto kertoi monipuolisesti kirkon maahanmuuttajatyöstä. Työssä tavattiin monien uskontojen edustajia ja sitä toteutettiin eri tavoin seurakuntatyöstä yhteiskunnalliseen vaikuttamiseen. Työ koettiin hyvin käytännönläheiseksi. Pelastusta pohdittiin, mutta se ei useinkaan ollut keskustelunaiheena. Opillinen keskustelu nähtiin helpompana maahanmuuttajien kuin uskontokriittisten suomalaisten kanssa. Pelastusta pidettiin kuitenkin tärkeänä kristillisenä oppina. Opin koettiin olevan merkittävä sekä tämän- että tuonpuolisen elämän kannalta. Vastaajien näkemykset pelastumisen tavoista mukailivat luterilaista oppia, joskin erilaisia tulkintojakin esiintyi. Maailman uskonnollista moninaisuutta selitettiin ihmisen tai Jumalan ominaisuuksiin tai historiallisiin tekijöiden vedoten. Osa vastaajista näki pelastuksen mahdollisena myös kristinuskon ulkopuolella, osa ei. Joidenkin mukaan pelastus toteutuu eri tavalla tai vain osittain muissa uskonnoissa. Sekä muiden uskontojen edustajiin että uskonnottomiin ja ateisteihin haluttiin suhtautua kunnioittavasti ja rakastavasti. Oman vakaumuksen vaaliminen koettiin tärkeänä. Kristinuskoa haluttiin tuoda esiin sopivaksi katsotuissa tilanteissa ja tasa-arvoisessa vuoropuhelussa. Kiteytin kirkon maahanmuuttajatyöntekijöiden näkemykset pelastuksen tarpeesta ja mahdollisuudesta yhteys-käsitteen ympärille. Vastaajat näkivät ihmisen kaipaavan pelastusta erosta takaisin yhteyteen itsensä, muiden ihmisten ja Jumalan kanssa. Tätä prosessia kuvattiin erilaisin termein, esimerkiksi puhumalla Jeesuksesta tai mielenrauhasta. Lähes kaikki vastaajat korostivat ennemmin ihmisten kuin uskontojen kohtaamista. Niin taivasta kuin pääsemistä tärkeämpänä näyttäytyi yhteinen matkanteko.

Democratic Legitimacy and the Politics of Rights : A comparative analysis of the conceptual relationship between democracy and rights in contemporary political theories

Democratic Legitimacy and the Politics of Rights is a research in normative political theory, based on comparative analysis of contemporary democratic theories, classified roughly as conventional liberal, deliberative democratic and radical democratic. Its focus is on the conceptual relationship between alternative sources of democratic legitimacy: democratic inclusion and liberal rights. The relationship between rights and democracy is studied through the following questions: are rights to be seen as external constraints to democracy or as objects of democratic decision making processes? Are individual rights threatened by public participation in politics; do constitutionally protected rights limit the inclusiveness of democratic processes? Are liberal values such as individuality, autonomy and liberty; and democratic values such as equality, inclusion and popular sovereignty mutually conflictual or supportive? Analyzing feminist critique of liberal discourse, the dissertation also raises the question about Enlightenment ideals in current political debates: are the universal norms of liberal democracy inherently dependent on the rationalist grand narratives of modernity and incompatible with the ideal of diversity? Part I of the thesis introduces the sources of democratic legitimacy as presented in the alternative democratic models. Part II analyses how the relationship between rights and democracy is theorized in them. Part III contains arguments by feminists and radical democrats against the tenets of universalist liberal democratic models and responds to that critique by partly endorsing, partly rejecting it. The central argument promoted in the thesis is that while the deconstruction of modern rationalism indicates that rights are political constructions as opposed to externally given moral constraints to politics, this insight does not delegitimize the politics of universal rights as an inherent part of democratic institutions. The research indicates that democracy and universal individual rights are mutually interdependent rather than oppositional; and that democracy is more dependent on an unconditional protection of universal individual rights when it is conceived as inclusive, participatory and plural; as opposed to robust majoritarian rule. The central concepts are: liberalism, democracy, legitimacy, deliberation, inclusion, equality, diversity, conflict, public sphere, rights, individualism, universalism and contextuality. The authors discussed are e.g. John Rawls, Jürgen Habermas, Seyla Benhabib, Iris Young, Chantal Mouffe and Stephen Holmes. The research focuses on contemporary political theory, but the more classical work of John S. Mill, Benjamin Constant, Isaiah Berlin and Hannah Arendt is also included.

Yhteinen verkosto? : Tutkimus nuorten syrjäytymistä ehkäisevistä poikkihallinnollisista ryhmistä

Since the 1990s, European policy strategies have stressed the mutual responsibility and joint action of all societal branches in preventing social problems. Network policy is an integral part of the new governance that generates a new kind of dependency between the state and civil society in formulating and adhering to policy goals. Using empirical group interview data collected in Helsinki, the capital of Finland, this case study explores local multi-agency groups and their efforts to prevent the exclusion of children and young people. These groups consist mainly of professionals from the social office, youth clubs and schools. The study shows that these multi-agency groups serve as forums for professional negotiation where the intervention dilemma of liberal society can be addressed: the question of when it is justified and necessary for an authority or network to intervene in the life of children and their families, and how this is to be done. An element of tension in multi-agency prevention is introduced by the fact that its objectives and means are anchored both in the old tradition of the welfare state and in communitarian rhetoric. Thus multi-agency groups mend deficiencies in wellbeing and normalcy while at the same time try to co-ordinate the creation of the new community, which will hopefully reduce the burden on the public sector. Some of the professionals interviewed were keen to see new and even forceful interventions to guide the youth or to compel parents to assume their responsibilities. In group discussions, this approach often met resistance. The deeper the social problems that the professionals worked with, the more solidarity they showed for the families or the young people in need. Nothing seems to assure professionals and to legitimise their professional position better than advocating the under-privileged against the uncertainties of life and the structural inequalities of society. The groups that grappled with the clear, specific needs of certain children and families were the most capable of co-operation. This requires the approval of different powers and the expertise of distinct professions as well as a forum to negotiate case-specific actions in professional confidentiality. The ideals of primary prevention for everyone and value discussions alone fail to inspire sufficient multiagency co-operation. The ideal of a network seems to give word and shape to those societal goals that are difficult or even impossible to reach, but are nevertheless yearned for: mutual understanding of the good life, close social relationships, mutual trust and active agency for all citizens. Individualisation, the multiplicity of life styles and the possibility to choose have come true in such a way that the very idea of a mutual and binding network can be attained only momentarily and between restricted participants. In conclusion, uniting professional networks that negotiate intervention dilemmas with citizen networks based on changing compassions and feelings of moral superiority seems impossible. Rather, one should encourage openness to scrutiny among tangential or contradicting groups, networks and communities. Key words: network policy, prevention of exclusion, multi-agency groups, young people

Monietnisten ihmisten etninen identiteetti suomalaisessa viitekehyksessä : kosmopoliittisuutta, monikulttuurisuutta ja itsensä etsimistä

The purpose of this thesis was to understand the experiences of the multiethnic people in Finland. This study explored the different aspects of the ethnic identity development process. Thesis was done in two phases. First phase studied the question of how is the ethnic identity developed in Finnish context and what aspects had affected their ethnic identity process. The second phase explored questions as what kind of ethnic identity form the multiethnic people have in Finland and do they have developed cosmopolitan global identities. The aim of this qualitative study was not to empirically measure or define the multiethnic identity, but to open new perspectives of the life and experiences through narrative research. Intention of this thesis was to give voice to small stories of the minority people that are so often shadowed by the big stories of the male of the majority. The first phase of this study included narratives from four multiethnic women. The narratives answered to questions who am I and where do I come from. The second phase data collection was made with narrative forms to 12 self-identified multiethnic persons. The multiethnic people were from three backgrounds: ones with parents from different ethnic backgrounds, Finnish who had lived long time abroad and people from non-Finnish backgraound who had lived in Finland for a long time. The analyzing was made by analyzing the narratives with content analysis that based on the theory of the multiethnic people and by narrative analyzing where short narratives were created of each person. In conclusion the multiethnic identity was found to be a continuous process that lasted through lifetime. Different aspects affected the identification process, including family dynamics, social mirroring and belonging. The variety of different ethnic options in multiethnic person identity process, lacking family support for the both ethnic identities and the feeling of otherness experienced by the multiethnic people in Finland cause additional challenges to the ethnic identity process and results in some cases cultural homelessness. On the other hand the variety of cultural contexts brings flexibility to negotiate between different cultures and languages resulting to positive hybrid identity for some of the multiethnic people. Hybrid identity was sub grouped to cosmopolitan identity and multicultural identity.

Inkluderande teaterverksamhet. Nya möjligheter för socialt arbete

I denna pro gradu-avhandling granskas teaterns möjligheter att främja social inklusion. Genom att analysera vad drama och teater kan ge ungdomar och hur social inklusion bland unga i ett samfund kan främjas, belyses även frågan om hur socialt arbete och teater ömsesidigt kan berika varandra. Avhandlingen är en fallstudie av Half Moon Young People’s Theatre, en barn- och ungdomsteater i Tower Hamlets i östra London. Teatern arbetar med barn och unga med ett särskilt fokus på att engagera grupper som ofta marginaliserats, exempelvis på grund av sin kulturella bakgrund eller till följd av funktionshinder. I denna studie är fokus på Half Moons projekt riktade till tonåringar: Careers in Theatre, Speak Up och ungdomsteatergrupperna Lunar och Solar. Studien är kvalitativ och studiens empiriska data har främst samlats in genom deltagande observation, intervjuer och granskning av dokument. Det empiriska materialet visar på Half Moons aktiva arbete för mångfald och för att göra verksamheten och deltagandet tillgängligt för alla barn och unga. Teatern blir en mötesplats genom vilken ungdomarna kan lära sig acceptera och uppskatta mångfalden i samfundet. Teaterarbetet bidrar till en ökad känsla för samfundet och till tolerans och förståelse för andra. Det är en glädjefylld, trygg och meningsfull fritidsverksamhet där nya vänskapskontakter kan knytas och många färdigheter övas inför framtiden. Teaterarbetet ger deltagarna bekräftelse vilket bidrar till att självförtroendet växer. Personalens engagemang och osjälviska arbete för inklusion genomsyrar verksamheten. Möjligheten att ge alla en ny chans och ett jämlikt bemötande är centralt i teaterns arbete. Forskningsresultaten pekar på teaterns potential inom socialt arbete och för att främja inklusion. Teaterns möjligheter att öka klientens delaktighet och utveckla förhållandet mellan socialarbetare och klient visar på betydelsen av etablera dylik verksamhet inom socialt arbete. Att inte låta sig begränsas, utan förutsättningslöst samarbeta över sektorer ökar chanserna att finna nya kreativa idéer och verksamhetsformer.