Fitness to stand trial : how discourses of rationality, reasonableness and culpability inform the law and psychiatry to create standards of normal

The objective of this thesis is to demonstrate the importance of the concepts of rationality, reasonableness, culpability and autonomy that inform and support our conception of both the person and the punishable subject. A critical discourse analysis tracing these concepts through both the law and psychological tools used to evaluate the fitness of a person reveals that these concepts and their implied values are inconsistently applied to the mentally disordered who come into conflict with the law. I argue that the result of this inconsistency compromises a person's autonomy which is a contradiction to this concept as a foundational principle of the law. Ultimately, this thesis does not provide a solution to be employed in policy making, but its analysis leaves open possibilities for further exploration into the ways legal and social justice can be reconciled.

Judging Culpability in Dwyer’s Climate Change “Gaia Commission”: A Response to Dwyer

Commentaire / Commentary

O sujeito contemporâneo

RESUMO: Resumo Interrogamos com este trabalho a injunção contemporânea que nos obriga a todos a ser felizes como uma nova modalidade do Supereu freudiano ou, segundo os termos de Lacan, um novo imperativo de gozo. Eis por que um e outro, Freud e Lacan, continuam actuais no século XXI. ABSTRACT: We question with this work the contemporary injunction that compels us to be happy as a new freudian «super-ego» modality or, with the terms of Lacan, a new «imperative of jouissance». This is why Freud and Lacan are still referential authors in the twenty-firstcentury.

A dispensa de prestação de garantia em processo de execução fiscal e a prova de factos negativos da inexistência ou insuficiência de bens do executado

Dissertação de mestrado em Direito Tributário e Fiscal

Donor's and organ representations in liver, kidney, heart and lung transplantation : a qualitative longitudinal study

Purpose: Organ transplantation is a biological and psychological challenge and graft acceptance is an important achievement for patients. Patients' concerns toward the deceased donor and the organ may contribute to this process. Method: Forty-seven patients involved in heart (N=9), liver (N=8), lung (N=14) and kidney (N=16) transplantation participated in IRB-approved longitudinal semi-structured interviews: (T1) registered on the waiting-list, (T2) six months and (T3) twelve months after transplantation. Qualitative pattern analysis (QUAPA) was carried out on the verbatim transcripts and concerns about the donor and the organ were then analysed. Results: - Donor's representation: At T1, patients were reluctant to talk about the donor: 27% expressed culpability and 19% accepted the clause of anonymity. At T2, intense emotions were associated with the reminiscing about the donor and 45% highlighted the generosity of his/her act. In addition, heart, lung and kidney recipients were concerned about the donor's identity: 42% challenged the clause of anonymity. Liver recipients complained about anonymity, but could nevertheless cope with it. At T3, 47% of heart, lung and kidney recipients thought daily of the donor and 33% were still looking for information about him/her. Liver recipients rarely have thoughts about the donor. - Organ representation: At T1, organ descriptions were biomedical (49% of the interviewees) and more rarely, mainly heart candidates, referred to the symbolic meaning of the organ. After transplantation (T2-T3), function was underlined. Acceptance and organ integration were associated with post-operative outcomes (23%) and psychological well-being (45%). Some patients (32%) inferred the donor's personality from the organ quality and felt privileged having received an organ in such a good state. Conclusion: Donor's representations should be explored during the transplantation process as they play an important role in the psychological acceptance of the graft.

The experience of transplantation for patients and their significant ones: A difficult encounter of two worlds

Objectives This paper reports on a longitudinal qualitative study exploring concerns of 60 patients before and after transplantation. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted without time constraints in a protected space out of the hospital. Qualitative analysis was performed. Results Prior to transplantation, all patients talked freely about negative feelings, stigmatisation, being misunderstood by others, loneliness and culpability caused by increasing physical dependency or abandoned roles. They mentioned alternative ways to cope (magic, spirituality), and even expressed their right to let go. In a subset of 13 patients, significant ones allowed themselves in the interview, or were integrated on the request of the patients. In this modified setting, two illness-worlds were confronted. If common themes were mentioned (e.g., modified life plans, restricted space, physical and psychological barriers), they were experienced differently. Fear of transplantation or guilt towards the donors was overtly expressed, often for the first time. Mutual hiding of anxiety in order to protect loved ones or to prevent loss of control was disclosed. The significant ones talked about accumulated stress and exhaustion related to the physical degradation of the patient, fear of the unpredictable evolution of illness and financial problems, and stressed their difficulty to adapt adequately to the fluctuating state of the patient. After transplantation, other themes emerged, where difficulty in disclosure was observed: intensive care and near death experiences, being a transplanted person, debt to the donor and his/her family, fear of rejection. Conclusions With the self-imposed strategy of hiding concerns to protect one another, a discrepancy between two illness-worlds was created. When concerns were confronted during the interviews, a new mutual understanding emerged. Patients and their families stated the need for sharing concerns in the course of illness.

Bridging the Conceptualization of Youth with Intellectual Disabilities to Sentencing under the YCJA

The current study examined how disability and the concepts of risk, need and responsivity are understood by criminal justice professionals and inform their perceptions of young offenders with ID at sentencing under the ‘different but equal’ philosophy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 lawyers and 8 mental health workers across 6 major urban areas in Ontario. Participants primarily perceived ID through a medical discourse, overlooking social and structural barriers that, in some cases, may hinder adherence to sentencing dispositions. Specifically, participants discussed balancing the reduced culpability of offenders (e.g., intent) – justifying lenient sentencing – with public safety concerns (i.e., ID viewed as a barrier to rehabilitation) – justifying increasing the severity of sentences. Participants assessed clients with ID and their risks, needs and responsivity within the context of other legal factors: criminal history, severity of the offence, and YCJA objectives. Participants articulated the importance of tailored courthouse identification programs, services/funding, and education/training.

Étude de l’attribution de la responsabilité chez des adolescents auteurs d’agression sexuelle : facteurs explicatifs et prise en charge

La présente recherche porte sur « l’attribution de la responsabilité » auprès d’une population de 166 adolescents auteurs d’agression sexuelle âgés de 12 à 19 ans. Le but premier de cette investigation est de déterminer quels aspects psychologiques (âge, stress post-traumatique, distorsion cognitive, estime de soi, aliénation, immaturité) influencent trois types d’attributions de la responsabilité, soit la culpabilité, l’attribution externe et l’attribution interne, et ainsi sur quels niveaux focaliser le traitement. Les résultats des régressions multiples ont mis en avant deux modèles. Pour le modèle prédisant la culpabilité, une seule composante est retenue, le stress post-traumatique. Ce modèle explique 26% (ajusté) de la variance de la culpabilité (R2=0,29, F(6,120)=8,35, p<0,01). Le modèle prédisant l’attribution externe est composé de l’âge et des distorsions cognitives et permet d’expliquer 25% (ajusté) de la variance (R2=0,28, F(6,122)=8,03, p<0,01). L’attribution interne ne présente aucune corrélation avec les variables étudiées. Le deuxième objectif est d’estimer l’efficacité de la prise en charge du jeune pour modifier l’attribution de responsabilité, selon les différentes modalités qui sont le « milieu de prise en charge », la « durée du traitement » et « l’approche thérapeutique » afin de choisir le programme le plus adéquat. En utilisant l’analyse de la variance (ANOVA), il a été possible de déterminer qu’aucune de ces modalités n’influence l’attribution de la responsabilité. Cette étude présente des limites, notamment la puissance statistique. Comme piste pour de futures recherches, le lien entre l’attribution de la responsabilité et la récidive pourrait être examiné.

Arqueología micropolítica del discurso bibliotecario. La biblioteca escolar ecológica productora de nueva subjetividad : su efecto en las redes sociales y bases de datos documentales.

El análisis micropolítico de los Discursos Bibliotecarios (DB) desinviste a las maquinas codificadoras de las misiones, que la institución bibliotecaria reproduce como valor agregado ligado a un modo de ser con base territorial; desmonta las máquinas axiomáticas de los manifiestos bibliotecarios que producen un valor agregado incluyendo forzadamente como deudores de conocimiento a los que no dominan el saber acumulado; y revela el valor agregado del capitalismo mundial integrado (CMI) que instaura procedimientos tácticos cada vez mas autoreferenciales (normas, pautas y directrices). En oposición a esos dispositivos de alineación, culpabilización, responsabilización y control, proponemos un proceso de singularización bibliotecaria en función de la producción de información ambiental en una Biblioteca Escolar Ecológica en conexión con redes sociales y bases de datos documentales.

When rules and principles are not enough: insiders’ views and narratives on the global financial crisis

Much has been written about Wall Street and the global financial crisis (GFC). From a fraudulent derivatives market to a contestable culture of banking bonuses, culpability has been examined within the frames of American praxis, namely that of American exceptionalism. This study begins with an exploratory analysis of non-US voices concerning the nature of the causes of the GFC. The analysis provides glimpses of the globalized extent of assumptions shared, but not debated within the globalization convergence of financial markets as the neo-liberal project. Practical and paradigmatic tensions are revealed in the capture of a London-based set of views articulated by senior financial executives of financial service organizations, the outcomes of which are not overly optimistic for any significant change in praxis within the immediate future.

La notion de la faute et le degré de culpabilité dansPhèdre. : Une étude comparative de la faute dans les différentspersonnages de Phèdre dans : Euripide, Sénèque et JeanRacine.

L’objectif majeur de ce mémoire est d’étudier la notion de la faute et le degré deculpabilité dans les tragédies inspirées du personnage de Phèdre. Nous allonsanalyser la notion de la faute et ses conséquences dans trois différentes tragédies àsavoir Hippolyte d’Euripide, Phèdre de Sénèque et celle du même titre de JeanRacine. Nous allons faire une étude comparative entre les trois versions enmontrant les ressemblances et les différences dans le traitement de la faute. Enfin,on va voir comment la faute commise volontairement pousse une personne à secondamner elle-même.

Fundamentos do poder administrativo sancionador : o exame da culpabilidade na infração administrativa

Este trabalho aborda a atividade sancionadora da Administração Pública e a necessidade de apreciação da culpabilidade para aplicação da sanção administrativa. Procede-se a uma análise dos fundamentos e conteúdo do Poder Sancionador da Administração Pública, em especial à culpabilidade do agente como elemento da infração administrativa. Defende-se, como regra, a necessidade de apreciação do elemento subjetivo do agente para aplicação da sanção administrativa, sob a ótica constitucional, enquanto garantia do administrado e decorrência da dignidade da pessoa humana.

Diagnostic de securite d'une entreprise bresilienne a partir de l'analyse des accidents du travail par la methode de l'arbre des causes

We present here the results of a study of 21 work-related accidents that occurred in a Brazilian manufacturing company. The aim was to assess the safety level of the company to improve its work accident prevention policy. In the last 6 months of 1992 and 1993, all accidents resulting in 15 days' absence from work, reported for social security purposes, were analyzed using the INRS causal tree method (ADC) and a questionnaire completed on site. Potential risk factors for accidents were identified based on the specific factors highlighted by the ADC. More universal trees were also compiled for the safety assessment. Three hundred and thirty specific accident factors were recorded (man of 15.71 per accident). This is consistent with there being multiple causes of accidents rather than the assertion of Brazilian business safety departments that accidents are due to 'dangerous' or 'unsafe' behavior. Introducing the idea of culpability into accidents prevents the implementation of an appropriate information feedback process, essential for effective prevention. However, the large number of accidents related to 'material' (78%) and 'environment' (70%) indicates that working conditions are poor. This shows that the technical risks, mostly due to unsafe machinery and equipment are not being dealt with. Seventy-five potential accident factors were identified. Of these, 35% were 'organizational', a high proportion for the company studied. Improvisation occurs at all levels, particularly at the organizational level. This is, thus a major determinant for entire series of, if not most, accident situations. The poor condition of equipment also plays a major role in accidents. The effects of poor equipment on safety exacerbate the organizational shortcomings. The company's safety intervention policy should improve the management of human resources (rules designating particular workers for particular workstations; instructions for the safe operation of machines and equipment; training of operators, etc.) and introduce programs to detect risks and to improve the safety of machines and equipment. We also recommend the establishment of a program to follow the results of any preventive measures adopted.

Diagnostic de sécurité d’une entreprise brésilienne à partir de l’analyse des accidents du travail par la méthode de l’arbre des causes

We present here the results of a study of 21 work-related accidents that occurred in a Brazilian manufacturing company. The aim was to assess the safety level of the company to improve its work accident prevention policy. In the last 6 months of 1992 and 1993, all accidents resulting in 15 days' absence from work, reported for social security purposes, were analyzed using the INRS causal tree method (ADC) and a questionnaire completed on site. Potential risk factors for accidents were identified based on the specific factors highlighted by the ADC. More universal trees were also compiled for the safety assessment. Three hundred and thirty specific accident factors were recorded (mean of 15.71 per accident). This is consistent with there being multiple causes of accidents rather than the assertion of Brazilian business safety departments that accidents are due to dangerous or unsafe behavior. Introducing the idea of culpability into accidents prevents the implementation of an appropriate information feedback process, essential for effective prevention. However, the large number of accidents related to material (78%) and environment (70%) indicates that working conditions are poor. This shows that the technical risks, mostly due to unsafe machinery and equipment are not being dealt with. Seventy-five potential accident factors were identified. Of these, 35% were organizational, a high proportion for the company studied. Improvisation occurs at all levels, particularly at the organizational level. This is thus a major determinant for entire series of, if not most, accident situations. The poor condition of equipment also plays a major role in accidents. The effects of poor equipment on safety exacerbate the organizational shortcomings. The company's safety intervention policy should improve the management of human resources (rules designating particular workers for particular workstations; instructions for the safe operation of machines and equipment; training of operators, etc.) and introduce programs to detect risks and to improve the safety of machines and equipment. We also recommend the establishment of a program to follow the results of any preventive measures adopted.

O linchamento de Edson Neris da Silva: reelaborações identitárias dos skinheads carecas do Brasil na sociedade paulista contemporânea

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)