Bilateralism and regionalism: re-establishing the primacy of multilateralism a Latin American and Caribbean perspective

Includes bibliography

Structure as Process: The Regularized Intergovernmentalism of Franco-German Bilateralism, CES Germany & Europe Working Papers, No.02.3, 2002

This article systematically scrutinizes the intergovernmental and administrative aspects of Franco- German relations with the 1963 Elysée Treaty at their core. This treaty, together with its various additions and extensions, has defined the basic processes of bilateral interaction between the French and German states. Recurrent tension in Franco-German relations notwithstanding, many observers and participants have viewed France and Germany to be connected particularly closely since the 1960s. This article explores key elements of what it is that links France and Germany. Thereby it clarifies the concept of regularized intergovernmentalism, suggests viewing this specific set of international practices from a social-structural perspective, and evaluates the effects and limits of such regularized procedures. Its findings suggest that bilateral structures have complemented and undergirded a broadly multilateral post-World War II world and are likely to continue to do.

Managing under bilateralism : a supervisor's guide.

Cover title.

The evolving landscape of natural resource planning and governance in Australia

Australia’s governance of land and natural resources involves multiple polycentric domains of decision-making from global through to local levels. Although certainly complex, these arrangements have not necessarily translated into better decision-making or better environmental outcomes as evidenced by the growing concerns over the health and future of the Great Barrier Reef, (GBR). However within this system, arrangements for natural resource management (NRM) and reef water quality, which both use Australia’s integrated regional NRM model, have showed signs of improving decision-making and environmental outcomes in the GBR. In this paper we describe the latest evolutions in the governance and planning for natural resource use and management in Australia. We begin by reviewing the experience with first generation NRM as published in major audits and evaluations. As our primary interest is the health and future of the GBR, we then consider the impact of changes of second generation planning and governance outcomes in Queensland. We find that first generation plans, although developed under a relatively cohesive governance context, faced substantial problems in target setting, implementation, monitoring and review. Despite this, they were able to progress improvements in water quality in the Great Barrier Reef Regions. Second generation plans, currently being developed, face an even greater risk of failure due to the lack of bilateralism and cross-sectoral cooperation across the NRM governance system. The findings highlight the critical need to re-build and enhance the regional NRM model for NRM planning to have a positive impact on environmental outcomes in the GBR.

Os investimentos estrangeiros e comércio internacional: uma análise comparativa e sua complementaridade

O comércio internacional vem desempenhando um papel cada vez mais vital no cenário da economia mundial. O fluxo de investimentos estrangeiros vem crescendo exponencialmente com potencial de gerar desenvolvimento econômico e oportunidades de lucro para os investidores. O crescimento da importância dessas duas disciplinas desafia as regras do Direito Internacional. Por um lado, o Direito Internacional dos Investimentos objeto de críticas em virtude da fragmentação normativa gerada pelo bilateralismo. Por outro lado, o Direito do Comércio Internacional consagrado através do multilateralismo da Organização Mundial do Comércio considerado, por muitos, como ultrapassado. As tentativas de regular em nível multilateral os investimentos estrangeiros restaram fracassadas e o existente sistema multilateral no comércio internacional rechaçado. Nessa dualidade entre investimentos estrangeiros e comércio internacional resta duvidoso o seu caráter de complementaridade. No entanto, a crescente e inegável interconexão entre investimentos estrangeiros e comércio internacional não somente representa um desenvolvimento para o panorama normativo de ambos, como também, contribui para o crescimento do padrão de tratamento, desenvolvimento econômico e trocas comerciais. Deixa de se tratar de uma relação entre duas disciplinas isoladas que, na verdade, são elementos complementares que devem ser desenvolvidos em conjunto para um crescimento econômico mais avançado e um desenvolvimento contributivo.

On Cherry-Picking ... or Trying to Have One’s Cake and Eating It: past principles and practice in the pursuit of an alternative to [full] EU membership

With the United Kingdom’s continued membership of the EU being increasingly questioned and the Prime Minister, David Cameron, committed to 're-negotiate’ the terms of membership, consideration is being given to what forms alternatives to [full] membership may take. While much current discussion focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of particular existing arrangements (e.g. European Economic Area, Swiss bilateralism), this paper examines the broader principles and practices that have to date underpinned – and undermined – EU’s attempts to develop alternatives to [full] EU membership. Drawing on an analysis of the evolution of association as an alternative to membership, the paper assesses the principled, practical and political limitations the EU faces – and imposes on itself – in offering an acceptable balance of rights and obligations to states not wishing to assume the mantle of full membership. In its assessment the paper considers various proposed models of affiliate and associate membership. It also situates consideration of the UK case in the broader context of the EU’s relations with other European non-member states for which membership may not be achievable and for which alternatives to membership (e.g. a form of privileged partnership) have been proposed. In doing so, the paper reflects on the precedent-setting consequences of any arrangement that the EU might reach with any state re-negotiating membership or withdrawing.

On the Limits of Exceptionalism: Principles and Practice in the Pursuit of Alternatives to Full EU Membership

Few states have been less uncomfortable with the relationship they have with the EU than the United Kingdom as a member and Turkey as an associate and would-be member. Both states currently find themselves questioning the substance and future of these relationships with domestic actors and, notably in the Turkish case, external EU voices actively advocating alternatives. While much discussion, particularly in the UK case, has focused on the advantages and disadvantages of particular existing arrangements (e.g. European Economic Area, Swiss bilateralism), this paper considers the broader principles and practices that the EU has to date either explicitly developed or implicitly established to govern the nature and substance of alternatives to [full] EU membership. It assesses the principled, practical and political limitations that exist in establishing alternatives to full membership for states seeking – or having sought for them – the accommodation of their exceptionalism. In doing so the paper considers the potential limits to a renegotiated EU membership for the UK and to an alternative short of full membership for Turkey. It also reflects on the precedent-setting consequences of any new arrangements that the EU might reach with either state for what forms membership and a relationship short of membership might take in the future.

Análisis de la tendencia a la bilateralización y la fragmentación de la normatividad internacional: caso injerencia de algunos estados en la redacción del proyecto de las Naciones Unidas relativo a la responsabilidad internacional de los estados por el hecho internacionalmente ilícito (2001).

El presente estudio de caso analiza la tendencia a la fragmentación del derecho internacional desde la ciencia política y el derecho internacional y su relación con la injerencia de los Estados en la redacción del Proyecto de Responsabilidad del Estado por el Hecho Internacionalmente Ilícito, el cual estudia como documento legal y posible modelo de análisis político internacional. El texto busca definir la tendencia a la fragmentación del derecho internacional, analiza la injerencia del Estado en el Proyecto a favor de las tesis bilateralistas en razón de su interés nacional, como manifestación de esa tendencia y ofrece evidencia de la participación e injerencia del Estado respecto al trabajo de la Comisión de Derecho Internacional.