Russell on the power and duty of an arbitrator and the law of submissions and awards : and references under order of court, with an appendix of forms, precedents, and statutes.

Mode of access: Internet.

Arbitration between Peru and Chile. The case of Peru in the matter of the controversy arising out of the question of the Pacific, before the President of the United States of America, arbitrator, under the protocol and supplementary act between the Republic of Chile, signed July 20, 1922, at Washington, D.C., ratified January 15, 1923.

Includes documents in Spanish and English.

Arbitration between Peru and Chile. The counter case of Peru in the matter of the controversy arising out of the question of the Pacific, before the President of the United States of America, arbitrator, under the protocol and supplementary act between the Republic of Peru and the Republic of Chile, signed July 20, 1922 at Washington, D.C. ratified January 15, 1923.

Binder's title: Peruvian-Chilean arbitration. Appendix to the counter case of Peru.

Tacna-Arica arbitration. The case of the republic of Chile, submitted to the President of the United States as arbitrator under the provisions of the protocol and supplementary agreement entered into between Chile and Peru at Washington on July 20, 1922.

Mode of access: Internet.

Diagrams annexed to the arguement of Costa Rica before the arbitrator Hon. Edward Douglass White, Chief Justice of the United States : under the provisions of the convention between the republic of Costa Rica and the Republic of Panama, concluded March 17, 1910.

At head of title: Costa Rica-Panama arbitration.

The Arbitrator

"A monthly digest of news of social significance." (varies)

The Arbitrator

Journal of the International Arbitration League

A arbitragem como alternativa para diminuir a morosidade do sistema judiciário brasileiro

This thesis is about arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution, as a solution for the slowness of the Brazilian Judiciary. The paper starts with an approach of the fundamental rights, highlighting their positivation, important to distinguish them from human rights, the four dimensions of the fundamental rights and, lastly, the analysis of their features, emphasizing their characters of complementarity and universality. After, it starts to discourse about the “access to Justice”, an important fundamental right, and, to delimitate the role of the Judiciary and the problems related to solve cases in a reasonable amount of time. Next, it exposes other alternative forms of dispute resolutions that, like the arbitration, can help to the concretization of a faster and more effective Justice. Then, it discusses the historical evolution of the arbitration in Brazil, highlighting the contemporary features of the institute, which were more visible with the ratification of the New York Convention and the promulgation of Law nº 9.307/1996. In addition, it analyses the possible changes that will come with the New Brazilian Procedure Law Code and the PL 7.108/2014, intended to change the current Arbitration Law. It also explains the main arbitration attributes, describing the peculiarities of the arbitral convention, the arbitrator role, and the arbitral award aspects. At least, it lists the main reasons someone should choose arbitration instead the Judiciary, considering the Brazilian Courts reality.

Relatório de estágio no Centro de Arbitragem Comercial da Câmara de Comércio e Indústria Portuguesa

This report is the outcome of an internship that took place in Centro de Arbitragem Comercial da Câmara de Comércio e Indústria Portuguesa and its completion is an essential part of the path towards obtaining the Master’s Degree in Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nova de Lisboa. This report has been structured in two stages – firstly, the presentation of the Centro de Arbitragem Comercial, focusing on its field of expertise, organic structure, principles and advantages. Then, the description of the activities developed within the Secretariat over the several stages of the arbitration procedure – since the reception of the arbitration requirement in institutional proceedings, terms of reference in ad hoc procedures, through the monitoring of the arbitral tribunal sessions (preliminary hearings, submission of evidence and final allegations) and the notification of the arbitration award. The second stage of this report is related to the description of the functions and powers of the President of Centro de Arbitragem Comercial. Firstly, it defines those powers by analyzing the statutes and rules of proceedings of the Centro de Arbitragem, drawing comparisons between the above mention and the rules of proceedings of others arbitral institutional centres, some of them are international references. The report assesses and describes the presidential powers, such as: configuration and composition of the arbitral tribunal (including arbitrator’s replacements, excuses and refusals); deadline extensions; determination of procedural rules and decision-making on any procedural incidents which arise before the constitution of the arbitral tribunal; definition of arbitration costs and fees; joinder of parties and consolidation of proceedings admission; and appointment of an emergency arbitrator. Lastly, this report analyzes some decisions delivered by the President in the respective institutional procedures which took place in the Centre.

Relatório de estágio curricular no Centro de Arbitragem Comercial da Câmara de Comércio e Indústria portuguesa

This report is the outcome of an internship that took place in Centro de Arbitragem Comercial da Câmara de Comércio e Indústria Portuguesa and its completion is an essential part of the path towards obtaining the Master’s Degree in Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nova de Lisboa. This report has been structured in two stages – firstly, the presentation of the Centro de Arbitragem Comercial, focusing on its field of expertise, organic structure, principles and advantages. Then, the description of the activities developed within the Secretariat over the several stages of the arbitration procedure – since the reception of the arbitration requirement in institutional proceedings, terms of reference in ad hoc procedures, through the monitoring of the arbitral tribunal sessions (preliminary hearings, submission of evidence and final allegations) and the notification of the arbitration award. The second stage of this report is related to the description of the functions and powers of the President of Centro de Arbitragem Comercial. Firstly, it defines those powers by analyzing the statutes and rules of proceedings of the Centro de Arbitragem, drawing comparisons between the above mention and the rules of proceedings of others arbitral institutional centres, some of them are international references. The report assesses and describes the presidential powers, such as: configuration and composition of the arbitral tribunal (including arbitrator’s replacements, excuses and refusals); deadline extensions; determination of procedural rules and decision-making on any procedural incidents which arise before the constitution of the arbitral tribunal; definition of arbitration costs and fees; joinder of parties and consolidation of proceedings admission; and appointment of an emergency arbitrator. Lastly, this report analyzes some decisions delivered by the President in the respective institutional procedures which took place in the Centre.

Compensation for environmental damages under international law

ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to clarify the contribution of international dispute adjudication mechanisms in regard to environmental protection. Most specifically, the study aims to identify and develop the criterion adopted by the international judge in relation to the compensation for environmental damages. In this perspective, the study identifies some gaps between international responsibility and environmental protection interests. The premise sustained all along the study is that compensation is determinant to conciliate environmental prerogatives with mechanisms of international adjudication, in particular the system of international responsibility. Supported by the analysis of treaties, international decisions and secondary sources, the thesis defends the idea that some elements of international law allow the adjudicator to adapt the compensation to attend certain environmental interests, creating a new approach which was entitled 'fair compensation'. The antithesis of this approach is the idea that compensation in international law is limited exclusively to the strict reparation of the material losses incurred by the victim. As a synthesis, the study defends the specificity of environmental damages in relation to other kind of damages that are subject to compensation under international law. The measure upon which compensation for environmental damages could be classified as a specific type of damage under international law remains to be determined. The main conclusion of the study is that the existing standard of compensation defined by the theory and practice of international law is impossible to be strictly respected in cases involving environmental damages. This limitation is mainly due to the complexity of the notion of environment, which is constantly conflicting with the anthropologic view of legal theory. The study supports the idea that the establishment of a 'fair compensation' which takes into account the political, legal and technical context of the environmental damage, is the best possible approach to conciliate internationally responsibility and environmental interests. This could be implemented by the observance of certain elements by the international judge/arbitrator through a case-by-case analysis.

Välimiehen esteellisyys ja korvausvastuu

Tutkielman tarkoituksena oli välimiehen vastuun johtaminen korvausperusteen ollessa esteellisyys. Tutkielmassa paneuduttiin syvällisesti välimiehen asemaan, velvollisuuksiin, esteellisyyteen ja vastuun johtamiseen. Tutkimusmetodi oli lainopillinen systematisointi ja tulkinta, ja jossain määrin käsiteanalyysi. Tutkimusaineisto koostui ennakkopäätöksen KKO:2005:14 lisäksi suurimmalta osalta lakiartikkeleista ja -teksteistä. Tutkielmassa päädyttiin siihen johtopäätökseen, että välimiehen esteellisyys voi johtaa korvausvastuuseen, kun tuottamus ja syy-yhteys vahinkoon todetaan. Tuottamus voi KKO:2005:14 mukaisesti ilmetä myös velvollisuuden laiminlyöntinä. Tällaisena rikottuna velvoitteena toimi välimiesmenettelylain 9.2 §. Todettavissa on, ettei välimiehen korvausvastuun määrittyminen etenkin esteellisyyden kyseessä ollessa ole selkeää eikä yksioikoista.

Välimiehen vahingonkorvausvastuu

Tutkielman tavoitteena on selvittää välimiehen vahingonkorvausoikeudellista asemaa suhteessa välimiesmenettelyn asianosaisiin ja välimiehen korvausvastuuta eri tilanteissa välimiesmenettelystä annetun lain mukaisessa sopimusperusteisessa välimiesmenettelyssä. Tutkielma on menetelmältään lainopillinen ja tutkielman aineisto koostuu pääosin oikeuskirjallisuudesta. Välimiehen ja asianosaisten välinen oikeussuhde voidaan katsoa rinnastuvan sopimussuhteeseen, mikä mahdollistaa sopimusperusteisen vahingonkorvausvastuun normien soveltamisen. Välimiehen korvausvastuu vaikuttaa mahdolliselta – vaikkakin käytännössä harvinaiselta – menettelyn viivästymisen, välimiehen aiheettoman tehtävästä luopumisen sekä välitystuomion mitättömyyden ja kumoamisen perusteella. Vastuu vaikuttaa syntyvän helpommin sellaisissa välimiehen velvoitteen rikkomistilanteissa, joissa välimiehen menettely ei edellytä oikeudellista harkintaa. Korvausvastuun arviointiin vaikuttavat useiden perusteiden osalta tilannekohtaiset tekijät ja välimiehen velvoitteen tulkinnanvaraisuus voi sulkea pois korvausvastuun. Välimiehen vastuun syntyminen salassapitovelvollisuuden rikkomisen perusteella on monilta osin epäselvä johtuen välimiehen salassapitovelvollisuuden heikosta normipohjasta. Vastuu välitystuomion aineellisoikeudellisen virheellisyyden perusteella vaikuttaa hyvin epätodennäköiseltä.

Statement of John O'Connor Damaged Wheat Crop

Statement (handwritten, 3 pages) in which John O’Connor states that his wheat crop of 1834 was damaged. A fence was also down which resulted in his wheat crop being destroyed by cattle and pigs. The defendants had to pay the plaintiff for damages. S. D. Woodruff was the arbitrator in this case, Aug. 1835.