Eficacia a largo plazo del tratamiento con treprostinil subcutáneo en pacientes con hipertensión arterial pulmonar

La hipertensión arterial pulmonar (HAP) se define como un grupo de enfermedades caracterizadas por el aumento de las resistencias vasculares pulmonares, que conduce a la insuficiencia respiratoria progresiva, al fracaso del ventrículo derecho y finalmente a la muerte prematura. Es una enfermedad rara, con una prevalencia baja (16 casos por millón de habitantes), de origen desconocido, posiblemente multifactorial y muy devastadora con una supervivencia del 68% a los 5 años. La definición de HP es fundamentalmente hemodinámica, y viene determinada por la presencia de una presión arterial pulmonar media en reposo por encima de 25 mmHg; el promedio normal de la PAP media es 14 ± 3 mmHg, con un límite superior de 20 mmHg; los valores entre 21-24 mmHg tienen aún significado incierto, los pacientes que presentan una presión arterial pulmonar en este rango deben ser seguidos porque pueden desarrollar hipertensión arterial pulmonar , como ocurre en los pacientes con enfermedad del tejido conectivo o familiares de los pacientes con HAP heredable. Estos pacientes sufren un gran deterioro en su calidad de vida y aunque en los últimos tiempos se están produciendo grandes avances en la investigación, con numerosos logros tanto en la etiopatogenia como en el tratamiento y han proporcionado pequeñas mejorías es necesario seguir, hasta conseguir que el diagnóstico sea precoz, antes de que se produzcan cambios iniciales y las presiones pulmonares comiencen a elevarse. El diagnóstico de la enfermedad se realiza todavía en el 70% de los casos es en fase avanzada, con afectación importante del ventrículo derecho y una clase funcional III a IV de la OMS...

Role of prostacyclin versus peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta receptors in prostacyclin sensing by lung fibroblasts.

Prostacyclin and its mimetics are used therapeutically for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. These drugs act via cell surface prostacyclin receptors (IP receptors); however, some of them can also activate the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta (PPARbeta). We examined the possibility that PPARbeta is a therapeutic target for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Using the newly approved (for pulmonary hypertension) prostacyclin mimetic treprostinil sodium, reporter gene assays for PPARbeta activation and measurement of lung fibroblast proliferation were analyzed. Treprostinil sodium was found to activate PPARbeta in reporter gene assays and to inhibit proliferation of human lung fibroblasts at concentrations consistent with an effect on PPARs but not on IP receptors. The effects of treprostinil sodium on human lung cell proliferation are mimicked by those of the highly selective PPARbeta ligand GW0742. There are no receptor antagonists for PPARbeta or for IP receptors, but by using lung fibroblasts cultured from mice lacking PPARbeta (PPARbeta-/-) or IP (IP-/-), we demonstrate that the antiproliferative effects of treprostinil sodium are mediated by PPARbeta and not IP in lung fibroblasts. These observations suggest that some of the local, longer-term benefits of treprostinil sodium on reducing the remodeling associated with pulmonary hypertension may be mediated by PPARbeta. This study is the first to identify PPARbeta as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension, which is important because orally active PPARbeta ligands have been developed for the treatment of dyslipidemia.

Safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan 50 and 100 mg in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Objective: To assess safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan 50 and 100 mg in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Background: Sitaxsentan is a highly selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist that was recently withdrawn by the manufacturer because of a pattern of idiosyncratic liver injury. Methods: Before sitaxsentan withdrawal, this 18-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized patients with PAH to receive placebo or sitaxsentan 50 or 100 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at week 18. Changes in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class and time to clinical worsening (TTCW) were secondary endpoints. The primary efficacy analysis was powered for sitaxsentan 100 mg versus placebo. Results: Of 98 randomized patients, 61% were WHO functional class II at baseline. Improvement from baseline to week 18 in 6MWD occurred with sitaxsentan 100 but not 50 mg; a strong placebo effect was observed. At week 18, WHO functional class was improved or maintained in more patients receiving sitaxsentan 100 mg than placebo (P = 0.038); 0% versus 12% of patients deteriorated, respectively. TTCW was not significantly different for 100-mg sitaxsentan patients than placebo (P = 0.090). Adverse events (AEs) occurring more frequently with sitaxsentan (50 or 100 mg) included headache, peripheral edema, dizziness, nausea, extremity pain, and fatigue; most AEs were of mild or moderate severity. Conclusion: Sitaxsentan 100 mg improved functional class but not 6MWD in PAH patients who were mostly WHO functional class II at baseline. No patient receiving sitaxsentan 100 mg experienced clinical worsening; sitaxsentan was well tolerated. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Hipertensão arterial pulmonar : patologia e abordagens terapêuticas

Trabalho Final do Curso de Mestrado Integrado em Medicina, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 2014

Strategia terapeutica nei pazienti con ipertensione arteriosa polmonare a rischio intermedio

Le attuali linee guida stratificano il rischio dei pazienti con ipertensione arteriosa polmonare (IAP) in basso, intermedio e alto (rispettivamente con mortalità a 1 anno <5%, 5-10% e >10%). La maggior parte dei pazienti è però classificata nella categoria intermedia. Per stratificare ulteriormente questi pazienti, abbiamo valutato il ruolo prognostico dello stroke volume index (SVI) misurato al cateterismo cardiaco destro (CCDx) in 725 pazienti naïve da terapia con IAP idiopatica/ereditaria, associata a malattie del tessuto connettivo o cardiopatie congenite. I pazienti sono stati valutati al basale e 3-4 mesi dopo l'inizio della terapia (1° F-UP) con CCDx, livelli plasmatici di peptide natriuretico cerebrale (BNP), test dei 6 minuti (T6M) e classe funzionale OMS. Abbiamo applicato una tabella di rischio semplificata utilizzando i criteri: classe funzionale OMS, T6M, pressione atriale destra o livelli plasmatici di BNP e indice cardiaco (IC) o saturazione di ossigeno venoso misto (SvO2). Le classi di rischio sono state definite come: basso= almeno 3 criteri a basso rischio e nessun criterio ad alto rischio; alto= almeno 2 criteri ad alto rischio inclusi IC o SvO2; intermedio= tutti gli altri casi. Lo SVI, mediante la regressione di Cox, stratifica la prognosi dei pazienti a rischio intermedio al 1° F-UP [p=0.008] ma non al basale [p=0.085]. Considerandone l’ottimale cut-off predittivo (38 ml/m2) i pazienti a rischio intermedio sono ulteriormente classificabili in intermedio-basso e intermedio-alto. Considerando l'effetto dei 3 principali farmaci che agiscono sulla via della prostaciclina in aggiunta alla duplice terapia di combinazione con inibitori della fosfodiesterasi-5 e antagonisti dell'endotelina, i pazienti trattati con epoprostenolo e.v. hanno ottenuto un maggiore miglioramento rispetto ai pazienti trattati con selexipag; col treprostinil s.c. vi è stata una risposta intermedia. Abbiamo quindi proposto un algoritmo di terapia con selexipag in pazienti a rischio intermedio-basso e con prostanoidi parenterali in pazienti a rischio intermedio-alto.

Triple combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a severe disease characterized by increasing in pulmonary vascular resistance leading to right ventricular failure and death. Currently available drugs for treatment of PAH act on three different pathways responsible of the pathogenesis of this disease: the endothelin pathway, the nitric oxide pathway and the prostacyclin pathway. The purpose of our study was to reassess our experience on the use of drugs that interact on the pathobiological line of prostacyclin so we retrospectively included all patients, referred to our center from February 1995 to December 2021, who received therapy with i.v. Epoprostenol, s.c. Treprostinil or oral Selexipag. Firstly, we observed that patients treated with Epoprostenol were significantly more compromised at baseline when compared to the two other groups and evaluating the effects of the three different drugs, it emerged that patients treated with Epoprostenol had significantly greater improvements in respect to those treated with Treprostinil and Selexipag. In the second part of our analysis we assessed the effects of these drugs when used as third line strategy in order to limit many confounding factors that could influence demographic, clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of patient populations. The differences emerged in exercise capacity and baseline hemodynamics reflect the fact that in our clinical practice, we add Epoprostenol as third line therapy in more compromised patients, Treprostinil in intermediate situations and Selexipag in less impaired conditions. Comparing the effects of treatments between baseline and first follow-up we noticed smaller benefits with Selexipag when compared with intravenous and subcutaneous strategies but it’s important to weight baseline patient’s differences. Our analysis confirmed clinical and functional benefits for the use of both prostacyclin analogues and prostacyclin receptor agonists in terms of improved functional class, six-minute walking distance and cardiopulmonary hemodynamics.