850 resultados para Success Factors in ERP Systems
Resumo:
Essa tese foca em diferentes perspectivas sobre CSF (Fatores Críticos de Sucess) em implementações de ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning). A literatura atual foca nos CSF sob o ponto de vista da alta gerência da organização e classifica esses CSF baseado nessa visão. Essa tese irá apresentar a visão do time de implementação de ERP sob os principais CSF e irá utilizar um estudo de caso para avaliar se a alta gerência e o time de implementação compartilham a mesma visão. Além disso ess tese irá propor uma relação entre o sucesso na implementação de ERP e os CSF pesquisados, usando o método PLS (Partial Least Squares) para analisar as respostas do time de implementação a um questionário desenvolvido para medir sucesso na implementação de ERP.
Resumo:
The Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems require huge investments while ineffective implementations of such projects are commonly observed. A considerable number of these projects have been reported to fail or take longer than it was initially planned, while previous studies show that the aim of rapid implementation of such projects has not been successful and the failure of the fundamental goals in these projects have imposed huge amounts of costs on investors. Some of the major consequences are the reduction in demand for such products and the introduction of further skepticism to the managers and investors of ERP systems. In this regard, it is important to understand the factors determining success or failure of ERP implementation. The aim of this paper is to study the critical success factors (CSFs) in implementing ERP systems and to develop a conceptual model which can serve as a basis for ERP project managers. These critical success factors that are called “core critical success factors” are extracted from 62 published papers using the content analysis and the entropy method. The proposed conceptual model has been verified in the context of five multinational companies.
Resumo:
This study is specifically concerned with the effect of the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) on the Business Process Redesign (BPR). Researcher’s experience and the investigation on previous researches imply that BPR and ERP are deeply related to each other and a study to found the mentioned relation further is necessary. In order to elaborate the hypothesis, a case study, in particular Turkish electricity distribution market and the phase of privatization are investigated. Eight companies that have taken part in privatization process and executed BPR serve as cases in this study. During the research, the cases are evaluated through critical success factors on both BPR and ERP. It was seen that combining the ERP Solution features with business processes lead the companies to be successful in ERP and BPR implementation. When the companies’ success and efficiency were compared before and after the ERP implementation, a considerable change was observed in organizational structure. It was spotted that the team composition is important in the success of ERP projects. Additionally, when the ERP is in driver or enabler role, the companies can be considered successful. On the contrary, when the ERP has a neutral role of business processes, the project fails. In conclusion, it can be said that the companies, which have implemented the ERP successfully, have accomplished the goals of the BPR.
Resumo:
Tässä työssä käsitellään niitä motiiveja, haasteita ja menestystekijöitä, jotka vaikuttavat lisäarvoatuottavassa liiketoimintaverkostossa. Työssä on selvitetty sitä, miten partneriverkostot syntyvät sekä mitkä seikat vaikuttavat siihen jatkuuko yhteistyö vai ei. Motiiveja partneruuteen on tutkittu kirjallisuudesta sekä analysoimalla työssä esitettyä tapausta. Tässä työssä käydään keskustelua myös partneruuden elinkaaresta, jota ei ole käsitellyssä kirjallisuudessa tuotu esille. Työssä esitettyä tapausta arvioitiin lähettämällä siihen liittyneille henkilöille kysely. Kyselyiden lähettämisen jälkeen järjestettiin haastattelu kyselyyn vastanneiden kanssa. Lopputulokset perustuvat pitkälti haastateltujen henkilöiden kanssa käytyihin keskusteluihin. Kävi ilmi, että arvoa tuottavan partneriverkoston yksi tärkeimpiä tavoitteita on saavuttaa jatkuvuutta liiketoiminnallaan. Ainoastaan pitkäaikaisella partneruudella voidaan saavuttaa merkittäviä etuja markkinoilla. Siksi on tärkeätä, jo partnerin valinnassa, kiinnittää huomiota partneruuden jatkuvuuteen pitkällä tähtäimellä. Liiketoimintaverkostossa partneruudesta syntyvät tuotot ja niiden jakaminen on tärkein yksittäinen osaalue. Oleellista partneruuden jatkuvuudelle pitkällä tähtäimellä on jo partneria valittaessa se, että kyetään arvioimaan miten partneruudesta syntyvät tuotot jaetaan tasapuolisesti ja onko partneruudesta syntyvälle liiketoiminnalle jatkuvuutta. Jotta partneriverkostolle asetetut tavoitteet voitaisiin saavuttaa, on tärkeää suunnitella partneriverkoston hallintaa myös operatiivisella tasolla. Lisäksi tärkeää on jakaa verkostolle asetetut yhteiset tavoitteet organisaatioiden sisällä. Jos ylemmänja operatiivisen tason johdon yhteistyö on riittämätöntä, se vaikeuttaa oleellisesti asetettujen tavoitteiden saavuttamista. Tiedon jakaminen aikaisessa vaiheessa sitouttaa eri sidosryhmät paremmin yhteisiin tavoitteisiin.
Resumo:
Tutkielman tavoitteena on tunnistaa kriittiset menestystekijät balanced scorecardin käyttöönotossa. Tutkimus on luonteeltaan selittävä tapaustutkimus. Tutkimuksen haastatteluaineisto on kerätty suomalaisyrityksistä, jotka ovat ottaneet onnistuneesti balanced scorecardin käyttöön organisaatiossa. Yksi tapauksista osoittautui kuitenkin epäonnistuneeksi. Balanced scorecardin onnistuneeseen käyttöönottoon vaikuttaa usea eri tekijä. Tutkielmassa käyttöönottoon vaikuttavat menestystekijät on jaettu neljään eri ryhmään, jotka ovat tekijät liittyen organisaatioon, resursseihin, käyttöönottoprosessiin ja itse balanced scorecardiin. Viitekehys havainnollistaa kriittisten menestystekijöiden keskinäisiä suhteita. Johdon sitoutuminen, ajankäyttö sekä avoin kommunikaatio ovat eräitä keskeisiä menestystekijöitä balanced scorecardin käyttöönottoprosessissa. Lisäksi balanced scorecardin onnistuneeseen käyttöönottoon on kaksi perusedellytystä: organisaation strategian selkeys sekä ympäristön tuki prosessille.
Resumo:
Hardcore, or long-term derelict and vacant brownfield sites which are often contaminated, form a significant proportion of brownfield land in many cities, not only in the UK but also in other countries. The recent economic recession has placed the economic viability of such sites in jeopardy. This paper compares the approaches for bringing back hardcore brownfield sites into use in England and Japan by focusing on ten case studies in Manchester and Osaka, using an `agency'-based frame- work. The findings are set in the context of (i) national brownfield and related policy agendas; (ii) recent trends in land and property markets in both England and Japan; and (iii) city-level comparisons of brownfields in Manchester and Osaka. The research, which was conducted during 2009 ^ 10, suggests that hardcore brownfield sites have been badly affected by the recent recession in both Manchester and Osaka. Despite this, not only is there evidence that hardcore sites have been successfully regenerated in both cities, but also that the critical success factors (CSFs) operating in bringing sites back into use share a large degree of commonality. These CSFs include the presence of strong potential markets, seeing the recession as an opportunity, long-term vision, strong branding, strong partnerships, integrated development, and getting infrastructure into place. Finally, the paper outlines the policy implications of the research.
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Different tools have been used to set up and adopt the model for the fulfillment of the objective of this research. 1. The Model The base model that has been used is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) adapted with the aim to perform a Benefit Cost Analysis. The AHP developed by Thomas Saaty is a multicriteria decision - making technique which decomposes a complex problem into a hierarchy. It is used to derive ratio scales from both discreet and continuous paired comparisons in multilevel hierarchic structures. These comparisons may be taken from actual measurements or from a fundamental scale that reflects the relative strength of preferences and feelings. 2. Tools and methods 2.1. The Expert Choice Software The software Expert Choice is a tool that allows each operator to easily implement the AHP model in every stage of the problem. 2.2. Personal Interviews to the farms For this research, the farms of the region Emilia Romagna certified EMAS have been detected. Information has been given by EMAS center in Wien. Personal interviews have been carried out to each farm in order to have a complete and realistic judgment of each criteria of the hierarchy. 2.3. Questionnaire A supporting questionnaire has also been delivered and used for the interviews . 3. Elaboration of the data After data collection, the data elaboration has taken place. The software support Expert Choice has been used . 4. Results of the Analysis The result of the figures above (vedere altro documento) gives a series of numbers which are fractions of the unit. This has to be interpreted as the relative contribution of each element to the fulfillment of the relative objective. So calculating the Benefits/costs ratio for each alternative the following will be obtained: Alternative One: Implement EMAS Benefits ratio: 0, 877 Costs ratio: 0, 815 Benfit/Cost ratio: 0,877/0,815=1,08 Alternative Two: Not Implement EMAS Benefits ratio: 0,123 Costs ration: 0,185 Benefit/Cost ratio: 0,123/0,185=0,66 As stated above, the alternative with the highest ratio will be the best solution for the organization. This means that the research carried out and the model implemented suggests that EMAS adoption in the agricultural sector is the best alternative. It has to be noted that the ratio is 1,08 which is a relatively low positive value. This shows the fragility of this conclusion and suggests a careful exam of the benefits and costs for each farm before adopting the scheme. On the other part, the result needs to be taken in consideration by the policy makers in order to enhance their intervention regarding the scheme adoption on the agricultural sector. According to the AHP elaboration of judgments we have the following main considerations on Benefits: - Legal compliance seems to be the most important benefit for the agricultural sector since its rank is 0,471 - The next two most important benefits are Improved internal organization (ranking 0,230) followed by Competitive advantage (ranking 0, 221) mostly due to the sub-element Improved image (ranking 0,743) Finally, even though Incentives are not ranked among the most important elements, the financial ones seem to have been decisive on the decision making process. According to the AHP elaboration of judgments we have the following main considerations on Costs: - External costs seem to be largely more important than the internal ones (ranking 0, 857 over 0,143) suggesting that Emas costs over consultancy and verification remain the biggest obstacle. - The implementation of the EMS is the most challenging element regarding the internal costs (ranking 0,750).
Resumo:
Managing supply chains effectively has become a critical element in enhancing company profitability and has been identified as the new frontier of competitive advantage. An important element of effective supply chain management is the strategic positioning of the company. The strategic positioning process is concerned with the choice of production-centred activities a company carries out internally and those provided externally. Strategic positioning within manufacturing supply chains however is a relatively recent research topic with apparently few articles currently available that explicitly address associated issues directly. Moreover there is no previous research working strategic positioning of manufacturing operations in global context. Therefore the purpose of this paper is to explore strategic positioning within global supply chains. This paper is based on three cases drawn from the cross industry sector manufacturing companies. It describes an exploratory analysis which is aimed at gaining insight into the success factor to form a strategic positioning within global supply chains.
Resumo:
ERP system is now attracting the SMEs, as it is now economical and affordable for them. The current research emphasizes on “how to make ERP successful for SMEs”. The researchers have identified various critical success factors in implementation of ERP. The research gap noticed by author is the missing point of view of ERP consultant. This thesis investigates the answer of research question “What are the critical success factors in implementation of ERP system in SMEs in opinion of ERP consultants and acquiring organizations”. The purpose of this study is to identify the highly important and less important factors. The study results will suggest the ERP managers where they have to concentrate more in order to achieve success. Literature is reviewed in order to setup a base for empirical study. Aplenty of work is found related to CSFs, SMEs and ERP. The authors and factors are organized in form of a table that tells which author is agreed upon which factor. Final result of literature review is a list of 14 CSFs. The qualitative research methodology is used to investigate the ERP in Pakistani SMEs. A case study approach is selected because of unified nature of SMEs in Pakistan. A rice mill is selected as a case because it contains maximum SME attributes. The opinion of a Microsoft certified consultant is obtained by a semi-structured interview. Similarly a semi-structured interview is conducted with CIO of SME that acquired ERP. Both the interviewees are asked about all 14 factors, whether they are agree or not and why. The collected evidences then analyzed by tabulation. The factors upon which both the participants found agreed, taken as highly important. Similarly the factors upon which both participants found disagree, taken as less important. Study results present a grid with four quadrants, the CSFs highly important in opinion of both, the CSFs less important in opinion of both, CSFs important in opinion of consultant but not client, CSFs important in opinion of client but not consultant. In discussion part, the significance of each factor is discussed individually. It is discussed that why some factors are high/less important for SMEs in Pakistan. The study output communicates a message that the success of ERP system in SMEs is linked with careful management of five important factors, the project management, top management support, user training and education, consultant participation and ERP teamwork and composition. The ERP consultants and managers can divert their concentration from less important factors such as user involvement, culture readiness and ERP package selection, toward the highly important factors. The limitations of the study are small number of interviews and less people involved, provide an opportunity for future research in this field of information system.