Inclusion of children identified as having special educational needs (SEN) within the Austrian compulsory educational system

Este artigo pretende descrever v��rios aspetos da segrega����o, integra����o e inclus��o dentro do sistema educativo obrigat��rio austr��aco. Ap��s uma introdu����o que cont��m defini����es e um resumo internacional, ser�� brevemente descrito o sistema educativo da ��ustria. Subsequentemente, tr��s temas de interesse ser��o debatidos. Primeiro ser�� caracterizada a situa����o atual referente �� inclus��o de crian��as com necessidades educativas especiais. Esta situa����o difere bastante entre estados federais. Ser��o descritos os desenvolvimentos que conduziram �� situa����o atual. Em segundo ser��o apresentados estudos emp��ricos recentes relativos ao movimento austr��aco que almeja a inclus��o. Em terceiro e a t��tulo exemplificativo ser��o apresentados em detalhe alguns desenvolvimentos recentes, alguns planos e vis��es futuras de tr��s estados federais austr��acos.

Engagement Plan: Review of AHP Support for Children with Statements of Special Educational Needs in Special Schools and Mainstream Education

This engagement plan outlines the collaborative and partnership approach with key stakeholders in the first phase of the Review of AHP Support for Children with Statements of Special Educational Needs in Special Schools and Mainstream Education. It provides detail on how communication objectives will be met.It gives information on:Stakeholder Analysis for Phase One of the ReviewMembership of the Project BoardMembership of the Professional Stakeholder Reference Group

Terms of Reference for Project: Review of AHP Support for Children with Statements of Special Educational Needs in Special Schools and Mainstream Education

This is the Terms of Reference for the review of Allied Health Professional (AHP) support for children/young people with statements of special educational needs.It outlines expectations of the review and should be read in conjunction with the Project Initiation Document (PID) for Phase 1of the review, the Terms of Reference for the Project Board and the Engagement Plan for phase 1.

Terms of reference for Project Board: Review of AHP Support for Children with Statements of Special Educational Needs in Special Schools and Mainstream Education

This is the Terms of Reference for the Project Board of the review of Allied Health Professions (AHP) support for children/young people with statements of special educational needs.It outlines the:Purpose of the Project BoardResponsibilities of the Project BoardMembership of the Project Board

Phase 2 Parent/Carer Questionnaire: Review of Allied Health Professions������' (AHP) support for children/young people with a statement of special educational needs

We want to know what you think about the AHP services for your child. We will also seek views of AHPs and teachers who work with your children and we will use them all to inform our decisions. This phase of the review is focusing on current AHP services for children/young people with a statement of special educational needs enrolled in mainstream schools and learning support centres/units attached to a mainstream school.

Review of AHP Support for Children with Statements of Special Educational Needs in Special Schools and Mainstream Education: Phase 2 Engagement Plan

This engagement plan outlines the collaborative and partnership approach with key stakeholders in the second phase of the Review of AHP Support for Children with Statements of Special Educational Needs in Special Schools and Mainstream Education. It provides detail on how communication objectives will be met. It gives information on: Stakeholder Analysis for Phase Two of the Review Membership of the Project Board Membership of the Professional Stakeholder Reference Group

Summary Interim Report on Findings and Interim Themes from Phase 1 of the review of Allied Health Professions (AHP) support for children/young people with a statement of special educational needs (SEN)

Summary Interim Report on Findings and Interim Themes from Phase 1 of the review of Allied Health Professions (AHP) support for children/young people with a statement of special educational needs (SEN)This interim report is outlining the service principles agreed by the Project Board and the themes identified throughout engagement and information gathering.

Special educational needs : a parent's guide.

Esta gu��a proporciona una somera visi��n de la diversidad de las necesidades educativas especiales m��s comunes. Contiene informaci��n y asesoramiento para que profesores y padres puedan tener las estrategias necesarias para utilizar con los ni��os en la vida cotidiana, c��mo manejar en la escuela y en el hogar comportamientos dif��ciles, qu�� hacer o ad��nde ir para obtener m��s informaci��n y para obtener la mejor educaci��n del ni��o seg��n sus necesidades especiales.

Special educational needs in practice.

Este recurso ha sido revisado para tener en cuenta a todos los profesionales que trabajan con ni��os con necesidades especiales. Trata la funci��n y responsabilidad de la SENCO (Special Educational Needs Code of Practice), establece sus procedimientos y propone numerosas estrategias para todos los que trabajan en este campo. Incluye c��mo apoyar mejor a los ni��os en diferentes condiciones, la forma de desarrollar y gestionar la pol��tica de necesidades educativas especiales en l��nea con los requisitos del gobierno y c��mo utilizar los recursos y el apoyo disponible; as�� como, tambi��n una secci��n de terapias para presentar nuevas ideas y conceptos que promuevan la relajaci��n, la creatividad, la concentraci��n y la imaginaci��n a trav��s del ejercicio, el tacto, el sonido y la experiencia.

Special educational needs across two decades: survey evidence from English primary schools

The article considers the perceived prevalence of special educational needs in English primary schools and changes in this prevalence over two decades and relates these to issues in education policy, teacher practice and the concept of special educational needs. The studies considered are two major surveys of schools and teachers, the first conducted in 1981 and the second conducted in the same schools in 1998. Important features of both studies were their scale and the exceptionally high response rates achieved. Two central findings were the perception of teachers that special educational needs were widespread and of an increase in special educational needs over time: perceived levels of special educational needs were one in five children in 1981, which had risen to one in four children in 1998. Learning difficulties were by far the most common aspects of special educational needs but many children had multiple difficulties, and behavioural difficulties were seen by teachers as the main barriers to inclusion. The very high figures for prevalence raise questions about the continued usefulness of the concept of special educational need distinct from broader issues of achievement.

Children with Special Educational Needs as film makers: Using digital video to support Understandings of Narrative

The literature has identified issues around transitions among phases for all pupils (Cocklin, 1999) including pupils with special educational needs (SEN) (Morgan 1999, Maras and Aveling 2006). These issues include pupils��� uncertainties and worries about building size and spatial orientation, exposure to a range of teaching styles, relationships with peers and older pupils as well as parents��� difficulties in establishing effective communications with prospective secondary schools. Research has also identified that interventions to facilitate these educational transitions should consider managerial support, social and personal familiarisation with the new setting as well as personalised learning strategies (BECTA 2004). However, the role that digital technologies can play in supporting these strategies or facilitating the role of the professionals such as SENCos and heads of departments involved in supporting effective transitions for pupils with SEN has not been widely discussed. Uses of ICT include passing references of student-produced media presentations (Higgins 1993) and use of photographs of activities attached to a timetable to support familiarisation with the secondary curriculum for pupils with autism (Cumine et al. 1998).