Implementation and operation of NASS PSU 52 - St. Clair, Shelby Counties, Alabama. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Washington, D.C.

The Voting Rights Act, Shelby County, and Redistricting: Improving Estimates of Racially Polarized Voting in a Multiple-Election Context

The Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County has severely limited the power of the Voting Rights Act. I argue that Congressional attempts to pass a new coverage formula are unlikely to gain the necessary Republican support. Instead, I propose a new strategy that takes a “carrot and stick” approach. As the stick, I suggest amending Section 3 to eliminate the need to prove that discrimination was intentional. For the carrot, I envision a competitive grant program similar to the highly successful Race to the Top education grants. I argue that this plan could pass the currently divided Congress.

Without Congressional action, Section 2 is more important than ever before. A successful Section 2 suit requires evidence that voting in the jurisdiction is racially polarized. Accurately and objectively assessing the level of polarization has been and continues to be a challenge for experts. Existing ecological inference methods require estimating polarization levels in individual elections. This is a problem because the Courts want to see a history of polarization across elections.

I propose a new 2-step method to estimate racially polarized voting in a multi-election context. The procedure builds upon the Rosen, Jiang, King, and Tanner (2001) multinomial-Dirichlet model. After obtaining election-specific estimates, I suggest regressing those results on election-specific variables, namely candidate quality, incumbency, and ethnicity of the minority candidate of choice. This allows researchers to estimate the baseline level of support for candidates of choice and test whether the ethnicity of the candidates affected how voters cast their ballots.

A traffic safety demonstration program for Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Traffic Safety Programs, Washington, D.C.

Shelbyville area : Shelby County /

"April 22, 1950."

Soil survey of Clay County, Alabama

"In cooperation with Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station."

Soil survey of Dallas County, Alabama /

"By E. P. Carr ... [et al.]" -- title page.

Camp Rotary, Elmore County, Alabama : an illustrated guide book /

"Maintained by the Rotary Club of Montgomery for the boys and girls of that city."

Estimating the need and supply of hired seasonal farm workers, Baldwin County, Alabama.

"April 1955."

John Jones Letter - Accession 7 - M6 (16)

The John Jones Letter was written by Mr. Jones in 1841, a farmer, from Montevallo, Alabama, to Jesse Trusdel of Santon in Kershaw District, South Carolina, in which Jones discusses economic and health conditions in Shelby County, Alabama, his family affairs, and future plans. The collection includes the envelope (in pieces) and a handwritten transcription.

Analysis of Madison County vehicle data to evaluate the effect of Autocheck program on vehicle accident rates. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

LMI trends. Beltline of Illinois counties (Coles, Cumberland, Macoupin, Montgomery, Christian, and Shelby).

Caption title.

Setting Congress Up to Fail

In Shelby County v. Holder the Supreme Court invalidated key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 based on Congress’s failure to justify the formula used to determine which jurisdictions would be subject to the Act’s pre-clearance requirement of submitting all changes to voting procedures to the Justice Department for prior approval. This short essay explores one problematic feature of the Court’s analysis: its refusal to consider the legislative record as adequate because it was created to justify the coverage formula after the fact, rather than to facilitate deliberation on the coverage formula before a decision had been made. This reasoning essentially imports from administrative law a rule called the Chenery principle, and as this essay explains, it does so without justification. The differences between administrative and legislative decision making processes compel different treatment by the courts, and treating legislative records like administrative ones, in essence, asks of Congress something it is institutionally ill-equipped to perform. It sets Congress up to fail.

Report on a survey of the organization and administration of the state and county governments of Alabama:

Mode of access: Internet.

Public school laws of the state of Alabama : together with forms for teachers, officers and the Constitution of Alabama, and a revised list of county and city superintendents /

Includes index.