Regulation of Set1-mediated methylation of Dam1

Eukaryotic genomes exist within a dynamic structure named chromatin in which DNA is wrapped around an octamer of histones forming the nucleosome. Histones are modified by a range of posttranslational modifications including methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination, which are integral to a range of DNA-templated processes including transcriptional regulation. A hallmark for transcriptional activity is methylation of histone H3 on lysine (K) 4 within active gene promoters. In S. cerevisiae, H3K4 methylation is mediated by Set1 within the COMPASS complex. Methylation requires prior ubiquitination of histone H2BK123 by the E2-E3 ligases Rad6 and Bre1, as well as the Paf1 transcriptional elongation complex. This regulatory pathway exemplifies cross-talk in trans between posttranslational modifications on distinct histone molecules. Set1 has an additional substrate in the kinetochore protein Dam1, which is methylated on K233. This methylation antagonizes phosphorylation of adjacent serines by the Ipl1 Aurora kinase. The discovery of a second Set1 substrate raised the question of how Set1 function is regulated at the kinetochore. I hypothesized that transcriptional regulatory factors essential for H3K4 methylation at gene promoters might also regulate Set1-mediated methylation of Dam1K233. Here I show that the regulatory factors essential for COMPASS activity at gene promoters is also indispensable for the methylation of Dam1K233. Deletion of members of the COMPASS complex leads to loss of Dam1K233 methylation. In addition, deletion of Rad6, Bre1, or members of the Paf1 complex abolishes Dam1 methylation. The role of Rad6 and Bre1 in Dam1 methylation is dependent on H2BK123 ubiquitination, as mutation of K123 within H2B results in complete loss of Dam1 methylation. Importantly, methylation of Dam1K233 is independent of transcription and occurs at the kinetochore. My results demonstrate that Set1-mediated methylation is regulated by a general pathway regardless of substrate that is composed of transcriptional regulatory factors functioning independently of transcription at the kinetochore. My data provide the first example of cross-talk in trans between modifications on a histone and a non-histone protein. Additionally, my results indicate that several factors previously thought to be required for Set1 function at gene promoters are more generally required for the catalytic activity of the COMPASS complex regardless of substrate or cellular process.

The Set1 methyltransferase opposes Ipl1 aurora kinase functions in chromosome segregation

A phosphorylation balance governed by Ipl1 Aurora kinase and the Glc7 phosphatase is essential for normal chromosome segregation in S. cerevisiae . Deletion of SET1, a histone K4 methyltransferase, suppresses the temperature sensitive phenotype of ipl1-2, and loss the catalytic activity of Set1 is important for this suppression. SET1 deletion also suppresses chromosome loss in ipl1-2 cells. Deletion of other Set1 complex components suppresses the temperature sensitivity of ipl1-2 as well. In contrast, SET1 deletion is synthetic lethal combined with glc7-127. Strikingly, these effects are independent of previously defined functions for Set1 in transcription initiation and histone H3 methylation. I find that Set1 methylates conserved lysines in a kinetochore protein, Dam1, a key mitotic substrate of Ipl1/Glc7. Biochemical and genetic experiments indicate that Dam1 methylation inhibits Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation of flanking serines. My studies demonstrate that Set1 has important, unexpected functions in mitosis through modulating the phosphorylation balance regulated by Ipl1/Glc7. Moreover, my findings suggest that antagonism between lysine methylation and serine phosphorylation is a fundamental mechanism for controlling protein function. ^

SET1, A Yeast Member of the Trithorax Family, Functions in Transcriptional Silencing and Diverse Cellular Processes

The trithorax gene family contains members implicated in the control of transcription, development, chromosome structure, and human leukemia. A feature shared by some family members, and by other proteins that function in chromatin-mediated transcriptional regulation, is the presence of a 130- to 140-amino acid motif dubbed the SET or Tromo domain. Here we present analysis of SET1, a yeast member of the trithorax gene family that was identified by sequence inspection to encode a 1080-amino acid protein with a C-terminal SET domain. In addition to its SET domain, which is 40–50% identical to those previously characterized, SET1 also shares dispersed but significant similarity to Drosophila and human trithorax homologues. To understand SET1 function(s), we created a null mutant. Mutant strains, although viable, are defective in transcriptional silencing of the silent mating-type loci and telomeres. The telomeric silencing defect is rescued not only by full-length episomal SET1 but also by the conserved SET domain of SET1. set1 mutant strains display other phenotypes including morphological abnormalities, stationary phase defects, and growth and sporulation defects. Candidate genes that may interact with SET1 include those with functions in transcription, growth, and cell cycle control. These data suggest that yeast SET1, like its SET domain counterparts in other organisms, functions in diverse biological processes including transcription and chromatin structure.

Compositional data analysis in archaeometry

We shall call an n × p data matrix fully-compositional if the rows sum to a constant, and sub-compositional if the variables are a subset of a fully-compositional data set1. Such data occur widely in archaeometry, where it is common to determine the chemical composition of ceramic, glass, metal or other artefacts using techniques such as neutron activation analysis (NAA), inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICPS), X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) etc. Interest often centres on whether there are distinct chemical groups within the data and whether, for example, these can be associated with different origins or manufacturing technologies

Genomic roles of the HCF transcriptional regulator in "Drosophila"

Abstract : Transcriptional regulation is the result of a combination of positive and negative effectors, such as transcription factors, cofactors and chromatin modifiers. During my thesis project I studied chromatin association, and transcriptional and cell cycle regulatory functions of dHCF, the Drosophila homologue of the human protein HCF-1 (host cell factor-1). The human and Drosophila HCF proteins are synthesized as large polypeptides that are cleaved into two subunits (HCFN and HCFC), which remain associated with one another by non covalent interactions. Studies in mammalian cells over the past 20 years have been devoted to understanding the cellular functions of HCF-1 and have revealed that it is a key regulator of transcription and cell cycle regulation. In human cells, HCF-1 interacts with the histone methyltransferase Set1/Ash2 and MLL/Ash2 complexes and the histone deacetylase Sin3 complex, which are involved in transcriptional activation and repression, respectively. HCF-1 is also recruited to promoters to regulate G1 -to-S phase progression during the cell cycle by the activator transcription factors E2F1 and E2F3, and by the repressor transcription factor E2F4. HCF-1 protein structure and these interactions between HCP-1 and E2F transcriptional regulator proteins are also conserved in Drosophila. In this doctoral thesis, I use proliferating Drosophila SL2 cells to study both the genomic-binding sites of dHCF, using a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation and ultra high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis, and dHCF regulated genes, employing RNAi and microarray expression analysis. I show that dHCF is bound to over 7500 chromosomal sites in proliferating SL2 cells, and is located at +-200 bp relative to the transcriptional start sites of about 30% of Drosophila genes. There is also a direct relationship between dHCF promoter association and promoter- associated transcriptional activity. Thus, dHCF binding levels at promoters correlated directly with transcriptional activity. In contrast, expression studies showed that dHCF appears to be involved in both transcriptional activation and repression. Analysis of dHCF-binding sites identified nine dHCF-associated motifs, four of them linked dHCF to (i) two insulator proteins, GAGA and BEAF, (ii) the E-box motif, and (iii) a degenerated TATA-box. The dHCF-associated motifs allowed the organization of the dHCF-bound genes into five biological processes: differentiation, cell cycle and gene expression, regulation of endocytosis, and cellular localization. I further show that different mechanisms regulate dHCF association with chromatin. Despite that after dHCF cleavage the dHCFN and dHCFC subunits remain associated, the two subunits showed different affinities for chromatin and differential binding to a set of tested promoters, suggesting that dHCF could target specific promoters through each of the two subunits. Moreover, in addition to the interaction between dHCF and E2F transcription factors, the dHCF binding pattern is correlated with dE2F2 genomic 4 distribution. I show that dE2F factors are necessary for recruitment of dHCF to the promoter of a set of dHCF regulated genes. Therefore dHCF, as in mammals, is involved in regulation of G1 to S phase progression in collaboration with the dE2Fs transcription factors. In addition, gene expression arrays reveal that dHCF could indirectly regulate cell cycle progression by promoting expression of genes involved in gene expression and protein synthesis, and inhibiting expression of genes involved in cell-cell adhesion. Therefore, dHCF is an evolutionary conserved protein, which binds to many specific sites of the Drosophila genome via interaction with DNA of chromatin-binding proteins to regulate the expression of genes involved in many different cellular functions. Résumé : La regulation de la transcription est le résultat des effets positifs et négatifs des facteurs de transcription, cofacteurs et protéines effectrices qui modifient la chromatine. Pendant mon projet de thèse, j'ai étudié l'association a la chromatine, ainsi que la régulation de la transcription et du cycle cellulaire par dHCF, l'homologue chez la drosophile de la protéine humaine HCF-1 (host cell factor-1). Chez 1'humain et la V drosophile, les deux protéines HCF sont synthétisées sous la forme d'un long polypeptide, qui est ensuite coupé en deux sous-unités au centre de la protéine. Les deux sous-unités restent associées ensemble grâce a des interactions non-covalentes. Des études réalisées pendant les 20 dernières années ont permit d'établir que HCF-l et un facteur clé dans la régulation de la transcription et du cycle cellulaire. Dans les cellules humaines, HCF-1 active et réprime la transcription en interagissant avec des complexes de protéines qui activent la transcription en méthylant les histones (HMT), comme par Set1/Ash2 et MLL/Ash2, et d'autres complexes qui répriment la transcription et sont responsables de la déacétylation des histones (HDAC) comme la protéine Sin3. HCF-l est aussi recruté aux promoteurs par les activateurs de la transcription E2F l et E2F3a, et par le répresseur de la transcription E2F4 pour réguler la transition entre les phases G1 et S du cycle cellulaire. La structure de HCF-1 et les interactions entre HCF-l et les régulateurs de la transcription sont conservées chez la drosophile. Pendant ma these j'ai utilisé les cellules de la drosophile, SL2 en culture, pour étudier les endroits de liaisons de HCF-l à la chromatine, grâce a immunoprecipitation de la chromatine et du séquençage de l'ADN massif ainsi que les gènes régulés par dHCF 3 grâce a la technique de RNAi et des microarrays. Mes résultats on montré que dHCF se lie à environ 7565 endroits, et estimé a 1200 paire de bases autour des sites d'initiation de la transcription de 30% des gènes de la drosophile. J 'ai observe une relation entre dHCF et le niveau de la transcription. En effet, le niveau de liaison dHCF au promoteur corrèle avec l'activité de la transcription. Cependant, mes études d'expression ont montré que dHCF est implique dans le processus d'activation et mais aussi de répression de la transcription. L'analyse des séquences d'ADN liées par dHCF a révèle neuf motifs, quatre de ces motifs ont permis d'associer dl-ICF a deux protéines isolatrices GAGA et BEAF, au motif pour les E-boxes et a une TATA-box dégénérée. Les neuf motifs associes à dHCF ont permis d'associer les gènes lies par dHCF au promoteur a cinq processus biologiques: différentiation, cycle cellulaire, expression de gènes, régulation de l'endocytosis et la localisation cellulaire, J 'ai aussi montré qu'il y a plusieurs mécanismes qui régulent l'association de dHCF a la chromatine, malgré qu'après clivage, les deux sous-unites dHCFN and dHCFC, restent associées, elles montrent différentes affinités pour la chromatine et lient différemment un group de promoteurs, les résultats suggèrent que dHCF peut se lier aux promoteurs en utilisant chacune de ses sous-unitées. En plus de l'association de dHCF avec les facteurs de transcription dE2F s, la distribution de dHCF sur le génome corrèle avec celle du facteur de transcription dE2F2. J'ai aussi montré que les dE2Fs sont nécessaires pour le recrutement de dHCF aux promoteurs d'un sous-groupe de gènes régules par dHCF. Mes résultats ont aussi montré que chez la drosophile comme chez les humains, dl-ICF est implique dans la régulation de la progression de la phase G1 a la phase S du cycle cellulaire en collaboration avec dE2Fs. D'ailleurs, les arrays d'expression ont suggéré que dHCF pourrait réguler le cycle cellulaire de façon indirecte en activant l'expression de gènes impliqués dans l'expression génique et la synthèse de protéines, et en inhibant l'expression de gènes impliqués dans l'adhésion cellulaire. En conclusion, dHCF est une protéine, conservée dans l'évolution, qui se lie spécifiquement a beaucoup d'endroits du génome de Drosophile, grâce à l'interaction avec d'autres protéines, pour réguler l'expression des gènes impliqués dans plusieurs fonctions cellulaires.

Étude de l’interaction Ikaros/voie de signalisation Notch au cours de l'érythropoïèse

Tout au long de la vie d’un individu, il existe un nombre optimal de cellules à produire et de progéniteurs à conserver en réserve. On parle de maintien de l’homéostasie tissulaire. De façon générale, l’organisme a cinq possibilités pour réguler l’homéostasie : l’autorenouvellement et la quiescence, souvent utilisés pour maintenir un ‘pool’ fonctionnel de progéniteurs, la différenciation qui permet de produire des cellules effectrices, l’apoptose et la sénescence, qui permettent de limiter la production de cellules ou encore d’en faire diminuer le nombre quand elles sont en excès. La régulation de ces quatre mécanismes peut se faire de façon extrinsèque en passant par différentes voies de signalisation combinées à l’action intrinsèque de facteurs de transcription comme Ikaros et GATA1. Le facteur de transcription Ikaros joue un rôle critique dans le devenir des cellules progénitrices et la différenciation des lignages hématopoïétiques. Cependant, il demeure surtout connu pour son influence sur la voie Notch dans les cellules lymphoïdes, notamment les lymphocytes T. Les cellules érythroïdes sont hautement sensibles à l’environnement et donc, particulièrement adaptées à l’étude des régulations de l’homéostasie. Les résultats de différentes études ont permis de démontrer qu’Ikaros et la voie Notch influencent l’érythropoïèse. Cependant le détail de leurs actions demeure en grande partie inconnu à ce jour. Au cours de notre étude nous avons voulu déterminer l’action d’Ikaros dans le maintien de l’homéostasie des cellules érythroïdes et si son rôle passe par un dialogue avec la voie Notch. Nous avons voulu décrypter les mécanismes de régulation transcriptionnelle utilisés par Ikaros et par Notch au cours de l’érythropoïèse et leurs effets. Notre étude montre qu’Ikaros réprime à l’aide de GATA1 le gène Hes1, une cible importante de la voie Notch, en recrutant un complexe de la famille Polycomb, le PRC2 ii (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2). Cette répression permet la promotion de la différenciation des cellules érythroïdes. Au niveau du maintien de l’homéostasie par régulation de l’apoptose, Ikaros est connu pour cibler l’anti-apoptotique Bcl2l1 dans les lymphocytes. Puisque Gata-1, partenaire préférentiel d’Ikaros cible Bcl2l1 dans les cellules érythroïdes, nous avons caractérisé leur effet sur l’expression de Bcl2l1. Nous avons découvert qu’Ikaros active de façon directe Bcl2l1 et qu’il recrute sur le gène deux complexes partenaires d’élongation : un de la famille SET1/MLL, et le complexe P-TEFb-NuRD. En l’absence d’Ikaros, le fragment intracellulaire de Notch (NICD) et son cofacteur RBP-J remplacent Ikaros et favorisent l’hyper-activation de l’expression de Bcl2l1. Ceci est associé à la modification du complexe d’élongation recruté, ainsi qu’à la mise en place de modifications épigénétiques distinctes de celles observées avec Ikaros ce qui modifie l’élongation transcriptionnelle du gène. Ikaros et Notch sont fréquemment mutés ou présentent des fonctions altérées dans les leucémies. Notre étude montre un dialogue Ikaros/Notch influençant aussi bien la différenciation que l’apoptose et met en évidence l’existence d’un circuit génétique dont le dérèglement pourrait favoriser l’apparition d’une hématopoïèse maligne.

Compositional data analysis in archaeometry

We shall call an n × p data matrix fully-compositional if the rows sum to a constant, and sub-compositional if the variables are a subset of a fully-compositional data set1. Such data occur widely in archaeometry, where it is common to determine the chemical composition of ceramic, glass, metal or other artefacts using techniques such as neutron activation analysis (NAA), inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICPS), X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) etc. Interest often centres on whether there are distinct chemical groups within the data and whether, for example, these can be associated with different origins or manufacturing technologies

Epigenetic role of N-Myc in Neuroblastoma

Childhood neuroblastoma is the most common solid tumour of infancy and highly refractory to therapy. One of the most powerful prognostic indicators for this disease is the N-Myc gene amplification, which occurs in approximately 25% of all neuroblastomas. N-Myc is a member of transcription factors belonging to a subclass of the larger group of proteins sharing Basic-Region/Helix–Loop–Helix/Leucin-Zipper (BR/HLH/LZ) motif. N-Myc oncoproteins may determine activation or repression of several genes thanks to different protein-protein interactions that may modulate its transcriptional regulatory ability and therefore its potential for oncogenicity. Chromatin modifications, including histone methylation, have a crucial role in transcription de-regulation of many cancer-related genes. Here, it was investigated whether N-Myc can functionally and/or physically interact with two different factors involved in methyl histone modification: WDR5 (core member of the MLL/Set1 methyltransferase complex) and the de- methylase LSD1. Co-IP assays have demonstrated the presence of both N-Myc-WDR5 and N-Myc-LSD1 complexes in two neuroblastoma cell lines. Human N-Myc amplified cell lines were used as a model system to investigate on transcription activation and/or repression mechanisms carried out by N-Myc-LSD1 and N-Myc-WDR5 protein complexes. qRT-PCR and immunoblot assays underlined the ability of both complexes to positively (N-Myc-WDR5) and negatively (N-Myc-LSD1) influence transcriptional regulation of crititical neuroblastoma N-Myc-related genes, MDM2, p21 and Clusterin. Ch-IP experiments have revealed the binding of the N-Myc complexes above mentioned to the gene promoters analysed. Finally, pharmacological treatment pointed to abolish N-Myc and LSD1 activity were performed to test cellular alterations, such as cell viability and cell cycle progression. Overall, the results presented in this work suggest that N-Myc can interact with two distinct histone methyl modifiers to positively and negatively affect gene transcription in neuroblastoma.

Menin associates with a trithorax family histone methyltransferase complex and with the Hoxc8 locus

The cellular function of the menin tumor suppressor protein, product of the MEN1 gene mutated in familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, has not been defined. We now show that menin is associated with a histone methyltransferase complex containing two trithorax family proteins, MLL2 and Ash2L, and other homologs of the yeast Set1 assembly. This menin-associated complex methylates histone H3 on lysine 4. A subset of tumor-derived menin mutants lacks the associated histone methyltransferase activity. In addition, menin is associated with RNA polymerase II whose large subunit carboxyl-terminal domain is phosphorylated on Ser5. Men1 knockout embryos and cells show decreased expression of the homeobox genes Hoxc6 and Hoxc8. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that menin is bound to the Hoxc8 locus. These results suggest that menin activates the transcription of differentiation-regulating genes by covalent histone modification, and that this activity is related to tumor suppression by MEN1.

Analiza proteomiczna kompleksów tworzonych przez białko hDPY30 w komórkach ludzkich

Wydział Biologii