Numerical analysis of roadside design (NARD). Volume II: programmers manual. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations Research and Development, McLean, Va.

Safety treatment of roadside culverts on low volume roads. Final report.

Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, Transportation Planning Division, Austin

Hazardous effects of highway features and roadside objects. Volume 1: literature review and methodology. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Hazardous effects of highway features and roadside objects. Volume 2: findings. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Determination of the operational performance requirements for a roadside accident countermeasure warrant system. Volume II - technical documentation. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations Research and Development, McLean, Va.

Numerical analysis of roadside design (NARD). Volume I: users manual. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations Research and Development, McLean, Va.

Predicting occupant risk indicators for frontal impacts with redirective crash cushions

Crash cushions are devices deployed on the road network in order to shield fixed roadside hazards and the non-crashworthy ends of road safety barriers. However crash cushions vary in terms of configuration and operation, meaning that different devices may also vary in terms of ability to mitigate occupant risk. In this study, data derived from crash testing of eleven redirective crash cushions is used as the base input to a numerical procedure for calculation of occupant risk indicators Occupant Impact Velocity (OIV), Occupant Ridedown Acceleration (ORA) and longitudinal Acceleration Severity Index (ASI) for a range of simulated impacting vehicles (mass 800 kg to 2,500 kg) impacting each crash cushion at a range of impact speeds (18 m/s to 32 m/s). The results may be interpreted as demonstrating firstly that enhanced knowledge of the performance of a device over a range of impact conditions, i.e., beyond the crash testing, may assist in determining the crash cushion most suited to a particular application; secondly that a more appropriate conformance test for occupant risk would be a frontal impact by a small (light) vehicle travelling parallel to and aligned with the centreline of the crash cushion; and thirdly that current documented numerical procedures for calculating occupant risk indicators may require review.

Conventional road safety. Phase 1: a study of fixed subjects. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Relationships between off-road fixed-object accident rates and roadway elements of urban highways. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Safety effects of cross-section design for two-lane roads. Volume I - final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Safety Design Division, McLean, Va.

Crash tests of rural mailbox installations. Interim report.

Federal Highway Administration, Implementation Division, Washington, D.C.

Safety effects of cross-section design for two-lane roads. Volume II - appendixes.

Federal Highway Administration, Safety Design Division, McLean, Va.

Maintenance and highway safety handbook. 1977 update of 1970 edition.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Evaluation of design analysis procedures and acceptance criteria for roadside hardware. Volume V - hazards of the redirected car. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Safety Design Division, McLean, Va.

A safe system-based approach to selection of clear zones, safety barriers and other roadside treatments

On average, 560 fatal run-off-road crashes occur annually in Australia and 135 in New Zealand. In addition, there are more than 14,000 run-off-road crashes causing injuries each year across both countries. In rural areas, run-off-road casualty crashes constitute 50-60% of all casualty crashes. Their severity is particularly high with more than half of those involved sustaining fatal or serious injuries. This paper reviews the existing approach to roadside hazard risk assessment, selection of clear zones and hazard treatments. It proposes a modified approach to roadside safety evaluation and management. It is a methodology based on statistical modelling of run-off-road casualty crashes, and application of locally developed crash modification factors and severity indices. Clear zones, safety barriers and other roadside design/treatment options are evaluated with a view to minimise fatal and serious injuries – the key Safe System objective. The paper concludes with a practical demonstration of the proposed approach. The paper is based on findings from a four-year Austroads research project into improving roadside safety in the Safe System context.