The forensic radiographer: a new member in the medicolegal team.

Multidetector computed tomography is becoming more widespread in forensic medicine. In most services, autopsy assistants perform the radiological examination. We introduced professional radiographers into the legal medicine service and hypothesized they would also be able to take over duties currently reserved for other specialists. The aims of this study were to evaluate if radiographers could be trained as "forensic radiographers" by (1) integrating graduated medical radiographers into the legal medicine service, (2) investigating the advantages of this collaboration, and (3) defining the duties of the forensic radiographers.The study was performed prospectively on a group of 8 recruited radiographers who underwent a testing period with special training. They learned the basics of medicolegal case treatment, the autonomous execution of postmortem computed tomography angiography, and postprocessing of data. Seven of 8 radiographers finished the training and were integrated into our service. Although all radiographers were able to fulfill the duties demanded after the training period, some radiographers could not enter or complete the program because they were unable to work with dead bodies.Our study presents the advantages of integrating radiographers into the medicolegal team and proposes how to train the forensic radiographers. In addition, the duties and responsibilities of these new specialists are defined.

The effect of introducing radiographer reporting on the availability of reports for Accident and Emergency and General Practitioner examinations: a time-series analysis

This study explores whether the introduction of selectively trained radiographers reporting Accident and Emergency (A&E) X-ray examinations or the appendicular skeleton affected the availability of reports for A&E and General Practitioner (GP) examinations at it typical district general hospital. This was achieved by analysing monthly data on A&E and GP examinations for 1993 1997 using structural time-series models. Parameters to capture stochastic seasonal effects and stochastic time trends were included ill the models. The main outcome measures were changes in the number, proportion and timeliness of A&E and GP examinations reported. Radiographer reporting X-ray examinations requested by A&E was associated with it 12% (p = 0.050) increase in the number of A&E examinations reported and it 37% (p

Evaluation of exposure index (IgM) in orthopaedic radiography

The exposure index (lgM) obtained from a radiographic image may be a useful feedback indicator to the radiographer about the appropriate exposure level in routine clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate lgM in orthopaedic radiography performed in the standard clinical environment. We analysed the lgM of 267 exposures performed with an AGFA CR system. The mean value of lgM in our sample is 2.14. A significant difference (P=0.000<0.05) from 1.96 lgM reference is shown. Data show that 72% of exposures are above the 1.96 lgM and 42% are above the limit of 2.26. Median values of lgM are above 1.96 and below 2.26 for Speed class (SC) 200 (2.16) and SC400 (2.13). The interquartile range is lower in SC400 than in SC200. Data seem to indicate that lgM values are above the manufacturer’s reference of 1.96. Departmental exposure charts should be optimised to reduce the dose given to patients.

Caracterização tecnológica da mamografia digital em Portugal: progresso de um projeto em implementação

Introdução – A mamografia é o principal método de diagnóstico por imagem utilizado no rastreio e diagnóstico do cancro da mama, sendo a modalidade de imagem recomendada em vários países da Europa e Estados Unidos para utilização em programas de rastreio. A implementação da tecnologia digital causou alterações na prática da mamografia, nomeadamente a necessidade de adaptar os programas de controlo de qualidade. Objetivos – Caracterizar a tecnologia instalada para mamografia em Portugal e as práticas adotadas na sua utilização pelos profissionais de saúde envolvidos. Concluir sobre o nível de harmonização das práticas em mamografia em Portugal e a conformidade com as recomendações internacionais. Identificar oportunidades para otimização que permitam assegurar a utilização eficaz e segura da tecnologia. Metodologia – Pesquisa e recolha de dados sobre a tecnologia instalada, fornecidos por fontes governamentais, prestadores de serviços de mamografia e indústria. Construção de três questionários, orientados ao perfil do médico radiologista, técnico de radiologia com atividade em mamografia digital e técnico de radiologia coordenador. Os questionários foram aplicados em 65 prestadores de serviços de mamografia selecionados com base em critérios de localização geográfica, tipo de tecnologia instalada e perfil da instituição. Resultados – Foram identificados 441 sistemas para mamografia em Portugal. A tecnologia mais frequente (62%) e vulgarmente conhecida por radiografia computorizada (computed radiography) é constituída por um detector (image plate) de material fotoestimulável inserido numa cassete de suporte e por um sistema de processamento ótico. A maioria destes sistemas (78%) está instalada em prestadores privados. Aproximadamente 12% dos equipamentos instalados são sistemas para radiografia digital direta (Direct Digital Radiography – DDR). Os critérios para seleção dos parâmetros técnicos de exposição variam, observando-se que em 65% das instituições são adotadas as recomendações dos fabricantes do equipamento. As ferramentas de pós-processamento mais usadas pelos médicos radiologistas são o ajuste do contraste e brilho e magnificação total e/ou localizada da imagem. Quinze instituições (em 19) têm implementado um programa de controlo de qualidade. Conclusões – Portugal apresenta um parque de equipamentos heterogéneo que inclui tecnologia obsoleta e tecnologia “topo de gama”. As recomendações/guidelines (europeias ou americanas) não são adotadas formalmente na maioria das instituições como guia para fundamentação das práticas em mamografia, dominando as recomendações dos fabricantes do equipamento. Foram identificadas, pelos técnicos de radiologia e médicos radiologistas, carências de formação especializada, nomeadamente nas temáticas da intervenção mamária, otimização da dose e controlo da qualidade. A maioria dos inquiridos concorda com a necessidade de certificação da prática da mamografia em Portugal e participaria num programa voluntário. ABSTRACT - Introduction – Mammography is the gold standard for screening and imaging diagnosis of breast disease. It is the imaging modality recommended by screening programs in various countries in Europe and the United States. The implementation of the digital technology promoted changes in mammography practice and triggered the need to adjust quality control programs. Aims –Characterize the technology for mammography installed in Portugal. Assess practice in use in mammography and its harmonization and compliance to international guidelines. Identify optimization needs to promote an effective and efficient use of digital mammography to full potential. Methodology – Literature review was performed. Data was collected from official sources (governmental bodies, mammography healthcare providers and medical imaging industry) regarding the number and specifications of mammography equipment installed in Portugal. Three questionnaires targeted at radiologists, breast radiographers and the chief-radiographer were designed for data collection on the technical and clinical practices in mammography. The questionnaires were delivered in a sample of 65 mammography providers selected according to geographical criteria, type of technology and institution profile. Results – Results revealed 441 mammography systems installed in Portugal. The most frequent (62%) technology type are computerized systems (CR) mostly installed in the private sector (78%). 12% are direct radiography systems (DDR). The criteria for selection of the exposure parameters differ between the institutions with the majority (65%) following the recommendations from the manufacturers. The use of available tools for post-processing is limited being the most frequently reported tools used the contrast/ brightness and Zoom or Pan Magnification tools. Fifteen participant institutions (out of 19) have implemented a quality control programme. Conclusions – The technology for mammography in Portugal is heterogeneous and includes both obsolete and state of the art equipment. International guidelines (European or American) are not formally implemented and the manufacturer recommendations are the most frequently used guidance. Education and training needs were identified amongst the healthcare professionals (radiologists and radiographers) with focus in the areas of mammography intervention, patient dose optimization and quality control. The majority of the participants agree with the certification of mammography in Portugal.

A mamografia: experiência psicológica, atitudes e comportamentos do técnico de radiologia facilitadores da colaboração da mulher

RESUMO: A mamografia é o método de diagnóstico mais eficaz para deteção precoce de carcinoma da mama. A realização periódica deste exame tem vindo a ser associada a melhores prognósticos como deteção da doença em fases mais precoces e redução de mortalidade. Contudo, a mamografia não é encarada como mais um exame complementar de diagnóstico e constitui, para a maioria das mulheres, uma situação de ameaça. Na verdade, muitas mulheres referem ter experienciado ansiedade, dor ou desconforto durante a realização deste procedimento. Por outro lado, uma percentagem elevada de mulheres falha na realização periódica de mamografias. Este artigo pretende abordar as reações psicológicas associadas ao exame de mamografia e enfatizar a forma como os técnicos de radiologia podem melhorar o atendimento das mulheres que realizam este exame. O papel do técnico de radiologia no fornecimento de informação antes do exame, na criação de uma atmosfera agradável e empática e na utilização de estratégias de confronto para redução de dor e desconforto e na promoção do controlo e autonomia da paciente são alguns dos aspetos abordados.

Radiographers and radiation protection: education, training and CPD

The increasing use of ionizing radiation for medical purposes emphasizes the concern about safety and justification of using ionizing radiation. This is linked with the use of new and high-dose X-ray technology (particularly CT). According to the UNSCEAR 2010 Report the total number of diagnostic medical examinations (both medical and dental) is estimated to have risen from 2.4 billion (period 1991–1996) to 3.6 billion (period 1997– 2008) - a marked increase in collective doses. An appropriate use of technology aiming diagnostic or therapy and respecting the ALARA principle is a mandatory requisite to safely perform any radiological procedure. Radiation protection is thus, a concern of all specialists in the radiology field ( radiologists, radiographers, medical physicists, among other professional groups). The importance of education and training of these professionals in reducing patients’ doses while maintaining the desired level of quality in medical exposures, as well as precise therapeutic treatments is well recognized. Education, training and continuing professional development (CPD) constitute a triad pointing towards the radiographers’ development of competences in the radiation protection field. This presentation excludes the radiographer role and competences in the fields of ultrasonography and MRI.

Avaliação da dose efetiva recebida pelo técnico de radiologia no contexto ocupacional

Introdução – As funções a desempenhar pelos técnicos de radiologia (TR) envolvem exposição ocupacional às radiações ionizantes, podendo acarretar potenciais efeitos biológicos. Metodologia – De modo a avaliar a dose efetiva recebida pelo TR nos diferentes métodos de estudo radiológico em que este trabalha, procedeu-se à realização de um estudo exploratório-descritivo. Efetuaram-se medições com dosímetros termoluminescentes em cinco valências radiológicas e foram aplicados questionários aos TR para determinar o tempo total de trabalho, bem como as medidas gerais de proteção radiológica utilizadas durante o período de medições. Resultados – Verificou-se que as doses efetivas, calculadas por hora, foram mais elevadas na valência de radiologia de intervenção, com os dados obtidos sobre a proteção plumbínea, sendo que a valência com menor dose efetiva calculada por hora foi a de mamografia, que apresentou um valor de medição igual a zero. Conclusões – Com o presente estudo conclui-se que existem diferenças de dose efetiva recebida de acordo com a função desempenhada pelo TR. Pela extrapolação dos valores calculados para doses efetivas anuais, verificou-se que os valores correspondentes a cada valência se encontram muito abaixo do limite anual legal de 20mSv.

Perceção dos riscos ocupacionais pelos técnicos de radiologia da Região Autónoma dos Açores

Dissertação de Mestrado, Ambiente, Saúde e Segurança, 23 de Abril de 2013, Universidade dos Açores.

Mammography equipment design: impact on radiographers’ practice

Objectives - Identify radiographers’ postures during frequent mammography procedures related to the mammography equipment and patient characteristics. Methods - A postural task analysis was performed using images acquired during the simulation of mammography positioning procedures. Simulations included craniocaudal/(CC) and mediolateral-oblique/(MLO) positioning in three different settings: radiographers and patients with similar statures, radiographers smaller than the patients and radiographers taller than the patients. Measurements of postural angles were performed by two raters using adequate software and classified according to the European Standard EN1005-4:2005 + A1:2008. Results - The simulations revealed that the most awkward posture in mammography is during the positioning of MLO projection in short-stature patients. Postures identified as causing work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WRMSD) risk were neck extension, arms elevated and the back stooped, presenting angles of 87.2, 118.6 and 63.6, respectively. If radiographers were taller than patients, then the trunk and arm postures were not acceptable. Conclusions - Working in a mammography room leads to awkward postures that can have an impact on radiographers’ health, namely WRMSDs. The results in this study showed that there are non-acceptable postures associated with frequent working procedures in mammography. MLO is the most demanding procedure for radiographer postures and may be related to WRMSDs. Mammography devices should be redesigned considering adjustability for radiographers. Main Messages: • Mammography constraints for radiographers in mammography procedures have not been well studied. • Performing mammography leads to awkward postures that can impact radiographers’ health. • MLO, the most demanding procedure for radiographers, is possibly related to WRMSDs.

Guest editorial: OPTIMAX 2013

In 2012 we were awarded an Erasmus Intensive Programme grant to facilitate OPTIMAX 2013, a three week duration residential summer school held within the UK during August 2013. The summer school helped to further develop student radiographer skills in optimising x-radiation dose and image quality. With a major emphasis on visual techniques to determine image quality, lesion visibility, lesion detection performance and physical measures of image quality (eg signal to noise ratio (SNR)) we conducted controlled laboratory experiments on phantoms using Computed Radiography, CT and Full Field Digital Mammography. Mathematical modelling was used for radiation dose estimation. Sixty seven people from 5 European countries participated. This included 49 PhD, MSc and BSc students. Discipline areas included radiography, physics, biomedical science and nuclear medicine.

A decisão técnica num serviço de radiologia de urgência hospitalar: o caso dos técnicos de radiologia do Hospital de São José (Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa — Zona Central)

Mestrado em Intervenção Sócio-Organizacional na Saúde - Ramo de especialização: Políticas de Administração e Gestão de Serviços de Saúde

OPTIMAX 2014 - Radiation dose and image quality optimisation in medical imaging

Medical imaging is a powerful diagnostic tool. Consequently, the number of medical images taken has increased vastly over the past few decades. The most common medical imaging techniques use X-radiation as the primary investigative tool. The main limitation of using X-radiation is associated with the risk of developing cancers. Alongside this, technology has advanced and more centres now use CT scanners; these can incur significant radiation burdens compared with traditional X-ray imaging systems. The net effect is that the population radiation burden is rising steadily. Risk arising from X-radiation for diagnostic medical purposes needs minimising and one way to achieve this is through reducing radiation dose whilst optimising image quality. All ages are affected by risk from X-radiation however the increasing population age highlights the elderly as a new group that may require consideration. Of greatest concern are paediatric patients: firstly they are more sensitive to radiation; secondly their younger age means that the potential detriment to this group is greater. Containment of radiation exposure falls to a number of professionals within medical fields, from those who request imaging to those who produce the image. These staff are supported in their radiation protection role by engineers, physicists and technicians. It is important to realise that radiation protection is currently a major European focus of interest and minimum competence levels in radiation protection for radiographers have been defined through the integrated activities of the EU consortium called MEDRAPET. The outcomes of this project have been used by the European Federation of Radiographer Societies to describe the European Qualifications Framework levels for radiographers in radiation protection. Though variations exist between European countries radiographers and nuclear medicine technologists are normally the professional groups who are responsible for exposing screening populations and patients to X-radiation. As part of their training they learn fundamental principles of radiation protection and theoretical and practical approaches to dose minimisation. However dose minimisation is complex – it is not simply about reducing X-radiation without taking into account major contextual factors. These factors relate to the real world of clinical imaging and include the need to measure clinical image quality and lesion visibility when applying X-radiation dose reduction strategies. This requires the use of validated psychological and physics techniques to measure clinical image quality and lesion perceptibility.

Effect of technical parameters on dose and image quality in a computed radiography system

The discovery of X-rays was undoubtedly one of the greatest stimulus for improving the efficiency in the provision of healthcare services. The ability to view, non-invasively, inside the human body has greatly facilitated the work of professionals in diagnosis of diseases. The exclusive focus on image quality (IQ), without understanding how they are obtained, affect negatively the efficiency in diagnostic radiology. The equilibrium between the benefits and the risks are often forgotten. It is necessary to adopt optimization strategies to maximize the benefits (image quality) and minimize risk (dose to the patient) in radiological facilities. In radiology, the implementation of optimization strategies involves an understanding of images acquisition process. When a radiographer adopts a certain value of a parameter (tube potential [kVp], tube current-exposure time product [mAs] or additional filtration), it is essential to know its meaning and impact of their variation in dose and image quality. Without this, any optimization strategy will be a failure. Worldwide, data show that use of x-rays has been increasingly frequent. In Cabo Verde, we note an effort by healthcare institutions (e.g. Ministry of Health) in equipping radiological facilities and the recent installation of a telemedicine system requires purchase of new radiological equipment. In addition, the transition from screen-films to digital systems is characterized by a raise in patient exposure. Given that this transition is slower in less developed countries, as is the case of Cabo Verde, the need to adopt optimization strategies becomes increasingly necessary. This study was conducted as an attempt to answer that need. Although this work is about objective evaluation of image quality, and in medical practice the evaluation is usually subjective (visual evaluation of images by radiographer / radiologist), studies reported a correlation between these two types of evaluation (objective and subjective) [5-7] which accredits for conducting such studies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of exposure parameters (kVp and mAs) when using additional Cooper (Cu) filtration in dose and image quality in a Computed Radiography system.

Failure on clinical image quality criteria in digital mammography: how can radiographers do better?

Purpose: To assess image quality using PGMI (perfect, good, moderate, inadequate) scale in digital mammography examinations acquired in DR systems. Identify the main failures and propose corrective actions. Evaluate the most typical breast density. Methods and Materials: Clinical image quality criteria were evaluated considering mammograms acquired in 13 DR systems and classified according to PGMI scale using the criteria described in European Commission guidelines for radiographers. The breast density was assessed according to ACR recommendations. The data were collected on the acquisition system monitor to reproduce the daily practice of the radiographer. Results: The image quality criteria were evaluated in 3044 images. The criteria were fully achieved in 41% of the images that were classified as P (perfect), 31 % of the images were classified as M (moderate), 20% G (good) and 9% I (inadequate). The main cause of inadequate image quality was absence of all breast tissue in the image, skin folders in the pectoral muscle and in the infra-mammary angle. The higher number of failures occurred in MLO projections (809 out of 1022). The most represented (36%) breast type was type 2 (25-50% glandular tissue). Conclusion: Incorrect radiographic technique was frequently detected suggesting potential training needs and poor communication between the team members (radiographer and radiologists). Further correlations are necessary to identify the main causes for the failures, namely specific education and training in digital mammography and workload.

Lesion detection performance in an anthropomorphic chest phantom: comparative analysis of low-dose CT data on two hybrid imaging systems

Introduction: multimodality environment; requirement for greater understanding of the imaging technologies used, the limitations of these technologies, and how to best interpret the results; dose optimization; introduction of new techniques; current practice and best practice; incidental findings, in low-dose CT images obtained as part of the hybrid imaging process, are an increasing phenomenon with advancing CT technology; resultant ethical and medico-legal dilemmas; understanding limitations of these procedures important when reporting images and recommending follow-up; free-response observer performance study was used to evaluate lesion detection in low-dose CT images obtained during attenuation correction acquisitions for myocardial perfusion imaging, on two hybrid imaging systems.