Посланието на патриарх Фотий до българския княз Борис-Михаил и неговият славянски превод

Статията разглежда славянския превод на Посланието на патриарх Фотий до българския княз Борис- Михаил, запазен само в руски преписи от началото на XVI до началото на XX в. Специално внимание се отделя на езика на славянския превод (правопис, морфосинтаксис, лексика и словообразуване), чрез който става възможно датирането на превода, тъй като липсват всякакви други (литературни, исторически, палеографски, кодикологични) сведения за това. Изследването на езика позволява пре- водът да се отнесе към книжовната продукция на XIV в. и по-точно към школата на Евтимий Търновски. Причината за появата на славянския превод на Фотиевия трактат трябва да се търси в основното послание на съчинението – запазване устоите на християнската вяра и въплъщаването й в държавното управление.

Der Patriarch Isak in der bildenden Kunst

G. Kutna

Der Patriarch Jakob in der bildenden Kunst

G. Kutna

Der Patriarch Jakob in der bildenden Kunst

G. Kutna

[Sefer Yetsirah] id est Liber Iezirah, qui Abrahamo patriarchæ adscribitur : unà cum commentario rabi Abraham f. D super 32 Semitis Sapientiæ, à quibus liber Iezirah incipit

translatus & notis illustratus à Joanne Stephano Rittanglio

Der Patriarch : Fest-Predigt zur Vorfeier des Fest's des hundertsten Geburtstages Sir Moses Montefiore's am Schemini-Azereth 5645

gehalten von Oberrabbiner Dr. Moritz Löwy

Patriarch Kirill's game over Ukraine. OSW Commentary No. 144, 14.08.2014

The protests on Kyiv’s Maidan which commenced in November 2013, followed by the conflict in Ukraine’s eastern regions, have redefined the political and social relations between Russia and Ukraine, and have added complexity to the dependences between the Orthodox Churches operating in the two countries. The Kremlin’s policy has put the Russian Orthodox Church–Moscow Patriarchate (ROC) in an awkward position. The ROC is Russia’s largest religious organisation, which also exercises symbolic sovereignty over Ukraine’s most numerous Orthodox community, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church–Moscow Patriarchate (UOC–MP), which since 13 August has had a new leader, Metropolitan Onufry. The head of the ROC, the Patriarch of Moscow and All-Russia, Kirill, has been facing a dilemma as to how he should respond to the Russian government’s aggressive policy towards Ukraine. His firm support of the Kremlin’s moves in Ukraine, may lose the Russian Church its social influence in this country. This might also catalyse a process within which Ukraine’s largest Orthodox Church would gradually become independent of Moscow. On the other hand, if he condemns the Kremlin’s policy, this would adversely affect the co-operation between ‘the altar and the throne’ which has been rapidly developing over the past few years in Russia, and which has offered multiple benefits to the Russian Church. As a result, Patriarch Kirill has distanced the ROC from the recent developments in Ukraine and has adopted a neutral stance. However, Kirill’s choice has aggravated the negative perception of the ROC among the Orthodox community in Ukraine. Given its close relations with the Kremlin, the ROC is increasingly viewed there as an instrument of political struggle and an exponent of the Russian government’s interests. The ROC’s stance has cast the UOC–MP, which has links with the Russian Church, in an unfavourable light, and has fostered its efforts to become more independent from the Moscow Patriarchate. Regardless of how the situation evolves, the recent developments in Ukraine have made it clear that the interests of the Russian Church and the Kremlin, which have coincided for years, now come into conflict, mainly due to the disagreement over the methods used. Despite this, the Russian Church is not withdrawing from the cooperation of ‘the altar and the throne’, and submits itself to the Kremlin’s decisions.

The patriarch of one hundred years; being reminiscences, historical and biographical, of Rev. Henry Boehm,

Mode of access: Internet.

William Nast, patriarch of German Methodism.

Includes bibliography.

The ecclesiastical history of Sozomen, comprising a history of the church, from A.D.324 to A.D.440. Tr. from the Greek: with a memoir of the author. Also: The ecclesiastical history of Philostorgius, as epitomised by Photius, patriarch of Constantinople.

Mode of access: Internet.

The travels of Macarius, patriarch of Antioch: written by his attendant archdeacon, Paul of Aleppo, in Arabic ...

Issued in 9 pts., 1829-36.

The travels of Macarius, patriarch of Antioch:

An incomplete translation; does not contain the history of the Antioch patriarchs. cf. Russian Brockhaus.

Patriarch Mahnke;

Mode of access: Internet.

Chan Patriarch Bodhidharma

Chen Yanqing; 11 47/64 in.x 7 31/64 in.x 5 33/64 in.; porcelain with ivory glaze (Dehua ware)