748 resultados para PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS
Resumo:
This study investigated the effects of an explicit individualized phonemic awareness intervention administered by a speech-language pathologist to 4 prekindergarten children with phonological speech sound disorders. Research has demonstrated that children with moderate-severe expressive phonological disorders are at-risk for poor literacy development because they often concurrently exhibit weaknesses in the development of phonological awareness skills (Rvachew, Ohberg, Grawburg, & Heyding, 2003).^ The research design chosen for this study was a single subject multiple probe design across subjects. After stable baseline measures, the participants received explicit instruction in each of the three phases separately and sequentially. Dependent measures included same-day tests for Phase I (Phoneme Identity), Phase II (Phoneme Blending), and Phase III (Phoneme Segmentation), and generalization and maintenance tests for all three phases.^ All 4 participants made substantial progress in all three phases. These skills were maintained during weekly and biweekly maintenance measures. Generalization measures indicated that the participants demonstrated some increases in their mean total number of correct responses in Phase II and Phase III baseline while the participants were in Phase I intervention, and more substantial increases in Phase III baseline while the participants were in Phase II intervention. Increased generalization from Phases II to III could likely be explained due to the response similarities in those two skills (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007).^ Based upon the findings of this study, speech-language pathologists should evaluate phonological awareness in the children in their caseloads prior to kindergarten entry, and should allocate time during speech therapy to enhance phonological awareness and letter knowledge to support the development of both skills concurrently. Also, classroom teachers should collaborate with speech-language pathologists to identify at-risk students in their classrooms and successfully implement evidence-based phonemic awareness instruction. Future research should repeat this study including larger groups of children, children with combined speech and language delays, children of different ages, and ESOL students.^
Resumo:
This study investigated the effects of an explicit individualized phonemic awareness intervention administered by a speech-language pathologist to 4 prekindergarten children with phonological speech sound disorders. Research has demonstrated that children with moderate-severe expressive phonological disorders are at-risk for poor literacy development because they often concurrently exhibit weaknesses in the development of phonological awareness skills (Rvachew, Ohberg, Grawburg, & Heyding, 2003). The research design chosen for this study was a single subject multiple probe design across subjects. After stable baseline measures, the participants received explicit instruction in each of the three phases separately and sequentially. Dependent measures included same-day tests for Phase I (Phoneme Identity), Phase II (Phoneme Blending), and Phase III (Phoneme Segmentation), and generalization and maintenance tests for all three phases. All 4 participants made substantial progress in all three phases. These skills were maintained during weekly and biweekly maintenance measures. Generalization measures indicated that the participants demonstrated some increases in their mean total number of correct responses in Phase II and Phase III baseline while the participants were in Phase I intervention, and more substantial increases in Phase III baseline while the participants were in Phase II intervention. Increased generalization from Phases II to III could likely be explained due to the response similarities in those two skills (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007). Based upon the findings of this study, speech-language pathologists should evaluate phonological awareness in the children in their caseloads prior to kindergarten entry, and should allocate time during speech therapy to enhance phonological awareness and letter knowledge to support the development of both skills concurrently. Also, classroom teachers should collaborate with speech-language pathologists to identify at-risk students in their classrooms and successfully implement evidence-based phonemic awareness instruction. Future research should repeat this study including larger groups of children, children with combined speech and language delays, children of different ages, and ESOL students
Resumo:
Objective: Stimulability is the ability to produce an adequate sound under specific conditions. This study aimed to describe the stimulability of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children with and without phonological disorders for the production of liquid sounds with the aid of visual and tactile cues. Patients and Methods: The study sample included 36 children between 5; 0 and 11; 6 years of age, 18 with phonological disorder and 18 without any speech-language disorders. Stimulability was measured for syllable imitation. The stimulability test employed includes 63 syllables with the sounds [1], [(sic)], and [(sic)], as well as seven oral vowels. If the subject was unable to imitate a sound, a visual cue was given. When necessary, a tactile cue was also given. Results: The sound [(sic)] required greater use of sensory cues. Children with phonological disorder needed a greater number of cues. Conclusion: The use of sensory cues seemed to facilitate sound stimulability, making it possible for the children with phonological disorder to accurately produce the sounds modeled. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Educação - FFC
Aquisição fonológica de fricativas por crianças com transtorno fonológico: uma investigação acústica
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Estudos Linguísticos - IBILCE
Resumo:
The present study focuses on the presence of covert contrasts in the speech of children with a phonological disorder. The hypothesis is that children with phonological disorders manipulate secondary acoustic cues in an attempt to distinguish the phonological contrasts. We used five audio recordings of the speech of five children with speech disorders, between four and five years of age, who showed the so-called “phonic substitution” involving the sound group of the fricatives. The data were edited and analyzed using the software PRAAT. A phonetic transcription of the first repetition of each child was performed by three evaluators, reaching a 66% agreement level. After the transcription, we carried out a contrastive phonological analysis of the production of the five children and, finally, an acoustic analysis of all the “substitutions”, based on six parameters. We discovered the existence of covert contrasts in the productions auditorily regarded as homophones by the evaluators, representing a total of 54% of total substitutions identified through an impressionistic approach by the evaluators. Children with phonological disorders are seen to rely on secondary acoustic cues in an attempt to distinguish fricative phonemes. The data obtained in this study allow us to reflect on the importance of considering the phonetic detail within the phonological models.
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
OBJETIVO: Comparar o desempenho de crianças com e sem transtorno fonológico (TF) quanto às habilidades de consciência fonológica (CF), índice de Porcentagem de Consoantes Corretas - Revisada (PCC-R) e Índice de Inconsistência de Fala (IIF), além de correlacionar estes resultados entre si. MÉTODOS: Participaram 36 sujeitos, entre 5 anos e 7 anos de idade, divididos em: Grupo Pesquisa (GP): 18 crianças com TF; e Grupo Controle (GC): 18 crianças em desenvolvimento típico de linguagem. Foi calculado o PCC-R, aplicado o IIF e o Teste de Sensibilidade Fonológica-Visual (TSF-V): aliteração igual (AI), diferente (AD) e total (AT), rima igual (RI), diferente (RD) e total (RT). Os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente. RESULTADOS: Foram encontradas diferenças na comparação dos grupos em todos os índices, com melhores desempenhos no GC. Neste, houve correlação negativa do IIF com todas as habilidades de CF e com o PCC-R, exceto com RI. Em todos os subtestes do TSF-V houve correlações positivas entre si. No GP, foram encontradas correlações positivas entre o PCC-R e as provas de aliteração; não foram encontradas correlações entre IFF e PCC-R, nem com as provas de CF. Houve correlações no TSF-V: AI com AT; AD com AT; AD com RD; RI com RT e RD com RT. CONCLUSÃO: Crianças com TF apresentam pior desempenho; as do GC, na medida em que estabilizam a produção de fala, desenvolvem as habilidades de rima e aliteração. As crianças do GP são mais inconsistentes e parecem desenvolver as habilidades de CF de forma desorganizada.
Resumo:
OBJETIVO: Comparar o desempenho em processamento temporal de crianças com transtorno fonológico submetidos a treino auditivo formal e informal. MÉTODOS: Quinze indivíduos com transtorno fonológico (limiares tonais ≤20 dBNA de 0,50 a 4 kHz e idades entre 7 anos e 10 anos e 11 meses) foram avaliados e divididos em três grupos: Grupo Controle - composto por cinco indivíduos (média de idade de 9,1 anos) sem transtorno do processamento auditivo, que passaram por duas avaliações do processamento auditivo (central) com intervalo de seis a oito semanas, sem receber qualquer intervenção; Grupo Treino Formal - composto por cinco indivíduos (média de idade de 8,3 anos), com transtorno do processamento auditivo, submetidos a oito sessões de treino formal; e Grupo Treino Informal - composto por cinco indivíduos (média de idade de 8,1 anos) com transtorno do processamento auditivo, submetidos a oito sessões de treino informal. RESULTADOS: Após oito sessões, o grupo treino formal apresentou melhora de 8% e o grupo treino informal de 22,5% no que se refere ao teste padrão temporal de frequência. Para o teste padrão temporal de duração, o grupo treino formal melhorou 12,9% e o grupo treino informal 18,7%. No desempenho nos testes padrão de frequência e padrão de duração, não houve diferença estatística entre as médias obtidas pelos dois grupos após a intervenção. CONCLUSÃO: Embora os resultados não tenham apresentado significância estatística, o estudo piloto apresentado sugere que ambos os treinos, formal e informal, proporcionam melhora das habilidades de processamento temporal em crianças com transtorno fonológico e do processamento auditivo.
Resumo:
Background: The cognitive bases of language impairment in specific language impairment (SLI) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) were investigated in a novel non-word comparison task which manipulated phonological short-term memory (PSTM) and speech perception, both implicated in poor non-word repetition. Aims: This study aimed to investigate the contributions of PSTM and speech perception in non-word processing and whether individuals with SLI and ASD plus language impairment (ALI) show similar or different patterns of deficit in these cognitive processes. Method & Procedures: Three groups of adolescents (aged 14–17 years), 14 with SLI, 16 with ALI, and 17 age and non-verbal IQ matched typically developing (TD) controls, made speeded discriminations between non-word pairs. Stimuli varied in PSTM load (two- or four-syllables) and speech perception load (mismatches on a word-initial or word-medial segment). Outcomes & Results: Reaction times showed effects of both non-word length and mismatch position and these factors interacted: four-syllable and word-initial mismatch stimuli resulted in the slowest decisions. Individuals with language impairment showed the same pattern of performance as those with typical development in the reaction time data. A marginal interaction between group and item length was driven by the SLI and ALI groups being less accurate with long items than short ones, a difference not found in the TD group. Conclusions & Implications: Non-word discrimination suggests that there are similarities and differences between adolescents with SLI and ALI and their TD peers. Reaction times appear to be affected by increasing PSTM and speech perception loads in a similar way. However, there was some, albeit weaker, evidence that adolescents with SLI and ALI are less accurate than TD individuals, with both showing an effect of PSTM load. This may indicate, at some level, the processing substrate supporting both PSTM and speech perception is intact in adolescents with SLI and ALI, but also in both there may be impaired access to PSTM resources.