A distribuição de riscos em concessões florestais: uma análise econômico-jurídica dos riscos recorrentes do inventário florestal amostral

A Lei 11.284/2006 é um importante marco legal da atividade de gestão florestal do Brasil. O manejo florestal sustentável de florestas públicas, até então exercido exclusivamente pelo Estado, passou a ser passível de concessão com o advento dessa Lei. A chamada “concessão florestal” se insere, portanto, na nova orientação político-econômica brasileira de “desestatização”, privilegiando o princípio da eficiência. Como resultado, a atividade de exploração sustentável de produtos florestais passa a ser transferida pelo Estado, por intermédio do Serviço Florestal Brasileiro, à iniciativa privada. Para o sucesso de uma concessão florestal, os licitantes interessados precisam de uma estimativa da capacidade produtiva da “Unidade de Manejo Florestal”. O estudo disponibilizado pelo Serviço Florestal Brasileiro para fazer essa estimativa é o inventário florestal que, resumidamente, tem a importante missão de antecipar às características vegetais de área que será objeto da concessão. E os resultados desse estudo são a principal fonte de informação para que o licitante calcule o valor que irá ofertar ao Poder Concedente. Ocorre que, por questões técnico-metodológicas que fogem ao conhecimento jurídico, os estudos de inventário florestal estão sujeitos a erros de grande escala, retratando, de maneira ilusória, a realidade da vegetação que compõe área que será concedida. Isto é um risco intrínseco à atividade de exploração sustentável de produtos florestais. Diante desse contexto, caberia ao Serviço Florestal Brasileiro administrar o risco do inventário florestal da maneira mais eficiente possível. Entretanto, não é isso que vem ocorrendo nos contratos de concessão florestal. Sobre a distribuição de riscos em contratos de concessão, a doutrina especializada no tema oferece critérios que, quando seguidos, possibilitam uma alocação dos riscos peculiares a cada atividade à parte que melhor tem condições de geri-los. Esses critérios aumentam a eficiência da concessão. Contudo, os contratos de concessão florestal até hoje celebrados não vêm considerando esses importantes critérios para uma eficiente distribuição de riscos. Como consequência, o risco do inventário florestal é, igualmente a outros inúmeros riscos, negligenciado por esses contratos, aumentando-se a ineficiência dos contratos de concessão. Diante desse panorama, os licitantes interessados na concessão adotam duas posturas distintas, ambas igualmente rejeitáveis: a postura do Licitante Conservador e a postura do Licitante Irresponsável. Esses perfis de licitantes geram, respectivamente, ineficiência à concessão e, caso o erro do inventário florestal efetivamente ocorra, a possibilidade de inviabilidade da concessão. Como resposta a isso – que é exatamente o “problema” que pretendo resolver –, proponho uma solução para melhor administrar o risco do inventário florestal. Essa solução, inspirada em uma ideia utilizada na minuta do contrato de concessão da Linha 4 do Metrô de São Paulo, e baseando-se nos critérios oferecidos pela doutrina para uma distribuição eficiente dos riscos, propõe algo novo: a fim de tornar a os contratos de concessão florestal mais eficientes, sugere-se que o risco do inventário florestal deve ser alocado na Administração Pública, e, caso o evento indesejável efetivamente ocorra (erro do inventário florestal), deve-se, por meio do reequilíbrio econômico-financeiro do contrato, ajustar o valor a ser pago pelo concessionário ao Poder Concedente. Como consequência dessa previsão contratual, as propostas dos licitantes serão mais eficientes, permitindo-se alcançar o objetivo primordial da Lei 11.284/2006: aumento da eficiência da exploração florestal sustentável e preservação do meio ambiente e dos recursos florestais.

Willingness to trial functional foods and vitamin supplements: the role of attitudes, subjective norms, and dread of risks

Australian non-users of vitamin supplements (N = 162) and functional foods (N = 226) responded to a questionnaire examining their attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), risk dread and risk familiarity, and willingness to engage in free product trials. The impact of participants’ gender and age was also examined. Attitude and subjective norms were significant determinants of non-users willingness to trial each of the health products. Participants’ dread of the risk associated with the product was also a determinant of willingness to use functional foods. The overall models predicted between 25% and 30% of the variance in people’s willingness to trial the products. The findings provided some support for the TPB in predicting people’s willingness to trial functional foods and vitamin supplements and suggested, for willingness to trial functional foods, that non-users are also influenced by their dread of the risk associated with product use.

The future of cognitive and behavioral therapies in the prevention and early management of psychosis : opportunities and risks

Behavioral and cognitive interventions for people with psychosis have a long and distinguished history, although the evidence for their application to young people remains limited. We anticipate that the next decades will show substantial research into psychological intervention for this population. Important targets will include the management of environmental stressors, reduction of substance misuse, and promotion of early treatment. Psychological management of positive symptoms, depression, and suicidal behavior will continue to be critical objectives. Important secondary prevention goals will be the retention of cognitive functioning, vocational options, social skills, and social network support, including appropriate family support. We expect primary prevention to include both universal programs and interventions for adolescents at particularly high risk. Technical innovations will include increasing use of Internet-based intervention and behavior cueing devices. Pressures for intervention brevity will continue, as will problems with the systematic delivery of effective procedures.

Discharge planning in the emergency department : a comprehensive approach

Discharge planning has become increasingly important, with current trends toward shorter hospital stays, increased health care costs, and more community-based health services. Effective discharge planning ensures the safety and ongoing care for patients,1 and it also benefits health care providers and organizations. It results in shorter hospital stays, fewer readmissions, higher access rates to post-hospitalization services, greater patient satisfaction with the discharge, and improved quality of life and continuity of care.[2] and [3] All acute care patients and their caregivers require some degree of preparation for discharge home—education about their health status, risks, and treatment; help setting health goals and maintaining a good level of self-care; information about community resources; and follow-up appointments and referrals to appropriate community health providers. Inadequate preparation exposes the patient to unnecessary risks of recurrence or complications of the acute complaint, neglect of nonacute comorbidities, mismanagement and side effects of medication, disruption of family and social life, emotional distress, and financial loss.[2], [3] and [4] The result may be re-presentation to the emergency department. It is noteworthy that up to 18% of ED presentations are revisits within 72 hours of the original visit5; many of these are considered preventable.6 It is a primary responsibility of nurses to ensure that patients return to the community adequately prepared and with appropriate support in place. Up to 65% of ED patients are discharged home from the emergency department,7 and the characteristics of the emergency department and its patient population make the provision of a high standard of discharge planning uniquely difficult. In addition, discharge planning is neglected in contemporary emergency nursing—there are no monographs devoted to the subject, and there is little published research. In this article 3 issues are explored: the importance of emergency nurses’ participation in the discharge-planning process, impediments to their participation; and strategies to improve discharge planning in the emergency department.

15 year old volens to BMX riding risks

The Queensland Court of Appeal recently heard a case that raised the defence of volenti on fit injuria. By a majority of 2:1 the court held in Leyden v Caboolture Shire Council [2007] QCA 134 (20 April 2007) that the defence of volenti was established and defeated the action in negligence for damages for personal injury. The facts of the case were quite simple. The plaintiff was 15 years old when he was injured at the Bluebell Park which was controlled and managed by the Caboolture Shire Council (the defendant). The park had a BMX track – built and maintained by the defendant. At trial it was held that although the defendant owed a duty of care to entrants, a duty was not owed to the plaintiff. The judge found that the plaintiff was different to other entrants who used facilities provided by a council in a public park. The plaintiff was not relying upon the defendant to provide a BMX track with jumps that were reasonably safe as the evidence was that the track was regularly altered by third parties and the plaintiff knew that. Therefore it was reasoned that the plaintiff was relying upon the ability of the third parties who modified the jump and his own ability to use it, not the ability of the defendant to provide a reasonably safe track (at [10]). The trial judge also held that if a duty was owed, the defence of volenti applied so as to defeat the claim for damages. This was based upon the evidence that the plaintiff knew of the modification of the jump by third parties and knew of the risk. It was held that the plaintiff ‘had the appropriate subjective appreciation of the risk’ (at [11]).

Validity of the Waterlow screening tool and risks for pressure injury in acute care

Objectives: To assess the validity of the Waterlow screening tool in a cohort of internal medicine patients and to identify factors contributing to pressure injury. Design: Longitudinal cohort study Setting: A tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia Participants: 274 patients admitted through the Emergency Department or outpatient clinics and expected to remain in hospital for at least three days were included in the study. The mean age was 65.3 years. Interventions: Patients were screened on admission using the Waterlow screening tool. Every second day, their pressure ulcer status was monitored and recorded. Main outcome measures: Pressure ulcer incidence Results: Fifteen participants (5.5%) had an existing pressure ulcer and a further 12 (4.4%) developed a pressure ulcer during their hospital stay. Sensitivity of the Waterlow scale was 0.67, (95% CI: 0.35 to 0.88); specificity 0.79, (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.85); PPV 0.13, (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.24); NPV 0.98, (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.99). Conclusion: This study provides further evidence of the poor predictive validity of the Waterlow scale. A suitably powered randomised controlled trial is urgently needed to provide definitive evidence about the usefulness of the Waterlow scale compared with other screening tools and with clinical judgement.

Identity fraud and torrens - minimising the risks and allocating the loss to achieve a sustainable system

Immediate indefeasibility is the cornerstone of the Torrens system of land registration. However, when combined with the apparent ease in which forged mortgages become registered, the operation of this doctrine can come into question. This article seeks to argue that, rather than question indefeasibility, the focus should be on the verification of identity of parties to land transactions. Whilst no system can ever be infallible, it is suggested that by correctly imposing the responsibility for identity verification on the appropriate individual, the Torrens system can retain immediate indefeasibility as its paramount principle, yet achieve the optimum level of fairness in terms of allocation of responsibility and loss. With the dawn of a new era of electronic conveyancing about to begin, the framework suggested here provides a model for minimising the risks of forged mortgages and appropriately allocating the loss.