Rapid parallel expression in E-coli and insect cells: Analysis of five lef gene products of the Autographa californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcMNPV)

A number of strategies are emerging for the high throughput (HTP) expression of recombinant proteins to enable structural and functional study. Here we describe a workable HTP strategy based on parallel protein expression in E. coli and insect cells. Using this system we provide comparative expression data for five proteins derived from the Autographa californica polyhedrosis virus genome that vary in amino acid composition and in molecular weight. Although the proteins are part of a set of factors known to be required for viral late gene expression, the precise function of three of the five, late expression factors (lefs) 6, 7 and 10, is unknown. Rapid expression and characterisation has allowed the determination of their ability to bind DNA and shown a cellular location consistent with their properties. Our data point to the utility of a parallel expression strategy to rapidly obtain workable protein expression levels from many open reading frames (ORFs).

Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale Into a Brazilian Portuguese Version and Validation on Patients With Knee Injuries

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement. OBJECTIVE: To translate and culturally adapt the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) into a Brazilian Portuguese version, and to test the construct and content validity and reliability of this version in patients with knee injuries. BACKGROUND: There is no Brazilian Portuguese version of an instrument to assess the function of the lower extremity after orthopaedic injury. METHODS: The translation of the original English version of the LEFS into a Brazilian Portuguese version was accomplished using standard guidelines and tested in 31 patients with knee injuries. Subsequently, 87 patients with a variety of knee disorders completed the Brazilian Portuguese LEES, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form and a visual analog scale for pain. All patients were retested within 2 days to determine reliability of these measures. Validation was assessed by determining the level of association between the Brazilian Portuguese LEFS and the other outcome measures. Reliability was documented by calculating internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and standard error of measurement. RESULTS: The Brazilian Portuguese LEES had a high level of association with the physical component of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (r = 0.82), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (r = 0.87), the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (r = 0.82), and the pain visual analog scale (r = -0.60) (all, P<.05). The Brazilian Portuguese LEES had a low level of association with the mental component of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (r = 0.38, P<.05). The internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = .952) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.957) of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the LEES were high. The standard error of measurement was low (3.6) and the agreement was considered high, demonstrated by the small differences between test and retest and the narrow limit of agreement, as observed in Bland-Altman and survival-agreement plots. CONCLUSION: The translation of the LEFS into a Brazilian Portuguese version was successful in preserving the semantic and measurement properties of the original version and was shown to be valid and reliable in a Brazilian population with knee injuries. J Ort hop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(11):932-939, Epub 9 October 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4101

Identificazione di un profilo molecolare di rischio nei pazienti pediatrici affetti da Linfoma di Hodgkin

Obiettivi: nonostante i miglioramenti nel trattamento, circa il 30% dei pazienti pediatrici affetti da Linfoma di Hodgkin (LH) in stadio avanzato recidiva o muore per progressione di malattia e i correnti metodi predittivi biologico-clinici non consentono di individuare tali pazienti. L’obiettivo dello studio è stato quello di definire un profilo molecolare di rischio che correli con l’outcome in questi pazienti. Materiali e metodi: studio retrospettico condotto su pazienti pediatrici affetti da LH omogeneamente trattati dal 2004 in poi. Su tali pazienti è stato intrapreso uno studio di validazione di marcatori molecolari già identificati in studi esplorativi precedenti. 27 geni sono stati analizzati in RT PCR su campioni di tessuto istologico prelevato alla diagnosi fissato in formalina e processato in paraffina relativi a una coorte di 37 pazienti, 12 ad outcome sfavorevole e 25 ad outcome favorevole. Risultati: dall’analisi univariata è emerso che solo l’espressione di CASP3 e CYCS, appartenenti al pathway apoptotico, è in grado di influenzare l’EFS in modo significativo nella nostra coorte di pazienti. Lo studio delle possibili combinazioni di questi geni ha mostrato l’esistenza di 3 gruppi di rischio che correlano con l’EFS: alto rischio (down regolazione di entrambi i geni), rischio intermedio (down regolazione di uno solo dei 2 geni), basso rischio (up regolazione di entrambi i geni). Dall’analisi multivariata è emerso che CASP3 è l’unica variabile che mantiene la sua indipendenza nell’influenzare la prognosi con un rischio di eventi di oltre il doppio di chi ha un’espressione bassa di questo gene. Conclusioni: i risultati ottenuti sulla nostra coorte di pazienti pediatrici affetti da LH confermano l’impatto sulla prognosi di due marcatori molecolari CASP3 e CYCS coinvolti nel patwhay apoptotico. La valutazione del profilo di espressione di tali geni, potrebbe pertanto essere utilizzata in corso di stadiazione, come criterio di predittività.

The Lower Limb Functional Index: development and clinimetric properties

Background Existing lower-limb, region-specific, patient-reported outcome measures have clinimetric limitations, including limitations in psychometric characteristics (eg, lack of internal consistency, lack of responsiveness, measurement error) and the lack of reported practical and general characteristics. A new patient-reported outcome measure, the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI), was developed to address these limitations. Objective The purpose of this study was to overcome recognized deficiencies in existing lower-limb, region-specific, patient-reported outcome measures through: (1) development of a new lower-extremity outcome scale (ie, the LLFI) and (2) evaluation of the clinimetric properties of the LLFI using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) as a criterion measure. Design This was a prospective observational study. Methods The LLFI was developed in a 3-stage process of: (1) item generation, (2) item reduction with an expert panel, and (3) pilot field testing (n=18) for reliability, responsiveness, and sample size requirements for a larger study. The main study used a convenience sample (n=127) from 10 physical therapy clinics. Participants completed the LLFI and LEFS every 2 weeks for 6 weeks and then every 4 weeks until discharge. Data were used to assess the psychometric, practical, and general characteristics of the LLFI and the LEFS. The characteristics also were evaluated for overall performance using the Measurement of Outcome Measures and Bot clinimetric assessment scales. Results The LLFI and LEFS demonstrated a single-factor structure, comparable reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1]=.97), scale width, and high criterion validity (Pearson r=.88, with 95% confidence interval [CI]). Clinimetric performance was higher for the LLFI compared with the LEFS on the Measurement of Outcome Measures scale (96% and 95%, respectively) and the Bot scale (100% and 83%, respectively). The LLFI, compared with the LEFS, had improved responsiveness (standardized response mean=1.75 and 1.64, respectively), minimal detectable change with 90% CI (6.6% and 8.1%, respectively), and internal consistency (α=.91 and .95, respectively), as well as readability with reduced user error and completion and scoring times. Limitations Limitations of the study were that only participants recruited from outpatient physical therapy clinics were included and that no specific conditions or diagnostic subgroups were investigated. Conclusion The LLFI demonstrated sound clinimetric properties. There was lower response error, efficient completion and scoring, and improved responsiveness and overall performance compared with the LEFS. The LLFI is suitable for assessment of lower-limb function.