Expert study: A bolus calculator improves glycemic control and quality of life of type 1 diabetic patients (T1DM) (preliminary results)

Aims: To evaluate the impact on glycemic control and quality of life of a bolus calculator. Methods: Multicentre randomized prospective crosssectional study. Patients were randomized to control phase (3 months; calculation of prandial insulin according to insulinto-carbohydrate ratio and insulin sensitivity factor using a single strip meter) or intervention phase (3 months; calculation of prandial insulin with a bolus advisor), with a washout period (3 months). Patients wore a continuous glucosensor (7 days) and answered a quality of life questionnaire at the beginning and at the end of each phase. A questionnaire of satisfaction was obtained at the end of both phases. Inclusion criteria: Adults; T1DM> 1 year, HbA1c > 7.5%, basal-bolus therapy with insulin analogs, experience with carbohydrate Results: Data from the first 32 subjects with at least 1 ended phase (27 females, age 38 – 11 years, diabetes duration 16.8 – 7.5 years). Basal characteristics were comparable independently of the starting phase. No differences were found between phases in terms of mean blood glucose, standard deviation (from meter neither from sensor) and satisfaction. Conclusions: The use of a bolus calculator improves glycemic control and quality of life of T1DM subjects.

Cissus sicyoides: Analysis of Glycemic Control in Diabetic Rats Through Biomarkers

Diabetes is a chronic degenerative disease with no cure, is found in millions of people worldwide, and can cause life-threatening complications at any age. The plant Cissus sicyoides L. is a runner plant found abundantly in Brazil, especially in the Amazon. Its therapeutic properties are widely used in popular medicine as a diuretic, anti-influenza, antiinflammatory, anticonvulsion, and hypoglycemic agent. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of aqueous extracts from the leaves and stem of C. sicyoides L., administered for 60 days, for the control of glycemia in alloxan (monohydrate)-induced diabetic rats, monitored by biomarkers. Data obtained in this study confirmed that C. sicyoides has a hypoglycemic effect on diabetic rats. Administration of its aqueous extracts promoted a 45% decrease in glucose levels after 60 days of administration. Furthermore, indices of hepatic glycogen, blood glucose, C-reactive peptide, and fructosamine were found to be efficient biomarkers to monitor diabetes in rats.

Revisiting clinical trials on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk

The most relevant clinical trials, assessing the role of glycemic control in reducing cardiovascular risk, are examined. The UKPDS was the first to address this issue. More recent trials (ACCORD, ADVANCE and VADT) are controversial and evidences did not support that strict glycemic control (reflected by normal glycated hemoglobin) exclusively is sufficient to reduce cardiovascular risk in complicated individuals with long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus. Some possible reasons for controversies are included.

Prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and relation to glycemic control therapies at baseline in the BARI 2D cohort

We evaluated the associations between glycemic therapies and prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) at baseline among participants in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial on medical and revascularization therapies for coronary artery disease (CAD) and on insulin-sensitizing vs. insulin-providing treatments for diabetes. A total of 2,368 patients with type 2 diabetes and CAD was evaluated. DPN was defined as clinical examination score > 2 using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI). DPN odds ratios across different groups of glycemic therapy were evaluated by multiple logistic regression adjusted for multiple covariates including age, sex, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and diabetes duration. Fifty-one percent of BARI 2D subjects with valid baseline characteristics and MNSI scores had DPN. After adjusting for all variables, use of insulin was significantly associated with DPN (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.15-2.13). Patients on sulfonylurea (SU) or combination of SU/metformin (Met)/thiazolidinediones (TZD) had marginally higher rates of DPN than the Met/TZD group. This cross-sectional study in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes and CAD showed association of insulin use with higher DPN prevalence, independent of disease duration, glycemic control, and other characteristics. The causality between a glycemic control strategy and DPN cannot be evaluated in this cross-sectional study, but continued assessment of DPN and randomized therapies in BARI 2D trial may provide further explanations on the development of DPN.

Tube feeding with a diabetes-specific feed for 12 weeks improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients

Background and aims: Assess longer-term (12 weeks) effects of a diabetes-specific feed on postprandial glucose response, glycaemic control (HbA1c), lipid profile, (pre)-albumin, clinical course and tolerance in diabetic patients. Methods: In this randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group study 25 type 2 diabetic patients on tube feeding were included. Patients received a soy-protein based, multi-fibre diabetes-specific feed or isocaloric, fibre-containing standard feed for 12 weeks, while continuing on their anti-diabetic medication. At the beginning, after 6 and 12 weeks, several (glycaemic) parameters were assessed. Results: The postprandial glucose response (iAUC) to the diabetes-specific feed was lower at the 1st assessment compared with the standard feed (p = 0.008) and this difference did not change over time. HbA1c decreased over time in the diabetes-specific and not in the standard feed group (treatment*time:p = 0.034): 6.9 +/- 0.3% (mean +/- SEM) at baseline vs. 6.2 +/- 0.4% at 12 weeks in the diabetes-specific group compared to 7.9 +/- 0.3% to 8.7 +/- 0.4% in the standard feed group. No significant treatment*time effect was found for fasting glucose, insulin, (pre-) albumin or lipid profile, except for increase of HDL in the diabetes-specific group. Conclusions: The diabetes-specific feed studied significantly improved longer-term glycaemic control in diabetic patients. This was achieved in addition to on-going anti-diabetic medication and may affect clinical outcome. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism.

Resistance exercise and glycemic control in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of a resistance exercise program with an elastic band on insulin requirement and glycemic control in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-four patients with gestational diabetes mellitus were randomly assigned into 2 groups: an exercise group (EG; n = 32) and a control group not submitted to the exercise program (CG; n = 32). RESULTS: A significant reduction in the number of patients who required insulin was observed in the EG (7/32) compared with the CG group (18/32) (P = .005). The percentage of time spent within the proposed target glucose range (of at least 80% of weekly measurements below the limits preestablished for the disease) was significantly higher in EG compared with the CG group (EG = 0.63 +/- 0.30; CG = 0.41 +/- 0.31; P = .006). CONCLUSION: The resistance exercise program was effective in reducing the number of patients with GDM who required insulin and in improving capillary glycemic control in this population.

Effect of the glycemic control on intracellular cytokine production from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients

Aims: To evaluate the intracellular production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha), interleukine-6 (IL-6), INF-gamma, IL-8 and IL-10 in peripheral blood lympbomononuclear cells from type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, stratified according to the glycemic control. Methods: Thirty-five diabetic patients (17 type 1 and 18 type 2) and nine healthy individuals paired to patients in terms of sex and age were studied. Nine patients of each group were on inadequate glycemic controls. Intracellular cytokines were evaluated using flow cytometry. Cell cultures were stimulated with LPS to evaluate TNF-alpha and IL-6 or with PMA and lonomycin to evaluate IFN-gamma, IL-8 and IL-10 intracellular staining. Results: The percentages of CD33(+) cells bearing TNF-alpha and CD3(+) cells bearing IL-10 were increased in type 1 diabetic patients with inadequate glycemic control in relation to those with adequate control. In contrast, the percentage of CD3(+) cells bearing IL-8 was decreased in type 2 patients under inadequate glycemic control. Conclusions: The glycemic control is important for the detection of intracellular cytokines, and may contribute towards the susceptibility to infections in diabetic patients. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effects of periodontal therapy on glycemic control and inflammatory markers

Background: Periodontitis, a complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), can induce or perpetuate systemic conditions. This double-masked, placebo-controlled study evaluated the effects of periodontal therapy (scaling and root planing [SRP]) on the serum levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and on inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: Thirty subjects with type 2 DM and periodontitis were treated with SRP + placebo (SRP; N = 15) or with SRP + doxycycline (SRP+Doxy; N = 15), 100 mg/day, for 14 days. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded at baseline and at 3 months after treatment. Results: After 3 months, the reduction in probing depth Was 0.8 mm for the SRP group (P <0.01) and 1.1 mm for the SRP+Doxy group (P <0.01) followed by a 0.9% (SRP; P = 0.17) and 1.5% (SRP+Doxy; P<0.01) reduction in HbA1c levels. A significant reduction in interleukin (IL)-6; interferon-inducible protein 10; soluble fas ligand; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; RANTES; and IL-12 p70 serum levels were also verified (N = 30). To our knowledge, this is the first report on the effects of periodontal therapy on multiple systemic inflammatory markers in DM. Conclusions: Periodontal therapy may influence the systemic conditions of patients with type 2 DM, but no statistical difference was observed with the adjunctive systemic doxycycline therapy. Moreover, it is possible that the observed improvement in glycemic control and in the reduction of inflammatory markers could also be due to diet, which was not controlled in our study. Therefore, a confirmatory study with a larger sample size and controlled diet is necessary.

Inefficacité de la gestion de l'hyperglycémie du patient hospitalisé: origines et remèdes [The inefficacy of glycemic control in the hospitalized patient: origins and solutions]

La prévalence du diabète peut être estimée entre 20 et 30% parmi les patients en hôpital aigu. Il a été démontré que l'hyperglycémie, même modérée, est associée à une augmentation de la morbi-mortalité hospitalière, tandis que le contrôle glycémique efficace a un impact favorable sur celle-ci. La prise en charge de l'hyperglycémie demeure pourtant largement inefficace hors des soins intensifs, en raison de la persistance d'une pratique inadaptée. Nous développons actuellement un projet de soins destiné à faire changer les pratiques. Pour un contrôle glycémique efficace, une formation des soignants à une gestion basée sur le concept de couverture des besoins en insuline du patient est nécessaire. La démarche doit être intégrée à une approche de type systémique, prenant en compte le contexte dans lequel les soignants évoluent. The hospital inpatient prevalence of diabetes mellitus can be estimated between 20 and 30%. Even moderate hyperglycemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the acute care setting, whereas efficient glycemic control has been shown to improve both of them significantly. Glycemic control however remains largely inefficient outside of the intensive care unit due to the persistance of an inadequate glycemic management practice. We are currently developing a clinical care project aimed at changing this practice. For an efficient glycemic control, a training programme for health care professionals based on the concept of covering the insulin needs of the patient is mandatory. This programme needs to be integrated in a systemic approach, which takes the professionals' context in account.

Impact of tight glycemic control on cerebral glucose metabolism after severe brain injury: a microdialysis study.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effect of tight glycemic control with the use of intensive insulin therapy on cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with severe brain injury. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective observational cohort. SETTING: University hospital neurologic intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Twenty patients (median age 59 yrs) monitored with cerebral microdialysis as part of their clinical care. INTERVENTIONS: Intensive insulin therapy (systemic glucose target: 4.4-6.7 mmol/L [80-120 mg/dL]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Brain tissue markers of glucose metabolism (cerebral microdialysis glucose and lactate/pyruvate ratio) and systemic glucose were collected hourly. Systemic glucose levels were categorized as within the target "tight" (4.4-6.7 mmol/L [80-120 mg/dL]) vs. "intermediate" (6.8-10.0 mmol/L [121-180 mg/dL]) range. Brain energy crisis was defined as a cerebral microdialysis glucose <0.7 mmol/L with a lactate/pyruvate ratio >40. We analyzed 2131 cerebral microdialysis samples: tight systemic glucose levels were associated with a greater prevalence of low cerebral microdialysis glucose (65% vs. 36%, p < 0.01) and brain energy crisis (25% vs.17%, p < 0.01) than intermediate levels. Using multivariable analysis, and adjusting for intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure, systemic glucose concentration (adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.37, for each 1 mmol/L decrease, p < 0.001) and insulin dose (adjusted odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, for each 1 U/hr increase, p = 0.02) independently predicted brain energy crisis. Cerebral microdialysis glucose was lower in nonsurvivors than in survivors (0.46 +/- 0.23 vs. 1.04 +/- 0.56 mmol/L, p < 0.05). Brain energy crisis was associated with increased mortality at hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio 7.36, 95% CI 1.37-39.51, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe brain injury, tight systemic glucose control is associated with reduced cerebral extracellular glucose availability and increased prevalence of brain energy crisis, which in turn correlates with increased mortality. Intensive insulin therapy may impair cerebral glucose metabolism after severe brain injury.

Which factors influence glycemic control in the intensive care unit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intensive insulin therapy titrated to restore and maintain blood glucose between 80 and 110 mg/dl (4.4-6.1 mmol/l) was found to improve survival of critically ill patients in one pioneering proof-of-concept study performed in a surgical intensive care unit. The external validity of these findings was investigated. RECENT FINDINGS: Six independent prospective randomized controlled trials, involving 9877 patients in total, were unable to confirm the survival benefit reported in the pioneering trial. Several hypotheses were proposed to explain this discrepancy, including the case-mix, the features of the usual care, the quality of glucose control and the risks associated with hypoglycemia. SUMMARY: Before a better understanding and delineation of the conditions associated with and improved outcome by tight glycemic control, the choice of an intermediate glycemic target appears as a safe and effective solution.

Moderate glycemic control safe in critically ill adult burn patients: A 15 year cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperglycemia is a metabolic alteration in major burn patients associated with complications. The study aimed at evaluating the safety of general ICU glucose control protocols applied in major burns receiving prolonged ICU treatment. METHODS: 15year retrospective analysis of consecutive, adult burn patients admitted to a single specialized centre. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: death or length of stay <10 days, age <16years. VARIABLES: demographic variables, burned surface (TBSA), severity scores, infections, ICU stay, outcome. Metabolic variables: total energy, carbohydrate and insulin delivery/24h, arterial blood glucose and CRP values. Analysis of 4 periods: 1, before protocol; 2, tight doctor driven; 3, tight nurse driven; 4, moderate nurse driven. RESULTS: 229 patients, aged 45±20 years (mean±SD), burned 32±20% TBSA were analyzed. SAPSII was 35±13. TBSA, Ryan and ABSI remained stable. Inhalation injury increased. A total of 28,690 blood glucose samples were analyzed: the median value remained unchanged with a narrower distribution over time. After the protocol initiation, the normoglycemic values increased from 34.7% to 65.9%, with a reduction of hypoglycaemic events (no extreme hypoglycemia in period 4). Severe hyperglycemia persisted throughout with a decrease in period 4 (9.25% in period 4). Energy and glucose deliveries decreased in periods 3 and 4 (p<0.0001). Infectious complications increased during the last 2 periods (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: A standardized ICU glucose control protocol improved the glycemic control in adult burn patients, reducing glucose variability. Moderate glycemic control in burns was safe specifically related to hypoglycemia, reducing the incidence of hypoglycaemic events compared to the period before. Hyperglycemia persisted at a lower level.

Le contrôle glycémique modéré est-il sans danger chez les patients adultes grièvement brûlés? = Is moderate glycemic control safe in major burns? : a 15 year cohort study

Introduction: L'hyperglycémie est un phénomène connu chez les patients gravement agressés, et surtout chez ceux nécessitant un séjour aux soins intensifs, alors que l'hypoglycémie est une complication menaçante. Des valeurs de glycémies anormales sont associées avec une mortalité et morbidité augmentées chez les patients de soins intensifs, y compris les grands brûlés. Des glycémies jusqu'à 15mmol/l ont longtemps été tolérées sans traitement. En 2001, une grande étude randomisée a complètement changé les pratiques du contrôle glycémique aux soins intensifs. Van den Berghe et al. ont montré qu'un contrôle glycémique strict atteint au moyen d'une « intensive insulin therapy » (HT) visant une glycémie 4.1-6.0 mmol/l réduisait la mortalité chez les patients chirurgicaux traités plus que 5. Par la suite plusieurs études contradictoires ont questionné la validité externe de l'étude de Louvain: avec la publication de l'étude « NICE-SUGAR » en 2009 enrôlant plus de 6000 patients cette hypothèse a été réfutée, aboutissant à un contrôle modéré de la glycémie (6-8 mmol/l). Bien que plusieurs études sur le contrôle glycémique aient également inclus quelques patients brûlés, à ce jour il n'y a pas de recommandation ferme concernant la gestion de la glycémie chez les patients brûlés adultes. Le but de l'étude était d'évaluer la sécurité du protocole de contrôle de la glycémie qui avait été introduit aux soins intensifs adultes chez des patients grand brûlés nécessitant un traitement prolongé aux soins intensifs. Méthodes : 11 s'agit d'une étude rétrospective uni-centrique sur des patients brûlés admis aux soins intensifs du CHUV à Lausanne entre de 2000 à juin 2014. Critères d'inclusions : Age >16 ans, brûlures nécessitant un traitement aux soins intensifs >10 jours. Critères d'exclusion : Décès ou transfert hors des soins intensifs <10 jours. Les investigations ont été limitées aux 21 premiers jours de l'hospitalisation aux soins intensifs. Variables : Variables démographiques, surface brûlée (TBSA), scores de sévérité, infections, durée d'intubation, durée du séjour aux soins intensifs, mortalité. Variables métaboliques : Administration totale de glucides, énergie et insuline/2411, valeurs de glycémie artérielle et CRP. Quatre périodes (P) ont été analysées, correspondant à l'évolution du protocole de contrôle de glycémie du service. P1: Avant son introduction (2000-2001) ; P2: Contrôle glycémie serré géré par les médecins (2002-2006) ; P3: Contrôle glycémie serré géré par lés infirmières (2007-2010); P4: Contrôle modéré géré par les infirmières (2011-2014). Les limites glycémiques ont été définis de manière suivante: Hypoglycémie extrême <2.3mmol/l ; hypoglycémie modéré <4.0mmol/l ; hyperglycémie modérée 8.1-10.0mmol/l ; hyperglycémie sévère >10.0mmol/l. Toutes les valeurs de glycémies artérielles ont été extraites depuis le système informatisé des soins intensifs (MetaVision ®). Statistiques: Wilcoxon rank test, Two- way Anova, Tuckey Kramer test, area under the curve (AUC), Spearman's test et odds ratio. STATA 12 1 ' StataCorp, College station, TX, USA and JPM V 10.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Résultats: Sur les 508 patients brûlés admis durant la période étudiée, 229 patients correspondaient aux critères d'inclusion, âgés de 45±20ans (X±SD) et brûlés sur 32±20% de la surface corporelle. Les scores de sévérité sont restés stables. Au total 28'690 glycémies artérielles ont été analysées. La valeur médiane de glycémie est restée stable avec une diminution progressive de la variabilité intra-patient. Après initiation du protocole, les valeurs normoglycémiques ont augmenté de 34.7% à 65.9% avec diminution des événements hypoglycémiques (pas d'hypoglycémie extrême en P4). Le nombre d'hyperglycémies sévères est resté stable durant les périodes 1 à 3, avec une diminution en P4 (9.25%) : les doses d'insuline ont aussi diminué. L'interprétation des résultats de P4 a été compliquée par une diminution concomitante des apports d'énergie et de glucose (p<0.0001). Conclusions: L'application du protocole destiné aux patients de soins intensifs non brûlés a amélioré le contrôle glycémique chez les patients adultes brûlés, aboutissant à une diminution significative de la variabilité des glycémies. Un contrôle modéré de la glycémie peut être appliqué en sécurité, considérant le nombre très faible d'hypoglycémies. La gestion du protocole par les infirmières s'avère plus sûre qu'un contrôle par les médecins, avec diminution des hypoglycémies. Cependant le nombre d'hyperglycémies reste trop élevé. L'hyperglycémie' n'est pas contrôlable uniquement par l'administration d'insuline, mais nécessite également une approche multifactorielle comprenant une optimisation de la nutrition adaptée aux besoins énergétiques élevés des grands brûlés. Plus d'études seront nécessaire pour mieux comprendre la complexité du mécanisme de l'hyperglycémie chez le patient adulte brûlé et pour en améliorer le contrôle glycémique.