969 resultados para INTERNATIONAL SOAP, INC.
Resumo:
Internacional Soap, Inc. es una compañía norteamericana con su Casa Matriz en Nueva York, que cotiza en la Bolsa de Valores de esa ciudad y hace parte de las 50 compañías más grandes del mundo, según el listado publicado por la Revista Fortune. Como resultado de la globalización de la economía, la crisis financiera asiática y la inestabilidad de las economías emergentes, los ingresos y utilidades de la Corporación se han visto afectadas en los últimos dos años, principalmente por la fortaleza del dólar. De ahí que el Comité Ejecutivo facultara al Presidente para reducir los costos de producción en el mundo y de esta forma mejorar la rentabilidad de los accionistas. Después de un prolongado estudio que llevó más de dos años y en el que se involucraron consultores externos como McKinsey y Co y Andersen Consulting, la decisión estaba tomada: se requiere cerrar 30 de las 60 plantas que existen en el mundo para ser competitivos en el mercado actual; es necesario evitar la duplicidad de inversión de activos en las diferentes regiones y, además, es indispensable tomar ventaja del nuevo orden mundial en cuanto a comercio internacional se refiere. Los bloques económicos (Unión Europea, Mercosur, Nafta, etc.) están facilitando el intercambio entre países, por lo que ya no es necesario tener plantas de producción en cada uno de los países en los que se quiere mercadear el producto. Para Suramérica se definió que deberían quedar solamente dos plantas, una en la parte sur para atender Mercosur y otra en la parte norte, para atender los mercados del Pacto Andino, Centroamérica y el Caribe (actualmente existen plantas de producción en Colombia, Perú y Venezuela). El señor Carlos Casanova, Vicepresidente Operativo para América Latina es el encargado de ejecutar esta pesada y difícil decisión.
Resumo:
Later American eds. of The Studio called: Atelier (1931), continued by: London studio (1932-1938).
Resumo:
This article considers the race to sequence the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome virus ('the SARS virus') in light of the debate over patent law and access to essential medicines. Part II evaluates the claims of public research institutions in Canada, the United States, and Hong Kong, and commercial companies, to patent rights in respect of the SARS virus. It highlights the dilemma of ’defensive patenting' - the tension between securing private patent rights and facilitating public disclosure of information and research. Part III considers the race to patent the SARS virus in light of wider policy debates over gene patents. It examines the application of such patent criteria as novelty, inventive step, utility, and secret use. It contends that there is a need to reform the patent system to accommodate the global nature of scientific inquiry, the unique nature of genetics, and the pace of technological change. Part IV examines the role played by the World Trade Organization and the World Health Organization in dealing with patent law and access to essential medicines. The article contends that there is a need to ensure that the patent system is sufficiently flexible and adaptable to accommodate international research efforts on infectious diseases.
Resumo:
No. 229 repeated in numbering; no. 230 omitted.
Resumo:
Sign: James Healy, Maynard E. Pirsig, Benjamin C. Roberts.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"File no. 3-1400."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"January 19, 2002."
Resumo:
Published in concomitance with the adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, this volume brings together a group of renowned legal experts and activists from different parts of the world who, from international and comparative perspectives, investigate the right of indigenous peoples to reparation for breaches of their individual and collective rights. The first part of the book is devoted to general aspects of this important matter, providing a comprehensive assessment of the relevant international legal framework and including overviews of the topic of reparations for human rights violations, the status of indigenous peoples in international law, and the vision of reparations as conceived by the communities concerned. The second part embraces a comprehensive investigation of the relevant practice at the international, regional, and national level, examining the best practices of reparations according to the ideologies and expectations of indigenous peoples and offering a comparative perspective on the ways in which the right of these peoples to redress for the injuries suffered is realized worldwide. The global picture painted by these contributions provides a view of the status of relevant international law that is synthesized in the two final chapters of the book, which include a concrete example of how a judicial claim for reparation is to be structured and prescribes the best practices and strategies to be adopted in order to maximize the opportunities for indigenous peoples to obtain effective redress. As a whole, this volume offers a comprehensive vision of its subject matter in international and comparative law, with a practical approach aimed at supporting legal academics, administrators, and practitioners in improving the avenues and modalities of reparations for indigenous peoples
Resumo:
This paper examines the role of powerful entities and coalitions in shaping international accounting standards. Specifically, the focus is on the process by which the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) developed IFRS 6, Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources. In its Issues Paper, the IASB recommended that the successful efforts method be mandated for pre-production costs, eliminating the choice previously available between full cost and successful efforts methods. In spite of the endorsement of this view by a majority of the constituents who responded to the Issues Paper, the final outcome changed nothing, with choice being retained. A compelling explanation of this disparity between the visible inputs and outputs of the standard setting process is the existence of a “black box”, in which powerful extractive industries entities and coalitions covertly influenced the IASB to secure their own ends and ensure that the status quo was maintained