Can written nursing practice standards improve documentation of initial assessment of ED patients?

Introduction: There is wide variation in emergency nursing practice in terms of initial patient assessment and the interventions implemented in response to these patient assessment findings. It is hypothesised that written ED nursing practice standards will reduce variability in documentation standards related to initial patient assessment.

Aim: This study aimed to examine the effect of written ED nursing practice standards augmented by an in-service education programme on the documentation of the initial nursing assessment.

Method: A pre-test/post-test design was used. Initial patient assessment was assessed using the Emergency Department Observation Chart. All adult patients (>18 years) who presented with chest pain and who were triaged to the general adult cubicles were eligible for inclusion in the study. Random sampling was used to select the patients for the pre-test (n = 78) and post-test groups (n = 74).

Results: There was significant improvement in documentation of all aspects of symptom assessment except quality and historical variables: pre-hospital care, cardiac risk factors, and past medical history. Improvements in documentation of elements of primary survey assessment were variable. There were significant increases in documentation of respiratory effort, chest auscultation findings, capillary refill and conscious state. There was a significant 18.3% decrease in the frequency of documentation of respiratory rate and no significant changes in documentation of oxygen saturation, heart rate or blood pressure.

Conclusion: Written ED nursing practice standards were effective in improving the documentation of some elements of initial nursing assessment for patients with chest pain. Active implementation strategies are important to ensure effective uptake of written practice standards and the relationship between nursing documentation and actual clinical practice warrants further consideration using a naturalistic approach in real practice settings.

Impact of a modified nursing handover model for improving nursing care and documentation in the emergency department: A pre- and post-implementation study

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether implementation of a new nursing handover model led to improved completion of nursing care activities and documentation. A pre- and post-implementation study, using a survey and document audit, was conducted in a hospital ED in Melbourne. A convenience sample of nurses completed the survey at baseline (n = 67) and post-intervention (n = 59), and the audit was completed at both time points. Results showed significant improvements in several processes: handover in front of the patient (P < 0.001), patients contributed and/or listened to handover discussions (P < 0.001), and provision of adequate information about all patients in the department (P < 0.001). Nurses also reported a reduction in omission of vital signs (P = 0.022) during handover. Three hundred sixty-eight medical records were audited in the two study periods: 173 (pre-intervention) and 195 (post-intervention). Statistically significant improvements in the completion of two nursing care tasks and three documentation items were identified. The findings suggest that implementation of a new handover model improved completion of nursing care activities and documentation, and transfer of important information to nurses on oncoming shifts.

Prevalencia de punto de úlceras por presión y nivel de riesgo en el Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá

Las úlceras por presión causadas por una presión sostenida sobre la piel y sus tejidos adyacentes es una problemática considerada de salud pública, dada su alta prevalencia, se presentan mayormente en personas que tienen restricción en su movilidad, en el 3 a 10 % de los pacientes hospitalizados; con una tasa de incidencia que oscila entre 7,7 y 26,9 %, con consecuencias para la institución por altos costos, la comunidad, el paciente y su familia. En Colombia solo se cuenta con algunos estudios en instituciones en Bogotá, Cartagena, Bucaramanga y Medellín. Los estudios de prevalencia son importantes porque permiten visualizar la situación de la problemática, incentiva la implementación de medidas preventivas y la formulación de políticas institucionales que promuevan la seguridad del paciente y la calidad de la atención. En el Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá no se conoce con exactitud la prevalencia pero se sabe que está presente por las complicaciones y consecuencias ya mencionadas, por ende el objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia de punto de úlceras por presión en los pacientes hospitalizados, y al finalizar ser insumo para un estudio posterior que genere un Programa de Piel Sana institucional. El estudio se realizó mediante la medición en 1 día donde se valoró todos los pacientes hospitalizados, se realizó un análisis descriptivo de cada variable, y con un análisis bivariado se obtuvo medidas de asociación para identificar la relación entre los factores de riesgo y el desarrollo de ulceras por presión.

Lewis's medical-surgical nursing: Assessment and management of clinical problems [ANZ Edition, 4th Ed.]

"Using the nursing process as a framework for practice, the fourth edition has been extensively revised to reflect the rapid changing nature of nursing practice and the increasing focus on key nursing care priorities. Building on the strengths of the third Australian and New Zealand edition and incorporating relevant global nursing research and practice from the prominent US title Medical-Surgical Nursing, 9Th Edition, Lewis’s Medical-Surgical Nursing, 4th Edition is an essential resource for students seeking to understand the role of the professional nurse in the contemporary health environment."--Publisher website

Exploring the potential of Mask-Ed™ (KRS simulation) to teach both the art and science of nursing : a discussion paper

A Strategy for supporting students given Advanced Standing into Nursing

A strategy for supporting students, given Advanced Standing into the second year of a Nursing degree in bioscience and pharmacology, is being rolled out at QUT.

Review : "Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd Ed.)" by Peter M. Fayers & David Machin

An updated version, this excellent text is a timely addition to the library of any nurse researching in oncology or other settings where individuals’ quality of life must be understood. Health-related quality of life should be a central aspect of studies concerned with health and illness. Indeed, considerable evidence has recently emerged in oncology and other research settings that selfreported quality of life is of great prognostic significance and may be the most reliable predictor of subsequent morbidity and mortality. From a nursing perspective, it is also gratifying to note that novel therapy and other oncology studies increasingly recognize the importance of understanding patients’ subjective experiences of an intervention over time and to ascertain whether patients perceive that a new intervention makes a difference to their quality of life and treatment outcomes. Measurements of quality of life are now routine in clinical trials of chemotherapy drugs and are often considered the prime outcome of interest in the cost/benefit analyses of these treatments. The authors have extensive experience in qualityof- life assessment in cancer clinical trials, where most of the pioneering work into quality of life has been conducted. That said, many of the health-related qualityof- life issues discussed are common to many illnesses, and researchers outside of cancer should find the book equally helpful.