Charles e Ray Eames: o casamento entre a razão e emoção no design

The rationalism appears as a philosophical current whose mental process and logic and evidenced, with the main characteristic of modern thought the method, the Bauhaus represents for the design the way the industry undressed the ornaments seeking the ideal of form and function. In a current contemporary design the emotional recovery in addition to the functions that an object can have, aesthetic, practical and symbolic, also the emotional identification, making review the methods. This article makes a relation of this context with the brilliantly that the couple Charles and Ray Eames, have created a method quite emotional for the creation of design, starting with the invention of the plywood and then with access to various technologies resulting from post-war, they created a very interesting process of building design combining art technique, producing seats that are ageless, found easily in the contemporary world.

Charles e Ray Eames, o casamento entre razão e emoção no design

O racionalismo surge como uma corrente filosófica, cuja operação mental e lógica é evidenciada. Sendo a principal característica do pensamento moderno o método, a bauhaus representa para o design a forma como a indústria se despiu dos ornamentos, buscando o ideal de forma e função. Numa corrente contemporânea, o design emocional retoma, além das funções que um objeto pode ter, estéticas, práticas e simbólicas, também as emocionais de identificação, fazendo rever os métodos. Este artigo faz uma relação deste contexto com a forma brilhante com que o casal Charles e Ray Eames, criou um método absolutamente emocional para a criação do design, iniciando, com a invenção do contraplacado, e depois com acesso a diversas tecnologias advindas do pós-guerra, um processo muito interessante de construção de design, aliando arte e técnica, produzindo assentos atemporais, encontrados facilmente no mundo contemporâneo.

Agrupaciones heterogéneas e intervención en arquitecturas existentes

Esta tesis doctoral profundiza, dentro del campo de la práctica del proyecto arquitectónico, en aquellas técnicas proyectuales que al intervenir sobre lo ya construido son capaces de cambiar su valor y su significado. La investigación tiene como objetivo demostrar que es posible revertir la obsolescencia de las arquitecturas ordinaras existentes mediante una técnica proyectual que hemos llamado agrupaciones heterogéneas. En ellas, la preexistencia y lo aportado inauguran un tiempo de convivencia que obliga a reinterpretar a la primera mientras que la segunda es forzada a traducir sus imaginarios. Esta investigación se conecta con el mundo del conocimiento a través de dos vectores, uno que lo enlaza con el estudio de las agrupaciones heterogéneas y otro con la intervención sobre arquitecturas ordinarias. Para el desarrollo de los trabajos, en una primera parte, se ha procedido al análisis de cada campo por separado a través del estudio de casos concretos: la plastic furniture de Charles y Ray Eames para el caso de las agrupaciones heterogéneas y el libro-manifiesto Plus de Frédéric Druot, Anne Lacaton y Jean-Philippe Vassal para la intervención sobre arquitecturas ordinarias. En cada estudio hemos obtenido unas conclusiones parciales: la arquitectura entendida como estado de encuentro y la teoría de la resistencia a los imaginarios. La segunda parte de la tesis toma el proyecto de Frank Gehry para su casa en Santa Mónica como un ejemplo en el que se ha revertido con éxito la obsolescencia de una arquitectura ordinaria a través de la técnica de las agrupaciones heterogéneas. A partir de ese ejemplo, y bajo la perspectiva de los dos campos estudiados, se propone una cartografía teórica para leer los procesos de innovación que tienen lugar al utilizar esta estrategia en diseño del proyecto. ABSTRACT This PhD thesis will provide an in-depth view of the techniques in practice in architectural projects, with proposals that are able to change the value and meaning of work that has already been built. The research is aimed at proving that it is possible to revert the obsolescence of the existing ordinary architecture using a project technique that we have called “heterogeneous ensembles”. In these ensembles, what existed beforehand and what has been contributed afterwards have brought about a new form of co-existence which forces the former to be reinterpreted and the latter to clarify its archetypes. This research connects to the world of knowledge through two vectors: one which links it to the study of the heterogeneous ensembles and the other to the work carried out on the ordinary architecture. To carry out this work, firstly we analysed each field separately by studying specific cases: the Charles and Ray Eames plastic furniture for the heterogeneous ensembles and the book and manifesto Plus by Frédéric Druot, Anne Lacaton and Jean- Philippe Vassal for the work carried out on the ordinary architecture. We drew partial conclusions in each study: architecture understood as a state of encounter and the theory of resistance to the archetypes. The second part of the thesis takes Frank Gehry’s project for his Santa Monica house as an example in which the obsolescence of ordinary architecture has been successfully reverted using the heterogeneous ensembles technique. Based on this example and from the standpoint of the two fields in question, we propose a theoretical cartography to read the innovation processes that take place when using this strategy in project design.

L’architecture engagée du «Case Study House Program» de la revue Arts and Architecture de 1945 – 1966 : une confluence génératrice

La conception architecturale du logis, individuel ou collectif, est un défi majeur pour les architectes depuis l'avènement de la modernité. Au début du 21ième siècle, la multiplicité des conditions démographiques et celle de la mobilité des personnes sous-tendent la complexité de l'élaboration de prototypes ou de modèles d'habitation. Que peut-on apprendre des expériences menées dans ce domaine après la seconde guerre mondiale aux États-Unis ? Ce mémoire de maîtrise est consacré à l'étude d’un cas particulier celui du programme de création architecturale réalisée en Californie de 1945 à 1966, connu sous le nom de : «Case Study House Program». Ce programme, dirigé par John Entenza, éditeur de la revue Arts and Architecture, rassemblait de nombreux architectes dont les plus célèbres sont Charles et Ray Eames, Richard Neutra, Craig Ellwood et Pierre Koenig, tous auteurs de maisons modernes devenues oeuvres canoniques dans l’histoire de l’architecture. L'analyse détaillé de ce cas et de ses retombées devrait permettre de mieux cerner les aspects suivants: la portée critique du CSHP (case study house program) qui s'opposait aux modèles dominants du marché immobilier, modèles généralement inspirés de styles traditionnels; le potentiel et les limites d'une telle démarche face à la demande sociale; la dimension anticipatrice des propositions du CSHP pour la conception de logis mieux adaptés aux besoins du 21ième siècle, en particulier ceux qui découlent des changements démographiques et de la mobilité géographiques des personnes; la valeur d'exemple du CSHP pour mieux comprendre les fondements de la résistance du public aux innovations architecturales, autant du point de vue technique que du point de vue esthétique.

The Herman Miller collection,

To be kept up to date with loose leaf binder.

An encyclopædia of cottage, farm, and villa architecture and furniture : containing numerous designs for dwellings from the cottage to the villa including farm houses, farmeries, and other agricultural buildings, several designs for country inns, public houses, and parochial schools, with the requisite fittings-up fixtures and furniture ; and appropriate offices, gardens and garden scenery ; each design accompanied by analytical and critical marks illustrative of the principles of archtiectural science and taste on whihc it is composed /

Includes index.

Who's in Charge in the Inner City? The Conflict Between Efficiency and Equity in the Design of a Metropolitan Area

A circular metropolitan area consists of an inner city and a suburb. Households sort over the two jurisdictions based on public service levels and their costs of commuting to the metropolitan center. Using numerical simulations, we show (1) there typically exist two equilibria: one in which the poor form the majority in the inner city and the other in which the rich form the majority in the inner city; (2) there is an efficiency vs. equity trade-off as to which equilibrium is preferred; and (3) if the inner city contains only poor households, equity favors expanding the inner city to include rich households.

An autostereoscopic device for mobile applications based on a liquid crystal microlens array and an OLED display

In recent years, many experimental and theoretical research groups worldwide have actively worked on demonstrating the use of liquid crystals (LCs) as adaptive lenses for image generation, waveform shaping, and non-mechanical focusing applications. In particular, important achievements have concerned the development of alternative solutions for 3D vision. This work focuses on the design and evaluation of the electro-optic response of a LC-based 2D/3D autostereoscopic display prototype. A strategy for achieving 2D/3D vision has been implemented with a cylindrical LC lens array placed in front of a display; this array acts as a lenticular sheet with a tunable focal length by electrically controlling the birefringence. The performance of the 2D/3D device was evaluated in terms of the angular luminance, image deflection, crosstalk, and 3D contrast within a simulated environment. These measurements were performed with characterization equipment for autostereoscopic 3D displays (angular resolution of 0.03 ).

Plastic Furniture: las sillas-mundo

Investigación sobre las herramientas arquitectónicas utilizadas por Charles y Ray Eames a través del estudio de la familia de mobiliario que ha recibido el nombre de Plastic Furniture

Las casualidades controladas : la primera visibilidad del cambio del paradigma moderno

Como no pocos proyectos, el origen de esta tesis es fruto de una casualidad. Hace unos años me topé en Londres, en la librería Walden Books del 38 de Harmood St., con una primera edición de la conocida monografía de Mies a cargo de Philip Johnson. El librito, en realidad catálogo de la exposición que en 1947 el MoMA de Nueva York dedicara a la obra de Mies Van der Rohe a los diez años del desembarco del arquitecto en Estados Unidos, tiene un tamaño de 10 x 7,5 pulgadas, es decir, la mitad del formato americano Crown (20x15 pulgadas), equivalente a 508 x 381 mm. Se imprimieron, en su primera tirada, editada por The Plantin Press, 12.000 ejemplares. Ese mismo año, con edición al cuidado de Reynal y Hitchcock, se publicaría la primera traducción al inglés de Cuando las catedrales eran blancas de Le Corbusier y una selección de poemas de Lorca, siete años después de su Poeta en Nueva York. En la monografía, en la página 109, aparece el conocido croquis de Mies Sketch for a glass house on a hillside. c. 1934, escasamente unas líneas, aunque precisas y llenas de matices, de la casa en una ladera que rápidamente nos remite a aquella primera propuesta de Saarinen para una casa en el aire, primero en 1941 en Pensilvania y después, en 1945, con Charles Eames, en Los Angeles, que nunca llegarían a construirse, sino en su aliteraciones posteriores realizadas por Harry Seidler (Julian Rose House, Wahroonga, Sydney, 1949), Philip Johnson (Leonhardt house, Long Island, Nueva York, 1956) o Craig Ellwood (Smith House, Crestwood Hills, 1958; Frank & Polly Pierson House, Malibú, 1962; Chamorro House, Hollywood Hills, 1963, o la serie Weekend House, con Gerald Horn, entre 1964 y 1970, hasta el magnífico Art Center College of Design de Pasadera, su puente habitado de 1977). El relato que da origen al texto discurre en un estricto período de tiempo, desde los primeros dibujos de la Case Study House nº8, dentro del programa promovido por John Entenza y su revista Arts & Architecture en California, realizados en el estudio de Saarinen en Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, hasta que el proyecto de la casa Eames finaliza cinco años después de acabar la obra en 1955, en la versión conocida, radicalmente distinta al proyecto original, cuando la pareja Charles y Ray Eames edita el corto House After Five Years of Living. La discusión original en torno a esta casita, o mejor, a las circunstancias, casualidades controladas, que rodean su construcción, se produce estrictamente cuando rastreamos aquellos invariantes que se mantienen en las dos versiones y las reconcilian. En este corto período de tiempo se producen en el proyecto una serie de decisiones que permiten descubrir, tanto en la forma como en el mismo proceso transformador del proyecto, en su obsesivo registro, en los nuevos referentes asumidos y propuestos, la primera visibilidad del cambio del paradigma moderno. Pero este momento germinal que cristaliza el paso a la postmodernidad no es inédito en la historia de la arquitectura americana. Así, el relato abre su ámbito temporal hasta un nuevo período de cincuenta años que arranca en 1893, año de la celebración en Chicago de la Exposición Internacional Colombina. En la White City de Hunt & McKim y del traidor Burham, Louis Sullivan construye su Golden Doorway en el pabellón de los Transportes. Aquella que visitará Adolf Loos antes de volver, renovado, a Viena; la misma que admirará André Bouillet, representante de la Union Centrale des Arts Decoratifs de Paris, y que deslumbrará en los museos de toda Europa, de París a Moscú en grandes fotografías y maquetas. Hasta que en Finlandia alguien muestra una de esas fotografías a un joven estudiante de diecinueve años en el Instituto Politécnico. Eliel Saarinen queda fascinado por la poderosa novedad de la imagen. Cuelga la fotografía frente a su tablero de dibujo, consciente de que la Golden Doorway, esa puerta de la aventura y la catarsis que Sullivan acuñaría como distintivo y que resolvería como único elemento complejo sus proyectos más maduros, desprovistos de todo ornamento; la misma que repetirían más tarde, con profundo reconocimiento, Ladovsky, Wright, Scarpa o Moneo, puerta dentro de puerta, fuelle y umbral, contenía, en sus propias palabras emocionadas, todo el futuro de la arquitectura. Desde ahí, pasando por el año 1910, momento de la huida de Wright a La Toscana y el descubrimiento de su arquitectura en Europa, entre otros por un joven Mies van der Rohe, meritorio en el estudio de Peter Behrens, a través del Wasmuth Portfolio; y así como algo después, en 1914, Schindler y en 1923 Neutra, harán el camino inverso, hasta que Mies les siga en 1937, animado por un Philip Johnson que había viajado a Europa en 1930, volviendo a 1945 y el inicio del programa Case Study House en California, hasta 1949, momento de la construcción de la CSH#8, y, por fin, al año 1955, after 5 years of living, en el que Julius Shulman fotografía la casa de Ray y Charles Eames en el prado de Chautauqua sobre las Pacific Palisades de Los Angeles, lanzando sus finas líneas amarillas hasta Alison y Peter Smithson y su tardomoderno heroico, hasta el primer Foster y su poético hightech y hasta el O-riginal Ghery, deconstruyendo el espacio esencial de su casa desde el espacio mismo, abiertas ya las puertas al nuevo siglo. Y en estos cambios de paradigma, desde el rígido eclecticismo de los estilos al lirismo moderno en el gozne secular y de ahí a la frivolidad, ligereza, exhibicionismo y oportunismo cultos del hecho postmoderno, hay algo que se mantiene invariante en los bandazos de la relación del hombre contemporáneo con su entorno. Como la escultura, que según Barnett Newman no es sino aquello contra lo que uno choca cuando retrocede para mirar un cuadro, en estos prístinos lugares, comunes y corrientes, recorrido, puerta, umbral, recinto y vacío, te topas con la arquitectura antes de darte cuenta de que es arquitectura. ABSTRACT As with many other projects, the origin of this doctoral thesis is the result of a chance. A few years ago I found in a bookstore in London, 38 Harmood st., Walden Books, a first edition of the well-known monograph about Mies by Philip Johnson. The tiny book, in fact a catalog of the exhibition that the MoMA of New York devoted to the work of Mies van der Rohe in 1947, ten years after his landing in the United States, has a size of 10 x 7.5 inches, that is, half of Crown American format (20 x 15 inches), equivalent to 508 x 381 mm. In the first printing, published by The Plantin Press, 12,000 copies were released. That same year, produced by Reynal and Hitchcock, both the first English translation of When the cathedrals were white by Le Corbusier and a selection of poems by Lorca were published, seven years after his Poet in New York. Inside the book, the famous drawing from Mies Sketch for a glass house on a hillside c. 1934 appears on page 109, barely a few lines, precise and nuanced though, the house on a hillside that quickly reminds us of the proposals of Eero Saarinen for a house in the air, first in 1941, in Pennsylvania, and later, in 1945, with Charles Eames, in Los Angeles, that would never be built, but in their later alliterations made by Harry Seidler (Julian Rose House, Wahroonga, Sydney, 1949), Philip Johnson (Leonhardt house, Long Island, New York, 1956) or Craig Ellwood (Smith House, Crestwood Hills, 1958; Frank Pierson & Polly House, Malibu, 1962, Chamorro House, Hollywood Hills, 1963, or the Weekend House series, with Gerald Horn, between 1964 and 1970, to the magnificent Art Center College of Design Pasadena, the inhabited bridge, in 1977). The story that gives rise to the text flows in a short amount of time, from the first drawings of the Case Study House No. 8, within the program promoted by John Entenza and his magazine Arts & Architecture in California, made in the study of Saarinen in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, until the project of the Eames house is completed five years after finishing the construction in 1955, in the final version we know, radically different from the initial state, when the couple, Charles and Ray, published the film House after Five Years of Living. The original discussion around this house, or better, about the circumstances, controlled coincidences, regarding its construction, appears when one takes account of those that remain, the invariants, in the two versions, drawn and built, which precisely allow the reconciliation between both projects. In this short period of time a series of decisions made in the transformation process of the project reveal, in the obsessive record made by Charles Eames and in the new proposed references, the first visibility of the changing of the modern paradigm. But this germinal moment that crystallizes the transition to postmodernism is not unprecedented in the history of American architecture. So, the story opens its temporal scope to a fifty-year period that started in 1893, date of the celebration of the Chicago World´s Columbian Exposition. In the White City by Hunt & McKim and Burnham, the traitor, Louis Sullivan builds his Golden Doorway in the Transportation Building. That visited by a renovated Adolf Loos before his coming back to Vienna; the same that André Bouillet, Head of the Union Centrale des Arts Decoratifs in Paris, admired and dazzled in museums all over Europe, from Paris to Moscow, in large photographs and models. Until someone in Finland showed one of those photos to a young nineteen-years-old student at the Polytechnic Institute. Eliel Saarinen became fascinated by the powerful new image: he hanged the picture in front of his drawing board, aware that the Golden Doorway, that door of adventure and catharsis Sullivan coined as distinctive and as a single complex element which would solve their most mature projects, devoid of all ornament; the same that would repeat later, with deep appreciation, Ladovsky, Wright, Scarpa, or Moneo, a door inside a door, a threshold, a gap that contained, in its own moving words, the whole future of architecture. From there, through 1910, when Wright's flight to Tuscany allows Europe to discover his architecture, including a young Mies van der Rohe, meritorious in the studio of Peter Behrens, via the Wasmuth Portfolio; and as a little bit later, in 1914, Schindler and Neutra in 1923, made the travel in opposite direction, until Mies follows them in 1937, led by a Philip Johnson who had traveled to Europe in 1930, we return to 1945 and the beginning of the program Case Study House in California, and from 1949, when construction of the CSH # 8 begins, and finally, to 1955, after five years of living, when Julius Shulman photographs the inside of the house with Ray and Charles Eames, and all their belongins, at the Chautauqua meadows on Pacific Palisades in Los Angeles, launching its fine yellow lines to Alison and Peter Smithson and his heroic late modern, up to the first Foster and his poetic hightech and even the O-riginal Gehry, deconstructing the essential space of his home from the space itself, opening the doors to the new century. And these paradigm shifts, from the hard eclectic styles to modern secular lyricism in the hinge and then overcoming the cultured frivolity, lightness, exhibitionism, and opportunism of the postmodern skeptical focus, something remains intense, invariant in the lurching relationship of contemporary man and his environment. As the sculpture, which according to Barnett Newman is what you bump into when you back up to see a painting, in these pristine, ordinary places, promenade, door, threshold, enclosure and emptiness, you stumble upon the architecture even before realizing that it is architecture.

The Indian style of architecture, a brief sketch of its history and development, with a design for a temple,

Mode of access: Internet.

Troilus and Cressida - A Scenic Design

The purpose of this thesis is to provide research, supporting paperwork, production photographs, and other materials that document the scenic design process for the production of William Shakespeare’s Troilus & Cressida by the University of Maryland – College Park, School of Theater, Dance, and Performance Studies. This thesis contains the following: scenic research images collected to express period, location, and emotional/intellectual landscapes to the production team; preliminary sketches; photographs of the ¼” scale model; a full set of drafting plates and paint elevations used to communicate the design to the technical director and paint charge; a unit list naming each scenic element; a props list and research book to detail each hand prop, furniture piece and consumable to the prop master; and, lastly, archival production photographs to document the completed design.

Adaptable Strut-and-Tie Model for Design and Verification of Four-Pile Caps

A large percentage of pile caps support only one column, and the pile caps in turn are supported by only a few piles. These are typically short and deep members with overall span-depth ratios of less than 1.5. Codes of practice do not provide uniform treatment for the design of these types of pile caps. These members have traditionally been designed as beams spanning between piles with the depth selected to avoid shear failures and the amount of longitudinal reinforcement selected to provide sufficient flexural capacity as calculated by the engineering beam theory. More recently, the strut-and-tie method has been used for the design of pile caps (disturbed or D-region) in which the load path is envisaged to be a three-dimensional truss, with compressive forces being supported by concrete compressive struts between the column and piles and tensile forces being carried by reinforcing steel located between piles. Both of these models have not provided uniform factors of safety against failure or been able to predict whether failure will occur by flexure (ductile mode) or shear (fragile mode). In this paper, an analytical model based on the strut-and-tie approach is presented. The proposed model has been calibrated using an extensive experimental database of pile caps subjected to compression and evaluated analytically for more complex loading conditions. It has been proven to be applicable across a broad range of test data and can predict the failures modes, cracking, yielding, and failure loads of four-pile caps with reasonable accuracy.