How do investors respond to share buyback programs? : evidence from Brazil during 2008 crisis

This paper provides empirical evidence of how effective share repurchase programs were as instruments to signal low prices during 2008 crisis in Brazil. Although we found that stock prices did not respond to buyback programs in the period 2006 to 2012 (1.65% cumulative abnormal returns after 5 days), the average stock price reaction in 2008 (2.93%) is higher and different with statistical significance. Furthermore, we found that the share price reaction from companies with market capitalization below R$10 billion is higher than the one from larger companies. In addition, we found that the response to the buyback programs is positively correlated (i) to the company’s purchasing activity after the announcement, (ii) to the maximum amount of shares announced which can be bought and (iii) to the quantity actually bought during the program. This research is unique in providing empirical evidence on the Brazilian case by analyzing 377 programs announced during that period. The research also confirms that the stock reaction is not influenced by the company's purchasing activity in prior announcements.

Impacts of vessel capacity reduction programs on the efficiency in fisheries. The case of Australia's multispecies in northern prawn fishery

Capacity reduction programs in the form of buybacks or decommissioning programs have had relatively widespread application in fisheries in the US, Europe and Australia. A common criticism of such programs is that they remove the least efficient vessels first, resulting in an increase in average efficiency of the remaining fleet. The effective fishing power of the fleet, therefore, does not decrease in proportion to the number of vessels removed. Further, reduced crowding may increase efficiency of the remaining vessels. In this paper, the effects of a buyback program on average technical efficiency in Australia’s Northern Prawn Fishery are examined using a multi-output distance function approach with an explicit inefficiency model. The results indicate that average efficiency of the remaining vessels was greater than that of the removed vessels, and that average efficiency of remaining vessels also increased as a result of reduced crowding.

Ceticismo ou reputação nas recompras de ações?

Este trabalho investiga as recompras de ações no Brasil pelo prisma da reputação das empresas anunciadoras. Por meio de uma base de dados ainda inexplorada, o formulário de referência anual, que possibilita a diferenciação dos anúncios de recompras pelas quantidades efetivamente compradas. Com metodologia de estudo de evento e regressão, foram analisados os anúncios de recompras de ações da própria companhia em mercado aberto para o período compreendido entre os anos de 2007 a 2014. Os principais resultados encontrados foram à existência de reputação para empresas que apresentam uma taxa efetiva de recompra mais elevada e uma penalização para as empresas que apresentam baixas taxas efetivas de recompra em anúncios anteriores, quanto mais próximo de zero a taxa efetiva de recompra do anuncio anterior, menor é o efeito de um novo anúncio. Por fim, foi encontrado retorno anormal acumulado significativo no mercado acionário brasileiro para empresas que anunciam recompra de ações próprias no mercado aberto de 1,12% no primeiro dia, 1,56% no quinto dia e 1,97% ao final do primeiro mês. Para eventos com histórico, foi de 0,98% no primeiro dia, 1,33% no quinto dia e 1,38% ao final do primeiro mês. Já para o caso nos quais os eventos foram antecedidos imediatamente por anúncios de recompra com taxas efetivas de recompras de no mínimo 70%, foi de 1,42% no primeiro dia, 2,70% no quinto dia e 5,09% ao final do primeiro mês.

Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries

The failures of traditional target-species management have led many to propose an ecosystem approach to fisheries to promote sustainability. The ecosystem approach is necessary, especially to account for fishery-ecosystem interactions, but by itself is not sufficient to address two important factors contributing to unsustainable fisheries: inappropriate incentives bearing on fishers and the ineffective governance that frequently exists in commercial, developed fisheries managed primarily by total-harvest limits and input controls. We contend that much greater emphasis must be placed on fisher motivation when managing fisheries. Using evidence from more than a dozen natural experiments in commercial fisheries, we argue that incentive-based approaches that better specify community and individual harvest or territorial rights and price ecosystem services and that are coupled with public research, monitoring, and effective oversight promote sustainable fisheries.