The contrasting invertebrate fauna of freshwater habitats in the Swavesey fens of East Anglia

During July and August 1988, 21 ponds and 33 ditch sites were sampled at Swavesey fens in East Anglia. Water from each site was collected and analysed at monthly intervals in the year preceding faunal sampling. Temperature and oxygen were measured on site. The "quality" of the faunal community was assessed by three approaches: a modification of the BMWP scoring system (Biological Monitoring Working Party); faunal richness was calculated as the number of faunal "groups" at each site; and by using Simpson's index of diversity. Statistical analysis was carried out to explore the relationships between sites, environmental variables and faunal diversity. The survey clearly showed the detrimental effects of elevated nitrate and phosphate from agricultural sources and the localised impacts of treated sewage effluent on invertebrates in ditches.

Habitat use by 0+ cyprinid fish in the River Great Ouse, East Anglia

This study was designed to examine the habitat use of several species of 0+ cyprinid in the regulated River Great Ouse and to determine the reasons for specific habitat use. In general, all fish species were found associated with the marginal zone, with little diel variation. Use of shallow habitats in the presence of macrophytes correlated well with the distribution of zooplankton in the river channel, the preferred food source of 0+ cyprinids. During the early to late larval phase, all species fed upon rotifers and diatoms. Cladocera, particularly Alona spp. and Chydorus spp., and early instar larvae of Chironomidae, then became prevalent in the diet along with small numbers of Copepoda. Models were developed to determine habitat availability over a range of discharges, using the physical habitat simulation (PHABSIM) component of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM). The results of this analysis revealed that habitat suitable for 0+ fishes comprised a relatively small percentage of the main channel and generally decreased with discharge.

1.° Aggregatio dictorum antiquorum ferè omnium de calculo renum et vesicae, edita à quodam sapiente. — 2.° Galeni liber de elementis, secundùm sententiam Hippocratis. — 3.° Ejusdem Galeni libri tres de temperamentis. — 4.° Liber de malitia complexionis diversae. — 5.° Nicolai de Anglia commentarius in librum Galeni de elementis, secundùm Hippocratem. — 6.° Ejusdem Nicolai commentarius in libros Galeni de crisibus. — 7.° Ejusdem Nicolai commentarius in tres libros Galeni de facultatibus naturalibus. — 8.° Galeni de differentiis pulsuum liber primus. — 9.° Ejusdem liber de praesagitione ex somniis. — 10.° Ejusdem liber de causis respirationis. — 11.° Ejusdem liber de pulsibus ad tyrones. — 12.° Ejusdem liber de virtutibus corpus nostrum dispensantibus. — 13.° Ejusdem liber de utilitate pulsus.

Colbertinus

Aproximaci?? a les estrat??gies de lluita contra el plagi acad??mic desenvolupades per les universitats brit??niques d'East Anglia (Norwich) i John Moore's University (Liverpool)

Resumen tomado del autor

Placing pits: landscape occupation and depositional practice during the Neolithic in East Anglia

This paper takes Neolithic pits as a starting point from which to investigate the broader issues of settlement and deposition in Britain at that time. It suggests that while sites made up primarily, and often only, of pits have recently been incorporated much more readily into accounts of the period, they are still not well understood. It is only by investigating the character of occupation across the landscape as a whole, and the nature of deposits in a variety of different contexts, that we will be able to understand pits, settlement, or deposition fully. On the basis of a study of this kind, it is suggested that pits were sited in specific locations which might be considered suitable for ‘settlement’; it is also demonstrated that deposition varied considerably between contexts and over time. By including large numbers of sites known only through ‘grey’ reports and Historic Environment Records, the study draws on an important body of work which has been under-used in the past. The paper focuses primarily on East Anglia, a region well-known for its pit sites but not well-known for its monuments; in doing so, it aims to counterbalance the weight of previous narratives which have tended to focus on other parts of Britain.