Translating Nietzsche, mediating literature: Alexander Tille and the limits of Anglo-German intercultural transfer

Dr. Alexander Tille (1866–1912) was one of the key-figures in Anglo-German intercultural transfer towards the end of the 19th century. As a lecturer in German at Glasgow University he was the first to translate and edit Nietzsche’s work into English. Writers such as W. B. Yeats were influenced by Nietzsche and used Tille’s translations. Tille’s social Darwinist reading of the philosopher’s oeuvre, however, had a narrowing impact on the reception of Nietzsche in the Anglo-Saxon world for decades. Through numerous publications Tille disseminated knowledge about British authors (e.g., Robert Louis Stevenson, William Wordsworth) in Germany and about German authors (e.g., Johann Wolfgang von Goethe) in Britain. His role as mediator also extended into areas such as history, religion, and industry. During the Boer war, however, Tille’s outspoken pro-German nationalism brought him in conflict with his British host society. After being physically attacked by his students he returned to Germany and published a highly anglophobic monograph. Tille personifies the paradox of Anglo-German relations in the pre-war years, which deteriorated despite an increase in intercultural transfer and knowledge about the respective Other. [From the Author]

Nietzsche's eternal recurrence of the same : the effect of logic abridgement, contradictions and inconsistencies

I will argue that the doctrine of eternal recurrence of the same no better interprets cosmology than pink elephants interpret zoology. I will also argue that the eternal-reiurn-of-the-same doctrine as what Magnus calls "existential imperative" is without possibility of application and thus futile. To facilitate those arguments, the validity of the doctrine of the eternal recurrence of the same will be tested under distinct rubrics. Although each rubric will stand alone, one per chapter, as an evaluation of some specific aspect of eternal recurrence, the rubric sequence has been selected to accommodate the identification of what I shall be calling logic abridgments. The conclusions to be extracted from each rubric are grouped under the heading CONCLUSION and appear immediately following rubric ten. Then, or if, at the end of a rubric a reader is inclined to wonder which rubric or topic is next, and why, the answer can be found at the top of the following page. The question is usually answered in the very first sentence, but always answered in the first paragraph. The first rubric has been placed in order by chronological entitlement in that it deals with the evolution of the idea of eternal recurrence from the time of the ancient Greeks to Nietzsche's August, 1881 inspiration. This much-recommended technique is also known as starting at the beginning. Rubric 1 also deals with 20th. Century philosophers' assessments of the relationship between Nietzsche and ancient Greek thought. The only experience of E-R, Zarathustra's mountain vision, is second only because it sets the scene alluded to in following rubrics. The third rubric explores .ii?.ih T jc,i -I'w Nietzsche's evaluation of rationality so that his thought processes will be understood appropriately. The actual mechanism of E-R is tested in rubric four...The scientific proof Nietzsche assembled in support of E-R is assessed by contemporary philosophers in rubric five. E-R's function as an ethical imperative is debated in rubrics six and seven.. .The extent to which E-R fulfills its purpose in overcoming nihilism is measured against the comfort assured by major world religions in rubric eight. Whether E-R also serves as a redemption for revenge is questioned in rubric nine. Rubric ten assures that E-R refers to return of the identically same and not merely the similar. In addition to assemblage and evaluation of all ten rubrics, at the end of each rubric a brief recapitulation of its principal points concludes the chapter. In this essay I will assess the theoretical conditions under which the doctrine cannot be applicable and will show what contradictions and inconsistencies follow if the doctrine is taken to be operable. Harold Alderman in his book Nietzsche's Gift wrote, the "doctrine of eternal recurrence gives us a problem not in Platonic cosmology, but in Socratic selfreflection." ^ I will illustrate that the recurrence doctrine's cosmogony is unworkable and that if it were workable, it would negate self-reflection on the grounds that selfreflection cannot find its cause in eternal recurrence of the same. Thus, when the cosmology is shown to be impossible, any expected ensuing results or benefits will be rendered also impossible. The so-called "heaviest burden" will be exposed as complex, engrossing "what if speculations deserving no linkings to reality. To identify ^Alderman p. 84 abridgments of logic, contradictions and inconsistencies in Nietzsche's doctrine of eternal recurrence of the same, I. will examine the subject under the following schedule. In Chapter 1 the ancient origins of recurrence theories will be introduced. ..This chapter is intended to establish the boundaries within which the subsequent chapters, except Chapter 10, will be confined. Chapter 2, Zarathustra's vision of E-R, assesses the sections of Thus Spoke Zarathustra in which the phenomenon of recurrence of the same is reported. ..Nihilism as a psychological difficulty is introduced in this rubric, but that subject will be studied in detail in Chapter 8. In Chapter 2 the symbols of eternal recurrence of the same will be considered. Whether the recurrence image should be of a closed ring or as a coil will be of significance in many sections of my essay. I will argue that neither symbolic configuration can accommodate Nietzsche's supposed intention. Chapter 3 defends the description of E-R given by Zarathustra. Chapter 4, the cosmological mechanics of E-R, speculates on the seriousness with which Nietzsche might have intended the doctrine of eternal recurrence to be taken. My essay reports, and then assesses, the argument of those who suppose the doctrine to have been merely exploratory musings by Nietzsche on cosmological hypotheses...The cosmogony of E-R is examined. In Chapter 5, cosmological proofs tested, the proofs for Nietzsche's doctrine of return of the same are evaluated. This chapter features the position taken by Martin ' Heidegger. My essay suggests that while Heidegger's argument that recurrence of the same is a genuine cosmic agenda is admirable, it is not at all persuasive. Chapter 6, E-R is an ethical imperative, is in essence the reporting of a debate between two scholars regarding the possibility of an imperative in the doctrine of recurrence. Their debate polarizes the arguments I intend to develop. Chapter 7, does E-R of the same preclude alteration of attitudes, is a continuation of the debate presented in Chapter 6 with the focus shifted to the psychological from the cosmological aspects of eternal recurrence of the same. Chapter 8, Can E-R Overcome Nihilism?, is divided into two parts. In the first, nihilism as it applies to Nietzsche's theory is discussed. ..In part 2, the broader consequences, sources and definitions of nihilism are outlined. My essay argues that Nietzsche's doctrine is more nihilistic than are the world's major religions. Chapter 9, Is E-R a redemption for revenge?, examines the suggestion extracted from Thus Spoke Zarathustra that the doctrine of eternal recurrence is intended, among other purposes, as a redemption for mankind from the destructiveness of revenge. Chapter 10, E-R of the similar refuted, analyses a position that an element of chance can influence the doctrine of recurrence. This view appears to allow, not for recurrence of the same, but recurrence of the similar. A summary will recount briefly the various significant logic abridgments, contradictions, and inconsistencies associated with Nietzsche's doctrine of eternal recurrence of the same. In the 'conclusion' section of my essay my own opinions and observations will be assembled from the body of the essay.

On affirmation and becoming : a Deleuzian reading of Nietzsche's critique of nihilism

The main thrust of this thesis is the re-exploration of Friedrich Nietzsche's "critique of nihilism" through the lenses of Gilles Deleuze. A Deleuzian reading of Nietzsche is motivated by a post-deconstrnctive style of interpretation, inasmuch as Deleuze goes beyond, or in between, henneneutics and deconstrnction. Deleuze's post-deconstrnctive reading of Nietzsche is, however, only secondary to the main aim of this thesis. The primary thrust of this study is the critique of a way of thinking characterized by Nietzsche as nihilistic. Therefore, it should be noted that this study is not about Deleuze's reading per se; rather, it is an appraisal of Nietzsche's "critique of nihilism" using Deleuze's experimental reading. We will accrue Nietzsche's critique and Deleuze's post-deconstrnctive reading in order to appraise Nietzsche's critique itself. Insofar as we have underscored Deleuze's purported experimentation of Nietzschean themes, this study is also an experiment in itself. Through this experimentation, we will find out whether it is possible to partly gloss Nietzsche's critique of nihilism through Deleuzian phraseology. Far from presenting a mere exposition of Nietzsche's text, we are, rather, re-reading, that is, re-evaluating Nietzsche's critique of nihilism through Deleuze's experimentation. This is our way of thinking with Nietzsche. Nihilism is the central problem upon which Nietzsche's philosophical musings are directed; he deems nihilism as a cultural experience and, as such, a phenomenon to be reckoned with. In our reconstruction of Nietzsche's critique of nihilism, we locate two related elements which constitute the structure of the prescription of a cure, Le., the ethics of affirmation and the ontology of becoming. Appraising Nietzsche's ethics and ontology amounts to clarifying what Deleuze thinks as the movement from the "dogmatic image of thought" to the "new image of thought." Through this new image of thought, Deleuze makes sense of a Nietzschean counterculture which is a perspective that resists traditional or representational metaphysics. Deleuze takes the reversal of Platonism or the transmutation of values to be the point of departure. We have to, according to Deleuze, abandon our old image of the world in order to free ourselves from the obscurantism of foundationalist or essentialist thinking. It is only through the transmutation of values that we can make sense of Nietzsche's ethics of affirmation and ontology of becoming. We have to think of Nietzsche's ethics as an "ethics" and not a moral philosophy, and we have to think of his ontology as 1/ ontology" and not as metaphysics. Through Deleuze, we are able to avoid reading Nietzsche as a moral philosopher and metaphysician. Rather, we are able to read Nietzsche as one espousing an ethical imperative through the thought of the eternal return and one advocating a theory of existence based on an immanent, as opposed to transcendent, image of the world.

Nietzsche's will-to-power ontology : an interpretation of Beyond Good and Evil

Abstract: Nietzsche's Will-to-Power Ontology: An Interpretation of Beyond Good and Evil § 36 By: Mark Minuk Will-to-power is the central component of Nietzsche's philosophy, and passage 36 of Beyond Good and Evil is essential to coming to an understanding of it. 1 argue for and defend the thesis that will-to-power constitutes Nietzsche's ontology, and offer a new understanding of what that means. Nietzsche's ontology can be talked about as though it were a traditional substance ontology (i.e., a world made up of forces; a duality of conflicting forces described as 'towards which' and 'away from which'). However, 1 argue that what defines this ontology is an understanding of valuation as ontologically fundamental—^the basis of interpretation, and from which a substance ontology emerges. In the second chapter, I explain Nietzsche's ontology, as reflected in this passage, through a discussion of Heidegger's two ontological categories in Being and Time (readiness-to-hand, and present-at-hand). In a nutshell, it means that the world of our desires and passions (the most basic of which is for power) is ontologically more fundamental than the material world, or any other interpretation, which is to say, the material world emerges out of a world of our desires and passions. In the first chapter, I address the problematic form of the passage reflected in the first sentence. The passage is in a hypothetical style makes no claim to positive knowledge or truth, and, superficially, looks like Schopenhaurian position for the metaphysics of the will, which Nietzsche rejects. 1 argue that the hypothetical form of the passage is a matter of style, namely, the style of a free-spirit for whom the question of truth is reframed as a question of values. In the third and final chapter, 1 address the charge that Nietzsche's interpretation is a conscious anthropomorphic projection. 1 suggest that the charge rests on a distinction (between nature and man) that Nietzsche rejects. I also address the problem of the causality of the will for Nietzsche, by suggesting that an alternative, perspectival form of causality is possible.

Nietzsche : en torno al pensamiento nietzcheano : Seminario de Actualización Filosófica.

El documento recoge algunas de las ponencias presentadas en el Seminario de Actualización Filosófica del curso 1994-1995, celebrado en la Universidad de Alcalá de Henares con el apoyo del Centro de Profesores de la localidad. Los seis textos tratan sobre el pensamiento y las teorías filosóficas de Nietzsche: Los ingredientes intempestivos del pensamiento de Nietzsche, el poder de lo ilusorio; La idea de Dios en Nietzsche; Nietzsche y la moral; Nietzsche y Heidegger ante la tradición filosófica; El lenguaje del silencio, análisis del lenguaje de y en Nietzsche; Hablar es como bailar en cadenas, el uso irónico del lenguaje en Nietzsche.

La determinazione dell'esistenza: Nietzsche e Spinoza

La tesi indaga i temi fondamentali, i limiti e le implicazioni della relazione tra le filosofie di Nietzsche e di Spinoza, sia analizzando storiograficamente il ruolo di Spinoza nei testi di Nietzsche (I parte), sia sviluppando una proposta teoretica a partire dai due autori (II, III e IV parte). L’indagine storiografica procede presentando le riflessioni che Nietzsche dedica a Spinoza secondo un criterio tematico-cronologico. Durante l’esposizione sono discusse le fonti utilizzate da Nietzsche e il significato che le menzioni di Spinoza ricoprono nell’economia generale del pensiero nietzschiano. La seconda parte della ricerca indaga le ragioni per le quali la connessione tra Nietzsche e Spinoza può risultare teoreticamente convincente, in particolare a partire dall’istanza propriamente critica della loro riflessione, che si manifesta come domanda “empia” sul mondo delle credenze condivise. In particolare, è la nozione di “causa” a fungere da rifugio per la credenza metafisica nel soggetto anche all’interno dell’universo deterministico in cui opera la scienza. Come va invece pensato un determinismo che sia filosoficamente coerente? Le ultime due parti di questa ricerca sviluppano alcune ipotesi in proposito, considerando singolarmente le filosofie di Spinoza e di Nietzsche.

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 633 - Aufsätze für die "Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung" (p. IX 7-IX 8)

"Der neueste Angriff auf die Metaphysik" (GS 4, S. 108-161), veröffentlicht in: Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung VI, 1937, S. 4-53, englische Fassung mit dem Titel "The latest Attack on Metaphysics", Typoskript mit handschriftlichen Korrekturen, 63 Blatt; "Bemerkungen zu Jaspers' 'Nietzsche'" (GS 4, S. 226-235), veröffentlicht in: Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung VI, 1937, S. 407-414, Typoskript mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen, 8 Blatt;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 663 - "Research-Project on Anti-Semitism" (p. IX 92.1e-IX 92.7)

International Institute of Social Research: Research-Project on Anti-Semitism" (1939-42) (veröffentlicht in Studies in Philosophy and Social Science Bd. IX, 1941, S. 124-143):; 1. e) Typoskript, 46 Blatt, f) Teilstück, Typoskript, 1 Blatt, g) deutsche Fassung, Typoskript, 43 Blatt; 2. Entwurf, deutsch, Typoskript mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen, 6 Blatt; 3. Über das Forschungsprojekt zum Antisemitismus, Typoskript, deutsch, 1 Seite fehlt, 38 Blatt; 4. Zitate aus Werken Friedrich Nietzsches über Jude, Antisemitismus, Rasse, Heinrich Heine, Typoskript, 18 Blatt; 5. Stichwortverzeichnis zu 4., handschriftliche Notizen, 10 Blatt; 6. Über Nietzsche, eigenhändige und handschriftliche Notizen zu 4., 3 Blatt; 7. "Supplementary Statement Dec. 1942", enthält unter anderem Abschriften bzw. Kopien von Briefen der Sponsoren des Projekts und ein Memorandum über die Tätigkeiten des Instituts 1939-41, a) als Typoskript vervielfältigt, 51 Blatt und 1 Sonderdruck: "International Institute of Social Research: A Report on Its History, Aims and Activities 1933-38", b) Typoskript und Photokopien, 28 Blatt und 2 Sonderdrucke: wie bei 7.a), außerdem "Research Project on Antisemitism", Studies in Philosophy and Social Science IX, 1941;

Sorprendente el poder del cuerpo : Deleuze y su interpretación de Nietzsche y Spinoza

En el artículo que presentamos nos proponemos mostrar una original comprensión del cuerpo desde una perspectiva ontológica, alternativa a los desarrollos hegemónicos producidos en la historia de la filosofía occidental donde éste aparece sub-estimado o subordinado al pensamiento, a partir de la recepción deleuziana de las filosofías de Spinoza y Nietzsche; y cuya elaboración comienza a partir de problematizar qué es y qué puede un cuerpo, abriendo la posibilidad de entenderlo en tanto relaciones entre términos (potencias-fuerzas) desiguales (diferencias intensivas) y no como totalidad (substancia). Para mostrar en las conclusiones cómo, a partir de ello, Deleuze puede construir una nueva ontología de la diferencia donde la realidad del ser es diferir y no fundamentar.

La construcción relacional de la subjetividad en Nietzsche: hacia nuevas perspectivas políticas

El presente Trabajo de investigación parte de la idea de que la filosofía de Nietzsche, de un modo general, responde al desarrollo de una intuición básica que se manifiesta en toda su obra. Desde sus primeros textos, hasta los más maduros, Nietzsche reflexiona sobre la ineludible tensión que subyace al devenir y al desarrollo de la vida, de todo lo vivo. La primera expresión de esta intuición aparecerá bajo las nociones de lo apolíneo y lo dionisiaco, por las que un joven Nietzsche trataría, en El nacimiento de la Tragedia, de dar cuenta del origen de la tragedia como momento estético que justificaba el sinsentido final del mundo y de la vida del hombre. Se ha realizado aún dentro del marco de la metafísica aunque no sin evidentes discrepancias con ella. Sin embargo, tras la ruptura con Wagner y Schopenhauer y la radicalización de su «crítica a la metafísica», Nietzsche expresaría su renuncia a apresar, a representar, aquellos elementos, supuestamente últimos. Estos elementos constituyen la tensión constitutiva del mundo como devenir, sin renunciar, por ello, a hacerse cargo dicha tensión. A partir de este momento, para él toda representación del mundo, del hombre, de la vida, etc., que nos hagamos, será producto de la relación entre unos elementos a los que, en último término, no tenemos acceso directo –ni intelectual ni sensorialmente–. Por tanto, no podrán ser “representados” ni “conocidos” en los términos de “adecuación” sugeridos por la epistemología y la ontología de orientación metafísica...

Nietzsche, moral y adolescencia

La adolescencia es una etapa de la vida marcada por el cambio físico, intelectual y emocional. Durante este periodo los jóvenes desarrollan la identidad personal que determinará su personalidad adulta. Los adolescentes tienen que enfrentarse a este proceso en una sociedad capitalista en la que impera el nihilismo, caracterizada por el consumismo y la competitividad. La filosofía de Friedrich Nietzsche es esencial para ayudar a la juventud a hacer un ejercicio intelectual en el que cuestionen los valores morales que se quieren imponer para, empleando el nihilismo activo, crear los suyos propios, fomentando así su autonomía y capacidad crítica para ser los actores principales de su vida y evitar ser objetos de manipulación. Al mismo tiempo, Nietzsche proporciona las herramientas necesarias para que los adolescentes aprendan a ver las inevitables dificultades que la vida conlleva, como retos de los que saldrán fortalecidos. La filosofía de Nietzsche en el aula es una propuesta para fomentar en los alumnos un ejercicio intelectual que les ayude a dirigir sus vidas con autonomía, responsabilidad, y superación personal.