An account of the controversy in the First Parish in Cambridge. 1827-1829. Published pursuant to a vote of the church.

The present version of the dispute was published by the seceding group.

An appeal to the public on the controversy respecting the revolution in Harvard College, and the events which have followed it : occasioned by the use which has been made of certain complaints and accusations of Miss Hannah Adams, against the author /

Relating to the charges of plagiarism in the preparation of the Compendious history of New England.

A narrative of the controversy between the Rev. Jedidiah Morse, D.D. and the author /

Includes Some notice of the remarks on S. Higginson, Jun. contained in Dr. Morse's appeal to the publick, signed Stephen Higginson, Jun. and bound with a Review of Dr. Morse's "Appeal to the publick", principally with reference to that part of it which relates to Harvard College, by a friend of that college, signed An alumnus of Harvard.

A vindication of the end of religious controversy, from the exceptions of the right Rev. Dr. Thomas Burgess ... and the Rev. Richard Grier ... in letters to a catholic convert /

Bibliographical footnotes.

The Manchester socinian controversy /

Mode of access: Internet.

The International coffee agreement : its impact on coffee prices, its ability to deal with unforeseen supply and demand conditions, alleged discrimination against U.S. ships in the carriage of coffee, and the soluble coffee controversy /

At head of title: 93d Congress, 1st session. Committee print.

An introductory sketch to the Martin Marprelate controversy, 1588-1590 ...

A provisional chronological list of the works comprising this controversy": p. [197]-200.

Three episodes of Massachusetts history: the settlement of Boston Bay; the Antinomian controversy; a study of church and town government,

Paged continuously.

Handbook to the controversy with Rome /

"Translated from the seventh edition of the Handbuch der protestantischen Polemik gegen die Römisch-Katholische Kirche."

Origins of the TVA; the Muscle Shoals controversy, 1920-1932.

Bibliography: p. 316-328.

The flood control controversy : big dams, little dams, and land management /

"Sponsored by the Conservation Foundation."

Martensite Crystallography - the apparent controversy between the infinitesimal deformation approach and the phenomenological theory of martensitic transformations

The aim of this article is to demonstrate that the apparent controversy between the infinitesimal deformation (ID) approach and the phenomenological theory of martensitic transformations (PTMTs) in predicting the crystallographic characteristics of a martensitic transformation is entirely based on unjustified approximations associated with the way in which the ID calculations are performed. When applied correctly, the ID approach is shown to be absolutely identical to the PTMT. Nevertheless, there may be some advantages in using the ID approach. In particular, it is somewhat simpler than the PTMT; it is based on a physical concept that is easier to understand and, most important, it may provide a tool for investigating some of the features of martensitic transformations that have eluded explanation via the PTMT.

Single- vs. multiple-set resistance training: Recent developments in the controversy

Galvao, D.A., and D.R. Taaffe. Single- vs. multiple-set resistance training: recent developments in the controversy. J. Strength Cond. Res. 18(3):660-667. 2004.-The number of sets in a resistance training program remains a major point of discussion and controversy. Studies prior to 1998 demonstrated inconsistent findings between single-set and multiple-set programs; however, recent evidence suggests that multiple sets promote additional benefits following short- and long-term training. The rationale supporting multiple sets is that the number of sets is part of the exercise volume equation, and the volume of exercise is crucial in producing the stimulus necessary to elicit specific physiological adaptations. The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of recent resistance training studies comparing single and multiple sets. However, it should be noted that studies to date have been conducted in young and middle-aged adults, and it remains to be determined if the additional benefits accrued with multiple-set training also occurs for older adults, especially the frail elderly.

The difference between science and philosophy: The Spinoza-Boyle controversy revisited

This article examines the seventeenth-century debate between the Dutch philosopher Benedict de Spinoza and the British scientist Robert Boyle, with a view to explicating what the twentieth-century French philosopher Gilles Deleuze considers to be the difference between science and philosophy. The two main themes that are usually drawn from the correspondence of Boyle and Spinoza, and used to polarize the exchange, are the different views on scientific methodology and on the nature of matter that are attributed to each correspondent. Commentators have tended to focus on one or the other of these themes in order to champion either Boyle or Spinoza in their assessment of the exchange. This paper draws upon the resources made available by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari in their major work What is Philosophy?, in order to offer a more balanced account of the exchange, which in its turn contributes to our understanding of Deleuze and Guattari's conception of the difference between science and philosophy.

June Sutor and the C-H…O hydrogen bonding controversy

In 1962, D. June Sutor published the first crystallographic analysis of C–H…O hydrogen bonding based on a selection of structures then known. Her follow-up paper the next year cited more structures and provided more details, but her ideas met with formidable opposition. This review begins by describing knowledge of C-H…O hydrogen bonding available at the time from physico-chemical and spectroscopic studies. By comparison of structures cited by Sutor with modern redeterminations, the soundness of her basic data set is assessed. The plausibility of the counter-arguments against her is evaluated. Finally, her biographical details are presented along with consideration of factors that might have impeded the acceptance of her work. © 2012 Taylor & Francis.