Use of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology and cardiology: Tests in hospitals - ORAMED project

Although active personal dosemeters (APDs) are not used quite often in hospital environments, the possibility to assess the dose and/or dose rate in real time is particularly interesting in interventional radiology and cardiology (IR/IC) since operators can receive relatively high doses while standing close to the primary radiation field.A study concerning the optimization of the use of APDs in IR/IC was performed in the framework of the ORAMED project, a Collaborative Project (2008-2011) supported by the European Commission within its 7th Framework Program. This paper reports on tests performed with APDs on phantoms using an X-ray facility in a hospital environment and APDs worn by interventionalists during routine practice in different European hospitals.The behaviour of the APDs is more satisfactory in hospitals than in laboratories with respect to the influence of the tube peak high voltage and pulse width, because the APDs are tested in scattered fields with dose equivalent rates generally lower than 1 Sv.h(-1).

Measurements of eye lens doses in interventional radiology and cardiology: Final results of the ORAMED project

Within the ORAMED project (Optimization of Radiation Protection of Medical Staff) a coordinated measurement program for occupationally exposed medical staff was performed in different hospitals in Europe (www.oramed-fp7.eu). The main objective was to obtain a set of standardized data on extremity and eye lens doses for staff involved in interventional radiology and cardiology and to optimize radiation protection. Special attention was given to the measurement of the doses to the eye lenses. In this paper an overview will be given of the measured eye lens doses and the main influence factors for these doses. The measured eye lens doses are extrapolated to annual doses. The extrapolations showed that monitoringof the eye lens should be performed on routine basis.

Estratègies i errors en la resolució de problemes d'extrems per mètodes elementals

Aquesta investigació s’engloba dins del camp de la resolució de problemes en educació matemàtica i se centra en estudiar de quina manera els alumnes de primer curs de Batxillerat de dos instituts públics de Catalunya resolen alguns problemes d’extrems per mètodes elementals, és a dir, sense utilitzar les tècniques del càlcul diferencial. Tanmateix, s’estudia el punt de partida d’aquests alumnes davant dels problemes de màxims i mínims i es detecten algunes estratègies i diversos errors que cometen a l’hora de resoldre’ls. L’instrument de recollida de dades és un qüestionari individual que combina problemes d’extrems de resposta tancada amb altres problemes de resposta oberta. Es realitza una anàlisi inductiva – deductiva de les dades, la qual permet determinar que una part important dels participants en la recerca confonen les relacions entre l’àrea i el volum d’algunes figures geomètriques. A més, la majoria dels alumnes d’aquesta investigació resolen els problemes d’extrems plantejats fent ús de l’estratègia de conjecturar. Finalment, es detecta que diverses respostes dels participants presenten errors causats per l’ús de teoremes i/o de definicions matemàtiques equivocades. Aquest és el cas d’una aplicació errònia del teorema de Pitàgores, la confusió del perímetre d’un quadrat amb la longitud del seu costat i la determinació incorrecta de l’altura de diversos paral·lelograms.

Classification of sags according to their origin based on the waveform similarity

A statistical method for classification of sags their origin downstream or upstream from the recording point is proposed in this work. The goal is to obtain a statistical model using the sag waveforms useful to characterise one type of sags and to discriminate them from the other type. This model is built on the basis of multi-way principal component analysis an later used to project the available registers in a new space with lower dimension. Thus, a case base of diagnosed sags is built in the projection space. Finally classification is done by comparing new sags against the existing in the case base. Similarity is defined in the projection space using a combination of distances to recover the nearest neighbours to the new sag. Finally the method assigns the origin of the new sag according to the origin of their neighbours

Training effects with the observer-rated cognitive errors and the coping action patterns scales

The use of observer-rated scales requires that raters be trained until they have become reliable in using the scales. However, few studies properly report how training in using a given rating scale is conducted or indeed how it should be conducted. This study examined progress in interrater reliability over 6 months of training with two observer-rated scales, the Cognitive Errors Rating Scale and the Coping Action Patterns Rating Scale. The evolution of the intraclass correlation coefficients was modeled using hierarchical linear modeling. Results showed an overall training effect as well as effects of the basic training phase and of the rater calibration phase, the latter being smaller than the former. The results are discussed in terms of implications for rater training in psychotherapy research.

A-8a 2003 Summary of Food Stamp Errors - Active and Negative Cases, April 2003 - September 2003

Summary of food stamp errors.

Traitement des tumeurs malignes du foie par radiologie interventionnelle: techniques ablatives [Interventional radiology procedures for malignancies of the liver: ablation procedures].

Percutaneous ablative procedures allow curative treatment of stage BCLC 0 or BCLC A hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Several methods exist including radiofrequency ablation, the most commonly used. These techniques can be used in combination with surgical excision or alone if surgery is contraindicated. They are associated with significantly reduced mortality as compared to surgery.

Validation study of the French version of the observer-rater scales measuring coping and cognitive errors (CE-CAP) on a non-clinical population

This study examined the validity and reliability of the French version of two observer-rated measures developed to assess cognitive errors (cognitive errors rating system [CERS]) [6] and coping action patterns (coping action patterns rating system [CAPRS]) [22,24]. The CE measures 14 cognitive errors, broken down according to their valence positive or negative (see the definitions by A.T. Beck), and the CAP measures 12 coping categories, based on an comprehensive review literature, each broken down into three levels of action (affective, behavioural, cognitive). Thirty (N = 30) subjects recruited in a community sample participated in the study. They were interviewed according to a standardized clinical protocol: these interviews were transcribed and analysed with both observer-rated systems. Results showed that the inter-rater reliability of the two measures is good and that their internal validity is satisfactory, due to a non-significant canonical correlation between CAP and CE. With regard to discriminant validity, we found a non-significant canonical correlation between CAPRS and CISS, one of most widely used self-report questionnaire measuring coping. The same can be said for the correlation with a self-report questionnaire measuring symptoms (SCL-90-R). These results confirm the absence of confounds in the assessment of cognitive errors and of coping as assessed by these observer-rated scales and add an argument in favour of the French validation of the CE-CAP rating scales. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

A8a Summary of Food Stamp Errors-Active and Negative cases, July 2004

A-8A summary of food stamp errors active and negative cases

A-8a 2003 Summary of Food Stamp Errors - Active and Negative Cases, April 2001 - September 2001

Summary of food stamp errors.

A-8a Summary of Food Stamp Errors Active and Negative Cases, April-September 2004

A-8a Summary of Food Stamp Errors Active and Negative Cases, Apr. 2004 - Sept. 2004

A-8a Summary of Food Stamp Errors Active and Negative Cases, October 2004-March 2005

A-8a Summary of Food Stamp Errors Active and Negative Cases, Oct. 2004 - Mar. 2005

Dealing with Errors in QCA

This paper discusses five strategies to deal with five types of errors in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): condition errors, systematic errors, random errors, calibration errors, and deviant case errors. These strategies are the comparative inspection of complex, intermediary, and parsimonious solutions; the use of an adjustment factor, the use of probabilistic criteria, the test of the robustness of calibration parameters, and the use of a frequency threshold for observed combinations of conditions. The strategies are systematically reviewed, assessed, and evaluated as regards their applicability, advantages, limitations, and complementarities.