Isolation and Characterization of Effector-Loop Mutants of CDC42 in Yeast

The highly conserved small GTPase Cdc42p is a key regulator of cell polarity and cytoskeletal organization in eukaryotic cells. Multiple effectors of Cdc42p have been identified, although it is unclear how their activities are coordinated to produce particular cell behaviors. One strategy used to address the contributions made by different effector pathways downstream of small GTPases has been the use of “effector-loop” mutants of the GTPase that selectively impair only a subset of effector pathways. We now report the generation and preliminary characterization of a set of effector-loop mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC42. These mutants define genetically separable pathways influencing actin or septin organization. We have characterized the phenotypic defects of these mutants and the binding defects of the encoded proteins to known yeast Cdc42p effectors in vitro. The results suggest that these effectors cannot account for the observed phenotypes, and therefore that unknown effectors exist that affect both actin and septin organization. The availability of partial function alleles of CDC42 in a genetically tractable system serves as a useful starting point for genetic approaches to identify such novel effectors.

Abnormal differentiation of epidermis in transgenic mice constitutively expressing cyclooxygenase-2 in skin

In prostanoid biosynthesis, the first two steps are catalyzed by cyclooxygenases (COX). In mice and humans, deregulated expression of COX-2, but not of COX-1, is characteristic of epithelial tumors, including squamous cell carcinomas of skin. To explore the function of COX-2 in epidermis, a keratin 5 promoter was used to direct COX-2 expression to the basal cells of interfollicular epidermis and the pilosebaceous appendage of transgenic mouse skin. COX-2 overexpression in the expected locations, resulting in increased prostaglandin levels in epidermis and plasma, correlated with a pronounced skin phenotype. Heterozygous transgenic mice exhibited a reduced hair follicle density. Moreover, postnatally hair follicle morphogenesis and thinning of interfollicular dorsal epidermis were delayed. Adult transgenics showed a body-site-dependent sparse coat of greasy hair, the latter caused by sebaceous gland hyperplasia and increased epicutaneous sebum levels. In tail skin, hyperplasia of scale epidermis reflecting an increased number of viable and cornified cell layers was observed. Hyperplasia was a result of a disturbed program of epidermal differentiation rather than an increased proliferation rate, as reflected by the strong suppression of keratin 10, involucrin, and loricrin expression in suprabasal cells. Further pathological signs were loss of cell polarity, mainly of basal keratinocytes, epidermal invaginations into the dermis, and formation of horn perls. Invaginating hyperplastic lobes were surrounded by CD31-positive vessels. These results demonstrate a causal relationship between transgenic COX-2 expression in basal keratinocytes and epidermal hyperplasia as well as dysplastic features at discrete body sites.

Alpha 1(E)-catenin is an actin-binding and -bundling protein mediating the attachment of F-actin to the membrane adhesion complex.

Calcium-dependent homotypic cell-cell adhesion, mediated by molecules such as E-cadherin, guides the establishment of classical epithelial cell polarity and contributes to the control of migration, growth, and differentiation. These actions involve additional proteins, including alpha- and beta-catenin (or plakoglobin) and p120, as well as linkage to the cortical actin cytoskeleton. The molecular basis for these interactions and their hierarchy of interaction remain controversial. We demonstrate a direct interaction between F-actin and alpha (E)-catenin, an activity not shared by either the cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin or beta-catenin. Sedimentation assays and direct visualization by transmission electron microscopy reveal that alpha 1(E)-catenin binds and bundles F-actin in vitro with micromolar affinity at a catenin/G-actin monomer ratio of approximately 1:7 (mol/mol). Recombinant human beta-catenin can simultaneously bind to the alpha-catenin/actin complex but does not bind actin directly. Recombinant fragments encompassing the amino-terminal 228 residues of alpha 1(E)-catenin or the carboxyl-terminal 447 residues individually bind actin in cosedimentation assays with reduced affinity compared with the full-length protein, and neither fragment bundles actin. Except for similarities to vinculin, neither region contains sequences homologous to established actin-binding proteins. Collectively these data indicate that alpha 1 (E)-catenin is a novel actin-binding and -bundling protein and support a model in which alpha 1(E)-catenin is responsible for organizing and tethering actin filaments at the zones of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell contact.

The ins and outs of E-cadherin trafficking

One way of controlling the activity of E-cadherin - a protein that is, simultaneously, a major cell-adhesion molecule, a powerful tumour suppressor, a determinant of cell polarity and a partner to the potent catenin signalling molecules - is to keep it on the move. During the past two decades, many insights into the fundamental role of E-cadherin in these processes have been garnered. Studies during the past five years have begun to reveal the importance of intracellular trafficking as a means of regulating the functions of E-cadherin. E-cadherin is trafficked to and from the cell surface by exocytic and multiple endocytic pathways. In this article, we survey the vesicle-trafficking machinery that is responsible for the sorting, transport, actin association and vesicle targeting of E-cadherin to regulate its movement and function during growth and development and, possibly, in cancer.

Cloning and expression of the large zebrafish protocadherin gene, Fat

The cadherin superfamily members play an important role in mediating cell-cell contact and adhesion (Takeichi, M., 1991. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 251, 1451-1455). A distinct subfamily, neither belonging to the classical or protocadherins includes Fat, the largest member of the cadherin super-family. Fat was originally identified in Drosophila. Subsequently, orthologues of Fat have been described in man (Dunne, J., Hanby, A. M., Poulsom, R., Jones, T. A., Sheer, D., Chin, W. G., Da, S. M., Zhao, Q., Beverley, P. C., Owen, M. J., 1995. Molecular cloning and tissue expression of FAT, the human homologue of the Drosophila fat gene that is located on chromosome 4q34-q35 and encodes a putative adhesion molecule. Genomics 30, 207-223), rat (Ponassi, M., Jacques, T. S., Ciani, L., ffrench, C. C., 1999. Expression of the rat homologue of the Drosophila fat tumour suppressor gene. Mech. Dev. 80, 207-212) and mouse (Cox, B., Hadjantonakis, A. K., Collins, J. E., Magee, A. I., 2000. Cloning and expression throughout mouse development of mfat 1, a homologue of the Drosophila tumour suppressor gene fat [In Process Citation]. Dev. Dyn. 217, 233-240). In Drosophila, Fat has been shown to play an important role in both planar cell polarity and cell boundary formation during development. In this study we describe the characterization of zebrafish Fat, the first non-mammalian, vertebrate Fat homologue to be identified. The Fat protein has 64% amino acid identity and 80% similarity to human FAT and an identical domain structure to other vertebrate Fat proteins. During embryogenesis fat mRNA is expressed in the developing brain, specialised epithelial surfaces the notochord, ears, eyes and digestive tract, a pattern similar but distinct to that found in mammals. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Verprolin cytokinesis function mediated by the Hof one trap domain

In budding yeast, partitioning of the cytoplasm during cytokinesis can proceed via a pathway dependent on the contractile actomyosin ring, as in other eukaryotes, or alternatively via a septum deposition pathway dependent on an SH3 domain protein, Hof1/Cyk2 (the yeast PSTPIP1 ortholog). In dividing yeast cells, Hof1 forms a ring at the bud neck distinct from the actomyosin ring, and this zone is active in septum deposition. We previously showed the yeast Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP)-interacting protein (WIP) ortholog, verprolin/Vrp1/End5, interacts with Hof1 and facilitates Hof1 recruitment to the bud neck. A Vrp1 fragment unable to interact with yeast WASP (Las17/Bee1), localize to the actin cytoskeleton or function in polarization of the cortical actin cytoskeleton nevertheless retains function in Hof1 recruitment and cytokinesis. Here, we show the ability of this Vrp1 fragment to bind the Hof1 SH3 domain via its Hof one trap (HOT) domain is critical for cytokinesis. The Vrp1 HOT domain consists of three tandem proline-rich motifs flanked by serines. Unexpectedly, the Hof 1 SH3 domain itself is not required for cytokinesis and indeed appears to negatively regulate cytokinesis. The Vrp1 HOT domain promotes cytokinesis by binding to the Hof 1 SH3 domain and counteracting its inhibitory effect.

Rab11 in recycling endosomes regulates the sorting and basolateral transport of E-cadherin

E-cadherin plays an essential role in cell polarity and cell-cell adhesion; however, the pathway for delivery of E-cadherin to the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells has not been fully characterized. We first traced the post-Golgi, exocytic transport of GFP-tagged E-cadherin (Ecad-GFP) in unpolarized cells. In live cells, Ecad-GFP was found to exit the Golgi complex in pleiomorphic tubulovesicular carriers, which, instead of moving directly to the cell surface, most frequently fused with an intermediate compartment, subsequently identified as a Rab11-positive recycling endosome. In MDCK cells, basolateral targeting of E-cadherin relies on a dileucine motif. Both E-cadherin and a targeting mutant, Delta S1-E-cadherin, colocalized with Rab11 and fused with the recycling endosome before diverging to basolateral or apical membranes, respectively. In polarized and unpolarized cells, coexpression of Rab11 mutants disrupted the cell surface delivery of E-cadherin and caused its mistargeting to the apical membrane, whereas apical Delta S1-E-cadherin was unaffected. We thus demonstrate a novel pathway for Rab11 dependent, dileucine-mediated, mu 1B-independent sorting and basolateral trafficking, exemplified by E-cadherin. The recycling endosome is identified as an intermediate compartment for the post-Golgi trafficking and exocytosis of E-cadherin, with a potentially important role in establishing and maintaining cadherin-based adhesion.

The BAR domain proteins: Molding membranes in fission, fusion, and phagy

The Bin1/amphiphysin/Rvs167 (BAR) domain proteins are a ubiquitous protein family. Genes encoding members of this family have not yet been found in the genomes of prokaryotes, but within eukaryotes, BAR domain proteins are found universally from unicellular eukaryotes such as yeast through to plants, insects, and vertebrates. BAR domain proteins share an N-terminal BAR domain with a high propensity to adopt alpha-helical structure and engage in coiled-coil interactions with other proteins. BAR domain proteins are implicated in processes as fundamental and diverse as fission of synaptic vesicles, cell polarity, endocytosis, regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, transcriptional repression, cell-cell fusion, signal transduction, apoptosis, secretory vesicle fusion, excitation-contraction coupling, learning and memory, tissue differentiation, ion flux across membranes, and tumor suppression. What has been lacking is a molecular understanding of the role of the BAR domain protein in each process. The three-dimensional structure of the BAR domain has now been determined and valuable insight has been gained in understanding the interactions of BAR domains with membranes. The cellular roles of BAR domain proteins, characterized over the past decade in cells as distinct as yeasts, neurons, and myocytes, can now be understood in terms of a fundamental molecular function of all BAR domain proteins: to sense membrane curvature, to bind GTPases, and to mold a diversity of cellular membranes.

Ryk: A novel Wnt receptor regulating axon pathfinding

Members of the Wnt family and their receptors, the Frizzleds, are key regulators of pivotal developmental processes including embryonic patterning, specification of cell fate, and determination of cell polarity. The versatility and complexity of Wnt signaling has been further highlighted by the emergence of a novel family of Wnt receptors, the Ryk family. In mammals and flies, Ryk is a key chemorepulsive axon guidance receptor responsible for the establishment of important axon tracts during nervous system development. Although the function of Ryk is currently best understood with respect to this role, its widespread expression, both in developing tissues and in the adult, suggests that Ryk may regulate many essential biological processes. This hypothesis is supported by the multiple developmental phenotypes apparent in Ryk loss-of-function mice. These mice display a variety of embryonic abnormalities, including disruption of skeletal, craniofacial and cardiac development. Here we review Ryk structure and function focusing on its activity as an axon guidance receptor. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Bidirectional transport between the trans-Golgi network and the endosomal system

The exchange of proteins and lipids between the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and the endosomal system requires multiple cellular machines, whose activities are coordinated in space and time to generate pleomorphic, tubulo-vesicular carriers that deliver their content to their target compartments. These machines and their associated protein networks are recruited and/or activated on specific membrane domains where they select proteins and lipids into carriers, contribute to deform/elongate and partition membrane domains using the mechanical forces generated by actin polymerization or movement along microtubules. The coordinated action of these protein networks contributes to regulate the dynamic state of multiple receptors recycling between the cell surface, endosomes and the TGN, to maintain cell homeostasis as exemplified by the biogenesis of lysosomes and related organelles, and to establish/maintain cell polarity. The dynamic assembly and disassembly of these protein networks mediating the exchange of membrane domains between the TGN and endosomes regulates cell-cell signalling and thus the development of multi-cellular organisms. Somatic mutations in single network components lead to changes in transport dynamics that may contribute to pathological modifications underlying several human diseases such as mental retardation.

Mechanisms of Cdc42 Polarization in Yeast

Polarization is important for the function and morphology of many different cell types. The keys regulators of polarity in eukaryotes are the Rho-family GTPases. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which must polarize in order to bud and to mate, the master regulator is the highly conserved Rho GTPase, Cdc42. During polarity establishment, active Cdc42 accumulates at a site on the plasma membrane characterizing the “front” of the cell where the bud will emerge. The orientation of polarization is guided by upstream cues that dictate the site of Cdc42 clustering. However, in the absence of upstream cues, yeast can still polarize in a random direction during symmetry breaking. Symmetry breaking suggests cells possess an autocatalytic polarization mechanism that can amplify stochastic fluctuations of polarity proteins through a positive feedback mechanism.

Two different positive feedback mechanisms have been proposed to polarize Cdc42 in budding yeast. One model posits that Cdc42 activation must be localized to a site at the plasma membrane. Another model posits that Cdc42 delivery must be localized to a particular site at the plasma membrane. Although both mechanisms could work in parallel to polarize Cdc42, it is unclear which mechanism is critical to polarity establishment. We directly tested the predictions of the two positive feedback models using genetics and live microscopy. We found that localized Cdc42 activation is necessary for polarity establishment.

While this explains how active Cdc42 localizes to a particular site at the plasma membrane, it does not address how Cdc42 concentrates at that site. Several different mechanisms have been proposed to concentrate Cdc42. The GDI can extract Cdc42 from membranes and selective mobilize GDP-Cdc42 in the cytoplasm. It was proposed that selectively mobilizing GDP-Cdc42 in combination with local activation could locally concentrate total Cdc42 at the polarity site. Although the GDI is important for rapid Cdc42 accumulation at the polarity site, it is not essential to Cdc42 concentration. It was proposed that delivery of Cdc42 by actin-mediated vesicle can act as a backup pathway to concentrate Cdc42. However, we found no evidence for an actin-dependent concentrating pathway. Live microscopy experiments reveal that prenylated proteins are not restricted to membranes, and can enter the cytoplasm. We found that the GDI-independent concentrating pathway still requires Cdc42 to exchange between the plasma membrane and the cytoplasm, which is supported by computational modeling. In the absence of the GDI, we found that Cdc42 GAP became essential for polarization. We propose that the GAP limits GTP-Cdc42 leak into the cytoplasm, which would be prohibitive to Cdc42 polarization.

Btk regulates macrophage polarization in response to lipopolysaccharide

Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a strong inducer of inflammation and does so by inducing polarization of macrophages to the classic inflammatory M1 population. Given the role of Btk as a critical signal transducer downstream of TLR4, we investigated its role in M1/M2 induction. In Btk deficient (Btk (-\-)) mice we observed markedly reduced recruitment of M1 macrophages following intraperitoneal administration of LPS. Ex vivo analysis demonstrated an impaired ability of Btk(-/-) macrophages to polarize into M1 macrophages, instead showing enhanced induction of immunosuppressive M2-associated markers in response to M1 polarizing stimuli, a finding accompanied by reduced phosphorylation of STAT1 and enhanced STAT6 phosphorylation. In addition to STAT activation, M1 and M2 polarizing signals modulate the expression of inflammatory genes via differential activation of transcription factors and regulatory proteins, including NF-κB and SHIP1. In keeping with a critical role for Btk in macrophage polarization, we observed reduced levels of NF-κB p65 and Akt phosphorylation, as well as reduced induction of the M1 associated marker iNOS in Btk(-/-) macrophages in response to M1 polarizing stimuli. Additionally enhanced expression of SHIP1, a key negative regulator of macrophage polarisation, was observed in Btk(-/-) macrophages in response to M2 polarizing stimuli. Employing classic models of allergic M2 inflammation, treatment of Btk (-/-) mice with either Schistosoma mansoni eggs or chitin resulted in increased recruitment of M2 macrophages and induction of M2-associated genes. This demonstrates an enhanced M2 skew in the absence of Btk, thus promoting the development of allergic inflammation.

Histochemical studies of chondrogenesis

The formation of the cartilage tissue depends on the coordination of cell to cell or cell to ECM interaction that cause to the cell polarity, migration and differentiation of precursor mesenchymal cells during chondrogenesis Many of these events are mediated by ECM components such as glycocojugates which with their suger residues such as galactose or aminosuger have a ligand role for regulatory molecules. The aim of this study was to identify the presence and distribution of some different glycoconjugates and their suger residues in the chondrogenesis by histochemistry and lectin-histochemistry techniques. For this purpose, embryos from pregnant wistar rats from E12-E20 were collected and fixed. Some of them were stained with alizarin red Salcin blue staining to demonstrate cartilage and bone formation in whole mount embryos. Other embryos with serial sections (5-7micm thikness) were stained by: 1-alcian blue (pH: l) for S-GAG,2-alcin blue (pH:2.5)for C-GAG, S-PAS alcian blue fora neutral and acidic sugers,4- tuloidin blue for metachromatic substances. Stained sections were graded according to the staining intensity (0-5 grading s method). Statistical analysis showed significant difference for those substances among experimental groups. Lectin histochemistry with MPA, VVA, SBA, OFA demonstrated differences between organs for suger residues during chondrogensis. It seems that synthesis and secretion of glycocojugates and change of their suger residues follows a spatiotemporal pattern and developmentaly regulated.

Understanding the role of CAP proteins in the polarization process of C. elegans

La division cellulaire asymétrique est un processus crucial dans le développement des organismes multicellulaires puisqu’elle permet la génération de la diversité cellulaire. Les cellules qui se divisent de façon asymétrique doivent tout d’abord se polariser et correctement orienter leur fuseau mitotique pour ségréger des déterminants cellulaires en deux entités distinctes. L’embryon du nématode C. elegans est un modèle robuste et largement utilisé pour étudier la division cellulaire asymétrique. Dans cet embryon, le point d'entrée du spermatozoïde détermine l'axe de polarité antéro-postérieur. Suite à la fécondation, le cortex embryonnaire est uniformément contractile et un complexe conservé formé des protéines PAR-3, PAR-6 et PKC-3 (nommé complexe PAR-3 ci-dessous) est localisé sur l'ensemble du cortex. La complétion de la méiose maternelle induit une relaxation corticale au postétieur et un flux cortical vers l’antérieur de l’embryon. Ces contractions corticales asymétriques mènent à la formation d'un domaine antérieur contenant le complexe PAR-3, tandis que le cortex postérieur, dont le complexe PAR-3 s’est délocalisé, est enrichi avec les protéines PAR-2 et PAR-1. Par conséquent, les domaines formés par les protéines PAR définissent un pôle antérieur et un pôle postérieur dans l'embryon suite au remodelage du cytosquelette. Les protéines PAR-4 et PAR-5 restent localisées de façon uniforme dans l'embryon. Curieusement, les protéines PAR exercent une régulation par rétroaction sur la contractilité corticale. Il a été montré qu’une des protéines PAR récemment identifiée, PAR-5, est orthologue à la protéine adaptatrice 14-3-3 et joue un rôle important dans la contractilité corticale. En dépit de son rôle central dans la contractilité corticale et le processus de polarisation cellulaire, le mécanisme par lequel PAR-5 régule la contractilité corticale n’est pas bien compris. Le but de ce projet est de mieux comprendre comment PAR-5 et ses interacteurs contrôlent la régulation des contractions corticales et, de ce fait, la polarité cellulaire. Dans un essai de capture de la protéine GST (GST pull-down), nous avons identifié plusieurs nouveaux interacteurs de PAR-5. Parmi ceux-ci, nous avons trouvé CAP-2 (protéine de coiffage de l'actine), qui a été identifiée dans des éxpériences de capture de 14-3-3 dans trois systèmes modèles différents. CAP-2 est un hétérodimère des protéines CAP, qui sont impliquées dans la régulation de l'actine. Nous avons trouvé que la déplétion des protéines CAP par interférence à l’ARN dans des vers de type sauvage mène à une augmentation létalité embryonnaire, ce qui suggère que ces protéines jouent un rôle important dans le développement embryonnaire. L'imagerie en temps réel d'embryons déplétés pour les protéines CAP montre qu’ils ont une diminution des contractions corticales avec un sillon de pseudoclivage mois stable, suggérant un défaut dans la régulation du cytosquelette d'actine-myosine. Ceci a également été confirmé par la diminution de la vitesse et du nombre de foci de NMY-2::GFP. En outre, ces embryons montrent une légère diminution de la taille du croissant cortical de PAR-2 lors de la phase d’établissement de la polarité. Les embryons déplétés en CAP-2 montrent également un retard dans la progression du cycle cellulaire, mais le lien entre ce phénotype et la régulation des contractions corticales reste à être précisé. La caractérisation des protéines CAP, des régulateurs du remodelage du cytosquelette, permettra d'améliorer notre compréhension des mécanismes qui sous-tendent l'établissement et le maintien de la polarité cellulaire, et donc la division cellulaire asymétrique.

Understanding the role of CAP proteins in the polarization process of C. elegans

La division cellulaire asymétrique est un processus crucial dans le développement des organismes multicellulaires puisqu’elle permet la génération de la diversité cellulaire. Les cellules qui se divisent de façon asymétrique doivent tout d’abord se polariser et correctement orienter leur fuseau mitotique pour ségréger des déterminants cellulaires en deux entités distinctes. L’embryon du nématode C. elegans est un modèle robuste et largement utilisé pour étudier la division cellulaire asymétrique. Dans cet embryon, le point d'entrée du spermatozoïde détermine l'axe de polarité antéro-postérieur. Suite à la fécondation, le cortex embryonnaire est uniformément contractile et un complexe conservé formé des protéines PAR-3, PAR-6 et PKC-3 (nommé complexe PAR-3 ci-dessous) est localisé sur l'ensemble du cortex. La complétion de la méiose maternelle induit une relaxation corticale au postétieur et un flux cortical vers l’antérieur de l’embryon. Ces contractions corticales asymétriques mènent à la formation d'un domaine antérieur contenant le complexe PAR-3, tandis que le cortex postérieur, dont le complexe PAR-3 s’est délocalisé, est enrichi avec les protéines PAR-2 et PAR-1. Par conséquent, les domaines formés par les protéines PAR définissent un pôle antérieur et un pôle postérieur dans l'embryon suite au remodelage du cytosquelette. Les protéines PAR-4 et PAR-5 restent localisées de façon uniforme dans l'embryon. Curieusement, les protéines PAR exercent une régulation par rétroaction sur la contractilité corticale. Il a été montré qu’une des protéines PAR récemment identifiée, PAR-5, est orthologue à la protéine adaptatrice 14-3-3 et joue un rôle important dans la contractilité corticale. En dépit de son rôle central dans la contractilité corticale et le processus de polarisation cellulaire, le mécanisme par lequel PAR-5 régule la contractilité corticale n’est pas bien compris. Le but de ce projet est de mieux comprendre comment PAR-5 et ses interacteurs contrôlent la régulation des contractions corticales et, de ce fait, la polarité cellulaire. Dans un essai de capture de la protéine GST (GST pull-down), nous avons identifié plusieurs nouveaux interacteurs de PAR-5. Parmi ceux-ci, nous avons trouvé CAP-2 (protéine de coiffage de l'actine), qui a été identifiée dans des éxpériences de capture de 14-3-3 dans trois systèmes modèles différents. CAP-2 est un hétérodimère des protéines CAP, qui sont impliquées dans la régulation de l'actine. Nous avons trouvé que la déplétion des protéines CAP par interférence à l’ARN dans des vers de type sauvage mène à une augmentation létalité embryonnaire, ce qui suggère que ces protéines jouent un rôle important dans le développement embryonnaire. L'imagerie en temps réel d'embryons déplétés pour les protéines CAP montre qu’ils ont une diminution des contractions corticales avec un sillon de pseudoclivage mois stable, suggérant un défaut dans la régulation du cytosquelette d'actine-myosine. Ceci a également été confirmé par la diminution de la vitesse et du nombre de foci de NMY-2::GFP. En outre, ces embryons montrent une légère diminution de la taille du croissant cortical de PAR-2 lors de la phase d’établissement de la polarité. Les embryons déplétés en CAP-2 montrent également un retard dans la progression du cycle cellulaire, mais le lien entre ce phénotype et la régulation des contractions corticales reste à être précisé. La caractérisation des protéines CAP, des régulateurs du remodelage du cytosquelette, permettra d'améliorer notre compréhension des mécanismes qui sous-tendent l'établissement et le maintien de la polarité cellulaire, et donc la division cellulaire asymétrique.