Anàlisi d'una conversa argumentativa : Articles al diari Ara, Tresserras vs. Pastor

Aquest treball té per objecte l'anàlisi d'una "conversa" argumentativa -un conjunt de sis articles periodístics que conformen un macrotext-, des del punt de vista del model pragmadialèctic. Els columnistes expressen els seus punts de vista al voltant de la "qüestió catalana", de vigència notable especialment d'ençà del setembre de 2012.

Teoría de la comunicación y análisis transaccional

La descripción e interpretación del lenguaje -en su amplitud- parece sustraerse, por el momento, a un solo sistema teórico. Por ello la prevención ante la naturaleza diversa de ciertas aportaciones necesariamente debe matizarse, para que no sea causa de empobrecimiento. En el campo de la psicología clásica el canadiense Eric Berne crea a principios de los años sesenta el análisis transaccional (AT) , terapia de características singulares con un sistemático fundamento teórico 1. En alguno de sus aspectos tiene relevancia para la teoría de la comunicación en aquello que enfatizaba Bloomfield, el estudio de la conducta. Y ello a su gusto: de manera objetiva, antidefinicionista y antiesencialista. El Análisis Transaccional contempla la descomposición de la conducta (análisis), que es el resultado de la acción o interacción con los demás (transaccional). Para nuestro objetivo, su excelencia radica en su carácter verificable, descriptivo y explicativo, predictivo e integrador.

Usos políticos del lenguaje. Un discurso paradójico

Beatriz Gallardo Paúls ha publicado Usos políticos del lenguaje. Se trata de un libro sobre análisis del discurso que destaca por ser doblemente provechoso. Lo es porque reúne, sin solución de continuidad, un marco teóricodiverso y relevante y el análisis de discurso político. La obra articula con concisión y lucidez un discurso formativo, detallado y aplicado. Para ofrecer este resultado, la autora utiliza elementos de pragmática y de semántica cognitiva. La autora es catedrática de Lingüística en la Universidad de Valencia. Beatriz Gallardo Paúls se ha especializado en análisis conversacional y ha realizado estudios sobre discurso privado, en particular en el ámbito clínico, y sobre discurso público. Una clave de esta dedicación se halla en la identidad de su departamento, el de Teoría de los Lenguajes y Ciencias de la Comunicación. La consecuencia es que la lingüística se concibe como una disciplina que adquiere una dimensión aplicada e interdisciplinar. Lo que parece un factor administrativo puede tener una gran repercusión científica. Un efecto afortunado de esta concepción abierta, práctica e inquisitiva es la edición del libro que nos ocupa, 'Usos políticos del lenguaje'.

La Relación del lenguaje con la teoría de la mente en edad escolar

In the past years a considerable amount of research has been carried out on the development of theory of mind (ToM) reporting that language and ToM performance are correlated. However it is less clear what aspect of language is related with ToM development. Some studies show a greater influence of semantics aspects, whereas others suggest that sentential complement sentences, a specific aspect of syntax, are crucial for false belief understanding (FB). Yet others argue that pragmatic abilities correlate with FB understanding. The aim of this study is investigate, on the one side, the development of ToM between the ages of 6 and 8 and on the other side, the relationship between some aspects of language and the ToM improvement. Several ToM tasks were administrated to evaluate children’s performance at two different ages (60 participants aged 6 and 8 years) and four tasks to assess language abilities. The results show a significant increase in the understanding of the mind between the ages of 6 and 8. Furthermore, results reveal a significant relationship between syntax and tasks that require FB understanding, while pragmatics is more strongly associated with tasks that involve more complex socio-cognitive understandings

Pragmática de la puntuación y nuevas tecnologías

La puntuación ha evolucionado a lo largo de la historia, no solo en cuanto al número de signos, sino también con respecto a su función de guía en la (re)presentación y el procesamiento del texto. El objetivo del presente artículo es discutir la pragmática de la puntuación en los principales modos de comunicación mediada por ordenador. Mi propuesta consiste en considerar que las nuevas formas escritas de interacción mediada por ordenador situadas en el polo de la inmediatez comunicativa han dado lugar a un particular sistema de puntuación metarrepresentativa que compite con los códigos de puntuación tanto retórico como gramatical.

«M'encantaria poder venir a l'estadi a jugar contra el meu equip»: dixi de persona, footing i identitat, una entrevista a Pep Guardiola

Aquest article té dos objectius bàsics. En primer lloc, mostrar la capacitat analítica d'un estudi de cas a l'hora d'estudiar l'expressió de la identitat i dels rols assumits pels participants en la comunicació, posant-la en relació amb els marcs participatius d'Erwing Goffman (1981), d'una banda, i amb la dixi de persona i les seves manifestacions gramaticals (Levinson 1983; Nogué 2008), de l'altra. I en segon lloc, mostrar com l'estructura gramatical pot proporcionar indicadors lingüístics que donen informació sobre la identitat i els rols assumits, posant l'èmfasi en una circumstància concreta: la manera com es reflecteix lingüísticament la col¿lisió entre dos o més rols. Paraules clau: dixi de persona, identitat, rol participatiu, marc participatiu. This article has two main purposes. In the first place, to show how a case study can provide interesting information about the expression of identity and of the different roles assumed by the communication participants. On the one hand, this information is related to the participation frameworks proposed by Erwing Goffman (1981); on the other hand, to person deixis and its grammatical manifestations (Levinson 1983; Nogué 2008). And in the second place, to show how grammatical structure can provide linguistic cues about identity and roles, putting the emphasis on a specific circumstance: the linguistic signs of the collision between two or more of these roles. Key words: person deixis, identity, participation role, participation framework.

Equivalence and translation strategies in multilingual thesaurus construction

In the present dissertation, multilingual thesauri were approached as cultural products and the focus was twofold: On the empirical level the focus was placed on the translatability of certain British-English social science indexing terms into the Finnish language and culture at a concept, a term and an indexing term level. On the theoretical level the focus was placed on the aim of translation and on the concept of equivalence. In accordance with modern communicative and dynamic translation theories the interest was on the human dimension. The study is qualitative. In this study, equivalence was understood in a similar way to how dynamic, functional equivalence is commonly understood in translation studies. Translating was seen as a decision-making process, where a translator often has different kinds of possibilities to choose in order to fulfil the function of the translation. Accordingly, and as a starting point for the construction of the empirical part, the function of the source text was considered to be the same or similar to the function of the target text, that is, a functional thesaurus both in source and target context. Further, the study approached the challenges of multilingual thesaurus construction from the perspectives of semantics and pragmatics. In semantic analysis the focus was on what the words conventionally mean and in pragmatics on the ‘invisible’ meaning - or how we recognise what is meant even when it is not actually said (or written). Languages and ideas expressed by languages are created mainly in accordance with expressional needs of the surrounding culture and thesauri were considered to reflect several subcultures and consequently the discourses which represent them. The research material consisted of different kinds of potential discourses: dictionaries, database records, and thesauri, Finnish versus British social science researches, Finnish versus British indexers, simulated indexing tasks with five articles and Finnish versus British thesaurus constructors. In practice, the professional background of the two last mentioned groups was rather similar. It became even more clear that all the material types had their own characteristics, although naturally not entirely separate from each other. It is further noteworthy that the different types and origins of research material were not used to represent true comparison pairs, and that the aim of triangulation of methods and material was to gain a holistic view. The general research questions were: 1. Can differences be found between Finnish and British discourses regarding family roles as thesaurus terms, and if so, what kinds of differences and which are the implications for multilingual thesaurus construction? 2. What is the pragmatic indexing term equivalence? The first question studied how the same topic (family roles) was represented in different contexts and by different users, and further focused on how the possible differences were handled in multilingual thesaurus construction. The second question was based on findings of the previous one, and answered to the final question as to what kinds of factors should be considered when defining translation equivalence in multilingual thesaurus construction. The study used multiple cases and several data collection and analysis methods aiming at theoretical replication and complementarity. The empirical material and analysis consisted of focused interviews (with Finnish and British social scientists, thesaurus constructors and indexers), simulated indexing tasks with Finnish and British indexers, semantic component analysis of dictionary definitions and translations, coword analysis and datasets retrieved in databases, and discourse analysis of thesauri. As a terminological starting point a topic and case family roles was selected. The results were clear: 1) It was possible to identify different discourses. There also existed subdiscourses. For example within the group of social scientists the orientation to qualitative versus quantitative research had an impact on the way they reacted to the studied words and discourses, and indexers placed more emphasis on the information seekers whereas thesaurus constructors approached the construction problems from a more material based solution. The differences between the different specialist groups i.e. the social scientists, the indexers and the thesaurus constructors were often greater than between the different geo-cultural groups i.e. Finnish versus British. The differences occurred as a result of different translation aims, diverging expectations for multilingual thesauri and variety of practices. For multilingual thesaurus construction this means severe challenges. The clearly ambiguous concept of multilingual thesaurus as well as different construction and translation strategies should be considered more precisely in order to shed light on focus and equivalence types, which are clearly not self-evident. The research also revealed the close connection between the aims of multilingual thesauri and the pragmatic indexing term equivalence. 2) The pragmatic indexing term equivalence is very much context-depended. Although thesaurus term equivalence is defined and standardised in the field of library and information science (LIS), it is not understood in one established way and the current LIS tools are inadequate to provide enough analytical tools for both constructing and studying different kinds of multilingual thesauri as well as their indexing term equivalence. The tools provided in translation science were more practical and theoretical, and especially the division of different meanings of a word provided a useful tool in analysing the pragmatic equivalence, which often differs from the ideal model represented in thesaurus construction literature. The study thus showed that the variety of different discourses should be acknowledged, there is a need for operationalisation of new types of multilingual thesauri, and the factors influencing pragmatic indexing term equivalence should be discussed more precisely than is traditionally done.

Contexts, non-specificity, and minimalism

Atlas (2007) argues that semantic minimalism (as defended by Cappelen & Lepore 2005) fails because it cannot deal with semantic non-specificity. I argue that thereis a plausible version of minimalism-viz., situated minimalism-which doesn't succumb to the non-specificity charge insofar as non-specificity can be dealt with at a postsemantic level. Thus, pragmatics plays no rolewhen it comes to determining the (minimal) proposition expressed. Instead, pragmatic and other extra-semantic considerations enter the scene in characterizing the situation vis-à-vis which the proposition is evaluated. For this reason a plausible form of minimalism must embrace a form of truth-relativism: a proposition is not universally true/false, but true/false only relative to a situation. I show how the position defended is not only (i) more cognitively plausible than either (semantic) minimalism as proposed by Cappelen & Lepore or the positions appealing to pragmaticintrusion into the proposition expressed, but is also (ii) in accordance with ordinary people's intuitions.

Enhancing teaching and learning speech acts: action research of Japanese as a foreign language /

This action research observes a second year Japanese class at a university where foreign language courses are elective for undergraduate students. In this study, using the six strategies to teach Japanese speech acts that Ishihara and Cohen (2006) suggested, I conducted three classes and analyzed my teaching practice with a critical friend. These strategies assist learners toward the development of their understanding of the following Japanese speech acts and also keep the learners to use them in a manner appropriate to the context: (I) invitation and refusal; (2) compliments; and (3) asking for a permission. The aim of this research is not only to improve my instruction in relation to second language (L2) pragmatic development, but also to raise further questions and to develop future research. The findings are analyzed and the data derived from my journals, artifacts, students' work, observation sheets, interviews with my critical friend, and pretests and posttests are coded and presented. The analysis shows that (I) after my critical friend encouraged my study and my students gave me some positive comments after each lesson, I gained confidence in teaching the suggested speech acts; (2) teaching involved explaining concepts and strategies, creating the visual material (a video) showing the strategies, and explaining the relationship between the strategy and grammatical forms and samples of misusing the forms; (3) students' background and learning styles influenced lessons; and (4) pretest and posttests showed that the students' Icvel of their L2 appropriate pragmatics dramatically improved after each instruction. However, after careful observation, it was noted that some factors prevented students from producing the correct output even though they understood the speech act differences.

Empathy and Emotion Processing in Mild Head Injury and Sub-clinical Psychopathy

The current study sought to investigate the nature of empathic responding and emotion processing in persons who have experienced Mild Head Injury (MHI) and how this relationship between empathetic responding and head injury status may differ in those with higher psychopathic characteristics (i.e., subclinical psychopathy). One-hundred university students (36% reporting having a previous MHI) completed an Emotional Processing Task (EPT) using images of neutral and negative valence (IAPS, 2008) designed to evoke empathy; physiological responses were recorded. Additionally, participants completed measures of cognitive competence and various individual differences (empathy - QCAE; Reniers, 2011; Psychopathy - SRP-III, Williams, Paulhus & Hare, 2007) and demographics questionnaires. MHI was found to be associated with lower affective empathy and physiological reactivity (pulse rate) while viewing images irrespective of valence, reflecting a pattern of generalized underarousal. The empathic deficits observed correlated with the individual’s severity of injury such that the greater number of injury characteristics and symptoms endorsed by a subject, the more dampened the affective and cognitive empathy reactions to stimuli and the lower his/her physiological reactivity. Importantly, psychopathy interacted with head injury status such that the effects of psychopathy were significant only for individuals indicating a MHI. This group, i.e., MHI subjects who scored higher on psychopathy, displayed the greatest compromise in empathic responding. Interestingly, the Callous Affect component of psychopathy was found to account for the empathic and emotion processing deficits observed for individuals who report a MHI; in contrast, the Interpersonal Manipulation component emerged as a better predictor of empathic and emotion deficits observed in the No MHI group. These different patterns may indicate the involvement of different underlying processes in the manifestation of empathic deficits associated with head injury or subclinical psychopathy. It also highlights the importance of assessing for prior head injury in populations with higher psychopathic characteristics due to the possible combined/enhanced influences. The results of this study have important social implications for persons who have experienced a concussion or limited neural trauma since even subtle injury to the head may be sufficient to produce dampened emotion processing, thereby impacting one’s social interactions and engagement (i.e., at risk for social isolation or altered interpersonal success). Individuals who experience MHI in conjunction with certain personality profiles (e.g., higher psychopathic characteristics) may be particularly at risk for being less capable of empathic compassion and socially-acceptable pragmatics and, as a result, may not be responsive to another person’s emotional well-being.

Les figures de la divinité chez Sartre, Giraudoux et Camus : trois pièces écrites sous l’Occupation allemande.

Les mouches, Sodome et Gomorrhe et Caligula présentent des divinités parodiant et critiquant les dirigeants politiques de l’Occupation (1940-1944), ainsi que l’usage par les dictateurs des idéologies religieuses traditionnelles dans le but de soumettre l’humanité à des régimes totalitaires. Divinités théâtrales autrefois infaillibles et toutes-puissantes, les figures analysées dans ce mémoire relèvent des remises en question de la divinité et du pouvoir politique du XXe siècle. Notre mémoire comporte trois chapitres examinant les discours de ces figures de la divinité sous des angles dramaturgique, sémiologique, philosophique et pragmatique avec comme point de départ l’hypothèse suivante : tout porte à croire qu’en limitant l’emprise de divinités fictives, et ce, en grande partie à travers les failles dans leurs discours, Sartre, Giraudoux et Camus ont tenté de neutraliser les discours correspondants d’hommes réels dans la conscience collective de l’époque. Les auteurs étudiés ont profondément modifié l’image traditionnelle de la divinité théâtrale en minant sa force langagière et en s’interrogeant sur son identité. Les divinités choisies pour cette étude annoncent la décomposition du personnage ayant lieu après 1950 : elles ont un statut dévalorisé de même qu’un langage à la force perlocutoire diminuée. Sans véritable emprise sur l’humanité, dépendant du théâtre, des simulacres, de l’histrionisme, ainsi que des faiblesses humaines, ces divinités caricaturales s’exposent à compromettre leurs régimes et sont réduites à une influence fortement limitée par la liberté des hommes. En actualisant ces mythes et récits ainsi, Sartre, Giraudoux et Camus ont tenté de discréditer, par extension, les dirigeants européens de l’époque.

Écrire la souffrance de l’enfant au tournant du XXIe siècle : le récit à l’épreuve de l’innommable

Thèse réalisée en cotutelle avec l’Université Charles-de-Gaulle – Lille-3 pour l'obtention du diplôme de doctorat en Langue et littérature françaises.

Analyse sémio-narrative d'un corpus de contes merveilleux du Québec

Ce mémoire propose une analyse sémio-narrative d’un corpus de dix-neuf contes merveilleux recueillis auprès des conteurs canadiens-français et canadiens-hurons par l’anthropologue Charles-Marius Barbeau, au début du XXe siècle. Après avoir passé en revue les principales théories dans l’approche sémiotique du conte à partir de Vladimir Propp jusqu’à nos jours, nous avons procédé à une étude narrative du corpus selon la méthode du grand folkloriste russe : cela nous a permis d’en montrer la valeur exceptionnelle mais aussi les limites. Nous avons constaté ainsi que le travail sur un corpus inédit peut mener à l’identification de nouveaux éléments dans la structure du conte merveilleux. En poursuivant nos recherches sur les dix-neuf contes recueillis par Barbeau, nous sommes passée du schéma linéaire, syntagmatique de Propp aux modèles logiques de ses continuateurs, particulièrement celui élaboré par Guy Laflèche. Nos analyses ont mis en évidence non seulement le fait que la structure en miroir est un modèle valide auquel une partie des contes merveilleux se plie parfaitement (d’emblée l’exclusivité du schéma de Propp est mise en question, sinon infirmée), mais aussi que tout conte merveilleux est exceptionnellement organisé, structuré (ce qui confirme la théorie de Claude Bremond conformément à laquelle le récit narratif est une alternance de dégradations et d’améliorations). Enfin, la dernière partie du mémoire est une analyse sémio-discursive de notre corpus qui, au lieu d’être une simple accumulation de listes de mots, d’expressions et de figures, tente d’aborder la structure idéologique, grâce à une étude en parallèle d’un conte du corpus et de deux versions littéraires.

Le Réel dans le texte : lecture et interprétation de la figure de Bartleby le scribe

La nouvelle « Bartleby The Scrivener. A Story of Wall-Street » pose des questions de lecture et d’interprétation littéraire. Grâce à des approches ayant le discours pour objet ou moyen de connaissance (rhétorique, étymologie, psychanalyse, pragmatique) de même qu’aux écrits de Herman Melville, il s’agit de cerner ce que représente Bartleby, qualifié d’« unaccountable » (inexplicable). Ce mot organise l’étude. Entier ou décomposé en morphèmes, dans une première partie, il met en évidence des univers de sens où Bartleby se montre marginal et court-circuite les systèmes : l’univers du langage (« unaccountable » : inénarrable), celui de la loi (« count » : chef d’accusation) et celui des chiffres (« account, count » : compte, compter). Une seconde partie rattache les pistes de lecture implicites ainsi dégagées aux thématiques de l’« inexplicable », explicites dans le texte, permettant une interprétation touchant l’univers des lettres, leur pérennité et leur circulation par le biais de la lecture et de l’interprétation.