Avaliação do uso de medicamentos psicotrópicos pelos pacientes de uma Unidade Básica de Saúde de um município de pequeno porte do Estado de São Paulo

Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva - FMB

A Randomized, Naturalistic, Parallel-Group Study for the Long-Term Treatment of Panic Disorder With Clonazepam or Paroxetine

This long-term extension of an 8-week randomized, naturalistic study in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia compared the efficacy and safety of clonazepam (n = 47) and paroxetine (n = 37) over a 3-year total treatment duration. Target doses for all patients were 2 mg/d clonazepam and 40 mg/d paroxetine (both taken at bedtime). This study reports data from the long-term period (34 months), following the initial 8-week treatment phase. Thus, total treatment duration was 36 months. Patients with a good primary outcome during acute treatment continued monotherapy with clonazepam or paroxetine, but patients with partial primary treatment success were switched to the combination therapy. At initiation of the long-term study, the mean doses of clonazepam and paroxetine were 1.9 (SD, 0.30) and 38.4 (SD, 3.74) mg/d, respectively. These doses were maintained until month 36 (clonazepam 1.9 [ SD, 0.29] mg/d and paroxetine 38.2 [SD, 3.87] mg/d). Long-term treatment with clonazepam led to a small but significantly better Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement rating than treatment with paroxetine (mean difference: CGI-Severity scale -3.48 vs -3.24, respectively, P = 0.02; CGI-Improvement scale 1.06 vs 1.11, respectively, P = 0.04). Both treatments similarly reduced the number of panic attacks and severity of anxiety. Patients treated with clonazepam had significantly fewer adverse events than those treated with paroxetine (28.9% vs 70.6%, P < 0.001). The efficacy of clonazepam and paroxetine for the treatment of panic disorder was maintained over the long-term course. There was a significant advantage with clonazepam over paroxetine with respect to the frequency and nature of adverse events.

Effects of diazepam on BOLD activation during the processing of aversive faces

This study aimed to measure, using fMRI, the effect of diazepam on the haemodynamic response to emotional faces. Twelve healthy male volunteers (mean age = 24.83 +/- 3.16 years), were evaluated in a randomized, balanced-order, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. Diazepam (10 mg) or placebo was given 1 h before the neuroimaging acquisition. In a blocked design covert face emotional task, subjects were presented with neutral (A) and aversive (B) (angry or fearful) faces. Participants were also submitted to an explicit emotional face recognition task, and subjective anxiety was evaluated throughout the procedures. Diazepam attenuated the activation of right amygdala and right orbitofrontal cortex and enhanced the activation of right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to fearful faces. In contrast, diazepam enhanced the activation of posterior left insula and attenuated the activation of bilateral ACC to angry faces. In the behavioural task, diazepam impaired the recognition of fear in female faces. Under the action of diazepam, volunteers were less anxious at the end of the experimental session. These results suggest that benzodiazepines can differentially modulate brain activation to aversive stimuli, depending on the stimulus features and indicate a role of amygdala and insula in the anxiolytic action of benzodiazepines.

Prescribed use of methylphenidate hydrochloride and its correlates among Brazilian college students

Background: The prevalence of prescribed use of methylphenidate (MPH) and its correlates are not well-known in Brazil. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of prescribed use of MPH and its correlates in a sample of Brazilian college students. Methods: Twelve-thousand seven hundred and eleven college students filled out a drug use questionnaire. They were divided into two groups based on the lifetime use of MPH: MPH users (MPHU) and MPH non-users (MPHNU). Quasi-binomial regression models were carried out in order to evaluate the correlation among MPHU and other variables. Results: A lifetime use of MPH was reported from 0.9% of college students (MPHU). Being from the Midwest (PR = 4.8, p < 0.01) and South (PR = 5.2, p < 0.05), living in students housing (PR = 5.8, p < 0.001), prescribed use of amphetamines (PR = 8.9, p < 0.001) and benzodiazepines (< 3 weeks: PR = 4.4, p < 0.001; >= 3 weeks: PR = 6.7, p < 0.001), and harmful use of alcohol (PR = 4.0, p < 0.05) were correlated with MPHU. Discussion: The association of alcohol and drug use with prescribed use of MPH among college students suggests the importance of screening drinking patterns and use of other drugs among students with ADHD symptoms. Cesar ELR, et al. / Rev Psiq Clin. 2012; 39(6):183-8

Study on the regulation of mRNA expression of GABA transporters (GAT-1 and GAT-3) in rat brain

The submitted work concentrated on the study of mRNA expression of two distinct GABA transporters, GAT-1 and GAT-3, in the rat brain. For the detection and quantification of the chosen mRNAs, appropriate methods had to be established. Two methods, ribonuclease protection assay (RPA) and competitive RT-PCR were emloyed in the present study. Competitive RT-PCR worked out to be 20 times more sensitive as RPA. Unlike the sensitivity, the fidelity of both techniques was comparable with respect to their intra- and inter-assay variability.The basal mRNA levels of GAT-1 and GAT-3 were measured in various brain regions. Messenger RNAs for both transporters were detected in all tested brain regions. Depending on the region, the observed mRNA level for GAT-1 was 100-300 higher than for GAT-3. The GAT-1 mRNA levels were similar in all tested regions. The distribution of GAT-3 mRNA seemed to be more region specific. The strongest GAT-3 mRNA expression was detected in striatum, medulla oblongata and thalamus. The lowest levels of GAT-3 were in cortex frontalis and cerebellum.Furthermore, the mRNA expression for GAT-1 and GAT-3 was analysed under altered physiological conditions; in kindling model of epilepsy and also after long-term treatment drugs modulating GABAergic transmission. In kindling model of epilepsy, altered GABA transporter function was hypothesised by During and coworkers (During et al., 1995) after observed decrease in binding of nipecotic acid, a GAT ligand, in hippocampus of kindled animals. In the present work, the mRNA levels were measured in hippocampus and whole brain samples. Neither GAT-1 nor GAT-3 showed altered transcription in any tested region of kindled animals compared to controls. This leads to conclusion that an altered functionality of GABA transporters is involved in epilepsy rather than a change in their expression.The levels of GAT-1 and GAT-3 mRNAs were also measured in the brain of rats chronically treated with diazepam or zolpidem, GABAA receptor agonists. Prior to the molecular biology tests, behavioural analysis was carried out with chronically and acutely treated animals. In two tests, open field and elevated plus-maze, the basal activity exploration and anxiety-like behaviour were analysed. Zolpidem treatment increased exploratory activity. There were observed no differencies between chronically and acutely treated animals. Diazepam increased exploratory activity and decresed anxiety-like behaviour when applied acutely. This effect disappeard after chronic administration of diazepam. The loss of effect suggested a development of tolerance to effects of diazepam following long-term administration. Double treatment, acute injection of diazepam after chronic diazepam treatment, confirmed development of a tolerance to effects of diazepam. Also, the mRNAs for GAT-1 and GAT-3 were analysed in cortex frontalis, hippocampus, cerebellum and whole brain samples of chronically treated animals. The mRNA levels for any of tested GABA transporters did not show significant changes in any of tested region neither after diazepam nor zolpidem treatment. Therefore, changes in GAT-1 and GAT-3 transcription are probably not involved in adaptation of GABAergic system to long-term benzodiazepine administration and so in development of tolerance to benzodiazepines.

Development of original analytical methods for the therapeutic drug monitoring of CNS druges: Antipsychotics, Antidepressants and Anxiolytics-hypnotics

Great strides have been made in the last few years in the pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, with the introduction into the therapy of several new and more efficient agents, which have improved the quality of life of many patients. Despite these advances, a large percentage of patients is still considered “non-responder” to the therapy, not drawing any benefits from it. Moreover, these patients have a peculiar therapeutic profile, due to the very frequent application of polypharmacy, attempting to obtain satisfactory remission of the multiple aspects of psychiatric syndromes. Therapy is heavily individualised and switching from one therapeutic agent to another is quite frequent. One of the main problems of this situation is the possibility of unwanted or unexpected pharmacological interactions, which can occur both during polypharmacy and during switching. Simultaneous administration of psychiatric drugs can easily lead to interactions if one of the administered compounds influences the metabolism of the others. Impaired CYP450 function due to inhibition of the enzyme is frequent. Other metabolic pathways, such as glucuronidation, can also be influenced. The Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of psychotropic drugs is an important tool for treatment personalisation and optimisation. It deals with the determination of parent drugs and metabolites plasma levels, in order to monitor them over time and to compare these findings with clinical data. This allows establishing chemical-clinical correlations (such as those between administered dose and therapeutic and side effects), which are essential to obtain the maximum therapeutic efficacy, while minimising side and toxic effects. It is evident the importance of developing sensitive and selective analytical methods for the determination of the administered drugs and their main metabolites, in order to obtain reliable data that can correctly support clinical decisions. During the three years of Ph.D. program, some analytical methods based on HPLC have been developed, validated and successfully applied to the TDM of psychiatric patients undergoing treatment with drugs belonging to following classes: antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytic-hypnotics. The biological matrices which have been processed were: blood, plasma, serum, saliva, urine, hair and rat brain. Among antipsychotics, both atypical and classical agents have been considered, such as haloperidol, chlorpromazine, clotiapine, loxapine, risperidone (and 9-hydroxyrisperidone), clozapine (as well as N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide) and quetiapine. While the need for an accurate TDM of schizophrenic patients is being increasingly recognized by psychiatrists, only in the last few years the same attention is being paid to the TDM of depressed patients. This is leading to the acknowledgment that depression pharmacotherapy can greatly benefit from the accurate application of TDM. For this reason, the research activity has also been focused on first and second-generation antidepressant agents, like triciclic antidepressants, trazodone and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-cpp), paroxetine and its three main metabolites, venlafaxine and its active metabolite, and the most recent antidepressant introduced into the market, duloxetine. Among anxiolytics-hypnotics, benzodiazepines are very often involved in the pharmacotherapy of depression for the relief of anxious components; for this reason, it is useful to monitor these drugs, especially in cases of polypharmacy. The results obtained during these three years of Ph.D. program are reliable and the developed HPLC methods are suitable for the qualitative and quantitative determination of CNS drugs in biological fluids for TDM purposes.

Specific PET-ligands for selected 5-HT and GABA A-receptor subtypes = PET-Liganden mit Spezifität für definierte 5-HT und GABA A-Rezeptor-Subtypen

Für diese Arbeit wurden sechs neue Benzodiazepinderivate, TC07, TC08, TC09, TC10, TC11 und TC12, hergestellt. Diese wurden mittels Radioligandenbindungsassay sowohl auf ihre Bindungseigenschaften für Membranen des Cerebellum, des Hippo-campus und des Cortex der Ratte hin untersucht, als auch für Membranen von HEK293 Zellen, die transient rekombinante GABAA Rezeptoren exprimierten. Zusätz-lich wurden kompetitive in situ Rezeptorautoradiographien an Rattenhirnschnitten mit den Liganden [3H]Ro15-4513 und [3H]R015-1788 durchgeführt. Zusammen ergaben sich aus diesen Experimenten deutliche Hinweise auf eine Selektivität der Verbindun-gen TC07, TC11 und TC12 für a5-Untereinheiten enthaltende GABAA Rezeptoren mit a5-Affinitäten im niedrigen nanomolaren Bereich. In vivo Bindungsexperimente in Ratten, mit [3H]Ro15-1788 als Tracer und TC07 als Kompetitor, ergaben, dass TC07 mehr [3H]Ro15-1788 im Vorderhirn als im Cerebellum verdrängt. Bezog man die regionale Verteilung der a5-Untereinheit des GABAA Rezep-tors im Rattenhirn mit ein – sehr wenige a5-Untereinheiten im Cerebellum, etwa 20 % der GABAA Rezeptor-Untereinheiten im Hippocampus – untermauerten diese Ergeb-nisse die Vermutung, TC07 könne a5-selektiv sein. Diese Daten bestätigten darü-berhinaus, dass TC07 die Blut-Hirn-Schranke passieren kann. Für elektrophysiologische Messungen mit TC07 und TC12 wurden die oben erwähnten transient transfizierten HEK293 Zellen verwendet, welche die GABAA Rezeptor Unte-reinheitenkombination a5b3g2 exprimierten. Das Dosis-Antwort Verhalten ergab keinen signifikanten Effekt für TC12. Die Daten von TC07 dagegen lassen auf einen schwach negativ modulatorischen Effekt schließen, was, zumindest theoretisch, die Möglichkeit eröffnet, TC07 auch als sogenannten cognitive enhancer einzusetzen. Der errechnete Ki-Wert lag in derselben Größenordnung wie der Ki-Wert, der anhand der Bindungsas-saydaten errechnet wurde. Insgesamt rechtfertigen die bisherigen Ergebnisse die radiochemische Markierung mit 18F von drei der sechs getesteten Verbindungen in der Reihenfolge TC07, TC12 und TC11. Des Weiteren wurde [18F]MHMZ, ein potentiell 5-HT2A selektiver Ligand und PET-Tracer einschließlich Vorläufer und Referenzverbindungen, mit hohen Ausbeuten syn-thetisiert (Herth, Debus et al. 2008). Autoradiographieexperimente mit Rattenhirn-schnitten zeigten hervorragende in situ Bindungseigenschaften der neuen Verbindung. Die Daten wiesen eine hohe Selektivität für 5-HT2A Rezeptoren in Verbindung mit einer niedrigen unspezifischen Bindung auf. [18F]MHMZ erfährt in vivo eine schnelle Metabo-lisierung, wobei ein polarer aktiver Metabolit entsteht, welcher vermutlich nicht die Blut-Hirn-Schranke passieren kann. Transversale, sagittale und coronale Kleintier-PET-Bilder des Rattenhirns zeigten eine hohe Anreicherung im frontalen Cortex und im Striatum, während im Cerebellum so gut wie keine Anreicherung festzustellen war. Diese Verteilung deckt sich mit der bekann-ten Verteilung der 5-HT2A Rezeptoren. Die in vivo Anreicherung scheint sich ebenfalls gut mit der Verteilung der in den Autoradiographieexperimenten gemessenen Bindung zu decken. Nach Berechnungen mit dem 4-Parameter Referenzgewebe Modell beträgt das Bindungspotential (BP) für den frontalen Cortex 1,45. Das Cortex zu Cerebellum Verhältnis wurde auf 2,7 nach 30 Minuten Messzeit bestimmt, was bemerkenswert nah an den von Lundkvist et al. für [11C]MDL 100907 publizierten Daten liegt. Abgesehen von der etwas niedrigeren Affinität waren die gemessenen in vitro, in situ und in vivo Daten denen von [3H]MDL 100907 und [11C]MDL 100907 sehr ähnlich, so dass wir ein [18F]Analogon in der Hand haben, das die bessere Selektivität von MDL 100907 verglichen mit Altanserin mit der längeren Halbwertszeit und den besse-ren Eigenschaften für die klinische Routine von 18F verglichen mit 11C verbindet. Die Ergebnisse von [18F]MHMZ rechtfertigenden weitere Experimente, um diesen Liganden für die klinische Routine am Menschen nutzbar zu machen.

Adverse effects of drugs on the esophagus

Given the function of the esophagus to transport orally ingested solids and liquids into the stomach there are several medications with adverse effect on esophageal structures and function. Various pharmacologic agents can induce esophageal injury, promote gastroesophageal reflux by decreasing lower esophageal sphincter tone or affect esophageal perception and motility. The risks of bisphosphonates, doxycycline, ferrous sulfate, ascorbic acid, aspirin/NSAIDs and chemotherapeutic agents to induce esophageal lesions have been documented in case reports and short series. In addition to direct mucosal injury, many commonly used medications including nitroglycerins, anticholinergics, beta-adrenergic agonists, aminophyllines, and benzodiazepines promote/facilitate gastroesophageal reflux by reducing lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Additional evidence accumulates on the adverse effects of various medications on esophageal motility and perception. The treatment of medication-induced esophageal lesions includes (1) identifying and discontinuing the causative medication, (2) promoting healing of esophageal injury by decreasing esophageal acid exposure or coating already existing esophageal lesions, (3) eventual use of protective compounds.

A closer look at the high affinity benzodiazepine binding site on GABAA receptors

Ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site of the GABA(A) receptor come in three flavors: positive allosteric modulators, negative allosteric modulators and antagonists all of which can bind with high affinity. The GABA(A) receptor is a pentameric protein which forms a chloride selective ion channel and ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site stabilize three different conformations of this protein. Classical benzodiazepines exert a positive allosteric effect by increasing the apparent affinity of channel opening by the agonist γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). We concentrate here on the major adult isoform, the α(1)β(2)γ(2) GABA(A) receptor. The classical binding pocket for benzodiazepines is located in a subunit cleft between α(1) and γ(2) subunits in a position homologous to the agonist binding site for GABA that is located between β(2) and α(1) subunits. We review here approaches to this picture. In particular, point mutations were performed in combination with subsequent analysis of the expressed mutant proteins using either electrophysiological techniques or radioactive ligand binding assays. The predictive power of these methods is assessed by comparing the results with the predictions that can be made on the basis of the recently published crystal structure of the acetylcholine binding protein that shows homology to the N-terminal, extracellular domain of the GABA(A) receptor. In addition, we review an approach to the question of how the benzodiazepine ligands are positioned in their binding pocket. We also discuss a newly postulated modulatory site for benzodiazepines at the α(1)/β(2) subunit interface, homologous to the classical benzodiazepine binding pocket.

Structure, function, and modulation of GABA(A) receptors

The GABA(A) receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in mammalian brain. Each isoform consists of five homologous or identical subunits surrounding a central chloride ion-selective channel gated by GABA. How many isoforms of the receptor exist is far from clear. GABA(A) receptors located in the postsynaptic membrane mediate neuronal inhibition that occurs in the millisecond time range; those located in the extrasynaptic membrane respond to ambient GABA and confer long-term inhibition. GABA(A) receptors are responsive to a wide variety of drugs, e.g. benzodiazepines, which are often used for their sedative/hypnotic and anxiolytic effects.

Influence of GABA(A) receptor α subunit isoforms on the benzodiazepine binding site

Classical benzodiazepines, such as diazepam, interact with α(x)β(2)γ(2) GABA(A) receptors, x = 1, 2, 3, 5 and modulate their function. Modulation of different receptor isoforms probably results in selective behavioural effects as sedation and anxiolysis. Knowledge of differences in the structure of the binding pocket in different receptor isoforms is of interest for the generation of isoform-specific ligands. We studied here the interaction of the covalently reacting diazepam analogue 3-NCS with α(1)S204Cβ(2)γ(2), α(1)S205Cβ(2)γ(2) and α(1)T206Cβ(2)γ(2) and with receptors containing the homologous mutations in α(2)β(2)γ(2), α(3)β(2)γ(2), α(5)β(1/2)γ(2) and α(6)β(2)γ(2). The interaction was studied using radioactive ligand binding and at the functional level using electrophysiological techniques. Both strategies gave overlapping results. Our data allow conclusions about the relative apposition of α(1)S204Cβ(2)γ(2), α(1)S205Cβ(2)γ(2) and α(1)T206Cβ(2)γ(2) and homologous positions in α(2), α(3), α(5) and α(6) with C-atom adjacent to the keto-group in diazepam. Together with similar data on the C-atom carrying Cl in diazepam, they indicate that the architecture of the binding site for benzodiazepines differs in each GABA(A) receptor isoform α(1)β(2)γ(2), α(2)β(2)γ(2), α(3)β(2)γ(2), α(5)β(1/2)γ(2) and α(6)β(2)γ(2).

Two neighboring residues of loop A of the alpha1 subunit point towards the benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA receptors

Benzodiazepines are widely used drugs exerting sedative, anxiolytic, muscle relaxant, and anticonvulsant effects by acting through specific high affinity binding sites on some GABA(A) receptors. It is important to understand how these ligands are positioned in this binding site. We are especially interested here in the conformation of loop A of the alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2) GABA(A) receptor containing a key residue for the interaction of benzodiazepines: alpha(1)H101. We describe a direct interaction of alpha(1)N102 with a diazepam- and an imidazobenzodiazepine-derivative. Our observations help to better understand the conformation of this region of the benzodiazepine pocket in GABA(A) receptor.

Proximity-accelerated chemical coupling reaction in the benzodiazepine-binding site of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors: superposition of different allosteric modulators

Benzodiazepines are widely used drugs. They exert sedative/hypnotic, anxiolytic, muscle relaxant, and anticonvulsant effects and act through a specific high affinity binding site on the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor, the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor. Ligands of the benzodiazepine-binding site are classified into three groups depending on their mode of action: positive and negative allosteric modulators and antagonists. To rationally design ligands of the benzodiazepine site in different isoforms of the GABA(A) receptor, we need to understand the relative positioning and overlap of modulators of different allosteric properties. To solve these questions, we used a proximity-accelerated irreversible chemical coupling reaction. GABA(A) receptor residues thought to reside in the benzodiazepine-binding site were individually mutated to cysteine and combined with a cysteine-reactive benzodiazepine site ligand. Direct apposition of reaction partners is expected to lead to a covalent reaction. We describe here such a reaction of predominantly alpha(1)H101C and also three other mutants (alpha(1)G157C, alpha(1)V202C, and alpha(1)V211C) with an Imid-NCS derivative in which a reactive isothiocyanate group (-NCS) replaces the azide group (-N(3)) in the partial negative allosteric modulator Ro15-4513. Our results show four contact points of imidazobenzodiazepines with the receptor, alpha(1)H101C being shared by classical benzodiazepines. Taken together with previous data, a similar orientation of these ligands within the benzodiazepine-binding pocket may be proposed.

Replacement of histidine in position 105 in the alpha(5) subunit by cysteine stimulates zolpidem sensitivity of alpha(5)beta(2)gamma(2) GABA(A) receptors

Zolpidem is a positive allosteric modulator of GABA(A) receptors with sensitivity to subunit composition. While it acts with high affinity and efficacy at GABA(A) receptors containing the alpha(1) subunit, it has a lower affinity to GABA(A) receptors containing alpha(2), alpha(3), or alpha(5) subunits and has a very weak efficacy at receptors containing the alpha(5) subunit. Here, we show that replacing histidine in position 105 in the alpha(5) subunit by cysteine strongly stimulates the effect of zolpidem in receptors containing the alpha(5) subunit. The side chain volume of the amino acid residue in this position does not correlate with the modulation by zolpidem. Interestingly, serine is not able to promote the potentiation by zolpidem. The homologous residues to alpha(5)H105 in alpha(1), alpha(2), and alpha(3) are well-known determinants of the action of classical benzodiazepines. Other studies have shown that replacement of these histidines alpha(1)H101, alpha(2)H101, and alpha(3)H126 by arginine, as naturally present in alpha(4) and alpha(6), leads to benzodiazepine insensitivity of these receptors. Thus, the nature of the amino acid residue in this position is not only crucial for the action of classical benzodiazepines but in alpha(5) containing receptors also for the action of zolpidem.

Diazepam versus fentanyl for premedication during percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Myocardial Protection by Fentanyl during Coronary Intervention (PROFIT) Trial

BACKGROUND: Sedation is a cornerstone in the premedication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Benzodiazepines and opioids are frequently used. Previous results suggest that opioids mimic the adaptation to ischemia during repeated balloon inflations and may provide direct myocardial protection in addition to their sedative effect. However, no comparative data exist. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial comparing diazepam and fentanyl in 276 patients undergoing elective PCI. Patients were randomized to either diazepam 5 mg sublingually or fentanyl 0.05 mg or 0.1 mg intravenously at least 5 minutes prior to the first balloon inflation. The primary end-point was the postprocedural elevation of myocardial markers of necrosis defined as an elevation of cardiac troponin T > or = 0.01 ng/ml. RESULTS: The three groups had similar baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, with no significant differences in lesion morphology, procedural complexity, or adjunctive medical treatment. No significant variation in the hemodynamic response to the study drugs was observed in the three groups. The rate of postprocedural troponin T elevation was 28% in the diazepam group, 20% in the fentanyl 0.05 mg group, and 30% in the fentanyl 0.1 mg group (P = 0.26). Rates of postprocedural myocardial infarction were 3%, 2%, and 2%, respectively (P = 0.84), with one case of in-hospital death in the diazepam group and no urgent TVR in the whole study population. CONCLUSION: Although providing a well-tolerated alternative to diazepam for sedation during PCI, fentanyl did not provide additional cardioprotection assessed through the postinterventional elevation of cardiac troponin T during elective coronary intervention.