Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: should we abandon p-value in forensic science applications?

Many people regard the concept of hypothesis testing as fundamental to inferential statistics. Various schools of thought, in particular frequentist and Bayesian, have promoted radically different solutions for taking a decision about the plausibility of competing hypotheses. Comprehensive philosophical comparisons about their advantages and drawbacks are widely available and continue to span over large debates in the literature. More recently, controversial discussion was initiated by an editorial decision of a scientific journal [1] to refuse any paper submitted for publication containing null hypothesis testing procedures. Since the large majority of papers published in forensic journals propose the evaluation of statistical evidence based on the so called p-values, it is of interest to expose the discussion of this journal's decision within the forensic science community. This paper aims to provide forensic science researchers with a primer on the main concepts and their implications for making informed methodological choices.

Regional Science trends through the analysis of the main facts of the 51st ERSA Conference

The 51st ERSA Conference held in Barcelona in 2011 was one of the largest ever. By examining the characteristics of the conference, this paper identifies the main trends in Regional Science and draws on a broad array of sources of information: the delegates" demographic details, the conference program itself, a satisfaction survey conducted among delegates, a quality survey addressed to those chairing the sessions and, finally, a bibliometric database including each author signing a paper presented at the conference. We finally run a regression analysis from which we show that for ERSA delegates what matters most is quality, and this must be the direction that future conferences should move toward. Ultimately, ERSA conferences are comprehensive, all-embracing occasions, representing an ideal opportunity for regional scientists to present their work to each other and to network.

"A Hard Battle to Fight": Natural Theology and the Dismal Science, 1820-1850

William Whewell's and Richard Jones's criticism of Jeremy Bentham's and David Ricardo's "dismal" views on the relation of theory and evidence in political economy was motivated by the former's views on the structuring role of natural theology for questions of method and evidence in the sciences, including political economy. In comparison, natural theology was for Richard Whately as structuring on these issues as it was for the Cambridge men. Whately's view on natural theology, however, conformed with the Ricardian predilection for theory over facts. The differences between the Cambridge men and Whately became manifest after (or better: during) the publication of Jones's book on rent in 1831 and led to a somewhat acerbic exchange of views on the role of definitions in science and the use of history for establishing scientific evidence. As far as political economy was concerned, Whately's stance carried the day in Victorian England.

PROM-OPEN: PROMOTING OPEN SCIENCE IN AN ON-LINE E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Peer-reviewed

Statistics in Public Understanding of Science review: How to achieve high statistical standards?

This article proposes a checklist to improve statistical reporting in the manuscripts submitted to Public Understanding of Science. Generally, these guidelines will allow the reviewers (and readers) to judge whether the evidence provided in the manuscript is relevant. The article ends with other suggestions for a better statistical quality of the journal.

El proyecto Science of the city. Territorio de encuentro entre arte, ciencia y ciudad

El objetivo de este artículo es presentar la experiencia colaborativa entre el proyecto Science of the city y el grupo de investigación"Metamétodo. Metodologías compartidas y procesos artísticos en la sociedad del conocimiento" de la Facultad de Bellas Artes de la UB y La Mandarina de Newton, empresa emergente en el ámbito de la divulgación científica, interesada en nuevas estrategias y formas de pensar la ciencia que reviertan en la transmisión del conocimiento. Las cuestiones ¿Qué es ciencia? y ¿Qué es ciudad? o ¿Dónde encontramos la ciencia en la ciudad? fueron el punto de partida del proyecto Science of the city, ideado por La Mandarina de Newton. Los organizadores lanzaron una convocatoria a través de la red, en formato de concurso internacional de vídeos que debían tratar estas cuestiones. El propósito era acercar la ciencia a las experiencias cotidianas de los habitantes de la ciudad y a su vez, obtener una respuesta en formato de vídeo que nos sirviera como punto de partida para los artistas integrantes de nuestro grupo de investigación para elaborar nuestras propias obras. Los vídeos ganadores y las obras resultantes de esta experiencia conformaron la exposición Science of the City, proyecto financiado por el FECYT. La exposición pudo verse en el espacio Arts Santa Mònica de Barcelona en mayo del pasado 2012. Los procesos de trabajo y las reflexiones quedaron recopilados en una publicación multilingüe.

Les Science studies : de la marginalité thématique à la refondation de la discipline

Dans cet article, nous tentons de mettre en évidence ce qui, progressivement, constitue des points de convergence relativement partagés (l'analyse des controverses, l'attention portée au contenu, la prise en compte des connaissances, des inscriptions, des objets et des instruments dans l'action) qui influent partiellement sur les problématiques et approches d'autres domaines et courants de pensée en sociologie. Des déplacements significatifs ont été opérés qui sont potentiellement porteurs d'effets profonds, encore faudrait-il qu'ils soient repris par d'autres sociologues, ce qui n'a rien d'évident tant ils posent questions. Ainsi, les Science studies (étude sociale des sciences), qui ont longtemps constitué un domaine relativement à part de la sociologie du fait de ses objets d'études, contribue au renouveau des manières de penser et de travailler dans les sciences sociales en ouvrant des champs de questionnement autour de la définition des éléments constitutifs de la société et de l'agency. n this article, we highlight what gradually becomes converging topics and issues (analyzing of controversies, consideration for the content, the objects and the instruments of the action, integration of the issues related to the knowledge) and affects the problematics and approaches into other research fields and currents of thought in sociology. Significant shifts occurred which are potential carriers of profound effects if they would be picked up by other sociologists, which is not obvious due to the profounds debates emerging from theses studies. Thus, the Science Studies, which have long been an area relatively apart from sociology because of its objects of study, participate to the renewal of ways of thinking and working in the social sciences by opening questioning around the definition of the elements of society and the agency.