959 resultados para Ontology Alignments Negotiations
Resumo:
The topic is white collar crime in its organizational form. The research question is why otherwise law-abiding people engage in wrongful behavior within legitimate organizations and what kinds of dynamics are involved in wrongful organizational processes. This is a theoretical inquiry the method of which is to bring together relevant literature on organizational behavior regardless of the branch of science. In addition to criminological and sociolegal writings, I mostly refer to works of social psychology and organization theory. At first, I discuss the terminological multiplicity related to organizational white collar crime. In conclusion from a critical analysis of the dominant terms and definitions, I argue for the concept of organizational wrongdoing. The approach of organizational wrongdoing captures unethical, illegal and criminal organizational behavior. Thus, it is not retricted by legislative categories but ethical reasoning. The approach aims at grasping a behavioral entity, and state law crimes do not constitute an ontology of behavior. In order to understand organizational wrongdoing, the dominant criminological theories applied to white collar crime are discussed. To a surprisingly large extent, they lack a sophisticated organizational perspective and do not offer viable frameworks for building a plausible theory of organizational white collar crime. In order to fill the gap, I incorporate the social psychological dynamics of organizational behavior and present several findings on collective behavior that criminological theorization must come to terms with. ------ This publication has been first presented and accepted as a master's thesis at the Faculty of Law, University of Turku. It has been published on the series: Criminal Law and Judicial Procedure, Series B: 15, in print format. The publication was digitized in 2015 and published online.
Resumo:
This caring science study explores ‘Will’ as an ontological concept. The aim is to deepen the understanding of the essence of Will, and to highlight the manifestations of Will and how Will becomes evident in clinical caring. Will is ontological and universal. Will is connected with the essence of the human being, and manifests in the human being as will. The approach is inspired by Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. The study’s horizon of understanding consists of Eriksson’s caritative theory and the caring science-tradition. The study’s research questions are as follows: What is the essence of Will? What are its manifestations? How does Will become evident in clinical caring? The hermeneutic interpretative movement is initiated by the material, which consists of the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s texts, letters from experts and dictionaries. Meaning-bearing substance fragments in the material are intertwined with the original horizon of understanding through hermeneutical reading, hermeneutical interpretation and concept analysis in an oscillating interpretive movement. An abstraction occurs when the new substance is illuminated by the caring science ontology. The oscillating interpretive movement results in a reinterpreted horizon of understanding, which in turn provides the findings of the study. The reinterpreted horizon of understanding is presented in the form of a theoretical model and abductive theses. The essence of Will is represented in the theoretical model as the lifeaffirming and the loving force. Life and love are Will’s origin and destination. Will’s manifestations (its diversity) hold conditions and chance occurrences that obstruct Will. Hence the will of the human being does not necessarily appear in a way that is in tune with ontological Will. Will represents the lifeblood of ethos, and in this lifeblood love flows. Will acts by virtue of itself, and gives ethos its force. Will manifests in a way that ethos can affirm. When Will is affected by caring its force is active in the service of life and love. Being a caregiver entails acting as a world-eye, which means recognizing Will in diversity. For caregivers, being a world-eye means observing fragments of Will as it manifests in its original form in the real reality, and acting as the mirror of life. The human being who is able to perceive the fundamental values of life and to live according to these has understood the laws of life and entered upon the human calling. The human being then lives according to the fundamental order and has found a home in life.
Resumo:
Human activity recognition in everyday environments is a critical, but challenging task in Ambient Intelligence applications to achieve proper Ambient Assisted Living, and key challenges still remain to be dealt with to realize robust methods. One of the major limitations of the Ambient Intelligence systems today is the lack of semantic models of those activities on the environment, so that the system can recognize the speci c activity being performed by the user(s) and act accordingly. In this context, this thesis addresses the general problem of knowledge representation in Smart Spaces. The main objective is to develop knowledge-based models, equipped with semantics to learn, infer and monitor human behaviours in Smart Spaces. Moreover, it is easy to recognize that some aspects of this problem have a high degree of uncertainty, and therefore, the developed models must be equipped with mechanisms to manage this type of information. A fuzzy ontology and a semantic hybrid system are presented to allow modelling and recognition of a set of complex real-life scenarios where vagueness and uncertainty are inherent to the human nature of the users that perform it. The handling of uncertain, incomplete and vague data (i.e., missing sensor readings and activity execution variations, since human behaviour is non-deterministic) is approached for the rst time through a fuzzy ontology validated on real-time settings within a hybrid data-driven and knowledgebased architecture. The semantics of activities, sub-activities and real-time object interaction are taken into consideration. The proposed framework consists of two main modules: the low-level sub-activity recognizer and the high-level activity recognizer. The rst module detects sub-activities (i.e., actions or basic activities) that take input data directly from a depth sensor (Kinect). The main contribution of this thesis tackles the second component of the hybrid system, which lays on top of the previous one, in a superior level of abstraction, and acquires the input data from the rst module's output, and executes ontological inference to provide users, activities and their in uence in the environment, with semantics. This component is thus knowledge-based, and a fuzzy ontology was designed to model the high-level activities. Since activity recognition requires context-awareness and the ability to discriminate among activities in di erent environments, the semantic framework allows for modelling common-sense knowledge in the form of a rule-based system that supports expressions close to natural language in the form of fuzzy linguistic labels. The framework advantages have been evaluated with a challenging and new public dataset, CAD-120, achieving an accuracy of 90.1% and 91.1% respectively for low and high-level activities. This entails an improvement over both, entirely data-driven approaches, and merely ontology-based approaches. As an added value, for the system to be su ciently simple and exible to be managed by non-expert users, and thus, facilitate the transfer of research to industry, a development framework composed by a programming toolbox, a hybrid crisp and fuzzy architecture, and graphical models to represent and con gure human behaviour in Smart Spaces, were developed in order to provide the framework with more usability in the nal application. As a result, human behaviour recognition can help assisting people with special needs such as in healthcare, independent elderly living, in remote rehabilitation monitoring, industrial process guideline control, and many other cases. This thesis shows use cases in these areas.
Resumo:
Työn tavoitteena on kehittää ABB:lle palvelutuote, jota voidaan tarjota voimalaitosasiakkaille. Uuden palvelutuotteen tulee vastata ABB:n uuden strategian linjauksiin. Palvelulla tarjotaan asiakkaille 1.1.2015 voimaan tulleen energiatehokkuuslain määrittelemien pakollisten toimenpiteiden suoritusta. Työssä kerätään, käsitellään ja analysoidaan tietoa voimalaitosasiakkaille suunnatun palvelun tuotteistamisprosessin päätöksenteon tueksi. Palvelutuotteen kehittämistä varten tutkitaan ABB:n nykyisiä palvelutuotteita, osaamista ja referenssi projekteja, energiatehokkuuslakia, voimalaitosten energiatehokkuus-potentiaalia ja erilaisia energiakatselmusmalleja. Päätöksenteon tueksi tehdään referenssiprojektina energia-analyysi voimalaitokselle, jossa voimalaitoksesta tehdään ipsePRO simulointiohjelmalla mallinnus. Mallinnuksen ja koeajojen avulla tutkitaan voimalaitoksen minimikuorman optimointia. Markkinatutkimuksessa selvitetään lainsäädännön vaikutusta, nykyistä markkinatilannetta, potentiaalisia asiakkaita, kilpailijoita ja ABB:n mahdollisuuksia toimia alalla SWOT–analyysin avulla. Tutkimuksen tulosten perusteella tehdään päätös tuotteistaa voimalaitoksille palvelutuote, joka sisältää kaikki toimet energiatehokkuuslain asettamien vaatimusten täyttämiseen yrityksen energiakatselmuksen vastuuhenkilön, energiakatselmuksen ja kohdekatselmuksien teon osalta. Lisäksi työn aikana Energiavirasto myönsi ABB:lle pätevyyden toimia yrityksen energiakatselmuksen vastuuhenkilönä, mikä on edellytyksenä palvelun tarjoamiselle.
Resumo:
Väitöstutkimuksen kohteena on säädösten valmistelu ja niitä koskevaa päätöksenteko Euroopan unionissa erityisesti siitä näkökulmasta, miten Suomen kaltainen pieni jäsenvaltio voi vaikuttaa EU-säädöksiin. Väitöskirjassa analysoidaan unionin toimielinten välillä vallitsevaa dynamiikkaa ja Suomen asemaa erityisesti EUT-sopimuksen 289 artiklan 1 kohdan ja 294 artiklan mukaisessa tavallisessa lainsäätämisjärjestyksessä. Lissabonin sopimuksen voimaantulon jälkeen tavallinen lainsäätämisjärjestys, joka aiemmin tunnettiin yhteispäätösmenettelynä, on selvästi yleisin lainsäädäntömenettely unionissa. Väitöskirja koostuu kuudesta erillisjulkaistusta pääosin vertaisarvioidusta artikkelista ja niitä täydentävästä ja kokoavasta yhteenveto-osasta. Kirjan tämä painos sisältää vain yhteenvetoluvun, ei erikseen julkaistuja artikkeleita. Väitöskirjassa hyödynnetään eurooppaoikeuden ja politiikan tutkimuksen kirjallisuutta. Metodologisesti väitöstutkimus edustaa empiiristä oikeustutkimusta, jossa yhdistyy lainopillinen analyysi ja empiiristen, tässä tapauksessa lähinnä laadullisten aineistojen analyysi. Yhteenvedossa on seurattu lainsäädäntömuutoksia ja oikeuskäytäntöä 10. huhtikuuta 2015 asti. Väitöskirjatutkimuksen kantavana teemana on oikeuden ja politiikan suhde EUlainsäätämisessä. Artikkeleita ja yhteenvetoa sitovat yhteen kaksi yleisen tason argumenttia. Ensiksi, EU:n lainsäädäntömenettelyä koskevat oikeussäännöt ja institutionalisoituneet käytännöt luovat kehikon toimielinten sisäiselle päätöksenteolle sekä niiden välisille poliittisluonteisille neuvotteluille, vaikkakaan sääntöihin ja käytäntöihin ei yleensä ole tarvetta nimenomaisesti vedota menettelyn kuluessa. Toiseksi, koska Suomen kaltaisen pienen jäsenvaltion muodollinen valta – siis äänimäärä neuvostossa – on hyvin rajallinen, suomalaisten ministerien ja virkamiesten tulisi hyödyntää erilaisia epävirallisia vaikuttamiskanavia, jos halutaan vahvistaa Suomen tosiasiallista vaikutusvaltaa menettelyssä. Unionin lainsäädäntötoiminta ei tyypillisesti ole rationaalisen mallin mukaan etenevää päätöksentekoa, vaan tempoilevaa ja vaikeasti ennakoitavaa kamppailua eri preferenssejä edustavien toimijoiden välillä. Väitöskirjan ensimmäisessä artikkelissa analysoidaan säädösvalmistelua ja lainsäätämismenettelyä unionissa vaihe vaiheelta. Johtopäätöksenä todetaan, että unioniin on syntynyt yhteispäätösmenettelyn, sittemmin tavallisen lainsäätämisjärjestyksen myötä uudenlainen lainsäätämiskulttuuri, jolle on leimallista tiiviit yhteydet komission, Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston välillä. Toimielimet ottavat nykyisin joustavasti huomioon toistensa kantoja menettelyn edetessä, mikä mahdollistaa sen, että valtaosa EU-säädöksistä voidaan hyväksyä jo ensimmäisessä käsittelyssä. Toisessa tutkimusartikkelissa analysoidaan komission asemaa unionin toimielinrakenteessa. Artikkelissa tarkastellaan komission aloiteoikeutta sekä komission puheenjohtajan ja sen jäsenten valintamenettelyjä siitä näkökulmasta, edistääkö komissio todella unionin yleistä etua itsenäisenä ja riippumattomana, kuten EU-sopimuksen 17 artiklassa edellytetään. Tiettyjen järjestelyjen myötä Euroopan parlamentin ja komission suhde on kehittynyt siihen suuntaan, että komissio toimii jossain määrin parlamentille vastuunalaisena hallituksena. Artikkelissa kritisoidaan, että kehitys ei välttämättä lähennä kansalaisia unionin toimielimiin ja että kehitys omiaan vaarantamaan komission aseman verrattain riippumattomana välittäjänä trilogeissa. Kolmas artikkeli sisältää tapaustutkimuksen kuluttajille myönnettäviä luottoja sääntelevän direktiivin (2008/48/EY) valmisteluvaiheista. Tapaustutkimus konkretisoi Suomen hallituksen edustajien tekemän EU-vaikuttamisen keinoja, vahvuuksia ja kehittämiskohteita. Artikkelissa todetaan, että Suomelle aivan keskeinen vaikuttamisresurssi ovat sellaiset virkamiehet, jotka hallitsevat niin käsiteltävän säädöshankkeen sisältökysymykset kuin unionin päätöksentekomenettelyt ja toimielinten institutionalisoituneet käytännöt. Artikkelissa tehdyt empiiriset havainnot jäsenvaltioiden välillä käydyistä neuvotteluista tukevat konstruktiivisen mallin perusoletuksia. Neljännessä artikkelissa, joka on laadittu yhteistyönä professori Tapio Raunion kanssa, analysoidaan unioniasioiden kansallista valmistelua ja tarkemmin ottaen sitä, miten Suomen neuvottelukannat muotoutuvat valtioneuvoston yhteensovittamisjärjestelmän ylimmällä tasolla EU-ministerivaliokunnassa. Artikkelissa todetaan laajan pöytäkirja-aineiston ja sitä täydentävän haastatteluaineiston pohjalta, että EUministerivaliokunnan asialistan laadinta on delegoitu kokonaisuudessaan asiantuntijavirkamiehille. Lisäksi asialistan muotoutumiseen vaikuttaa luonnollisesti unionin toimielinten, erityisesti Eurooppa-neuvoston agenda. Toisaalta, EU-ministerivaliokunnan kokouksissa ministerit yksin tekevät päätöksiä ja linjaavat Suomen EU-politiikkaa. Viidennessä artikkelissa selvitetään, miten olisi toimittava, jos pyritään siihen, että uusi tai muutettu EU-säädös vastaisi mahdollisimman pitkälti Suomen kansallisesti määriteltyä neuvottelukantaa. Tehokkainta on vaikuttaa aloiteoikeutta lainsäädäntömenettelyssä käyttävään komissioon, tarvittaessa myös virkahierarkian ylimmillä tasoilla, sekä tehdä yhteistyötä muiden jäsenvaltioiden kanssa, erityisesti puheenjohtajavaltion, tulevien puheenjohtajavaltioiden ja suurten jäsenvaltioiden kanssa. Mikäli käsittelyssä oleva EU-säädöshanke arvioidaan kansallisesti erityisen tärkeiksi tai ongelmalliseksi, tulisi vaikuttamistoimia laajentaa kattamaan myös Euroopan parlamentin avainhenkilöitä. Kuudennessa artikkelissa analysoidaan suomalaisen kansalaisyhteiskunnan ja etujärjestöjen vaikutusmahdollisuuksia EU-asioiden valmistelussa. Johtopäätöksenä todetaan, että muodollinen yhteensovittaminen EU-valmistelujaostojen laajan kokoonpanon kokouksissa ei ole sidosryhmille ensisijainen eikä tehokkain vaikuttamisen keino. Sen sijaan korostuvat epäviralliset yhteydet toimivaltaisen ministeriön vastuuvirkamieheen kotimaassa ja vaikuttaminen eurooppalaisen kattojärjestön välityksellä. Väitöskirjan yhteenveto-osassa on eritelty, missä EU:n säädösvalmistelun ja lainsäätämismenettelyn vaiheissa Suomen kaltaisella pienellä jäsenvaltiolla on parhaat edellytykset vaikuttaa valmisteltavana olevaan säädökseen. Parhaat vaikutusmahdollisuudet ovat aivan EU-säädöksen elinkaaren alkuvaiheessa, kun komissio on vasta käynnistämässä uutta säädösvalmistelua. Väitöstutkimuksessa todetaan, että varhaista kannanmuodostusta ja sen mahdollistamaa ennakkovaikuttamista on Suomessa kyetty kehittämään etenkin niissä poliittisesti, taloudellisesti tai oikeudellisesti tärkeissä hankkeissa, joissa hallituksen kannanmuodostus tapahtuu EU-ministerivaliokunnassa. Muissa unionin säädöshankkeissa ennakollisen vaikuttamisen intensiteetti näyttäisi vaihtelevan, riippuen muun muassa toimivaltaisen ministeriön keskijohdon ja ylimmän johdon sitoutumisesta. Toinen Suomelle otollinen vaikuttamisen ajankohta on silloin, kun komission antamaa ehdotusta käsitellään asiantuntijavirkamiesten kesken neuvoston työryhmässä. Tehokas vaikuttaminen edellyttää, että Suomea neuvotteluissa edustavat henkilöt kokoavat ”samanmielisistä” jäsenvaltioista kaksoisenemmistösäännön mukaisen voittavan koalition. Viimeinen vaikuttamisen ikkuna aukeaa silloin, kun Coreper-komiteassa laaditaan neuvoston puheenjohtajalle neuvottelumandaattia toimielinten välisiin trilogeihin tavallisen lainsäätämisjärjestyksen ensimmäisessä käsittelyssä. Tässä varsin myöhäisessä menettelyvaiheessa vaikuttaminen on pienen jäsenvaltion näkökulmasta jo selvästi vaikeampaa. Väitöskirja sijoittuu luontevasti osaksi valtiotieteellistä eurooppalaistumis-kirjallisuutta siltä osin, kuin siinä on tutkittu EU-jäsenyyden vaikutuksia kotimaisiin hallinnon rakenteisiin ja politiikan asialistaan. Kuten tunnettua, Suomen EU-politiikka rakentuu eduskunnalle vastuullisen valtioneuvoston varaan. Väitöskirjassa ei kuitenkaan ole otettu erityiseen tarkasteluun perustuslakiin sidottua eduskunnan ja hallituksen yhteistoimintaa EU-asioissa. Sen sijaan on tutkittu unioniasioiden valmistelua ja yhteensovittamista valtioneuvoston sisällä. Kun EU-asioiden yhteensovittamisjärjestelmää luotiin, pidettiin tärkeänä, että jokaisessa säädöshankkeessa ja politiikkahankkeessa kyetään muodostamaan kansallisesti yksi ja yhtenäinen neuvottelupositio. Yhtenäisen kansallisen linjan ajamisen katsottiin parantavan Suomen asemaa unionin päätöksenteossa. Väitöskirjassa todetaan johtopäätöksenä, että EU-asioiden kansallinen valmistelujärjestelmä toteuttaa sille asetetut tavoitteet käytännössä varsin hyvin. Merkittävin kehittämiskohde liittyy kansallisen EU-valmistelun reaktiivisuuteen. Jos Suomi haluaa vaikuttaa yhä vahvemmin EU-lainsäätämiseen, Suomelle tärkeät hankkeet pitäisi tunnistaa jo varhaisessa vaiheessa ja priorisoida selkeästi niiden hoitamista ministeriöissä.
Resumo:
Group B rotaviruses (RV-B) were first identified in piglet feces, being later associated with diarrhea in humans, cattle, lambs, and rats. In human beings, the virus was only described in China, India, and Bangladesh, especially infecting adults. Only a few studies concerning molecular analysis of the RV-B NSP2 gene have been conducted, and porcine RV-B has not been characterized. In the present study, three porcine wild-type RV-B strains from piglet stool samples collected from Brazilian pig herds were used for analysis. PAGE results were inconclusive for those samples, but specific amplicons of the RV-B NSP2 gene (segment 8) were obtained in a semi-nested PCR assay. The three porcine RV-B strains showed the highest nucleotide identity with the human WH1 strain and the alignments with other published sequences resulted in three groups of strains divided according to host species. The group of human strains showed 92.4 to 99.7% nucleotide identity while the porcine strains of the Brazilian RV-B group showed 90.4 to 91.8% identity to each other. The identity of the Brazilian porcine RV-B strains with outer sequences consisting of group A and C rotaviruses was only 35.3 to 38.8%. A dendrogram was also constructed to group the strains into clusters according to host species: human, rat, and a distinct third cluster consisting exclusively of the Brazilian porcine RV-B strains. This is the first study of the porcine RV-B NSP2 gene that contributes to the partial characterization of this virus and demonstrates the relationship among RV-B strains from different host species.
Resumo:
To investigate signal regulation models of gastric cancer, databases and literature were used to construct the signaling network in humans. Topological characteristics of the network were analyzed by CytoScape. After marking gastric cancer-related genes extracted from the CancerResource, GeneRIF, and COSMIC databases, the FANMOD software was used for the mining of gastric cancer-related motifs in a network with three vertices. The significant motif difference method was adopted to identify significantly different motifs in the normal and cancer states. Finally, we conducted a series of analyses of the significantly different motifs, including gene ontology, function annotation of genes, and model classification. A human signaling network was constructed, with 1643 nodes and 5089 regulating interactions. The network was configured to have the characteristics of other biological networks. There were 57,942 motifs marked with gastric cancer-related genes out of a total of 69,492 motifs, and 264 motifs were selected as significantly different motifs by calculating the significant motif difference (SMD) scores. Genes in significantly different motifs were mainly enriched in functions associated with cancer genesis, such as regulation of cell death, amino acid phosphorylation of proteins, and intracellular signaling cascades. The top five significantly different motifs were mainly cascade and positive feedback types. Almost all genes in the five motifs were cancer related, including EPOR,MAPK14, BCL2L1, KRT18,PTPN6, CASP3, TGFBR2,AR, and CASP7. The development of cancer might be curbed by inhibiting signal transductions upstream and downstream of the selected motifs.
Resumo:
We aimed to investigate miRNAs and related mRNAs through a network-based approach in order to learn the crucial role that they play in the biological processes of esophageal cancer. Esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma (EAC)-related miRNA and gene expression data were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and differentially expressed miRNAs and genes were selected. Target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs were predicted and their regulatory networks were constructed. Differentially expressed miRNA analysis selected four miRNAs associated with EAC and ESCC, among which hsa-miR-21 and hsa-miR-202 were shared by both diseases. hsa-miR-202 was reported for the first time to be associated with esophageal cancer in the present study. Differentially expressed miRNA target genes were mainly involved in cancer-related and signal-transduction pathways. Functional categories of these target genes were related to transcriptional regulation. The results may indicate potential target miRNAs and genes for future investigations of esophageal cancer.
Resumo:
In this study, biomarkers and transcriptional factor motifs were identified in order to investigate the etiology and phenotypic severity of Down syndrome. GSE 1281, GSE 1611, and GSE 5390 were downloaded from the gene expression ominibus (GEO). A robust multiarray analysis (RMA) algorithm was applied to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs). In order to screen for biological pathways and to interrogate the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database, the database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery (DAVID) was used to carry out a gene ontology (GO) function enrichment for DEGs. Finally, a transcriptional regulatory network was constructed, and a hypergeometric distribution test was applied to select for significantly enriched transcriptional factor motifs. CBR1, DYRK1A, HMGN1, ITSN1, RCAN1, SON, TMEM50B, and TTC3 were each up-regulated two-fold in Down syndrome samples compared to normal samples; of these, SON and TTC3 were newly reported. CBR1, DYRK1A, HMGN1, ITSN1, RCAN1, SON, TMEM50B, and TTC3 were located on human chromosome 21 (mouse chromosome 16). The DEGs were significantly enriched in macromolecular complex subunit organization and focal adhesion pathways. Eleven significantly enriched transcription factor motifs (PAX5, EGR1, XBP1, SREBP1, OLF1, MZF1, NFY, NFKAPPAB, MYCMAX, NFE2, and RP58) were identified. The DEGs and transcription factor motifs identified in our study provide biomarkers for the understanding of Down syndrome pathogenesis and progression.
Resumo:
Bovine herpesviruses 1 (BoHV-1) and 5 (BoHV-5) share high genetic and antigenic similarities, but exhibit marked differences in tissue tropism and neurovirulence. The amino-terminal region of glycoprotein C (gC), which is markedly different in each of the viruses, is involved in virus binding to cellular receptors and in interactions with the immune system. This study investigated the genetic and antigenic differences of the 5′ region of the gC (5′ gC) gene (amino-terminal) of South American BoHV-1 (n=19) and BoHV-5 (n=25) isolates. Sequence alignments of 374 nucleotides (104 amino acids) revealed mean similarity levels of 97.3 and 94.2% among BoHV-1 gC (gC1), respectively, 96.8 and 95.6% among BoHV-5 gC (gC5), and 62 and 53.3% between gC1 and gC5. Differences included the absence of 40 amino acid residues (27 encompassing predicted linear epitopes) scattered throughout 5′ gC1 compared to 5′ gC5. Virus neutralizing assays testing BoHV-1 and BoHV-5 antisera against each isolate revealed a high degree of cross-neutralization between the viruses, yet some isolates were neutralized at very low titers by heterologous sera, and a few BoHV-5 isolates reacted weakly with either sera. The virus neutralization differences observed within the same viral species, and more pronounced between BoHV-1 and BoHV-5, likely reflect sequence differences in neutralizing epitopes. These results demonstrate that the 5′ gC region is well conserved within each viral species but is divergent between BoHV-1 and BoHV-5, likely contributing to their biological and antigenic differences.
Resumo:
Negotiating trade agreements is an important part of government trade policies, economic planning and part of the globally operating trading system of today. European Union and the United States have been active in the formation of trade agreements in global comparison. Now these two economic giants are engaged in negotiations to form their own trade agreement, the so called Transnational Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). The purpose of this thesis is to understand the reasons for making a trade agreement between two economic areas and understanding the issues it may include in the case of the TTIP. The TTIP has received a great deal of attention in the media. The opinions towards the partnership have been extreme, and the debate has been heated. The purpose of this study is to introduce the nature of the public discussion regarding the TTIP from Spring 2013 until 2014. The research problem is to find out what are the main issues in the agreement and what are the values influencing them. The study was conducted applying methods of critical discourse analysis to the chosen data. This includes gathering the issues from the data based on the attention each has received in the discussion. The underlying motives for raising different issues were analysed by investigating the authors’ position in the political, economic and social circuits. The perceived economic impacts of the TTIP are also under analysis with the same criteria. Some of the most respected economic newspapers globally were included in the research material as well as papers or reports published by the EU and global organisations. The analysis indicates a clear dichotomy of the attitudes towards the TTIP. Key problems include lack of transparency in the negotiations, the misunderstood investor-state dispute settlement, the constantly expanding regulatory issues and the risk of protectionism. The theory and data does suggest that the removal of tariffs is an effective tool for reaching economic gains in the TTIP and even more effective would be the reducing of non-tariff barriers, such as protectionism. Critics are worried over the rising influence of corporations over governments. The discourse analysis reveals that the supporters of the TTIP have values related to increasing welfare through economic growth. Critics do not deny the economic benefits but raise the question of inequality as a consequence. Overall they represent softer values such as sustainable development and democracy as a counter-attack to the corporate values of efficiency and the maximising of profits.
Resumo:
This thesis investigates the matter of race in the context of Finnish language acquisition among adult migrants in Finland. Here matter denotes both the materiality of race and how race comes to matter. Drawing primarily on an auto/ethno/graphic account of learning the Finnish language as a participant in the Finnish for foreigners classes, this thesis problematises the ontology and epistemology of race, i.e., what race is, how it is known, and what an engagement with race entails. Taking cues from the bodily practices of learning the Finnish trill or the rolling r, this study proposes a notion of “trilling race” and argues for an onto-epistemological dis/continuity that marks race’s arrival. The notion of dis/continuity reworks the distinction between continuity and discontinuity, and asks about the how of the arrival of any identity, the where, and the when. In so doing, an analysis of “trilling race” engages with one of the major problematics that has exercised much critical attention, namely: how to read race differently. That is, to rethink the conundrum of the need to counter “representational weight” (Puar 2007, 191) of race on the one hand, and to account for the racialised lived realities on the other. The link between a study of the phenomenon of host country language acquisition and an examination of the question of race is not as obvious as it might seem. For example, what does the argument that the process of language learning is racialised actually imply? Does it mean that race, as a process of racialisation or an ongoing configuration of sets of power relations, exerts force from an outside on the otherwise neutral process of learning the host country language? Or does it mean that race, as an identity category, presents as among the analytical perspectives, along with gender and class for instance, of the phenomenon of host country language acquisition? With these questions in mind, and to foreground the examination of the question of race in the context of Finnish language acquisition among adult migrants, this thesis opens with a discussion of the art installation Finnexia by Lisa Erdman. Finnexia is a fictitious drug said to facilitate Finnish language learning through accelerating the cognitive learning process and reducing the anxiety of speaking the Finnish language. Not only does the Finnexia installation make visible the ways in which the lack of skill in Finnish is fgured as the threshold – a border that separates the inside from the outside – to integration, but also, and importantly, it raises questions about the nature of difference, and the process of differentiation that separates the individual from the social, fact from fiction, nature from culture. These puzzles animate much of the analysis in this dissertation. These concerns continue to be addressed in the rest of part one. Whereas chapter two offers a reconsideration of the ambiguities of ethnisme/ethnicity and race, chapter three dilates on the methodological implications of a conception of the dis/continuity of race. Part two focuses on the matter of race and examines the political economy of visual-aural encounters, whereas part three shifts the focus and rethinks the possibilities and limitations of transforming racialised and normative constraints. Taking up these particular problematics, this thesis as a whole argues that race trills itself: its identity/difference is simultaneously made possible and impossible.
Resumo:
This dissertation centres on the themes of knowledge creation, interdisciplinarity and knowledge work. My research approaches interdisciplinary knowledge creation (IKC) as practical situated activity. I argue that by approaching IKC from the practice-based perspective makes it possible to “deconstruct” how knowledge creation actually happens, and demystify its strong intellectual, mentalistic and expertise-based connotations. I have rendered the work of the observed knowledge workers into something ordinary, accessible and routinized. Consequently this has made it possible to grasp the pragmatic challenges as well the concrete drivers of such activity. Thus the effective way of organizing such activities becomes a question of organizing and leading effective everyday practices. To achieve that end, I have conducted ethnographic research of one explicitly interdisciplinary space within higher education, Aalto Design Factory in Helsinki, Finland, where I observed how students from different disciplines collaborated in new product development projects. I argue that IKC is a multi-dimensional construct that intertwines a particular way of doing; a way of experiencing; a way of embodied being; and a way of reflecting on the very doing itself. This places emphasis not only the practices themselves, but also on the way the individual experiences the practices, as this directly affects how the individual practices. My findings suggest that in order to effectively organize and execute knowledge creation activities organizations need to better accept and manage the emergent diversity and complexity inherent in such activities. In order to accomplish this, I highlight the importance of understanding and using a variety of (material) objects, the centrality of mundane everyday practices, the acceptance of contradictions and negotiations well as the role of management that is involved and engaged. To succeed in interdisciplinary knowledge creation is to lead not only by example, but also by being very much present in the very everyday practices that make it happen.
Resumo:
Video games industry has recently bonded California and Finland in a new way and where the employers are recruiting they also need to be aware of the provisions and procedures related to terminations. In general, collective dismissals are on a relatively high level both in Finland and in California. In California, collective redundancies are regulated under the WARN law. The WARN obligates employers with 75 or more employees to give a 60-day notice prior to a mass lay off and some other similar events. Employers with less than 75 employees are free to administer the terminations without the WARN notice period. Generally, the California at-will presumption allows employment relationship to be terminated any day with or without reason and without notice period if conditions of collective agreements or employment contract do not limit this right. Termination cannot anyhow be in violation of the anti-discrimination law. In Finland the termination related provisions are part of the Employment Contracts Act and the Act on Co-operation within Undertakings. Collective redundancies are allowed under financial and production related grounds. Small employers with less than 20 employees follow the termination provisions of the Employment Contracts Act and are obligated to inform the employee to be terminated on the details of the termination itself and also the services of the Employment and Economic Development Office. Employers with 20 or more employees are to initiate co-operation procedure under the Act on Co-operation within Undertakings when reducing personnel. The co- operation negotiations are to inform employees on the employer’s plans and financial situation as well as to involve them in the decision making regarding the terminations. The employer’s duty to inform the employees of the services of Employment and Economic Development Office needs to be fulfilled also in terminations under the co-operation procedure. Discrimination is prohibited in Finland in terminations of employment. As an alternative for terminations, employees can for example be transferred to another position or be temporarily laid off. Employer’s duties related to search of alternatives for layoff are broader in Finland than in California. The recent development of the labor laws in Finland and in California suggests that the labor law is not static in either one of these environments but changes can be expected as the needs of the business life so require.