Le Droit des peuples : organe d'action socialiste nationale et internationale et de défense des réfugiés alsaciens, lorrains, belges, français

1918/02/01 (A1,N3)-1918/02/07.

Le Droit des peuples : organe d'action socialiste nationale et internationale et de défense des réfugiés alsaciens, lorrains, belges, français

1918/05/10 (A1,N17)-1918/05/16.

Le Droit des peuples : organe d'action socialiste nationale et internationale et de défense des réfugiés alsaciens, lorrains, belges, français

1918/06/14 (A1,N22)-1918/06/20.

Le Droit des peuples : organe d'action socialiste nationale et internationale et de défense des réfugiés alsaciens, lorrains, belges, français

1918/01/25 (A1,N2)-1918/01/31.

Le Droit des peuples : organe d'action socialiste nationale et internationale et de défense des réfugiés alsaciens, lorrains, belges, français

1918/10/12 (A1,N40)-1918/10/18.

Le Droit des peuples : organe d'action socialiste nationale et internationale et de défense des réfugiés alsaciens, lorrains, belges, français

1918/05/17 (A1,N18)-1918/05/23.

Le Droit des peuples : organe d'action socialiste nationale et internationale et de défense des réfugiés alsaciens, lorrains, belges, français

1918/09/27 (A1,FASC37)-1918/10/03.

Understanding Neolithic Southern Levant: case studies of archaeological semiosis in action

I undersökningen tillämpas Charles Sanders Peirces semiotik för en kritisk granskning av arkeologiska tolkningsprocesser. Enligt Peirce bygger all betydelsegivning på tecken, som kan vara teckningar, föremål, ord, byggkonstruktioner eller egentligen vad som helst. Ett tecken är tredimensionellt: ”objekt”, ”tecken” och ”tolkning”. I sina tidiga skrifter definierar han tre grundtyper för tecknet, Index, Icon och Symbol. De grundläggande definitionerna i Peirces semiotik blir till ett slags lins. När den placeras på skrifter av en arkeolog som uttolkar tecken, framträder deras inre uppbyggnad, motiveringar och logiska konsekvens klart. Att beakta är, att denna bok är lika lite avsedd att utgöra en systematisk klarläggning av den arkeologiska semiotiken, som en omfattande beskrivning av symboliken i det neolitiska Mellanöstern. Analysen är deskriptiv och inte avsedd att utvärdera tolkningarnas riktighet, utan enbart att klarlägga hur arkeologen kommit fram till dessa. Som objekt har valts neolitiska södra Levanten, där viktiga fynd gällande denna i mänsklighetens kulturhistoria så betydelsefulla skede har gjorts. Förhistorien är intressant med tanke på arkeologisk semiosis, eftersom uttolkaren av en symbol inte kan stöda sig på textfynd, utan måste på annat sätt upptäcka vad ett föremål eller en byggnad betytt för sin upphovsman. Att upptäcka en trovärdig betydelse är ofta en mycket svår och understundom rentav omöjlig uppgift. Efter att förhållandet mellan semiotik och arkeologi dryftats analyseras i boken John Garstangs och Kathleen M. Kenyons grundläggande tolkningar i Jeriko, Denise-Schmandt Besserats jämförande analyser för uttolkningen av \'Ain Ghazalis kranium, Michele A. Millers kontextuella analys i Jarmuk samt David Lewis-Williams’ starkt strukturalistiska analys av betydelsen av fynden i \'Ain Ghazal. Peirces semiotik har använts som stöd för arkeologin i mycket mindre utsträckning än F. de Saussures lingvistiska ja strukturalistiska semiotik. I Mellanöstern har man hittills inte alls gjort det. Ingen av de forskare som behandlas i boken hänvisar själv till semiotik eller tecken. Logiken i uttolkningen av dessa undersökningar är mycket invecklad, och de av Peirce gestaltade processerna för betydelsegivning visar sig härvidlag utgöra en ytterst klargörande kritisk apparat.

[Pas d'action -kohtaus baletista Prinsessa Ruusunen]

Soitinnus: orkesteri.

Enhancing absorptive capacity in a non-research and development. An action research approach to converting individual observations into organisational awareness

The ability to recognize potential knowledge and convert it into business opportunities is one of the key factors of renewal in uncertain environments. This thesis examines absorptive capacity in the context of non-research and development innovation, with a primary focus on the social interaction that facilitates the absorption of knowledge. It proposes that everyone is and should be entitled to take part in the social interaction that shapes individual observations into innovations. Both innovation and absorptive capacity have been traditionally related to research and development departments and institutions. These innovations need to be adopted and adapted by others. This so-called waterfall model of innovations is only one aspect of new knowledge generation and innovation. In addition to this Science–Technology–Innovation perspective, more attention has been recently paid to the Doing–Using–Interacting mode of generating new knowledge and innovations. The amount of literature on absorptive capacity is vast, yet the concept is reified. The greater part of the literature links absorptive capacity to research and development departments. Some publications have focused on the nature of absorptive capacity in practice and the role of social interaction in enhancing it. Recent literature on absorptive capacity calls for studies that shed light on the relationship between individual absorptive capacity and organisational absorptive capacity. There has also been a call to examine absorptive capacity in non-research and development environments. Drawing on the literature on employee-driven innovation and social capital, this thesis looks at how individual observations and ideas are converted into something that an organisation can use. The critical phases of absorptive capacity, during which the ideas of individuals are incorporated into a group context, are assimilation and transformation. These two phases are seen as complementary: whereas assimilation is the application of easy-to-accept knowledge, transformation challenges the current way of thinking. The two require distinct kinds of social interaction and practices. The results of this study can been crystallised thus: “Enhancing absorptive capacity in practicebased non-research and development context is to organise the optimal circumstances for social interaction. Every individual is a potential source of signals leading to innovations. The individual, thus, recognises opportunities and acquires signals. Through the social interaction processes of assimilation and transformation, these signals are processed into the organisation’s reality and language. The conditions of creative social capital facilitate the interplay between assimilation and transformation. An organisation that strives for employee-driven innovation gains the benefits of a broader surface for opportunity recognition and faster absorption.” If organisations and managers become more aware of the benefits of enhancing absorptive capacity in practice, they have reason to assign resources to those practices that facilitate the creation of absorptive capacity. By recognising the underlying social mechanisms and structural features that lead either to assimilation or transformation, it is easier to balance between renewal and effective operations.

Effect of age of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid on its allelopathic action

Hybrids of Sorghum sudanensis (sudangrass) and Sorghum bicolor genotypes can produce high amounts of biomass, sorgoleone (a long chain hydroquinone), and other phytotoxic substances. Shoots and roots of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (cv. Trudan 8) were collected 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 days after emergence. Four concentrations of aqueous extracts from the shoots and roots (0, 0.4, 2, and 10 g L-1, w/v) were used to treat seeds of lettuce (Lactuca sativa), tomato (Lycopersicum sculentum), purslane (Portulaca oleracea), and pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Seed germination of lettuce, tomato, and pigweed was inhibited by extracts from sorghum-sudangrass shoots at 10 g L-1 when made from sorghum-sudangrass plants 20 days or less in age. Seed germination of purslane was not inhibited by any sorghum-sudangrass extract. Growth of the four species evaluated were systematically inhibited when treated with 10 g L-1 extracts from sorghum-sudangrass shoots harvested up to 10 days after emergence.