Wonderalp. Une science émerveillée. Les Alpes et la culture de la curiosité

WonderAlp est un cabinet de curiosités réalisé à partir d'une documentation provenant d'anciens ouvrages de voyages dans les Alpes. L'app présente des images de dragons, de fossiles, de cristaux, de plantes, d'animaux, de phénomènes naturels. Elle donne des clés pour retrouver et comprendre l'émerveillement devant la nature qui animait la science à l'époque de la curiosité (XVIe-XVIIIe siècles). WonderAlp is a cabinet of curiosities that transforms your iPad or Android into an Early Modern Wunderkammer. It displays objects discovered in the Alps during the early period of exploration. These are grouped under three titles : "Dragons of the Alps", "Fossils and Crystals", "Plants to Landscapes". It helps apprehend a natural world that is both rational and wonderful, scholarly and popular, unlike the compartmentalized thinking of modern life.

The local configuration of a science and innovation policy : a city into the nanoworld

Local trajectories and arrangements play a significant role because the development of a research field, such as nanoscience and nanotechnology, requires substantial investments in human and instrumental resources. But why are there often concentrated in a limited number of places? What dynamics lead to such concentration? The hypothesis is that there is an assemblage of heterogeneous resources through the action of local actors. The chapter will explore, from an Actor Network Theory (ANT) perspective, how the local emergence of research dynamics from: the revival of local traditions, the local and national action of institutional entrepreneurs, controversial dynamics, and researchers' arrangements to involve other actors. It will examine how they connect up with each other and mutually commit themselves to the development of new technologies. It will focus on the role of narratives in this assembling: how were the local narratives of the past mobilized and to what effect.

Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: should we abandon p-value in forensic science applications?

Many people regard the concept of hypothesis testing as fundamental to inferential statistics. Various schools of thought, in particular frequentist and Bayesian, have promoted radically different solutions for taking a decision about the plausibility of competing hypotheses. Comprehensive philosophical comparisons about their advantages and drawbacks are widely available and continue to span over large debates in the literature. More recently, controversial discussion was initiated by an editorial decision of a scientific journal [1] to refuse any paper submitted for publication containing null hypothesis testing procedures. Since the large majority of papers published in forensic journals propose the evaluation of statistical evidence based on the so called p-values, it is of interest to expose the discussion of this journal's decision within the forensic science community. This paper aims to provide forensic science researchers with a primer on the main concepts and their implications for making informed methodological choices.

Regional Science trends through the analysis of the main facts of the 51st ERSA Conference

The 51st ERSA Conference held in Barcelona in 2011 was one of the largest ever. By examining the characteristics of the conference, this paper identifies the main trends in Regional Science and draws on a broad array of sources of information: the delegates" demographic details, the conference program itself, a satisfaction survey conducted among delegates, a quality survey addressed to those chairing the sessions and, finally, a bibliometric database including each author signing a paper presented at the conference. We finally run a regression analysis from which we show that for ERSA delegates what matters most is quality, and this must be the direction that future conferences should move toward. Ultimately, ERSA conferences are comprehensive, all-embracing occasions, representing an ideal opportunity for regional scientists to present their work to each other and to network.

"A Hard Battle to Fight": Natural Theology and the Dismal Science, 1820-1850

William Whewell's and Richard Jones's criticism of Jeremy Bentham's and David Ricardo's "dismal" views on the relation of theory and evidence in political economy was motivated by the former's views on the structuring role of natural theology for questions of method and evidence in the sciences, including political economy. In comparison, natural theology was for Richard Whately as structuring on these issues as it was for the Cambridge men. Whately's view on natural theology, however, conformed with the Ricardian predilection for theory over facts. The differences between the Cambridge men and Whately became manifest after (or better: during) the publication of Jones's book on rent in 1831 and led to a somewhat acerbic exchange of views on the role of definitions in science and the use of history for establishing scientific evidence. As far as political economy was concerned, Whately's stance carried the day in Victorian England.

PROM-OPEN: PROMOTING OPEN SCIENCE IN AN ON-LINE E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Peer-reviewed

Statistics in Public Understanding of Science review: How to achieve high statistical standards?

This article proposes a checklist to improve statistical reporting in the manuscripts submitted to Public Understanding of Science. Generally, these guidelines will allow the reviewers (and readers) to judge whether the evidence provided in the manuscript is relevant. The article ends with other suggestions for a better statistical quality of the journal.

El proyecto Science of the city. Territorio de encuentro entre arte, ciencia y ciudad

El objetivo de este artículo es presentar la experiencia colaborativa entre el proyecto Science of the city y el grupo de investigación"Metamétodo. Metodologías compartidas y procesos artísticos en la sociedad del conocimiento" de la Facultad de Bellas Artes de la UB y La Mandarina de Newton, empresa emergente en el ámbito de la divulgación científica, interesada en nuevas estrategias y formas de pensar la ciencia que reviertan en la transmisión del conocimiento. Las cuestiones ¿Qué es ciencia? y ¿Qué es ciudad? o ¿Dónde encontramos la ciencia en la ciudad? fueron el punto de partida del proyecto Science of the city, ideado por La Mandarina de Newton. Los organizadores lanzaron una convocatoria a través de la red, en formato de concurso internacional de vídeos que debían tratar estas cuestiones. El propósito era acercar la ciencia a las experiencias cotidianas de los habitantes de la ciudad y a su vez, obtener una respuesta en formato de vídeo que nos sirviera como punto de partida para los artistas integrantes de nuestro grupo de investigación para elaborar nuestras propias obras. Los vídeos ganadores y las obras resultantes de esta experiencia conformaron la exposición Science of the City, proyecto financiado por el FECYT. La exposición pudo verse en el espacio Arts Santa Mònica de Barcelona en mayo del pasado 2012. Los procesos de trabajo y las reflexiones quedaron recopilados en una publicación multilingüe.