How novices design business processes

Process modeling is an important design practice in organizational improvement projects. In this paper, we examine the design of business process diagrams in contexts where novice analysts only have basic design tools such as paper and pencils available, and little to no understanding of formalized modeling approaches. Based on a quasi-experimental study with 89 BPM students, we identify five distinct process design archetypes ranging from textual to hybrid and graphical representation forms. We examine the quality of the designs and identify which representation formats enable an analyst to articulate business rules, states, events, activities, temporal and geospatial information in a process model. We found that the quality of the process designs decreases with the increased use of graphics and that hybrid designs featuring appropriate text labels and abstract graphical forms appear well-suited to describe business processes. We further examine how process design preferences predict formalized process modeling ability. Our research has implications for practical process design work in industry as well as for academic curricula on process design.

Engaging bodily with video in design

Video is commonly used as a method for recording embodied interaction for purposes of analysis and design and has been proposed as a useful ‘material’ for interaction designers to engage with. But video is not a straight forward reproduction of embodied activity – in themselves video recordings ‘flatten’ the space of embodied interaction, they impose a perspective on unfolding action, and remove the embodied spatial and social context within which embodied interaction unfolds. This does not mean that video is not a useful medium with which to engage as part of a process of investigating and designing for embodied interaction – but crucially, it requires that as people attempting to engage with video, designers own bodies and bodily understandings must be engaged with and brought into play. This paper describes and reflects upon our experiences of engaging with video in two different activities as part of a larger research project investigating the design of gestural interfaces for a dental surgery context.