Structure-Function Studies of GDNF Family Ligand-RET signalling

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and its family members neurturin (NRTN), artemin (ARTN) and persephin (PSPN) are growth factors, which are involved in the development, differentiation and maintenance of many neuron types. In addition, they function outside of the nervous system, e.g. in the development of kidney, testis and liver. GDNF family ligand (GFL) signalling happens through a tetrameric receptor complex, which includes two glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored GDNF family receptor (GFRα) molecules and two RET (rearranged during transfection) receptor tyrosine kinases. Each of the ligands binds preferentially one of the four GFRα receptors: GDNF binds to GFRα1, NRTN to GFRα2, ARTN to GFRα3 and PSPN to GFRα4. The signal is then delivered by RET, which cannot bind the GFLs on its own, but can bind the GFL-GFRα complex. Under normal cellular conditions, RET is only phosphorylated on the cell surface after ligand binding. At least the GDNF-GFRα1 complex is believed to recruit RET to lipid rafts, where downstream signalling occurs. In general, GFRαs consist of three cysteine-rich domains, but all GFRα4s except for chicken GFRα4 lack domain 1 (D1). We characterised the biochemical and cell biological properties of mouse PSPN receptor GFRα4 and showed that it has a significantly weaker capacity than GFRα1 to recruit RET to the lipid rafts. In spite of that, it can phosphorylate RET in the presence of PSPN and contribute to neuronal differentiation and survival. Therefore, the recruitment of RET to the lipid rafts does not seem to be crucial for the biological activity of all GFRα receptors. Secondly, we demonstrated that GFRα1 D1 stabilises the GDNF-GFRα1 complex and thus affects the phosphorylation of RET and contributes to the biological activity. This may be important in physiological conditions, where the concentration of the ligand or the soluble GFRα1 receptor is low. Our results also suggest a role for D1 in heparin binding and, consequently, in the biodistribution of released GFRα1 or in the formation of the GFL-GFRα-RET complex. We also presented the crystallographic structure of GDNF in the complex with GFRα1 domains 2 and 3. The structure differs from the previously published ARTN-GFRα3 structure in three significant ways. The biochemical data verify the structure and reveal residues participating in the interactions between GFRα1 and GDNF, and preliminarily also between GFRα1 and RET and heparin. Finally, we showed that, the precursor of the oncogenic MEN 2B (multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2) form of RET gets phosphorylated already during its synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We also demonstrated that it associates with Src homology 2 domain-containing protein (SHC) and growth factor receptor-bound protein (GRB2) in the ER, and has the capacity to activate several downstream signalling molecules.

Classification of Nonenzymatic Homologues of Protein Kinases

Protein Kinase-Like Non-kinases (PKLNKs), which are closely related to protein kinases, lack the crucial catalytic aspartate in the catalytic loop, and hence cannot function as protein kinase, have been analysed. Using various sensitive sequence analysis methods, we have recognized 82 PKLNKs from four higher eukaryotic organisms, namely, Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Drosophila melanogaster. On the basis of their domain combination and function, PKLNKs have been classified mainly into four categories: (1) Ligand binding PKLNKs, (2) PKLNKs with extracellular protein-protein interaction domain, (3) PKLNKs involved in dimerization, and (4) PKLNKs with cytoplasmic protein-protein interaction module. While members of the first two classes of PKLNKs have transmembrane domain tethered to the PKLNK domain, members of the other two classes of PKLNKs are cytoplasmic in nature. The current classification scheme hopes to provide a convenient framework to classify the PKLNKs from other eukaryotes which would be helpful in deciphering their roles in cellular processes.

Understanding Protein Structure from a Percolation Perspective

Underlying the unique structures and diverse functions of proteins area vast range of amino-acid sequences and a highly limited number of folds taken up by the polypeptide backbone. By investigating the role of noncovalent connections at the backbone level and at the detailed side-chain level, we show that these unique structures emerge from interplay between random and selected features. Primarily, the protein structure network formed by these connections shows simple (bond) and higher order (clique) percolation behavior distinctly reminiscent of random network models. However, the clique percolation specific to the side-chain interaction network bears signatures unique to proteins characterized by a larger degree of connectivity than in random networks. These studies reflect some salient features of the manner in which amino acid sequences select the unique structure of proteins from the pool of a limited number of available folds.

Role of cell cycle regulators in development of the inner ear

The inner ear originates from an ectodermal thickening called the otic placode. The otic placode invaginates and closes to an otic vesicle, the otocyst. The otocyst epithelium undergoes morphogenetic changes and cell differentiation, leading to the formation of the labyrinth-like mature inner ear. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions control inner ear morphogenesis, but the modes and molecules are largely unresolved. The expressions of negative cell cycle regulators in the epithelium of the early-developing inner ear have also not been elucidated. The mature inner ear comprises the hearing (cochlea) and balance (vestibular) organs that contain the nonsensory and sensory cells. In mammals, the inner ear sensory cells, called hair cells, exit the cell cycle during embryogenesis and are mitotically quiescent during late-embryonic differentiation stages and postnatally. The mechanisms that maintain this hair cell quiescense are largely unresolved. In this work I examined 1) the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions involved in inner ear morphogenesis, 2) expression of negative cell cycle regulators in the epithelium of the early developing inner ear and 3) the molecular mechanisms that maintain the postmitotic state of inner ear sensory cells. We observed that during otocyst stages, epithelial fibroblast growth factor 9 (Fgf9) communicates with the surrounding mesenchyme, where its receptors are expressed. Fgf9 inactivation leads to reduced proliferation of the surrounding vestibular mesenchyme and to the absence of semicircular canals. Semicircular canal development is blocked, since fusion plates do not form. These results show that the mesenchyme directs fusion plate formation and give direct evidence for the existence of reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the developing inner ear. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) are negative regulators of proliferation. We show that the members of the Cip/Kip family of CKIs (p21Cip1, p27Kip1 and p57Kip2) are expressed in the early-developing inner ear. Our expression data suggest that CKIs divide the otic epithelium into proliferative and nonproliferative compartments that may underlie shaping of the otocyst. At later stages, CKIs regulate proliferation of the vestibular appendages, and this may regulate their continual growth. In addition to restricting proliferation, CKIs may play a role in regional differentiation of various epithelial cells. Differentiating and adult inner ear hair cells are postmitotic and do not proliferate in response to serum or mitogenic growth factors. In our study, we show that this is the result of the activity of negative cell cycle regulators. Based on expression profiles, we first focused on the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene, which functions downstream of the CKIs. Analysis of the inner ear phenotype of Rb mutant mice show, that the retinoblastoma protein regulates the postmitotic state of hair cells. Rb inactivation leads to hyperplasia of vestibular and cochlear sensory epithelia that is a result of abnormal cell cycle entry of differentiated hair cells and of delayed cell cycle exit of the hair cell precursor cells. In addition, we show that p21Cip1 and p19Ink4d cooperate in maintaining the postmitotic state of postnatal auditory hair cells. Whereas inactivation of p19Ink4d alone leads to low-level S-phase entry (Chen et al., 2003) and p21Cip1 null mutant mice have a normal inner ear phenotype, codeletion of p19Ink4d and p21Cip1 triggers high-level S-phase entry of auditory hair cells during early postnatal life, which leads to supernumerary hair cells. The ectopic hair cells undergo apoptosis in all of the mutant mice studied, DNA damage being the immediate cause of this death. These findings demonstrate that the maintenance of the postmitotic state of hair cells is regulated by Rb and several CKIs, and that these cell cycle regulators are critical for the lifelong survival of hair cells. These data have implications for the future design of therapies to induce hair cell regrowth.