985 resultados para Measurement instruments
Resumo:
Resumen basado en el de la publicaci??n
Resumo:
Resumen tomado de la publicaci??n
Resumo:
Em face das transformações impostas pela globalização da economia as organizações necessitam de se adaptar às novas exigências para se tornarem mais competitivas e consequentemente devem procurar um melhor relacionamento com os seus colaboradores, de forma a aumentar os seus níveis de satisfação no trabalho. Neste sentido, o presente estudo tem como objetivo determinar quais as dimensões de justiça organizacional que, num contexto do sistema de recompensas, são identificadas pelos trabalhadores e qual a sua influência na satisfação no trabalho. Para o efeito foi efetuada uma revisão de literatura sobre as temáticas em estudo, que permitiu a elaboração dos instrumentos de medida das diferentes dimensões de justiça organizacional, bem como da satisfação do trabalho. Para esta última temática foi utilizado um instrumento de medida sobejamente testado: o Job Satisfaction Survey de Spector (1985). Deste modo, nesta investigação foi aplicada uma metodologia descritiva quantitativa através de um questionário que integra as duas temáticas anteriormente referidas (justiça organizacional e satisfação no trabalho), que foi aplicado a cento e trinta e nove colaboradores na Sede da Fundação INATEL. Da análise dos coeficientes de regressão múltipla obtidos para as três dimensões de justiça organizacional (distributiva, procedimental e interaccional) verifica-se que a justiça distributiva revelou ser o preditor significativo da satisfação no trabalho. Já no que se refere às dimensões de justiça procedimental e justiça interaccional os resultados obtidos permitem concluir que estas dimensões não têm influência sobre a satisfação no trabalho.
Resumo:
Quality management Self-evaluation of the organisation Citizens/customers satisfaction Impact on society evaluation Key performance evaluation Good practices comparison (Benchmarking) Continuous improvement In professional environments, when quality assessment of museums is discussed, one immediately thinks of the honourableness of the directors and curators, the erudition and specialisation of knowledge, the diversity of the gathered material and study of the collections, the collections conservation methods and environmental control, the regularity and notoriety of the exhibitions and artists, the building’s architecture and site, the recreation of environments, the museographic equipment design. We admit that the roles and attributes listed above can contribute to the definition of a specificity of museological good practice within a hierarchised functional perspective (the museum functions) and for the classification of museums according to a scale, validated between peers, based on “installed” appreciation criteria, enforced from above downwards, according to the “prestige” of the products and of those who conceive them, but that say nothing about the effective satisfaction of the citizen/customers and the real impact on society. There is a lack of evaluation instruments that would give us a return of all that the museum is and represents in contemporary society, focused on being and on the relation with the other, in detriment of the ostentatious possession and of the doing in order to meet one’s duties. But it is only possible to evaluate something by measurement and comparison, on the basis of well defined criteria, from a common grid, implicating all of the actors in the self-evaluation, in the definition of the aims to fulfil and in the obtaining of results.
Resumo:
This paper is a review of a study on distortion product emissions in normal hearing chinchillas.
Resumo:
This paper is a review of a study to determine whether the use of otoscopic examination and middle ear impedance measurement are feasible tools for use by an audiologist during a screening program.
Resumo:
The euro crisis has forced member states and the EU institutions to create a series of new instruments to safeguard macro-financial stability of the Union. This study describes the status of existing instruments, the role of the European Parliament and how the use of the instruments impinges on the EU budget also through their effects on national budgets. In addition, it presents a survey of other possible instruments that have been proposed in recent years (e.g. E-bonds and eurobonds), in order to provide an assessment of how EU macro-financial stability assistance could evolve in the future and what could be its impact on EU public finances.
Resumo:
This CEPS Special Report analyses the proposed expansion of innovative financial instruments in the EU Multiannual Financial Framework for the 2014–20 period. It presents the economic rationale, governance principles and criteria that these instruments should follow and compares these with proposals from the European Commission. Based on this assessment, it makes recommendations for the proposed instruments.