Nuclear weapons as obstacles to international security

This article argues that nuclear weapons serve no useful purpose in military calculations; moreover, their continued retention invites the dangers of further proliferation and of accidental use. They are thus defined here as obstacles to, rather than as facilitators of, international security. Seven reasons are presented to support this contention, including an assessment of the moral implications and the strategic limitations of nuclear weapons. Despite these limitations, and the recent commitments made by the nuclear weapon states to eliminate their arsenals, nuclear weapons remain central to the strategic doctrines of these states. Several reasons are put forward to explain why this retention continues, including the unchanging nature of strategic mindsets, the presence of vested interests, and now, in the case of the USA at least, a renewed reliance on nuclear weapons, regardless of how appropriate and effective such a strategy might be against emerging terrorist or `rogue state' threats.

Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance

In many respects, Australian boards more closely approach normative best practice guidelines for corporate governance than boards in other Western countries. Do Australian firms then demonstrate a board demographic-organisational performance link that has not been found in other economies? We examine the relationships between board demographics and corporate performance in 348 of Australia's largest publicly listed companies and describe the attributes of these firms and their boards. We find that, after controlling for firm size, board size is positively correlated with firm value. We also find a positive relationship between the proportion of inside directors and the market-based measure of firm performance. We discuss the implications of these findings and compare our findings to prevailing research in the US and the UK.

The Utility of the Human Security Agenda for Policy-makers

The idea of “human security” is gaining attention among policy-makers and security analysts. Little scholarly attention has been given to the questions of why states accept (or reject) a human security agenda or how such an agenda is incorporated into policy practices. The article suggests that a human security approach is most likely to be applied when both humanitarian and national interests combine. Yet when states or organisations adopt a human security approach, they often misjudge the complex and long-term commitment required of such an approach. There is also the potential for such an agenda to be manipulated to justify questionable courses of action. These issues frame an analysis of six recent case studies.

Mecanismos societ??rios e contratuais de gest??o das sociedades estatais

As sociedades estatais s??o importantes organiza????es societ??rias, que podem servir ao administrador p??blico para a realiza????o de atividades econ??micas que configurem relevante interesse coletivo ou motivo de seguran??a nacional. Com a finalidade de adequarem-se aos limites de investimento p??blico e com vistas ao cumprimento do princ??pio da efici??ncia, elas podem utilizar-se de mecanismos societ??rios e contratuais de gest??o disponibilizados a empresas, sejam elas estatais ou privadas. Os movimentos societ??rios, os mecanismos de controle e partilha de controle e a ado????o das pr??ticas de governan??a corporativa s??o alternativas jur??dicas disponibilizadas aos administradores das empresas estatais. A an??lise do caso da Companhia Paranaense de Energia El??trica (Copel) ?? realizada no artigo com o prop??sito de auxiliar na visualiza????o da aplica????o de tais institutos.

Fenômeno da governança corporativa : um estudo de caso em uma pequena empresa familiar capixaba

Este estudo tem como objetivo compreender a forma com que os mecanismos de governança corporativa interferem na gestão de uma pequena empresa familiar. Para isso, adotaram-se a perspectiva de Hart (1995), que discorre sobre governança corporativa, e de Leone (2005) para empresas familiares. Para alcançar este objetivo, adotou-se, em relação à condução da pesquisa, uma abordagem qualitativa, por meio do método do estudo de caso. A triangulação de dados foi utilizada como instrumento de coleta de dados por meio de pesquisa documental, observação assistemática e entrevista semiestruturada, e a análise de dados foi realizada através da análise de conteúdo. Como contribuição teórica, este estudo amplia o Modelo de Quatro Círculos com Contexto e Sistema de Valores com a introdução de proprietários formais e informais, gerando o Modelo de Cinco Círculos. A presença da governança corporativa foi identificada através dos fatores de diferenciação e da implantação de onze mecanismos de governança que gerou mudanças no controle da empresa, no processo sucessório, na profissionalização e na captação de recursos. Os mecanismos encontrados foram denominados como: “empresa controladora”; “respeito fraternal”; “projetos pessoais”; “pró-labore dos gestores familiares”; “ausência de remuneração dos familiares não gestores”; “aconselhamento profissional”; “prestação de contas”; “proteção do empreendimento familiar”; “alinhamento de interesses na gestão”; “atribuições e responsabilidades”; e “atenção aos interesses dos stakeholders”. Tais mecanismos não possuem ordem cronológica, pois o respeito fraternal e projetos pessoas já existiam antes da criação da empresa familiar. Quanto ao controle, destaca-se o mecanismo prestação de contas, que possibilitou uma ligação entre a família e a empresa; permitiu clareza, transparência, igualdade entre todos os irmãos, diminuindo a assimetria informacional; facilitou uma comunicação aberta e honesta entre todos os proprietários, transmitindo uma sensação de segurança e previsibilidade; e contribuiu para eliminar e/ou minimizar conflitos entre os proprietários (formais e informais). Quanto à sucessão, os mecanismos proteção do empreendimento familiar, aconselhamento profissional, respeito fraternal estão possibilitando planejar o processo sucessório da empresa; facilitaram a comunicação entre os familiares, e assim, diminuiu a assimetria informacional; e realizaram a manutenção e administração dos bens mobiliários da família empresária. Quanto à profissionalização, os mecanismos proteção do empreendimento familiar e respeito fraternal viabilizaram a participação de todos para decidir sobre a profissionalização da empresa. Com relação à captação de recursos, os mecanismos atribuições e responsabilidades e atenção aos interesses dos stakeholders possibilitaram a empresa, durante todo seu ciclo de vida, a buscar recursos financeiros sem dificuldade, gerando um maior investimento, crescimento e geração de empregos

Turkey's Accession to the European Union in terms of impact on the EU's security and defense policies: potential and drawbacks

This study explores the impact of Turkey's likely entry in the European Union (EU) in terms of the EU's foreign, security and defense policies. It reviews Turkish capabilities, namely its military capabilities, which could provide the EU with valuable defense assets. There are differences related to Turkey's relations with the EU, which have increasingly spilled over into the NATO, hindering the development of cooperation over crisis management operations. The article then delves in the implications of Turkey's strategic geographical location to EU policies. It reviews how far the EU and Turkey may have convergent interests in some of the neighboring regions, especially in the Middle East.

Security issues during Lula's administration: from the reactive to the assertive approach

Brazil's security agenda during Lula's administration was not homogeneous through the two mandates: the first tenure (2002-2006) revealed a reactive approach towards security topics, while the second one (2006-2010) was more assertive. More specifically, the shift occurred in terms of both its geographical scope - once it incorporated global issues in a more systematic way -, and instruments through which the security agenda was exercised, given the multilateral initiative of Unasur's CDS

Terrorism as war by other means: national security and state support for terrorism

The conventional approach in the discipline of International Relations is to treat terrorist organizations as "non-state" actors of international relations. However, this approach is problematic due to the fact that most terrorist organizations are backed or exploited by some states. In this article, I take issue with the non-stateness of terrorist organizations and seek to answer the question of why so many states, at times, support terrorist organizations. I argue that in the face of rising threats to national security in an age of devastating wars, modern nation states tend to provide support to foreign terrorist organizations that work against their present and imminent enemies. I elaborate on my argument studying three cases of state support for terrorism: Iranian support for Hamas, Syrian support for the PKK, and American support for the MEK. The analyses suggest that, for many states, terror is nothing but war by other means.

UN Security Council decision-making: testing the bribery hypothesis

Liberal-Institutionalism and Structural Realism expectations about international organizations are confronted by looking at if and how US-controlled international aid is granted, and particularly if it is related or not to political affinity and to United Nations Security Council (UNSC) non-permanent membership. A preliminary assessment suggests that these relations only hold for the period of the Cold War, and, even then, only when UNSC non-permanent membership is in years in which the Security Council was deemed very important.