Safety impacts of different speed limits on cars and trucks. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations Research and Development, McLean, Va.

The effect of motorcycle travel on the safety and operations of HOV facilities in Virginia. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Summary statistics of the national railroad-highway crossing inventory for public at-grade crossings. Final report.

Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Policy and Program Development, Washington, D.C.

Detector location for computerized arterial street sampling detectors.

Texas Department of Transportation, Austin

The safety impact of the 65 mph speed limit: a case study using Alabama accident records. Final grant report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Cost-effectiveness of countermeasures for utility pole accidents - appendixes A-N. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Estimation of an origin-destination trip table based on observed link volumes and turning movements. Executive summary. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Computer programs for safety analysis: HISAM users manual and operators guide.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Computer programs for safety analysis: HISAFE users manual and operators guide.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and Development, McLean, Va.

Highway fences as vehicle-deer collision deterrents. Final report.

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg

Roadside survey - Utah ASAP. Final report.

Utah Department of Public Safety, Salt Lake City

An analysis of expected delay reduction by replacing a congested at-grade intersection with an interchange.

Texas Department of Transportation, Austin

National functional system mileage and travel summary - from the 1976 National Highway Inventory and Performance Study. Final report.

Mode of access: Internet.

Development of safety performance functions for empirical Bayes estimation of crash reduction factors

Crash reduction factors (CRFs) are used to estimate the potential number of traffic crashes expected to be prevented from investment in safety improvement projects. The method used to develop CRFs in Florida has been based on the commonly used before-and-after approach. This approach suffers from a widely recognized problem known as regression-to-the-mean (RTM). The Empirical Bayes (EB) method has been introduced as a means to addressing the RTM problem. This method requires the information from both the treatment and reference sites in order to predict the expected number of crashes had the safety improvement projects at the treatment sites not been implemented. The information from the reference sites is estimated from a safety performance function (SPF), which is a mathematical relationship that links crashes to traffic exposure. The objective of this dissertation was to develop the SPFs for different functional classes of the Florida State Highway System. Crash data from years 2001 through 2003 along with traffic and geometric data were used in the SPF model development. SPFs for both rural and urban roadway categories were developed. The modeling data used were based on one-mile segments that contain homogeneous traffic and geometric conditions within each segment. Segments involving intersections were excluded. The scatter plots of data show that the relationships between crashes and traffic exposure are nonlinear, that crashes increase with traffic exposure in an increasing rate. Four regression models, namely, Poisson (PRM), Negative Binomial (NBRM), zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP), and zero-inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB), were fitted to the one-mile segment records for individual roadway categories. The best model was selected for each category based on a combination of the Likelihood Ratio test, the Vuong statistical test, and the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). The NBRM model was found to be appropriate for only one category and the ZINB model was found to be more appropriate for six other categories. The overall results show that the Negative Binomial distribution model generally provides a better fit for the data than the Poisson distribution model. In addition, the ZINB model was found to give the best fit when the count data exhibit excess zeros and over-dispersion for most of the roadway categories. While model validation shows that most data points fall within the 95% prediction intervals of the models developed, the Pearson goodness-of-fit measure does not show statistical significance. This is expected as traffic volume is only one of the many factors contributing to the overall crash experience, and that the SPFs are to be applied in conjunction with Accident Modification Factors (AMFs) to further account for the safety impacts of major geometric features before arriving at the final crash prediction. However, with improved traffic and crash data quality, the crash prediction power of SPF models may be further improved.

Improving Analytical Travel Time Estimation for Transportation Planning Models

This dissertation aimed to improve travel time estimation for the purpose of transportation planning by developing a travel time estimation method that incorporates the effects of signal timing plans, which were difficult to consider in planning models. For this purpose, an analytical model has been developed. The model parameters were calibrated based on data from CORSIM microscopic simulation, with signal timing plans optimized using the TRANSYT-7F software. Independent variables in the model are link length, free-flow speed, and traffic volumes from the competing turning movements. The developed model has three advantages compared to traditional link-based or node-based models. First, the model considers the influence of signal timing plans for a variety of traffic volume combinations without requiring signal timing information as input. Second, the model describes the non-uniform spatial distribution of delay along a link, this being able to estimate the impacts of queues at different upstream locations of an intersection and attribute delays to a subject link and upstream link. Third, the model shows promise of improving the accuracy of travel time prediction. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the model is 13% for a set of field data from Minnesota Department of Transportation (MDOT); this is close to the MAPE of uniform delay in the HCM 2000 method (11%). The HCM is the industrial accepted analytical model in the existing literature, but it requires signal timing information as input for calculating delays. The developed model also outperforms the HCM 2000 method for a set of Miami-Dade County data that represent congested traffic conditions, with a MAPE of 29%, compared to 31% of the HCM 2000 method. The advantages of the proposed model make it feasible for application to a large network without the burden of signal timing input, while improving the accuracy of travel time estimation. An assignment model with the developed travel time estimation method has been implemented in a South Florida planning model, which improved assignment results.