Risco em Saúde e Políticas Sociais:a Intervenção do Serviço Social Local na promoção do Acesso à Saúde.

Dissertação de Mestrado em Sociedade, Risco e Saúde

Submission to the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government: Sustainable Residential Development in Urban Areas

The Institute of Public Health in Ireland is an all-island body which aims to improve health in Ireland by working to combat health inequalities and influence public policies in favour of health. The Institute promotes co-operation in research, training, information and policy in order to contribute to policies which tackle inequalities in health.   Over the past ten years the Institute has worked closely with the Department of Health and Children and the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety in Northern Ireland to build capacity for public health across the island of Ireland.   The Institute takes the view that health is determined by policies, plans and programmes in many sectors outside the health sector as well as being dependent on access to and availability of first class health services. The importance of other sectors is encapsulated in a social determinants of health perspective which recognises that health is largely shaped and influenced by the physical, social, economic and cultural environments in which people live, work and play. Figure 1 illustrates these multi-dimensional impacts on health and also serves to highlight the clear and inextricable links between health and sustainable development. Factors that impact on long-term sustainability will thus also impact on health.

Tackling health inequalities: Ten years on

This report reviews developments in health inequalities over the last 10 years across government - from the publication of the Acheson report on health inequalities in November 1998 to the announcement of the post-2010 strategic review of health inequalities in November 2008. It covers developments across government on the wider social determinants of health, and the role of the NHS. It provides an assessment of developments against the Acheson report, reviews a range of key data sets covering social, economic, health and environmental indicators, and considers lessons learned and challenges for the future.

Health inequalities among the elderly in western Europe

Background: This paper analyses gender inequalities in health status and in social determinants of health among the elderly in Western Europe. Methods: Data came from the first wave of the “Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe” (SHARE, 2004). For the purposes of this study a subsample of community-residing people aged 65-85 years with no paid work was selected (4218 men and 5007 women). Multiple logistic regression models separated by sex and adjusted for age and country were fitted. Results: Women were more likely to report poor health status, limitations in mobility and poor mental health. Whereas in both sexes educational attainment was associated with the three health indicators, household income was only related to poor self-rated health among women. The relationship between living arrangements and health differed by gender and was primarily associated with poor mental health. In both sexes, not living with the partner but living with other people and being the household head was related to poor mental health status (aOR=2.14; 95% CI=1.11-4.14 for men and aOR=1.75; 95% CI=1.12-2.72 for women). Additionally, women living with their partner and other(s) and those living alone were more likely to report poor mental health status (aOR=1.67; 95% CI=1.17-2.41 and aOR=1.58; 95% CI=1.26-1.97, respectively). Conclusions: Health inequalities persist among the elderly. Women have poorer health status than men and in both sexes the risk of poor health status increases among those with low educational attainment. Living arrangements are primarily associated with poor mental health status with patterns that differ by gender.

The 2001 Iowa Health Fact Book.

State-wide data relating to health outcomes, social determinants of health, health behaviors, and health care resources are presented, generally at the county level. The data have been compiled in this book, but were collected using different methodologies by various organizations and reporting mechanisms.

The 2003 Iowa Health Fact Book.

State-wide data relating to health outcomes, social determinants of health, health behaviors, and health care resources are presented, generally at the county level. The data have been compiled in this book, but were collected using different methodologies by various organizations and reporting mechanisms.

The 2005 Iowa Health Fact Book.

State-wide data relating to health outcomes, social determinants of health, health behaviors, and health care resources are presented, generally at the county level. The data have been compiled in this book, but were collected using different methodologies by various organizations and reporting mechanisms.

The 2007 Iowa Health Fact Book.

State-wide data relating to health outcomes, social determinants of health, health behaviors, and health care resources are presented, generally at the county level. The data have been compiled in this book, but were collected using different methodologies by various organizations and reporting mechanisms.

The 2009 Iowa Health Fact Book.

State-wide data relating to health outcomes, social determinants of health, health behaviors, and health care resources are presented, generally at the county level. The data have been compiled in this book, but were collected using different methodologies by various organizations and reporting mechanisms.

The 2011 Iowa Health Fact Book.

State-wide data relating to health outcomes, social determinants of health, health behaviors, and health care resources are presented, generally at the county level. The data have been compiled in this book, but were collected using different methodologies by various organizations and reporting mechanisms.

The 2013 Iowa Health Fact Book

State-wide data relating to health outcomes, social determinants of health, health behaviors, and health care resources are presented, generally at the county level. The data have been compiled in this book, but were collected using different methodologies by various organizations and reporting mechanisms.

Impact of case management on frequent users quality of life : a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Frequent emergency department users represent a small number of patients but account for a large number of emergency department visits. They should be a focus because they are often vulnerable patients with many risk factors affecting their quality of life (QoL). Case management interventions have resulted in a significant decrease in emergency department visits, but association with QoL has not been assessed. One aim of our study was to examine to what extent an interdisciplinary case management intervention, compared to standard emergency care, improved frequent emergency department users' QoL. METHODS: Data are part of a randomized, controlled trial designed to improve frequent emergency department users' QoL and use of health-care resources at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. In total, 250 frequent emergency department users (≥5 attendances during the previous 12 months; ≥ 18 years of age) were interviewed between May 2012 and July 2013. Following an assessment focused on social characteristics; social, mental, and somatic determinants of health; risk behaviors; health care use; and QoL, participants were randomly assigned to the control or the intervention group (n=125 in each group). The final sample included 194 participants (20 deaths, 36 dropouts, n=96 in the intervention group, n=99 in the control group). Participants in the intervention group received a case management intervention by an interdisciplinary, mobile team in addition to standard emergency care. The case management intervention involved four nurses and a physician who provided counseling and assistance concerning social determinants of health, substance-use disorders, and access to the health-care system.

Impact of case management on frequent users' quality of life : a randomized, controlled trial (FM 286)

Introduction: Frequent emergency department (ED) users are often vulnerable patients with many risk factors affecting their quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to examine to what extent a case management intervention improved frequent ED users' QoL. Methods: Data were part of a randomized, controlled trial designed to improve frequent ED users' QoL at the Lausanne University Hospital. A total of 194 frequent ED users (≥ 5 attendances during the previous 12 months; ≥ 18 years of age) were randomly assigned to the control or the intervention group. Participants in the intervention group received a case management intervention (i.e. counseling and assistance concerning social determinants of health, substance-use disorders, and access to the health-care system). QoL was evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF at baseline and twelve months later. Four dimensions of QoL were retained: physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment, with scores ranging from 0 (low QoL) to 100 (high QoL).

Perceptions of health club exercise among middle-aged women

The goal of this Master’s Thesis is to investigate the typical perceptions of health club exercise among middle-aged women. This study is conducted for a Finnish health club Viva Wellness Club due to their interest to examine the perceived barriers of middle-aged women to exercise at their health club. In addition, the behavioral beliefs, normative beliefs, motivation and facilitating factors concerning health club exercise are studied. The social aspect of health clubs as social environments is taken into account. The study is conducted qualitatively with semi-structured interviews Eight customers from Viva Wellness Club are interviewed. The findings revealed that the consumers perceived health club exercise as important, effective, diverse and convenient. Despite the fact that some differences were found, the perceptions about exercise in general concurred with the contestants’ perceptions about health club exercise. The perceived barriers to health club exercise encompassed lack of time, tiredness, health restrictions, weather, family commitments and feelings of embarrassment about one’s appearance and condition.

Visión y análisis de las propuestas de reforma al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud en Colombia, vigencia 2012-2013

Con la Constitución Política de 1991, se inicia una nueva estructura funcional en el país a partir de los preceptos consagrados en la carta magna como un estado social de derecho, situación que no fue ajena al sector salud en el cual se estableció la seguridad social como un servicio público basado en los principios fundamentales de universalidad, solidaridad y eficiencia, enunciados que fueron plasmados entre otros en la Ley 100 de 1993, la cual incorporó estos elementos que resultaban innovadores en el contexto. Hoy después de 18 años de promulgada la Ley, se ha generado un modelo estructural que ha permitido mejorar los resultados en esta área, que si bien posee falencias en algunos de sus componentes (Acceso, Flujo de Recursos, Salud Pública), las mismas pueden ser superadas, con una reforma estructural al sistema que elimine los intereses particulares de los diferentes actores al momento de su elaboración y promulgación. Uno de los avances significativos en la reforma al sistema es la promulgación de la salud como derecho fundamental, inherente al ser humano, otorgando el carácter de inalienable, imprescriptible y sagrado, dejando en segundo plano su condición prestacional establecida. El derecho a la salud tendrá como eje principal la salud pública armonizada con la promoción y prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento integral de la enfermedad, las cuales deben ser articuladas con las políticas sociales, ambientales, culturales y económicas que permitan incidir en los determinantes sociales de la salud para mejorar la calidad de vida de la población. La reforma a la salud en el eje de la financiación como se encuentra propuesta, no generará cambios sustanciales toda vez que se avanza hacia un sistema en que el estado será el principal actor con las funciones afiliación, recaudo, pago, giro o transferencia de los recursos, responsable de la información. Sin embargo la administración del riesgo en salud seguirá delegada, función que es determinante para la administración de los recursos del sistema, en resumen se demuestra el interés del estado en retomar la gobernanza y su empoderamiento como administrador de lo público, sin que esto responda a las necesidades de cambio en el sistema de salud.