Obama no Brasil - Entrevista de Matias Spektor ao Globo News

Entrevista concedida ao canal de tv Globo News no contexto da visita do presidente norte-americano Barack Obama ao Brasil, em março de 2011

"Fenômeno" Obama mostra o potencial da tecnologia para a comunicação política

Não é novidade que o presidente dos Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, é um grande entusiasta da tecnologia. Primeiro a contratar um especialista de big data para a Casa Branca, Obama avançou muito na comunicação digital institucional do governo e, na última segunda-feira (18) inovou outra vez ao abrir uma conta pessoal no Twitter (@POTUS, abreviação de "President of the United States"). Popular, o chefe de Estado americano entrou para o livro dos recordes como o mais rápido a obter 1 milhão de seguidores - foram apenas 5 horas.

Lágrimas de Obama centralizam debate sobre o porte de armas nos EUA

A postura emocionada de Barack Obama para anunciar iniciativas que dificultem o acesso a armas nos Estados Unidos -- em combate aos frequentes assassinatos em massa no país -- se destacou como o principal tópico de debate no Twitter, tanto entre críticos quanto entre defensores do presidente americano. O ‘choro’ de Obama, inclusive, obteve repercussão maior que a pauta central da coletiva de imprensa feita na noite de terça-feira, 05 de janeiro: o controle do porte de armas de fogo por cidadãos, um tema muito sensível para republicanos e democratas no país.

As condições do trabalho docente: um estudo em escolas da rede municipal de Currais Novos-RN (2009 a 2012)

This work, named Teaching conditions: a study in municipal schools of Currais Novos RN (2009 to 2012) aims to analyze the status of teaching in schools in the municipality of Currais Novos RN in the period ranging from 2009 - 2012, considering infrastructure, initial and continued training and intensification and casualization of teaching factors in the context of the 1990s educational reformations. It, also, assumes that teaching is a constitutive part of capitalist society, and has been reconfigured with based on the new requirements demanded by the labor market. In order to conduct this study the considered data included the survey research Teaching Work in Basic Education in Brazil (2009 to 2010) , held in seven Brazilian states being: Pará, Rio Grande do Norte, Minas Gerais, Goiás, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Espírito Santo. Specifically selected for deepening of the study, there were schools in the municipality of Currais Novos in which semi-structured interviews were performed with teachers of the said municipality. This research is constituted of a qualitative and quantitative approach whose survey instruments adopted were, namely: documental research, literature review, interviews and surveys. The obtained data analysis allows us to infer that the teaching work performed by teachers in the states which participated in the survey has been influenced the changes in the labor market and educational reformations and has been taking on characteristics such as flexibility, tendency to precariousness and intensification; and this trend is also present in schools that were surveyed in the municipality of Currais Novos. As pertaining to the teachers conditions in classroom, these signs are more evident, considering that they had their duties and responsibilities extended beyond the classroom environment. The data also show that in general working conditions of teachers in national, state and local levels are unprofitable and heterogeneous, increasingly deepening the gap between school units and education networks. Therefore, the implantation of public policies that enhance the teaching work and improve their working conditions in all dimensions that directly interfere in their work are crucial

Das utopias e distopias: uma leitura de O presidente negro de Monteiro Lobato

Pós-graduação em Letras - FCLAS

La ventana de oportunidades del gobierno abierto en España: un análisis desde el ámbito local

El gobierno abierto se ha convertido en un nuevo modelo de política pública que sitúa la transparencia, la participación y la colaboración ciudadana como ejes primordiales para la acción política. El gobierno abierto fomenta que las administraciones y los gobiernos afronten el reto de recuperar la legitimidad y la confianza de la población a través de la transparencia y la responsabilidad, así como mediante la generación de espacios de intercambio y participación que promuevan la inteligencia colaborativa. Desde hace más de una década, el concepto de gobierno abierto ha formado parte de los estudios de Ciencias Políticas en relación a la transparencia, la participación, la modernización de la administración pública y el gobierno electrónico. Sin embargo, no fue hasta 2009 cuando alcanzó su máxima notoriedad debido a la presentación del Memorando sobre Transparencia y Gobierno Abierto presentado por el Presidente de los Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, como punto de partida orientado a cerrar la brecha existente entre el pueblo americano y su gobierno. Poco después, un pequeño grupo de países (Indonesia, México, Noruega, Filipinas, Sudáfrica y Reino Unido, bajo el liderazgo de Brasil y los EE.UU.) crearon la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto u Open Government Partnership (OGP) una iniciativa destinada a mejorar la rendición de cuentas, la transparencia y la participación gracias a las oportunidades que brinda las nuevas tecnologías y la web 2.0. A partir de ese momento, el gobierno abierto entró a formar parte de la agenda internacional, ofreciendo prácticas y conocimientos en red basados en un nuevo esquema de relación entre gobierno y ciudadanía a través del uso de las nuevas tecnologías...

Obama in Cuba: polarização e participação ativa no twitter

A histórica visita do presidente americano Barack Obama a Cuba, esta semana, impulsionou a presença dos cubanos nas redes sociais – e o debate sobre antigas questões políticas envolvendo a ilha e a difícil relação com os Estados Unidos, que apresenta contornos de conciliação, finalmente, após mais de cinco décadas. A Diretoria de Análise de Políticas Públicas (FGV/DAPP) identificou das 08h de segunda-feira, 21 de março, às 11h de terça (22) mais de 1,6 milhão de menções no Twitter sobre o assunto no mundo inteiro, sendo 800 mil entre as 10h e as 18h de segunda (horários de Brasília), quando Obama iniciou um passeio por Havana e fez uma coletiva de imprensa com o presidente cubano, Raúl Castro.

The Affordable Care Act and the Transformation of US Health Care

The neoliberal period was accompanied by a momentous transformation within the US health care system.  As the result of a number of political and historical dynamics, the healthcare law signed by President Barack Obama in 2010 ‑the Affordable Care Act (ACA)‑ drew less on universal models from abroad than it did on earlier conservative healthcare reform proposals. This was in part the result of the influence of powerful corporate healthcare interests. While the ACA expands healthcare coverage, it does so incompletely and unevenly, with persistent uninsurance and disparities in access based on insurance status. Additionally, the law accommodates an overall shift towards a consumerist model of care characterized by high cost sharing at time of use. Finally, the law encourages the further consolidation of the healthcare sector, for instance into units named “Accountable Care Organizations” that closely resemble the health maintenance organizations favored by managed care advocates. The overall effect has been to maintain a fragmented system that is neither equitable nor efficient. A single payer universal system would, in contrast, help transform healthcare into a social right.

La transformación de la política antidrogas de Estados Unidos y su incidencia en la cooperación colombo-estadounidense en la lucha contra las drogas (2010-2014).

Con la llegada del demócrata Barack Obama a la presidencia de Estados Unidos, se inició un proceso de transformación de la política antidrogas estadounidense, lo cual, impactó en el ámbito doméstico y exterior, en ése último, especialmente en cuanto cooperación refiere. Considerando lo anterior, la investigación analiza cómo la transformación de la política antidrogas de Estados Unidos ha incidido en la cooperación colombo-estadounidense en materia de lucha contra las drogas. Para ello, se estudia la transformación del modelo estadounidense, se identifica la evolución de la cooperación contra el narcotráfico entre los dos Estados en el periodo 2009- 2014 y se examina la incidencia de la transformación de la política estadounidense antidrogas en la política antidrogas de Colombia.

Alcances y limitaciones del tercer pilar de la doctrina de responsabilidad de proteger en la intervención militar de la crisis Libia (2011-2013)

El siguiente trabajo de investigación pretende analizar no solo la manera en la que la Intervención en la crisis Libia (2011-2013) se vio justificada a la luz de lo que establece la Doctrina de R2P, sino también investigar si logró cumplir con los objetivos de la misma. Con tal propósito, se evaluará si la intervención Militar Humanitaria por parte de la OTAN bajo la resolución 1973 del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU, se justifica desde los objetivos que establece la Doctrina de Responsabilidad de Proteger y cumple parcialmente con los propósitos fundamentales de prevenir, reaccionar y reconstruir en la crisis Libia de 2011- 2013. El método que se utilizará para responder a la pregunta de este estudio de caso, será en su totalidad cualitativo, descriptivo y analítico. En lo que respecta a las fuentes, se usarán fuentes secundarias como artículos académicos y fuentes primarias provenientes de noticias de periódicos, revistas, resoluciones AG y del CS de la ONU.

Greenwashing the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Fossil fuels, the environment, and climate change

There has been much controversy over the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) – a plurilateral trade agreement involving a dozen nations from throughout the Pacific Rim – and its impact upon the environment, biodiversity, and climate change. The secretive treaty negotiations involve Australia and New Zealand; countries from South East Asia such as Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Singapore, Vietnam, and Japan; the South American nations of Peru and Chile; and the members of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Canada, Mexico and the United States. There was an agreement reached between the parties in October 2015. The participants asserted: ‘We expect this historic agreement to promote economic growth, support higher-paying jobs; enhance innovation, productivity and competitiveness; raise living standards; reduce poverty in our countries; and to promote transparency, good governance, and strong labor and environmental protections.’ The final texts of the agreement were published in November 2015. There has been discussion as to whether other countries – such as Indonesia, the Philippines, and South Korea – will join the deal. There has been much debate about the impact of this proposed treaty upon intellectual property, the environment, biodiversity and climate change. There have been similar concerns about the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) – a proposed trade agreement between the United States and the European Union. In 2011, the United States Trade Representative developed a Green Paper on trade, conservation, and the environment in the context of the TPP. In its rhetoric, the United States Trade Representative has maintained that it has been pushing for strong, enforceable environmental standards in the TPP. In a key statement in 2014, the United States Trade Representative Mike Froman insisted: ‘The United States’ position on the environment in the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations is this: environmental stewardship is a core American value, and we will insist on a robust, fully enforceable environment chapter in the TPP or we will not come to agreement.’ The United States Trade Representative maintained: ‘Our proposals in the TPP are centered around the enforcement of environmental laws, including those implementing multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) in TPP partner countries, and also around trailblazing, first-ever conservation proposals that will raise standards across the region’. Moreover, the United States Trade Representative asserted: ‘Furthermore, our proposals would enhance international cooperation and create new opportunities for public participation in environmental governance and enforcement.’ The United States Trade Representative has provided this public outline of the Environment Chapter of the TPP: A meaningful outcome on environment will ensure that the agreement appropriately addresses important trade and environment challenges and enhances the mutual supportiveness of trade and environment. The Trans-Pacific Partnership countries share the view that the environment text should include effective provisions on trade-related issues that would help to reinforce environmental protection and are discussing an effective institutional arrangement to oversee implementation and a specific cooperation framework for addressing capacity building needs. They also are discussing proposals on new issues, such as marine fisheries and other conservation issues, biodiversity, invasive alien species, climate change, and environmental goods and services. Mark Linscott, an assistant Trade Representative testified: ‘An environment chapter in the TPP should strengthen country commitments to enforce their environmental laws and regulations, including in areas related to ocean and fisheries governance, through the effective enforcement obligation subject to dispute settlement.’ Inside US Trade has commented: ‘While not initially expected to be among the most difficult areas, the environment chapter has emerged as a formidable challenge, partly due to disagreement over the United States proposal to make environmental obligations binding under the TPP dispute settlement mechanism’. Joshua Meltzer from the Brookings Institute contended that the trade agreement could be a boon for the protection of the environment in the Pacific Rim: Whether it is depleting fisheries, declining biodiversity or reduced space in the atmosphere for Greenhouse Gas emissions, the underlying issue is resource scarcity. And in a world where an additional 3 billion people are expected to enter the middle class over the next 15 years, countries need to find new and creative ways to cooperate in order to satisfy the legitimate needs of their population for growth and opportunity while using resources in a manner that is sustainable for current and future generations. The TPP parties already represent a diverse range of developed and developing countries. Should the TPP become a free trade agreement of the Asia-Pacific region, it will include the main developed and developing countries and will be a strong basis for building a global consensus on these trade and environmental issues. The TPP has been promoted by its proponents as a boon to the environment. The United States Trade Representative has maintained that the TPP will protect the environment: ‘The United States’ position on the environment in the TPP negotiations is this: environmental stewardship is a core American value, and we will insist on a robust, fully enforceable environment chapter in the TPP or we will not come to agreement.’ The United States Trade Representative discussed ‘Trade for a Greener World’ on World Environment Day. Andrew Robb, at the time the Australian Trade and Investment Minister, vowed that the TPP will contain safeguards for the protection of the environment. In November 2015, after the release of the TPP text, Rohan Patel, the Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, sought to defend the environmental credentials of the TPP. He contended that the deal had been supported by the Nature Conservancy, the International Fund for Animal Welfare, the Joint Ocean Commission Initiative, the World Wildlife Fund, and World Animal Protection. The United States Congress, though, has been conflicted by the United States Trade Representative’s arguments about the TPP and the environment. In 2012, members of the United States Congress - including Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), and John Kerry (D-MA) – wrote a letter, arguing that the trade agreement needs to provide strong protection for the environment: ‘We believe that a '21st century agreement' must have an environment chapter that guarantees ongoing sustainable trade and creates jobs, and this is what American businesses and consumers want and expect also.’ The group stressed that ‘A binding and enforceable TPP environment chapter that stands up for American interests is critical to our support of the TPP’. The Congressional leaders maintained: ‘We believe the 2007 bipartisan congressional consensus on environmental provisions included in recent trade agreements should serve as the framework for the environment chapter of the TPP.’ In 2013, senior members of the Democratic leadership expressed their opposition to granting President Barack Obama a fast-track authority in respect of the TPP House of Representatives Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said: ‘No on fast-track – Camp-Baucus – out of the question.’ Senator Majority leader Harry Reid commented: ‘I’m against Fast-Track: Everyone would be well-advised to push this right now.’ Senator Elizabeth Warren has been particularly critical of the process and the substance of the negotiations in the TPP: From what I hear, Wall Street, pharmaceuticals, telecom, big polluters and outsourcers are all salivating at the chance to rig the deal in the upcoming trade talks. So the question is, Why are the trade talks secret? You’ll love this answer. Boy, the things you learn on Capitol Hill. I actually have had supporters of the deal say to me ‘They have to be secret, because if the American people knew what was actually in them, they would be opposed. Think about that. Real people, people whose jobs are at stake, small-business owners who don’t want to compete with overseas companies that dump their waste in rivers and hire workers for a dollar a day—those people, people without an army of lobbyists—they would be opposed. I believe if people across this country would be opposed to a particular trade agreement, then maybe that trade agreement should not happen. The Finance Committee in the United States Congress deliberated over the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations in 2014. The new chair Ron Wyden has argued that there needs to be greater transparency in trade. Nonetheless, he has mooted the possibility of a ‘smart-track’ to reconcile the competing demands of the Obama Administration, and United States Congress. Wyden insisted: ‘The new breed of trade challenges spawned over the last generation must be addressed in imaginative new policies and locked into enforceable, ambitious, job-generating trade agreements.’ He emphasized that such agreements ‘must reflect the need for a free and open Internet, strong labor rights and environmental protections.’ Elder Democrat Sander Levin warned that the TPP failed to provide proper protection for the environment: The TPP parties are considering a different structure to protect the environment than the one adopted in the May 10 Agreement, which directly incorporated seven multilateral environmental agreements into the text of past trade agreements. While the form is less important than the substance, the TPP must provide an overall level of environmental protection that upholds and builds upon the May 10 standard, including fully enforceable obligations. But many of our trading partners are actively seeking to weaken the text to the point of falling short of that standard, including on key issues like conservation. Nonetheless, 2015, President Barack Obama was able to secure the overall support of the United States Congress for his ‘fast-track’ authority. This was made possible by the Republicans and dissident Democrats. Notably, Oregon Senator Ron Wyden switched sides, and was transformed from a critic of the TPP to an apologist for the TPP. For their part, green political parties and civil society organisations have been concerned about the secretive nature of the negotiations; and the substantive implications of the treaty for the environment. Environmental groups and climate advocates have been sceptical of the environmental claims made by the White House for the TPP. The Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand, the Australian Greens and the Green Party of Canada have released a joint declaration on the TPP observing: ‘More than just another trade agreement, the TPP provisions could hinder access to safe, affordable medicines, weaken local content rules for media, stifle high-tech innovation, and even restrict the ability of future governments to legislate for the good of public health and the environment’. In the United States, civil society groups such as the Sierra Club, Public Citizen, WWF, the Friends of the Earth, the Rainforest Action Network and 350.org have raised concerns about the TPP and the environment. Allison Chin, President of the Sierra Club, complained about the lack of transparency, due process, and public participation in the TPP talks: ‘This is a stealth affront to the principles of our democracy.’ Maude Barlow’s The Council of Canadians has also been concerned about the TPP and environmental justice. New Zealand Sustainability Council executive director Simon Terry said the agreement showed ‘minimal real gains for nature’. A number of organisations have joined a grand coalition of civil society organisations, which are opposed to the grant of a fast-track. On the 15th January 2013, WikiLeaks released the draft Environment Chapter of the TPP - along with a report by the Chairs of the Environmental Working Group. Julian Assange, WikiLeaks' publisher, stated: ‘Today's WikiLeaks release shows that the public sweetener in the TPP is just media sugar water.’ He observed: ‘The fabled TPP environmental chapter turns out to be a toothless public relations exercise with no enforcement mechanism.’ This article provides a critical examination of the draft Environment Chapter of the TPP. The overall argument of the article is that the Environment Chapter of the TPP is an exercise in greenwashing – it is a public relations exercise by the United States Trade Representative, rather than a substantive regime for the protection of the environment in the Pacific Rim. Greenwashing has long been a problem in commerce, in which companies making misleading and deceptive claims about the environment. In his 2012 book, Greenwash: Big Brands and Carbon Scams, Guy Pearse considers the rise of green marketing and greenwashing. Government greenwashing is also a significant issue. In his book Storms of My Grandchildren, the climate scientist James Hansen raises his concerns about government greenwashing. Such a problem is apparent with the TPP – in which there was a gap between the assertions of the United States Government, and the reality of the agreement. This article contends that the TPP fails to meet the expectations created by President Barack Obama, the White House, and the United States Trade Representative about the environmental value of the agreement. First, this piece considers the relationship of the TPP to multilateral environmental treaties. Second, it explores whether the provisions in respect of the environment are enforceable. Third, this article examines the treatment of trade and biodiversity in the TPP. Fourth, this study considers the question of marine capture fisheries. Fifth, there is an evaluation of the cursory text in the TPP on conservation. Sixth, the article considers trade in environmental services under the TPP. Seventh, this article highlights the tensions between the TPP and substantive international climate action. It is submitted that the TPP undermines effective and meaningful government action and regulation in respect of climate change. The conclusion also highlights that a number of other chapters of the TPP will impact upon the protection of the environment – including the Investment Chapter, the Intellectual Property Chapter, the Technical Barriers to Trade Chapter, and the text on public procurement.

Encuesta a la población andina en la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (EPAPV, 2012). Dinámicas migratorias transnacionales de la población de Colombia, Ecuador y Perú

Encuesta realizada en el marco del proyecto “Implicaciones sociales de las migraciones transnacionales: más allá de las remesas. El caso del sistema migratorio entre países andinos y España”, con referencia CSO2009-08469 (subprograma SOCI). Este proyecto ha sido financiado por el Plan Nacional de I D i (2009-2012) del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación en su convocatoria de ayudas de Proyectos de Investigación Fundamental no orientada.

Comunicação política

Tese de Doutoramento apresentada à Universidade Fernando Pessoa como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Ciências da Informação.

Internet como escenario de la política

Características de la política por Internet en el marco de los contextos. Casos de estudio: la Obamanía en Estados Unidos y la Ola Verde en Colombia.

Análisis descriptivo del marco jurídico normativo referido a la Fuerza Armada Nacional y su incidencia en las relaciones cívico- militares en Venezuela, 1999- 2012

Las relaciones cívico- militares que se establecen desde el año 1999 en Venezuela debido a la llegada del entonces Teniente Coronel del Ejército (re) Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías, presentan cambios que permiten explicar la situación del país a través de un actor que ha sido fundamental desde el siglo XIX venezolano: los hombres en armas de la renovada Fuerza Armada Nacional Bolivariana. La hipótesis que se maneja llega a cumplirse gracias a la aplicación del enfoque neo institucionalista, desde el cual se dan los matices conceptuales necesarios para convertir el análisis en uno de tipo politológico. Los resultados reflejan con claridad la diferencia del panorama venezolano respecto a relaciones cívico- militares, entre el lapso del puntofijismo (1961- 1999) y la ejecución de la Revolución Bolivariana por parte del fallecido Presidente Hugo Chávez (1999- 2012). Esto, gracias al análisis normativo que se destaca, el cual permite extraer elementos de constituciones y leyes, que ayudan a la comprensión del comportamiento tanto de civiles como de militares en cada época.