The Social Enterprise as an Alternative Work Option for Persons with Developmental Disabilities: A Case Study of Staff Perspectives at Common Ground Co-operative

Traditional employment options for persons with developmental disabilities are lacking. Employment options available for persons with developmental disabilities are reflective of the medical and social model perspectives of disability; with segregated and supported employment reinforcing the idea that persons with developmental disabilities are incapable and competitive employment missing the necessary accommodations for persons to be successful. This study examined social enterprises as an alternative employment option that can balance both medical and social model perspectives by accommodating for weaknesses or limitations and recognizing the strengths and capabilities of persons with developmental disabilities in the workplace. Moreover, this study is part of a broader case study which is examining the nature and impacts of a social enterprise, known as Common Ground Co-operative (CGC), which supports five social purpose businesses that are owned and operated by persons with developmental disabilities. This study is part of the Social Business and Marginalized Social Groups Community-University Research Alliance. To date, a case study has been written describing the nature and impacts of CGC and its related businesses from the perspectives of the Partners, board members, funders and staff (Owen, Readhead, Bishop, Hope & Campbell, in press & Readhead, 2012). The current study used a descriptive case study approach to provide a detailed account of the perceptions and opinions of CGC staff members who support each of the Partners in the five related businesses. Staff members were chosen for the focus of this study because of the integral role that they play in the successful outcomes of the persons they support. This study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase five staff members were interviewed. During this stage of interviews, several themes were presented which needed to be examined in further detail, specifically staff stress and burnout and duty of care for business Partners versus the promotion of their autonomy. A second phase of interviews was then conducted with one individual participant and a focus group of seven. During both interview phases, Staff participants described an employment model that creates a non-judgemental environment for the business Partners that promotes their strengths, accommodates for their limitations, provides educational opportunities and places the responsibility for the businesses on the persons with developmental disabilities cultivating equality and promoting independence. Staff described the nature of their role including risk factors for stress, the protective factors that buffer stress, and the challenges associated with balancing many role demands. Issues related to the replication of this social enterprise model are described.

Consensus Statement: Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is increasingly utilized for genetic testing of individuals with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), or multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). Performing CMA and G-banded karyotyping on every patient substantially increases the total cost of genetic testing. The International Standard Cytogenomic Array (ISCA) Consortium held two international workshops and conducted a literature review of 33 studies, including 21,698 patients tested by CMA. We provide an evidence-based summary of clinical cytogenetic testing comparing CMA to G-banded karyotyping with respect to technical advantages and limitations, diagnostic yield for various types of chromosomal aberrations, and issues that affect test interpretation. CMA offers a much higher diagnostic yield (15%-20%) for genetic testing of individuals with unexplained DD/ID, ASD, or MCA than a G-banded karyotype (similar to 3%, excluding Down syndrome and other recognizable chromosomal syndromes), primarily because of its higher sensitivity for submicroscopic deletions and duplications. Truly balanced rearrangements and low-level mosaicism are generally not detectable by arrays, but these are relatively infrequent causes of abnormal phenotypes in this population (<1%). Available evidence strongly supports the use of CMA in place of G-banded karyotyping as the first-tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for patients with DD/ID, ASD, or MCA. G-banded karyotype analysis should be reserved for patients with obvious chromosomal syndromes (e.g., Down syndrome), a family history of chromosomal rearrangement, or a history of multiple miscarriages.

Annual report to the President and the Congress - National Advisory Council on the Education of Disadvantaged Children.

Some vols. have also a distinctive title.

Developmental disabilities abstracts.

Mode of access: Internet.

Road and bridge administration, purchasing organization and methods, in Dallas County; report and summary. Report: Griffenhagen & Associates. Summary: Greater Dallas Planning Council Advisory Committee.

At head of title. W. Dallas County, Texas.

[Aging; selected references. Seven pamphlets from the Library of The National Council on the Aging.

A general bibliography on aging, by the Library of the National Committee on the Aging. Recent publications on aging, 1962; a supplement to "A general bibliography on aging". Friendly visiting; selected references. Guardianship and protective services; selected references. Housing for the aged; selected references. Retirement planning; selected references. Rev. ed. The implications of automation and technological development for the employment of older workers: a preliminary selected bibliography, by Norman Sprague.

1980 update survey of state residential facilities : including Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities institutions, Department of Corrections (Adult & Juvenile) correctional centers, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Department of Veterans Affairs' Veterans Home /

Cover title.

Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Act : (20 ILCS 1705)

Cover title.

Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act : (740 ILCS 110).

"P.A. 80-1508."

Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act : (740 ILCS 110/1 et seq.).

"P.A. 80-1508."

Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Act : (20 ILCS 1705/0.01 et seq.)

"Including selected sections of the Civil Administrative Code."

Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Act : (20 ILCS 1705)

Includes index.

Environmental bulletin : a publication of the Illinois Environmental Council.

Description based on: Dec. 1999; title from caption.

Feasibility study, use of vacant state-owned mental health and developmental disabilities facilities, December 1978 /

Cover title.

Findings and recommendations of the Legislative Advisory Committee to the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission.

Description based on: 77th General Assembly, 1971.