Consensus Statement: Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies


Autoria(s): MILLER, David T.; ADAM, Margaret P.; ARADHYA, Swaroop; BIESECKER, Leslie G.; BROTHMAN, Arthur R.; CARTER, Nigel P.; CHURCH, Deanna M.; CROLLA, John A.; EICHLER, Evan E.; EPSTEIN, Charles J.; FAUCETT, W. Andrew; FEUK, Lars; FRIEDMAN, Jan M.; HAMOSH, Ada; JACKSON, Laird; KAMINSKY, Erin B.; KOK, Klaas; KRANTZ, Ian D.; KUHN, Robert M.; LEE, Charles; OSTELL, James M.; ROSENBERG, Carla; SCHERER, Stephen W.; SPINNER, Nancy B.; STAVROPOULOS, Dimitri J.; TEPPERBERG, James H.; THORLAND, Erik C.; VERMEESCH, Joris R.; WAGGONER, Darrel J.; WATSON, Michael S.; MARTIN, Christa Lese; LEDBETTER, David H.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

20/10/2012

20/10/2012

2010

Resumo

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is increasingly utilized for genetic testing of individuals with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), or multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). Performing CMA and G-banded karyotyping on every patient substantially increases the total cost of genetic testing. The International Standard Cytogenomic Array (ISCA) Consortium held two international workshops and conducted a literature review of 33 studies, including 21,698 patients tested by CMA. We provide an evidence-based summary of clinical cytogenetic testing comparing CMA to G-banded karyotyping with respect to technical advantages and limitations, diagnostic yield for various types of chromosomal aberrations, and issues that affect test interpretation. CMA offers a much higher diagnostic yield (15%-20%) for genetic testing of individuals with unexplained DD/ID, ASD, or MCA than a G-banded karyotype (similar to 3%, excluding Down syndrome and other recognizable chromosomal syndromes), primarily because of its higher sensitivity for submicroscopic deletions and duplications. Truly balanced rearrangements and low-level mosaicism are generally not detectable by arrays, but these are relatively infrequent causes of abnormal phenotypes in this population (<1%). Available evidence strongly supports the use of CMA in place of G-banded karyotyping as the first-tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for patients with DD/ID, ASD, or MCA. G-banded karyotype analysis should be reserved for patients with obvious chromosomal syndromes (e.g., Down syndrome), a family history of chromosomal rearrangement, or a history of multiple miscarriages.

U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

National Institutes of Health (NIH)[RC2FID064525]

U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

National Institutes of Health (NIH)[MH074090]

Simons Foundation

Simons Foundation[137578]

ACMG Foundation

ACMG Foundation

Luminex

Luminex

Identificador

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, v.86, n.5, p.749-764, 2010

0002-9297

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/27508

10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

CELL PRESS

Relação

American Journal of Human Genetics

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright CELL PRESS

Palavras-Chave #COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION #IDIOPATHIC MENTAL-RETARDATION #COPY-NUMBER VARIATIONS #17Q21.31 MICRODELETION SYNDROME #ARRAY-BASED TECHNOLOGY #LOW-LEVEL MOSAICISM #STRUCTURAL VARIATION #DYSMORPHIC FEATURES #CYTOGENETIC SURVEY #OLIGONUCLEOTIDE MICROARRAY #Genetics & Heredity
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion