974 resultados para 1900-1909


Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 6 contains the Turkish originals.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Vol. 3, 1900; v. 1-2, 1901-09.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Title from cover.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Volumes arbitrarily numbered.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Binder's title.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Vols. 7-34 include the Jahresbericht of the Goethe-Gesellschaft.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Contain also Bulletins and Reports of the director.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Abhandlungen aus der Kinderheilkunde und ihren Grenzgebieten, nos. 1- bound with v. 104, 106-

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Enchanted by Sources. Henry Biaudet, Liisi Karttunen and Finnish Historical Research in Rome in the Early Twentieth Century This study traces the scholarly endeavours of Henry Biaudet (1870 1915) and Liisi Karttunen (1880 1957) and "La mission historique finlandaise à Rome" which they founded in 1909. They are forgotten in Finnish historiography, but remain internationally renowned for their contribution to the nunciature studies. By investigating their historical work on the Counter- Reformation era, their roles in the scientific communities of Helsinki and Rome as well as the intersection of politics and science in their scholarly practices the study explores the nature of historical research in general at the turn of the twentieth century. The work covers fields such as historiography, university history and the political use of history. Methodologically the research is based on the analysis and contextualization of published and unpublished sources (e.g. correspondences, university records, scholarly publications and reviews in academic journals). Henry Biaudet criticized the previous research on the Nordic Counter-Reformation for its narrow national scope and sources. He sought out a new approach, including the use of sources in archives all over Europe and the inclusion of the Catholic viewpoint. Accordingly, Biaudet and Karttunen searched for records in archives in Southern Europe. Their unorthodox interpretations were denounced in Finland since the picture they gave of late sixteenth-century Sweden was too different from the national narrative. Moreover, Finnish national identity was firmly rooted in Protestantism, and questioning the benevolence of the Reformation and its main actors was considered as an attack not only against historical truth but also national values. The comparison between Biaudet s and Karttunen s arguments and the accepted narrative in Finland shows how traditional interpretations of the Nordic Reformation were influenced by the Lutheran ethos and European anticlerical rhetoric. Historians have recently paid substantial attention to the political use of history, usually focusing on politicized constructions of the national past. This study shows how research that met the criteria of modern historiography also served political purposes. Conducting research in an international community of historians and publishing ambitious scholarly studies that interested an international audience were ways to create a positive image of Finland abroad. These were not uniquely Finnish ideas but rather ideas shared by the international community of historians in Rome. In this context, scientific pursuits were given a clear political meaning. This enhances our understanding of nineteenth-century historiography being firmly rooted between science and politics.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

No início do século XX, as relações entre Brasil e Portugal ganharam novas perspectivas. Grupos de intelectuais e políticos de ambas as nações resolveram se unir com o objetivo de tentar criar uma comunidade Luso-brasileira. Logo, uma série de iniciativas e campanhas começaram a surgir, como a elaboração de um Acordo luso-brasileiro, incentivos da Sociedade de Geografia de Lisboa, e a criação de periódicos que discutissem temas relacionados com a temática Brasil-Portugal, dentre os quais se destacaram a revista Atlântida, Mensario artistico, Literario e Social para Portugal e Brasil. Em contrapartida a esse projeto de união, havia grupos que se manifestavam de forma contrária, proferindo discursos nacionalistas e criando uma cultura completamente anti-lusitana. O Brasil, que outrora fora uma colônia portuguesa, não tinha intenções de reviver aqueles tempos sob o domínio lusitano. Os setores mais radicais do nacionalismo viam o português como o elemento indesejado. Para disseminar seu pensamento, o artifício da imprensa também foi utilizado por esses grupos, através de jornais e periódicos de cunho anti-lusitano representado neste trabalho pela revista Gil Blás. A presente dissertação se constrói nesse cenário de oposição: a lusofilia versus a lusofobia em torno do projeto de união Brasil-Portugal no período delimitado entre os anos de 1909 a 1920.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In 1915 plans for the celebration of the 700th anniversary of Magna Carta had to be dropped following the outbreak of the First World War. Such celebrations marked a sense of Magna Carta as an event in the history of these islands. The usage of the term Magna Carta in Parliament in the run-up to the First World War, however, shows that its granting was not seen only as a significant historical event to be memorialised. During the period from 1900, opening with war in South Africa and ending in 1914 with war throughout Europe, the Great Charter was mentioned 85 times in Parliament. As a period marked by a lengthy constitutional crisis in 1909-11 and beset with problems in Ireland and the Empire, this seems like a good case study period to choose. This short paper attempts to analyse how and why it was invoked in Parliament in the years and what these various usages tell us about how Magna Carta was understood at the time.