933 resultados para Outdoor recreation--Ontario--Planning|vCase studies.
Resumo:
Debaryomyces hansenii cells cultivated on galactose produced extracellular and intracellular alpha-galactosidases, which showed 54.5 and 54.8 kDa molecular mass (MALDI-TOF), 60 and 61 kDa (SDS-PAGE) and 5.15 and 4.15 pI values, respectively. The extracellular and intracellular deglycosylated forms presented 36 and 40 kDa molecular mass, with 40 and 34% carbohydrate content, respectively. The N-terminal sequences of the alpha-galactosidases were identical. Intracellular alpha-galactosidase showed smaller thermostability when compared to the extracellular enzyme. D. hansenii UFV-1 extracellular alpha-galactosidase presented higher k(cat) than the intracellular enzyme (7.16 vs 3.29 s(-1), respectively) for the p-nitrophenyl-alpha-D-galactopyranoside substrate. The K(m) for hydrolysis of pNP alpha Gal, melibiose, stachyose, and raffinose were 0.32, 2.12, 10.8, and 32.8 mM, respectively. The intracellular enzyme was acompetitively inhibited by galactose (K(i) = 0.70 mM), and it was inactivated by Cu(II) and Ag(I). Enzyme incubation with soy milk for 6 h at 55 degrees C reduced stachyose and raffinose amounts by 100 and 73%, respectively.
Resumo:
Anal incontinence causes psychological, social and adaptive troubles prejudicial to the quality of life both in children and adults. Therefore, the detailed knowledge of its causes and the improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic methods increase the possibilities of a more adequate social life to patients with congenital anomalies or sphincteric lesions or degenerations. In this work, a manometric study was developed through an experimental model so as to analyze alterations in behavior of muscle groups responsible for the anorectal sphincteric mechanism, previous to and after proximal and distal lesions. Twenty-two pigs aged between 25 and 30 days, weighing 5-7 kg, were randomly divided into two groups. They were submitted to lesions of different levels in the anorectal muscle. The animals were studied by anorectal manometry (rectoanal inhibitory reflex and vector volume) before and after the lesions. The Student t test and the Wilcoxon test were applied for the statistical analyses, considered p <= 0.05. The proximal lesion preserved sphincter relaxation, retarding its closure [speed of relaxation recovery 4.35 +/- 2.10 vs. 2.70 +/- 1.32 mm/s (p = 0.001)], but it reduced the maximum pressure [62.45 +/- 20.02 vs. 40.36 +/- 12.59 mmHg (p = 0.004)] and vector volume [2,749 +/- 921 vs. 1,591 +/- 1,379 mmHg(2)cm (p = 0.005)]. There was an increment in the high-pressure zone [5.09 +/- 1.04 vs. 6.36 +/- 1.50 mm (p = 0.005)], but the asymmetry percentage and the sphincter length were maintained. The distal lesion did not alter the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, the high-pressure zone length, the asymmetry percentage, or the vector volume. Nevertheless, the sphincter length increased [11.82 +/- 2.82 vs. 14.09 +/- 2.39 mm (p = 0.022)] and the maximum pressure decreased [60.55 +/- 22.05 vs. 40.91 +/- 13.41 mmHg (p = 0.004)]. The alterations observed due to proximal lesion of the anorectal sphincter suggest a direct and more important interference of the levator ani muscle in the function of the sphincteric musculature than that caused by the distal lesion.
Resumo:
Tourism has had a profound impact upon destinations worldwide, and although this impact has been positive for many destinations, there are numerous examples where tourism has adversely impacted upon the environment and social fabric of the destination community (Coccossis 1996; Murphy 1985). The negative impacts of tourism have been attributed, among other things, to inadequate or non-existent planning for development (Gunn 1994; Hall2000). This has led to increased calls for tourism planning to offset some of the negative impacts that tourism can have on the destination community. While a number of approaches have been advocated, a collaborative philosophy, based on the principles of sustainability, is more likely to result in acceptable and successful policies and programmes for tourism destinations (Farrell1986; Jamal & Getz 1995; Maitland 2002; Minca & Getz 1995). Such an approach focuses on cooperation and broader based participation in tourism planning and decision-making between stakeholders to lead to agreement on planning directions and goals, with one of the primary objectives of collaborative arrangements being to develop a strategic vision for a destination (Bramwell & Lane 2000). [Extract from introduction]